Opinion Rachel Marsden: NATO proves we’re not all in this together
Fired State Department watchdog was looking into whether Pompeo made staffer walk his dog, pick up laundry
Congressional officials are trying to determine whether other investigations into Secretary of State Mike Pompeo were underway.The officials said they are working to learn whether former Inspector General Steve Linick may have had other ongoing investigations into Pompeo.
Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.
PARIS — Where has NATO been during this pandemic? U.S. President Donald Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron have repeatedly referred to their nations being at war with the coronavirus, so why haven’t we seen a coordinated international response to the “attack”?
Russian Navy Head Boasts Baltic Fleet Will Get Six New Warships
Tensions with NATO are high in the Baltic Sea and Nikolai Yevmenov said in a message that six Karakurt-class corvettes would boost Russia's fleet there.To mark Baltic Fleet Day, Navy Commander-in-Chief Nikolai Yevmenov said, in a message published on Russia's defense ministry website, that the fleet established under Peter the Great more than 300 years ago had "won many brilliant victories over the enemy, who tried to push the Russian state off the Baltic coast.
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization operates on the premise that an attack on one member country warrants a response by all. In 2003, NATO formed the Multinational Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Defense Battalion. According to NATO’s website, this unit is “prepared for deployment in crisis situations such as natural disasters, infectious disease outbreaks and industrial accidents, including those involving hazardous material.” A global pandemic would certainly seem to qualify.
So what would NATO’s response to a pandemic look like? By the alliance’s own standards, it would have a voluntary lead member nation with other countries contributing troops, equipment and logistical support, with components such as decontamination stations and deployable laboratories.
NATO partners refuse to back US
Brussels. At a NATO meeting in Brussels, the US received no support for its decision to withdraw from an international “open skies” agreement on military observation flights. © Frederico Gambarini / dpa The badge for the "Open Sky" mission is emblazoned on the arm of a crew member of the Bundeswehr's new A319 mission aircraft in Hamburg. Archive photo.
NATO’s website introduces us to Lt. Col. Piotr Wachna, deputy commander of the 4th Chemical Regiment of the Polish army. Wachna is also the current head of the CBRN. Photos show his team in hazmat suits disinfecting hospital beds and hallways — in Poland. What we don’t see are brigades of biological warfare specialists going to war with a virus abroad.
Unlike its bombings of Libya and Yugoslavia, NATO’s war on coronavirus has been more discreet. It’s been so subtle, in fact, that any 15-year-old kid with a computer connection and a blog could achieve similar results. NATO has resorted to posting appeals on its website that amount to: “Hey, Country X needs protective equipment. Anyone have any?” The requests ask suppliers to contact the country in need directly.
To be fair, NATO announced a few days ago that 10 CBRN medical specialists from Romania will be helping Alabama authorities in a two-week deployment. But for weeks, China, Cuba and Russia have been seen sending teams of doctors and supplies to coronavirus hotspots all over the world, including NATO member countries. Critics have accused them of exploiting the crisis for propaganda purposes — every act of assistance can be played as a public relations and diplomacy card, after all — but that doesn’t mean it’s not helpful.
Embroiled in controversy, Mike Pompeo does himself no favors
It's almost as if Mike Pompeo believes there's a contest underway to be The Worst Secretary of State ever, and he's confident he's winning.It's been six days since Donald Trump fired the State Department's inspector general at the behest of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and it's probably fair to say the Republican team hasn't enjoyed the week.
NATO should have mobilized to outshine its traditional Cold War foes. Instead, it seems largely focused on fighting what it considers “disinformation” coming from Russia and China.
“We have several examples of statements coming from Moscow and Beijing, which are not correct, which try to undermine the cohesion of NATO allies, and also portrays NATO in the absolutely wrong way,” NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said last month, adding that both countries “portray NATO allies as if we are unable to, for instance, protect our elderly people or that we are not able to work together. We are working together. That’s exactly what we do.”
It’s not disinformation that NATO allies were hijacking each other’s mask shipments. Sweden’s Sveriges Radio reported that a Swedish producer’s masks, which were being sent from Chinese factories to Spain and Italy, were intercepted in France. And there have been myriad reports of mask hoarding, blocking and hijacking in the U.S. by states competing with each other for supplies.
Nor is it disinformation that the elderly in care homes have been disproportionately affected in NATO countries.
Charles Mitchell: Coronavirus in Pa. — secrecy, hypocrisy by governor exacerbate crisis
There are common denominators in the governor’s decisions: he makes them behind closed doors, and they hurt people. As a result, Pennsylvania is now in the throes of a second public health crisis, devastated by the predictable after-effects of mass unemployment and social isolation. Overdoses, drug-related deaths, domestic violence, domestic abuse, anxiety, depression, and suicide attempts are all spiking. Wolf’s home county has seen over three times more deaths from opioid abuse during quarantine than from COVID-19.
What NATO’s secretary-general calls “disinformation” is really just inconvenient information. There has indeed been a lack of solidarity between NATO member states, with every country looking out for itself. It’s not an unreasonable position, of course. Anyone who’s flown in a plane knows that before you help your neighbor with an oxygen mask, you’re supposed to make sure that your own mask is properly secured.
Rather than focusing on how it can capitalize on this crisis to peddle questionable propaganda against old Cold War foes, NATO should be examining how it could perform better. Heaven forbid there’s ever a biological attack on a NATO member country that kills millions of people. What would NATO do then? Coordinate equipment bids online? Send 10 medical professionals into the field two months later?
At the very least, NATO could have organized the transport logistics and security of medical supplies from the outset. And if it really wanted to get into the disinformation-busting business, it could have cautioned its members against using “coronavirus cases” — a measure largely dependent on a country’s ability or willingness to test — as a benchmark. NATO also could have lobbied its member countries to establish a uniform definition of what constitutes a coronavirus death. Instead, some countries (including the U.S.) have been counting those with serious underlying medical conditions that could have caused their death as coronavirus victims. Countries with lower fatality counts seem to have a more strict interpretation of what constitutes a coronavirus death. This disparity has impeded objective analysis of the epidemic.
NATO blew an opportunity to reposition itself during a global emergency. Instead, it’s still obsessed with ghosts from the last century’s Cold War.
(Rachel Marsden is a columnist, political strategist and host of an independently produced French-language program that airs on Sputnik France. Her website can be found at.)
Ben Higgins, Ashley Iaconetti React to Backlash for Calling Out Hannah Brown .
Ben Higgins, Ashley Iaconetti React to Backlash for Calling Out Hannah Brown“Hannah says the N-word, and then Hannah disappears, doesn’t say anything. Like, she’s gone. And we get criticism on this podcast because we said that Hannah was wrong for what she did. That’s about where we left it,” the former Bachelor, 31, said during the latest episode of “The Ben and Ashley I. Almost Famous Podcast,” released on Wednesday, June 3. “And Ashley, I’ll stick to that. Now, there is more to the story here.