Opinion What a Republican Climate-Change Agenda Might Look Like

23:55  14 february  2020
23:55  14 february  2020 Source:   nationalreview.com

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti signs city’s enhanced ‘Green New Deal’

  Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti signs city’s enhanced ‘Green New Deal’ Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti on Monday signed an executive directive aimed at boosting the city’s Green New Deal initiative to fight climate change. © Michael Tran/FilmMagic HOLLYWOOD, CALIFORNIA - NOVEMBER 19: Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti speaks onstage at the ceremony honoring Kristen Bell and Idina Menzel with a Star on The Hollywood Walk of Fame held on November 19, 2019 in Hollywood, California. (Photo by Michael Tran/FilmMagic) In signing the executive directive – Garcetti’s 25th since taking office – the 49-year-old mayor insisted the “stakes could not be higher.

What a Republican Climate - Change Agenda Might Look Like . For the first time in a long time, Republicans seem engaged on climate change . As concern over the issue surges among younger Republicans and sweeping Democratic proposals demand an answer from the right, GOP lawmakers

Republicans might not say that humans caused climate change , but they still Fewer than a third of registered Republicans nationwide say that climate change is caused mostly by human So it’s no surprise that Republicans in major cities like Chicago, Philadelphia, San Francisco and New York are

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

Kevin McCarthy wearing a suit and tie: House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy holds a news conference at the U.S Capitol, January 30, 2020.© Amanda Voisard/Reuters House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy holds a news conference at the U.S Capitol, January 30, 2020.

For the first time in a long time, Republicans seem engaged on climate change. As concern over the issue surges among younger Republicans and sweeping Democratic proposals demand an answer from the right, GOP lawmakers have come forward with bills of their own to address the problem. The top Republican in the House, Kevin McCarthy, recently sat down with Axios’s Amy Harder to outline the biggest goals of a Republican climate-change agenda, namely:

City of Chicago declares climate crisis over disappearing lakefront

  City of Chicago declares climate crisis over disappearing lakefront Officials in Chicago have declared a climate crisis after a round of severe storms last month caused millions in damage to the city's already disappearing shoreline.In addition to the storms, record-high water levels in Lake Michigan during January also caused erosion on the lakefront, ABC Chicago station WLS reported.

Climate - change activists keep knocking on President Trump’s door. Only this time, it’s not Al Gore or Leonardo DiCaprio. But if climate change currently looks like an impossible issue for Republicans in Congress to tackle, these advocates say, at some point it may be an issue that’s impossible for the

Republicans who asserted support for climate change legislation or the seriousness of the climate “The midterm election was a clear rejection of policies like the cap-and-trade energy taxes that Republicans who had supported the climate change agenda began to defect and have since stayed

• Carbon capture, with a focus on natural solutions such as more trees and improved soil-management (what President Trump called the “trillion trees initiative” in his State of the Union Address);

• Clean-energy innovation; and

• Conservation and recycling, with a focus on plastic waste.

The first thing to say here is that Republican lawmakers’ now-explicit interest in climate-change policy is unequivocally good. Policy and legislation are better served by competing visions of action, not the permanent partisan stalemate that has characterized the debate to date. But Republicans might be missing an opportunity here all the same. So-called “natural” climate solutions such as planting trees and improving soil-management have uncertain long-term benefits to the climate. Likewise, as I’ve written elsewhere, plastic bags and plastic straws are highly visible forms of waste that don’t actually have huge impacts on climate change.

Daily on Energy: Climate change is gaining on the economy as a top issue

  Daily on Energy: Climate change is gaining on the economy as a top issue Subscribe today to the Washington Examiner magazine and get Washington Briefing: politics and policy stories that will keep you up to date with what's going on in Washington. SUBSCRIBE NOW: Just $1.00 an issue! © Provided by MediaDC: Washington Newspaper Publishing Company, Inc. DOE Default Image CLIMATE CHANGE IS GAINING ON THE ECONOMY AS A TOP ISSUE: As the economy has improved, Americans feel better about kitchen table issues and are prioritizing protecting the environment and combating climate change.

Klein Salamon said climate change was such an enormous threat to the planet that it demanded similar sacrifices. Psychologists from the University of California at Santa Barbara and the University of Colorado at Boulder found that most Republicans believed climate change was real, but didn’t

WASHINGTON — House Republicans , fighting hard to retain their majority and uncertain about who will lead them after Tuesday’s elections, have deferred the messy work of planning a legislative agenda until after the votes are tallied next week.

