•   
  •   
  •   

Opinion As we March for Life, remember the pro-life movement's roots

20:45  24 january  2020
20:45  24 january  2020 Source:   washingtonexaminer.com

What you need to know about today's Women's March

  What you need to know about today's Women's March The fourth annual Women's March is Saturday, and streets across the country and around the world will be flooded with women and allies to advocate for women's rights and equality.Thousands of women first swarmed the streets of Washington on January 21, 2017, to march for women's rights in the wake of Donald Trump's inauguration as the 45th President of the United States. More than 1 million people participated nationwide in the 2017 march.

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

a group of people standing in front of a sign© Provided by Washington Examiner

This year’s March for Life, the country’s largest annual pro-life rally, will surely call renewed attention to aggressive pro-life laws on the state level. It will be the first march since the passage of these laws last year, which had groups from social workers to Hollywood showrunners calling the laws “punitive” and “grotesque.”

Far less attention, however, is being been paid to states that have gone far in the other direction.

Half-Life games are free on Steam until March

  Half-Life games are free on Steam until March With the first Half-Life game in more than a decade set to come out in March, series creator Valve has made every game in the franchise free to play for the next two months. As long you have Steam installed on your Windows, Mac or Linux computer, you can play all of Gordon Freeman's adventures, including Half-Life and its excellent Opposing Force expansion, as well as Half-Life 2 and its two subsequent DLC episodes. According to Valve, it'sAccording to Valve, it's holding the promotion to help players get ready for Half-Life: Alyx. The upcoming VR title is set before the events of Half-Life 2and will feature many of the characters that play a part in later titles. "The games share characters and story elements," the company said.

In direct opposition to Alabama’s and Georgia’s pro-life laws, Democrats in Illinois passed a bill last summer that allows for partial-birth abortion, noting that "a fertilized egg, embryo, or fetus does not have independent rights under the law, of this State." That allows for abortion at any time during pregnancy, up to the very moment of live birth. New York’s Reproductive Health Act legalized abortion past 24 weeks if the woman’s health is at risk, but state law does not define what is meant by “health,” essentially opening the law up to a doctor’s interpretation and allowing for full-term abortion in questionable circumstances.

Most disturbing, however, was the Kansas Supreme Court decision last April that women have the right to an abortion under its state constitution, arguing that that document protects the right of women to “decide whether to continue a pregnancy.” That claim, amazingly, turns on the very fact that the Kansas Constitution opens by quoting the Declaration of Independence: “All men are possessed of equal and inalienable natural rights, among which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

Trump to become first president in history to speak at March for Life

  Trump to become first president in history to speak at March for Life President Trump will speak at the March for Life on Friday, an annual rally held in Washington, D.C., against the legalization of abortion. © Provided by MediaDC: Washington Newspaper Publishing Company, Inc. President Trump had a good week in our White House Report Card. Trump will be the first president in history to speak at the march. Jeanne Mancini, the president of March for Life, celebrated the announcement in a statement, saying Trump had been loyal to the anti-abortion movement.

We have now come to the point where both positions in this debate, pro-life and pro-choice, claim the moral high ground of America’s first principles as the standard of their cause. How is that possible?

The pro-life cause looks to the Declaration of Independence, which holds that all are equal based on “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God.” America’s Founders believed that man has a unique and distinguishing nature, capable of deliberation, judgment and choice. As such, individuals are morally accountable for their actions and decisions. This responsibility distinguishes man from the other animals, makes them capable of self-government, and dignifies them by their nature with equal and unalienable rights.

From the Founders’ point of view, these rights are possessed inherently by each and every individual and are secured and protected equally through the constitutional rule of law. By this argument, there are and can be no such things as “women’s rights,” or “men’s rights,” or “black rights,” or “white rights.” Associating the legitimacy of rights with skin color, sex, interest groups, or any other arbitrary distinction gives rise to frivolous rights claims and endless battles for political power—and denies the basis of human equality and equal rights.

Trump campaign launching pro-life coalition to galvanize voters on abortion

  Trump campaign launching pro-life coalition to galvanize voters on abortion President Trump's campaign will unveil a new pro-life coalition on Friday as part of its effort to drive pro-life voters to the polls in 2020, Fox News has exclusively learned.The "Pro-Life Voices for Trump" coalition will be led by Susan B. Anthony List president Marjorie Dannenfelser, who once opposed Trump but came to praise his administration's achievements on the issue.

The Fourteenth Amendment, adopted in 1868, prohibits depriving “any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” In dictionaries of common and legal usage at the time of the Fourteenth Amendment’s adoption, the terms “person” and “human being” were defined interchangeably. If a pre-born baby is indeed a human being, then his or her right to life ought to be constitutionally protected. Common-law precedent leading up to 1868 also indicates that unborn were considered legal persons.

An interesting parallel can be drawn between today’s debate and those leading up to the Civil War.

The Clinton administration's policy was to make abortion "safe, legal and rare." Two decades later, abortion is not “rare” but commonplace—there are now about 1 million abortions each year. And the claim that abortion is a public good has become normalized. Similarly, at the time of our country’s founding, slavery was considered overwhelmingly a “necessary evil” that was wrong but had to be tolerated at the time for the sake of establishing a nation based on the principle of freedom. But by 1837, John C. Calhoun and his pro-slavery followers were arguing that human slavery was actually a “positive good” to be protected and celebrated. Pro-choice advocates are increasingly making this argument to garner public support, just as pro-slavery advocates were doing almost 200 years ago.

Trump administration says California can't require insurers to cover abortion

  Trump administration says California can't require insurers to cover abortion Trump administration says California can't require insurers to cover abortionThe U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a notice that the state is violating a federal law called the Weldon Amendment. The notice of violation comes as the result of an investigation by HHS' Office for Civil Rights.

The Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision in 1973 by no means settled the abortion debate. Instead, it built a nationwide fire and gave it fuel. The wave of abortion and anti-abortion laws we are seeing today raise political, legal, and moral questions about how this country necessarily decides questions about the right to life.

How the country goes down this path is a matter of prudence. Should those decisions be step by step, or decided in one fell swoop? If a state’s laws get too far ahead of public opinion, they are very likely to fail. According to the Washington Post, for example, four out of five people in Alabama opposed their new law. A more prudent approach would implement restrictions gradually—heartbeat bills, for example, will likely achieve greater public support than laws banning abortion outright. And those decisions would more likely push a successful case before the Supreme Court.

The more important question, though, is the principle that will guide these decisions. “Public opinion, on any subject, always has a ‘central idea,’ from which all its minor thoughts radiate,” Abraham Lincoln once wrote. Our central idea, at the beginning and until recently, is that all are equal and possess equal rights by nature. Getting that right, and restoring that idea in the public mind, will determine not only how this debate proceeds but also, in the long run, whether we shall be secure in our rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Matthew Spalding is Dean of Hillsdale College’s Van Andel Graduate School of Government in Washington, D.C.

Greta Thunberg seeks to trademark her name to stem misuse .
Teen climate activist Greta Thunberg said on Instagram on Wednesday she has applied to register her name and that of the Fridays For Future movement she founded in 2018, which has gone global and catapulted her to international fame. The move would allow legal action against persons or companies trying to use her name or the movement's which are not in line with its values, she said.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!