Opinion Opinions | Susan Collins’s willful blindness already looks awful

18:15  16 january  2020
18:15  16 january  2020 Source:   washingtonpost.com

Time to stop playing the Susan Collins game

  Time to stop playing the Susan Collins game They only need four Republicans to break ranks with Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell. This time, to set ground rules for a serious but fair Senate trial for Trump, following his impeachment by the House of Representatives-- and not the kind of rigged, sham trial McConnell's trying to set up in cahoots with the White House. One day, Susan Collins tells reporters she'sHere we go again. It's crunch time. Senate Democrats are united. They only need four Republicans to break ranks with Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell.

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

Susan Collins wearing glasses and looking at the camera: Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) outside the Senate chamber on Wednesday.© Joshua Roberts/Reuters Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) outside the Senate chamber on Wednesday.

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) replied yesterday to a reporter’s question about the blockbuster Lev Parnas documents handed over to the House on Tuesday. “I wonder why the House did not put that into the record and it’s only now being revealed,” she said. When told the House had just received them, she retorted, “Doesn’t that suggest that the House did an incomplete job, then?” No, and her reply should deeply concern the voters of Maine and anyone who wants a full and fair impeachment trial.

Trump signals he will use executive privilege to block John Bolton testimony in Senate trial

  Trump signals he will use executive privilege to block John Bolton testimony in Senate trial President Trump strongly indicated he will try to block former national security adviser John Bolton from testifying in a Senate impeachment trial that could start as soon as next week. © Provided by Washington Examiner"I think you have to, for the sake of the office," Trump said during an interview on Friday with Fox News host Laura Ingraham, who asked if he would invoke executive privilege. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

The documents, you will recall, were swept up by the FBI in the arrest of Parnas, a former associate of President Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, last fall. Only earlier this month did the district court finally allow Parnas to share them with the House. The House could not get them previously. Doesn’t that suggest Collins did an incomplete job of keeping abreast of the facts?

But take a step back. Documents emerged showing that then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch was under surveillance by a pack of thugs, and that a former Ukrainian prosecutor was, in effect, offering a bribe (an announcement that one of Trump’s political rivals was under investigation) for a public act (firing the ambassador).

Prosecutors seek maximum prison sentence for ex-Rep. Chris Collins

  Prosecutors seek maximum prison sentence for ex-Rep. Chris Collins He pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit securities fraud and making false statements . He resigned from Congress immediately after that plea.Prosecutors say he invented statements and lied to federal agents when questioned about the stock sales and insider information he received while being on the board of Innate Pharmaceuticals.They wrote in the sentencing memo, "Collins is wrong to assert that "[s]ociety . . .

Collins’s first reaction was not, “We need to get to the bottom of this and find out whether the president’s cohorts were spying on our ambassador!” It was not, “How in the world could the secretary of state allowed this to go on?” It was not, “Well, in a full and fair trial in the Senate, we want to get those documents.”

No, it was a right-wing talking point claiming (falsely) that the House’s inability to get evidence because of the president’s stonewalling bars such evidence from being used in a Senate trial. Collins’s notion seems to be that the surefire way to prevent Trump’s removal by the Senate is to stonewall the House. Oddly, that’s been Trump’s tactic, as well, which explains why the second article of impeachment accuses Trump of obstructing Congress.

Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Today’s most popular stories on The Washington Post

Former prosecutor Mimi Rocah tells me, “Senator Collins is either ignorant and uninformed because she doesn’t understand or know that a federal court only just released the Parnas docs or she is just making up excuses because the documents are so damning. Either one is unacceptable and the real question she should be asking is why Trump was trying to hide them.”

Pelosi accepts Collins's apology for saying Democrats are 'in love with terrorists'

  Pelosi accepts Collins's apology for saying Democrats are 'in love with terrorists' Speaker Nancy Pelosi during her floor speech accepted House Judiciary Committee ranking member Doug Collins's apology for his recent remark about Democrats."As I enter into the conversation, I want to thank the distinguished gentleman from Georgia for his apology for his ridiculous remarks about me and House Democrats," Pelosi said as she took to the floor to discuss impeachment. "Thank you, we accept your apology, Mr. Collins. Now I want to go to the purpose of why we are on the floor today.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) seemed to share that sentiment. He responded to Collins’s remarks on CNN Wednesday night. “If Senator Collins or other senators are interested in the documents or why they haven’t been available yet, they should turn those questions to the White House and say: ‘Why are you hiding this?’ ”

To make matters even more intriguing, Parnas, appearing on MSNBC on Wednesday night, told host Rachel Maddow, “President Trump knew exactly what was going on. He was aware of all my movements. I wouldn’t do anything without the consent of Rudy Giuliani, or the president. I have no intent, I have no reason to speak to any of these officials.” He went on to say that Giuliani instructed him to tell Ukraine’s president that all aid would be cut off and that Vice President Pence would not attend his inauguration unless Ukraine announced it would open an investigation of former vice president Joe Biden. He also claimed Pence was fully informed. In other words, Parnas opened up a crate of smoking guns.

Collins is reportedly considering voting for witnesses. That would presumably recognize that the Senate is obligated to hold a real trial, with witnesses and documents. No trial court judge says, “New witness available? Sorry, he didn’t come before the grand jury that indicted the defendant!” Collins’s obligation is to make sure the American people, not just Trump, get a fair trial.

Poll shows Collins displaces McConnell as most unpopular senator

  Poll shows Collins displaces McConnell as most unpopular senator Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who has come under mounting pressure as President Trump's impeachment trial starts, is now the Senate's most unpopular member, displacing Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) in the rankings, according to a new tracking poll. © Greg Nash Poll shows Collins displaces McConnell as most unpopular senator A quarterly Morning Consult tracking poll finds that Collins's net approval rating has dropped 10 points in her state since the end of September, a sign of the intense fire she has taken from critics since the House launched its impeachment inquiry.

Indeed, what the Parnas records remind us is that the documents the administration has refused to turn over are at least as important as the witnesses, if not more so. Since each new batch of documents obtained from a witness such as Parnas or from a Freedom of Information Act request provides damning evidence against the president, one can only assume that the documents Trump and his secretary of state still won’t release contain even bigger bombshells.

Collins and other Republicans can try pointing fingers at the House, but when Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) exited the Capitol on Wednesday, the House’s role was over, at least for now. The responsibility rests with the Senate to allow relevant evidence to be presented. The question is whether Collins will read from the White House script or uphold her oath. Maine voters are watching closely.

Read more:

Greg Sargent: Four big takeaways from the explosive Lev Parnas documents

Jennifer Rubin: New evidence of impeachable conduct: Could it get worse for Trump?

Dana Milbank: Impeachment descends into darkness

‘Not True’: GOP Senators Audibly Reacted When Schiff Brought Up ‘Head on a Pike’ Report During Trial .
There's reporting tonight that a comment Congressman Adam Schiff made in his closing arguments during the impeachment trial got a very noticeable reaction from Republican senators in the room. © Provided by MediaiteCBS News reported today that, per a Trump confidant, Republican senators were warned “Vote against the president and your head will be on a pike.”Schiff references CBS News report that GOP senators were warned that if they vote against Trump, "your head will be on a pike" https://t.co/loj1yQpaewpic.twitter.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 112
This is interesting!