Republicans can do better, and it wouldn’t take signing onto the Green New Deal to do so. Instead of offering watered-down versions of environmental proposals popular on the left, they could build a truly Republican climate-change agenda centered on innovation, nuclear power, natural gas, carbon capture, and large-scale agriculture.

Start with innovation: Republicans should demonstrate a commitment to it beyond “basic science,” backing carbon capture, nuclear energy, renewables, and other clean-energy technologies. And, by all accounts, they appear ready to do just that. They have reliably rejected President Trump’s proposals to slash clean-energy RD&D (research, design, and development) funding from the budgets of the Department of Energy and other federal agencies. In just the past two years, they have co-sponsored, introduced, and/or helped pass policies to accelerate demonstration and deployment of nuclear-energy and carbon-capture technologies, including the Nuclear Energy Leadership Act (NELA), the USE IT Act, and the Section 45Q tax credit for carbon removal.

Right-Wing Backlash Greets Modest GOP Foray Into Climate Change

  Right-Wing Backlash Greets Modest GOP Foray Into Climate Change House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy had barely finished presenting his party’s modest plan to fight climate change when conservatives began piling on in opposition.The free market-group American Energy Alliance dismissed it as a “Republican-led Green New Deal lite” that amounted to a “climate messaging exercise.” The libertarian Competitive Enterprise Institute called it “bad policy that will not bring any political relief.” require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

Earlier this year, Politifact went looking for congressional Republicans who had not expressed scepticism about climate change and came up Thune is another Republican who admits a potential role for humans in climate change . In May he was asked if climate change exists and is caused by

What is climate change ? The Earth's average temperature is about 15C but has been much higher and lower in the past. The effects of a changing climate can also be seen in vegetation and land animals. These include earlier flowering and fruiting times for plants and changes in the territories of

Importantly, these initiatives span the breadth of the “innovation pipeline,” from early-stage research to commercial deployment. Expanding on these commitments to technology-specific clean-energy innovation should form the backbone of a Republican vision of de-carbonization. Such commitments can make clean energy cheaper not just in the United States but also in poor and middle-income countries, where consumption of coal, oil, and natural gas is still growing.

Republicans have long favored nuclear energy and have, to their credit, worked across the aisle to advance key nuclear-innovation policies over the past decade, including NELA, the Nuclear Energy Innovation and Commercialization Act, and the creation of the Gateway for Accelerated Innovation in Nuclear (GAIN) program at the Department of Energy. With a new generation of advanced, smaller nuclear reactors poised to begin coming online in the next five years, nuclear energy is one key area where Republicans can demonstrate their commitment to innovation outside basic science. Advanced reactors could benefit from funding and facilities for demonstration at national laboratories, procurement by the U.S. military and other government agencies, and even early support for commercial deployment of the kind that has benefited wind, solar, and electric-vehicle technologies.

Courting young conservatives, Republicans speed up their 'evolution' on climate change

  Courting young conservatives, Republicans speed up their 'evolution' on climate change Republicans long divided over the scale, scope and science of climate change are unifying behind legislation geared toward a constituency they cannot afford to lose: young conservative voters. Their efforts to reach this key group for the 2020 election are rapidly accelerating.

As despair intensifies over Trump’s agenda , the bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus brings “The vast majority of Republicans in private buy the science – the likes of Inhofe are in the minority,” said There’s now a group who can see their constituents are genuinely concerned about climate change .

What Earth might look like in 80 years if we're lucky — and if we're not. Climate change is also linked to more warm, dry days in regions with a risk of wildfires, like California. In November 2018, the most deadly and destructive wildfire in the state's history — the Camp Fire — started during what is

In contrast to some prominent Democrats’ promises to ban hydraulic fracturing, a move that would by all indications increase emissions, Republicans could leverage America’s abundant stores of natural gas to reduce emissions domestically and internationally. Because natural-gas plants are less capital-intensive than coal plants and combustion emissions from natural gas are much cleaner than emissions from coal production, natural gas with carbon capture actually makes much more sense, technically and economically, than coal with carbon capture. Policy could accelerate the development of new technologies that would allow the United States to continue producing natural gas, just without the emissions.

More than that, one can imagine a bipartisan grand bargain of sorts in which the federal government increases exports of natural gas in exchange for tighter regulations on methane emissions and on flaring from natural-gas production and distribution systems. Substantially expanding natural-gas-export capacities would likely reduce natural-gas prices globally while increasing them domestically, thereby keeping them from undercutting nuclear and renewable energy in the United States while helping to displace coal generation globally. The magnitude of the impact would depend on how much gas was exported and its effects on the global supply and the domestic market. But paired with lowered methane leakage, the impact on emissions would almost certainly be salutary.

