Opinion: Trump impeachment based on unreliable presumptions, rumor and innuendo – Not facts - - PressFrom - US
  •   
  •   
  •   

Opinion Trump impeachment based on unreliable presumptions, rumor and innuendo – Not facts

04:10  21 november  2019
04:10  21 november  2019 Source:   foxnews.com

University of Florida student president faces impeachment after bringing Donald Trump Jr. to campus for $50,000

  University of Florida student president faces impeachment after bringing Donald Trump Jr. to campus for $50,000 Some members of the student government want to impeach their president over his role in bringing Donald Trump Jr. to campus.The Washington Post reports that Michael Murphy “was served with the impeachment resolution and accused of malfeasance and abuse of power” on Tuesday.

The action of the Trump — the actions of the Trump presidency revealed dishonorable fact of the president’s betrayal of his oath of office, betrayal of “The misguided Democrat impeachment strategy is meant to appease their rabid, extreme, leftist base , but will only serve to embolden and energize

Mr Trump denies using US military aid as a bargaining chip with Mr Zelensky and has repeatedly insisted his call with Ukraine's leader was "perfect". He has called the impeachment inquiry a "witch hunt" by Democrats and elements of the media. The Republican defence comes in three parts

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

Jim Jordan, Gordon Sondland are posing for a picture© Provided by Fox News Network LLC

The House Intelligence Committee’s impeachment hearing Wednesday posed a conundrum. Better yet, let’s call it a riddle. When is a “quid pro quo” not a “quid pro quo?” The answer is … when it’s “presumed.”

U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland testified that there was a “quid pro quo” between the U.S. and Ukraine, even though President Trump made it crystal clear to Sondland that there was no “quid pro quo.”

McConnell discounts quick dismissal of Trump impeachment articles: 'We'll have to have a trial'

  McConnell discounts quick dismissal of Trump impeachment articles: 'We'll have to have a trial' Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) brushed aside a question on Wednesday about trying to quickly dismiss the articles of impeachment against President Trump, noting the chamber would have to have a trial."I don't think there's any question that we have to take up the matter. The rules of impeachment are very clear, we'll have to have a trial. My own view is that we should give people the opportunity to put the case on," McConnell"I don't think there's any question that we have to take up the matter. The rules of impeachment are very clear, we'll have to have a trial. My own view is that we should give people the opportunity to put the case on," McConnell told reporters.

President Donald Trump has gone through a range of emotions since House Democrats’ started their public impeachment hearings last week about whether he threatened to withhold Ukrainian security aid unless the country opened politically advantageous investigations

Trump impeachment explained. Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered Mike Turner repeatedly asked Sondland if anyone explicitly told him that Trump “tied the Speier and Conaway had been speaking about a Washington Post fact check that gave three

So, how did the ambassador arrive at his opinion that a “quid pro quo” must somehow exist? It turns out that he assumed or “presumed” it. At one point, he called it a mere “guess.”

The trouble with presumptions and guess-work is that they are often unreliable and sometimes quite wrong. Assumptions and suppositions, by their nature, can be risky and foolish. We should trust only in what we know that is derived from facts. This was the fatal flaw in Sondland’s narrative.

Here is what we actually know: Nowhere in the July 25 telephone call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is there evidence of a demand, threat, condition or pressure for a “quid pro quo.” None. That is a demonstrable fact, as proven by a transcript of the conversation that the White House released to the public. Read it for yourself.

McConnell discounts quick dismissal of Trump impeachment articles: 'We'll have to have a trial'

  McConnell discounts quick dismissal of Trump impeachment articles: 'We'll have to have a trial' Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) brushed aside a question on Wednesday about trying to quickly dismiss the articles of impeachment against President Trump, noting the chamber would have to have a trial."I don't think there's any question that we have to take up the matter. The rules of impeachment are very clear, we'll have to have a trial. My own view is that we should give people the opportunity to put the case on," McConnell"I don't think there's any question that we have to take up the matter. The rules of impeachment are very clear, we'll have to have a trial. My own view is that we should give people the opportunity to put the case on," McConnell told reporters.

Related Topics. Trump impeachment inquiry. Image copyright EPA. Image caption US President Donald Trump returning to the White House after a game of golf on Saturday. The impeachment inquiry stems from the call, which was flagged up by the initial whistleblower in August.

Republicans’ unmistakable innuendo about Alexander Vindman. By. Maybe the diciest and most innuendo -laden line of questioning, though, came from Rep. Chris Stewart (R-Utah). He began his five minutes by picking up on something conservative media have attacked Vindman for — wearing his

There is no mention of military aid in exchange for an investigation into either election meddling by Ukraine in 2016 or a potential corrupt act by former Vice President Joe Biden. Indeed, the U.S. financial assistance was delivered to Kiev and there was no investigation launched.

We also know that President Trump personally informed Sondland: “I want nothing, I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo.”

