•   
  •   
  •   

Opinion Why We Voted Against the War Powers Resolution

11:16  14 january  2020
11:16  14 january  2020 Source:   nytimes.com

Iran and Presidential War Powers, Explained

  Iran and Presidential War Powers, Explained WASHINGTON — Democratic leaders in Congress are moving to swiftly invoke the War Powers Resolution in an attempt to block President Trump from taking the United States into a war with Iran, even as Iran vows revenge for his killing of Maj. Gen. Qassim Suleimani and Mr. Trump is threatening disproportionate strikes inside Iran if it does retaliate. But Congress’s control over decisions about going to war has been eroding for generations, and administrations of both parties have established precedents that undercut the resolution as a meaningful check on presidential war-making authority.Here is an explanation of the legal issues raised by the rapidly evolving crisis.

The War Powers Resolution passed by the House this week sends the wrong message to the American people and the world that our nation We must replace the nearly two-decade-old A.U.M.F.s with a legal framework that empowers the president to act against threats to our nation while

The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002, informally known as the Iraq Resolution , is a joint resolution passed by the United States Congress in October 2002 as Public Law No. 107-243

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

a group of people wearing military uniforms: American Special Forces troops at an outpost outside the town of Manbij in northern Syria in 2018.© Mauricio Lima for The New York Times American Special Forces troops at an outpost outside the town of Manbij in northern Syria in 2018.

The most consequential decision a member of Congress can make is whether to send troops into harm’s way, and it is one we take seriously and personally. We both served in the greater Middle East and saw the impact of these intractable conflicts on our fellow service members and their families. Our military personnel are our nation’s most valuable asset; we must not send them into unnecessary war.

Impeachment live updates: McConnell says Pelosi being ‘contemptuous of the American people’ for holding on to articles of impeachment

  Impeachment live updates: McConnell says Pelosi being ‘contemptuous of the American people’ for holding on to articles of impeachment Tensions flared as an impasse continued over the timing and scope of a trial of President Trump.President Donald Trump leaves the White House for a campaign trip to Battle Creek, Mich., on Dec. 18, in Washington. Trump is on the cusp of being impeached by the House, with a historic debate set Wednesday on charges that he abused his power and obstructed Congress ahead of votes that will leave a defining mark on his tenure at the White House.

The war powers resolution gathered momentum after a congressional briefing on Wednesday by administration officials seeking to justify the attack. Following the briefing by the secretary of state, defence secretary and CIA director, two Republicans senators broke ranks. Mike Lee of Utah and

War Powers Resolution ties Trump's hands : These Democrats voted no on the War Powers resolution Eight Democrats broke with their House passes resolution to limit Trump ' s war powers against Iran . Published Thu, Jan 9 20206:00 PM EST. The measure, which does not carry

We voted against the War Powers Resolution that the House passed this week because it merely restated existing law. It addressed a de-escalated conflict with a symbolic vote that did more to distract than to fix the real challenges we face. If Congress wants to assert its power to declare war, we must take on the hard task of publicly debating a new Authorization for Use of Military Force, the A.U.M.F., as it’s commonly called, as well as congressional appropriations for military operations. That is where decisions of war and peace are made.

Qassim Suleimani was a terrorist responsible for the death of hundreds of Americans. Our fellow service members were killed and wounded at his direction, and all intelligence indicates that he was in the process of planning further attacks. President Trump was within his right to order this attack and is now correctly de-escalating the conflict with the clear mandate that we must prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear capability.

Iran strikes could stall Democrats' plans for War Powers Resolution vote

  Iran strikes could stall Democrats' plans for War Powers Resolution vote House Democrats pushing for a vote to limit President Trump's ability to take military action against Iran may face pressure to put those plans on hold.House Speaker Nancy Pelosi had announced that the House would vote on a War Powers Resolution measure to curtail military action after the drone strike that killed Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani. Many Democrats were incensed that the administration did not notify Congress in advance.

However, the War Powers Resolution still contains some clearly defective features. The “ power of the purse” was used reactively and belatedly in this context, but there’s no good reason why it shouldn’t be deployed preemptively, as a credible warning to a president contemplating unilateral military action.

The resolution comes after a U . S . airstrike killed Gen. The resolution comes after a U . S . airstrike killed Gen. Qassem Soleimani, and Iran retaliated by launching missiles at bases in US House votes to limit Trump’s military action against Iran - Продолжительность: 3:01 TRT World 3 223 просмотра.

Sign up for the Morning Briefing newsletter

We are not at war with Iran, and no president can engage in war without congressional approval. But the commander in chief holds the authority and responsibility to target hostile combatants who threaten American forces and civilians. The War Powers Resolution passed by the House this week sends the wrong message to the American people and the world that our nation is heading toward or is currently engaged in war with Iran. Neither is true.

While we respect our colleagues who serve our nation and supported this resolution, the debate Congress should have is not whether the president had the authority to carry out the Suleimani killing, but rather how we move forward as a governing body if we must commit forces in future sustained combat operations to protect our nation.

It is Congress’s responsibility to act as a check on presidential power — and that includes on matters relating to war. This past week underscored that the United States is operating under outdated laws governing the use of force. We must replace the nearly two-decade-old A.U.M.F.s with a legal framework that empowers the president to act against threats to our nation while constraining him from unilaterally placing us on a path to war. We must also use the power of the purse in stating our military objectives.

Graham’s resolution calls on Pelosi to send articles of impeachment to Senate, says trial will start next week

  Graham’s resolution calls on Pelosi to send articles of impeachment to Senate, says trial will start next week Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told Fox News in an interview Wednesday that the Senate will take up President Trump's impeachment trial next week shortly after he crafted a resolution that called on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to deliver the articles of impeachment to the Senate. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); Graham, the Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, told Sean Hannity that Pelosi's "dam is about to crack," and cited recent reports that show emerging fissures in her own party.

Congressman Chris Smith voted against the resolution and made the Nancy Pelosi’s House of Representatives passed a non-binding War Powers Resolution on Thursday, 224-194, mostly along partisan lines.

Why is Congress asleep at the wheel? On September 18th, 2001, Congress passed legislation authorizing the use of military force against the There’s a constitutional argument for Congress reclaiming its war powers ; there’s also a practical one. Elected members of Congress are the voices

Our constituents sent us to Congress to do what is right, even when it is difficult. This transcends partisan politics. It’s about changing the way we engage in war and peace for decades to come. Now it is up to Congress to debate an A.U.M.F. that reflects the threats of today and tomorrow, not the forever wars of yesterday.

Elaine Luria (@ElaineLuriaVA) serves the 2nd District of Virginia in the United States Congress. She’s a Navy veteran. Max Rose (MaxRose4NY) serves New York’s 11th District in Congress. He’s a veteran of the U.S. Army.

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

McConnell Impeachment Rules Modify Clinton Precedent .
WASHINGTON — For weeks, Senator Mitch McConnell sought to deflect charges that he was trying to stack the deck in favor of President Trump in his impeachment trial by repeating that he was merely replicating the Senate’s only modern precedent: the 1999 trial of President Bill Clinton. © Doug Mills/The New York Times Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky and the majority leader, last week at the Capitol. Sign Up For the Morning Briefing Newsletter require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

Topical videos:

usr: 0
This is interesting!