Jeff Bezos pledges $10 billion to combat climate change

  Jeff Bezos pledges $10 billion to combat climate change Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos announced today he plans to contribute $10 billion toward fighting climate change through the creation of a new philanthropic project called the Bezos Earth Fund. "Climate change is the biggest threat to our planet," Bezos wrote in an Instagram post. "I want to work alongside others both to amplify known ways and to explore new ways of fighting the devastating impact of climate change on this planet we all share." He saysHe says the Bezos Earth Fund will support scientists, activists and NGOs, with the first grants slated to go out sometime this summer. Besides that information, Bezos didn't provide many details on the fund.

Scientists fear climate effects so severe that they might destabilize governments, produce waves of If you want to be at the cutting edge, you can look at buying an electric or hybrid car, putting solar adjust to climate change . Some technological breakthroughs are already making cleaner energy

Since climate change came to the forefront of the public eye, Democratic statements regarding it have evolved. In 2008, the Democratic Party platform stated, “We will lead to defeat the epochal, man-made threat to the planet: climate change . Without dramatic changes, rising sea levels will flood coastal

Finally, in contrast to Democrats’ focus on small farms and organic agriculture, Republicans could promote the benefits to the climate of America’s existing industrial-farm system. And they’d be on firm ground doing so: Because they’re so productive, American industrial farms tend to use less land and have lower greenhouse-gas emissions and nitrogen pollution per unit of food produced than the global average.

Boosting federal agricultural RD&D spending to improve productivity even further would have significant positive environmental effects as well. The United States exports more agricultural products than any other country. Greater productivity would boost exports even further and lower global commodity prices, which has been demonstrated to slow deforestation rates and the growth of emissions associated with global agriculture.

More than that, if policymakers found a way to let it, the productivity of our farm system could serve multiple environmental ends. The corn-ethanol tax credit has long been recognized as a fiscal and environmental disaster. Environmentalists don’t like it because the emissions benefits of blending ethanol into gasoline are uncertain, while conservatives have attacked it as one of the more egregious examples of rent-seeking in the U.S. tax code. A Republican climate-change agenda could include repurposing the tax credit, transforming it from a support for ethanol production into a support for additional U.S. exports. Perhaps even more than increasing crop productivity, this could help lower global food prices and slow deforestation abroad. I concede that this would be a heavy lift, but it also seems like the rare policy that environmentalists, Republicans, farmers, and the oil industry could all support.

Jeff Bezos launches $10 billion fund to fight climate change

  Jeff Bezos launches $10 billion fund to fight climate change Bezos Earth Fund will fund efforts to protect the planet from effects of climate change."Climate change is the biggest threat to our planet," Bezos wrote in his post. "I want to work alongside others both to amplify known ways and to explore new ways of fighting the devastating impact of climate change on this planet we all share.

We know that climate change is happening – but there are plenty of things individuals can do to help mitigate it. The road towards that transition includes daily decisions within your reach – like driving and flying less, switching to a ‘green’ energy provider and changing what you eat and buy.

"We need to treat global climate change like the existential threat that it is," Democratic Sen. "They might not want to get there as fast as we do, but I believe in a sense Republicans are entering the fray, too, after a long period of climate dormancy. Gaetz, who as a freshman introduced legislation to

Which is, of course, the ultimate goal: Effective climate-change policies will need to appeal to a broad variety of stakeholders, rather than passing an ideological-purity test. What’s important is not whether a Republican climate-change agenda is “better” or “worse” than current Democratic proposals but that it is different. On this as much as any issue, intellectual competition between Republicans and Democrats will create the opportunity for negotiation and compromise. After all, there are both plenty of things in here that Democrats would find distasteful and some things that they might find appealing. More-stringent methane regulations and the long-desired phaseout of the ethanol tax credit strike me as ideas that both parties could support. Likewise, Republicans have supported clean-energy standards at both the state and federal levels in the past. A federal clean-energy standard would prevent the nation’s nuclear power plants from closing and being replaced by fossil fuels, something that should appeal to Republicans as well as Democrats.

An agenda resembling what I’ve laid out here would boost American investments in technology and enterprise, increase American exports, improve American energy independence, support the development of a domestic clean-energy industry that can compete globally, support the domestic agriculture sector, and eliminate one of the biggest and most widely hated of all subsidies. Add it all together and you have not only a credible package of climate policies but a credible Republican one.

Bezos' $10B climate fund won't make up for Amazon's damage, activists say .
Based on Amazon's environmental track record, some activists say the CEO's philanthropy is "hypocritical."Some climate activists say, however, that much of this crisis starts with companies like Amazon.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!