The ambassador confirmed this exculpatory statement Wednesday. It was nearly identical to what he said in his earlier deposition when he testified that the president told him: “I want nothing. I don’t want to give them anything and I don’t want anything from them.” Sondland then elaborated by stating: “He (President Trump) kept repeating no quid pro quo over and over again.”

Yet, throughout his testimony Sondland seemed to oscillate wildly from contradiction to confusion to vacillation. He conspicuously omitted from his lengthy opening statement what proved to be the most stunning revelation of all. He told the committee: “I never heard from President Trump that aid was conditioned on an announcement” of investigations.

Trump files to dismiss lawsuit from Bolton aide on impeachment testimony

  Trump files to dismiss lawsuit from Bolton aide on impeachment testimony President Trump on Thursday moved to dismiss a lawsuit filed by an aide to former national security adviser John Bolton seeking a ruling on whether he must comply with a congressional subpoena to testify in the House impeachment inquiry.The filing to the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., cited Trump's official capacity as president. In it, he sought to have a judge dismiss White House official Dr. Charles Kupperman lawsuit seeking guidance on whether he should comply with the subpoena or the president's directive not to comply.An attorney for Trump argued that the president's direction should overrule any prospective court ruling.

In fact , House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said last week that Trump ’s actions in Ukraine makes what happened during Watergate Sondland is speculating based on VERY little contact. GOP calls Sondland’s testimony unreliable because of lack of documents. They're blocked by State and WH.

Trump impeachment highlights: Trump impeachment explained. Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings. GOP calls Sondland’s testimony unreliable because of lack of documents. They're blocked by State and WH.

Here is the important exchange:

Question: Did the president ever tell you personally about any preconditions for anything?

Sondland: No.

Question: OK. So, the president never told you about any preconditions for the aid to be released?

Sondland: No.

The counsel for Republicans seemed dumbfounded that the ambassador would bury the lead. Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, was more direct. He mockingly suggested that Sondland’s omission was a deliberate attempt to hide direct evidence that exonerates the president, while emphasizing Sondland’s presumptive illusion of wrongdoing.

Despite the president’s repeated denial of a “quid pro quo,” how did Sondland reach a contrary conclusion? Sondland surmised it.

While other witnesses have relied on a gossip chain of hearsay and conjecture, the ambassador appears to have invested himself in little more than a hunch. This, of course, was warmly embraced by the mainstream media mob. Consider the devastating cross-examination by Rep. Mike Turner, R-Ohio:

Question: If you pull up CNN today, right now, their banner says “Sondland ties Trump to withholding aid.” Is that your testimony today, Ambassador Sondland? Because I don’t think you’re saying that.

Support for Trump's impeachment unchanged after hearings begin: Reuters/Ipsos poll

  Support for Trump's impeachment unchanged after hearings begin: Reuters/Ipsos poll The televised impeachment hearings that began this week in the U.S. House of Representatives do not appear to have changed many minds about President Donald Trump, with public support for his impeachment about the same before and after the first U.S. diplomats testified, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll. © Reuters/TOM BRENNER U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks on honesty and transparency in healthcare prices inside the Roosevelt Room at the White House in Washington The national online poll, which ran from Thursday to Friday morning, showed that 44% of U.S.

Speaker Pelosi only cares about destroying President Trump and obtaining more political power. This is contradictory to the U.S. criminal justice system, which is based on the presumption of REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI: This is a finding of fact , unfolding of the truth, and then a

Rep. Zeldin: The Facts Are Blowing A Hole In The Dems’ Impeachment Narrative. The Crazed, Do Nothing Democrats are turning Impeachment into a routine partisan weapon. WH Press Secretary Fights Dangerous Rumors . Visited a great family of a young man under major surgery at the amazing

Sondland: I’ve said repeatedly, congressman, I was presuming.

Question: So no one heard. Not just the president. Giuliani didn’t tell you. Mulvaney didn’t tell you. Nobody. Pompeo didn’t tell you. Nobody else on this planet told you that Donald Trump was tying aid to these investigations. Is that correct?

Sondland: I think I already testified.

Question: No, answer the question. No one on this planet told you that Donald Trump was tying this aid to the investigation? Because if your answer is yes, then the chairman is wrong. And the headline on CNN is wrong. No one on this planet told you that President Trump was tying aid to investigations. Yes or no?

Sondland: Yes.

Question: So you really have no testimony today that ties President Trump to a scheme to withhold aid from Ukraine in exchange for these investigations.

Sondland: Other than my own presumption.

Throughout four days of tortured hearings, Americans have been force-fed the gruel of speculation, interpretation, opinion, multiple hearsay, and now “presumptions.”

This is impeachment by rumor and innuendo. And that is no presumption.

Stefanik: The left is 'spun up' after her impeachment hearing performance .
In an interview with radio talk show host John Catsimatidis, Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) said that Democrats are "spun up" after her performance during the public impeachment hearings. © The Hill Stefanik: The left is 'spun up' after her impeachment hearing performance "I was focused on the facts and the substance in my questions of witnesses as part of these impeachment hearings," the House Intelligence Committee member told Catsimatidis. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 3
This is interesting!