Opinion Don’t Make the Election About the Court

21:00  20 september  2020
21:00  20 september  2020 Source:   theatlantic.com

Voting By Mail? Here Are the Deadlines in Every U.S. State

  Voting By Mail? Here Are the Deadlines in Every U.S. State Voting By Mail? Here Are the Deadlines in Every U.S. StateBefore the pandemic, five states—Colorado, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington and Utah—already held all-mail elections, meaning every active registered voter automatically received a ballot in the mail that would allow them to bypass a physical polling place. Due to COVID-19, several more states, including California and New Jersey, are adopting this model for the 2020 election. Twenty-nine states and Washington D.C. already allowed for “no excuse” mail-in absentee ballots, meaning voters can request a mail-in ballot without having to meet certain qualifications.

Fixating on the open Supreme Court seat will provoke a culture war.

With 42 days until Election Day … Biden’s moderation contrasts with Democratic rage as a fight looms over the Supreme Court Trump plans to hold a rally Tuesday night at Pittsburgh International Airport, making his fourth trip this month to Live updates: Get the latest on the election and Supreme Court .

I know that Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s empty Supreme Court seat has provoked an epic, long-awaited clash between Democrats and Republicans, that the very principle of judicial independence hangs dangerously in the balance. I realize that the social-media wave cannot be stopped, that the talking heads cannot be silenced, and that Democrats in Congress must fight this nomination. Nevertheless, let me try to convince anyone who will listen: Democrats should not spend the weeks between now and November talking solely about judges, Mitch McConnell, and the Supreme Court.

Is 8 enough? Court vacancy could roil possible election case

  Is 8 enough? Court vacancy could roil possible election case WASHINGTON (AP) — Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death has left the Supreme Court shorthanded during a polarizing presidential campaign in which President Donald Trump has already suggested he may not accept the outcome and the court could be called on to step in and decide the fate of the nation. It's the second time in four years that a justice has died during an election year, though that eight-justice court was not asked to referee any election disputes in 2016. Today, both sides have armies of lawyers ready to take the outcome to court.

We don ' t know where the money ultimately went. Trump said he wants to have his supreme court nominee confirmed before election day, on 3 November. In a floor speech this afternoon, Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell signaled the vote would take place “this year” but he did not specify

a. the judges in southern courts interpreted the Court 's decision differently than the rest of the nation b. though the schools wanted to desegregate, certain When the Congress and the president don ' t like a Sup Ct ruling that interprets the meaning of the Constitution. a. they have to sue in fed ct and force the

a man looking at the camera © Getty / The Atlantic

Why? Fixating on the Court organizes the electorate along two fronts of a culture war, and forces people to make stark ideological choices. Instead of focusing voters on the president’s failure to control COVID-19 or the consequent economic collapse, the culture war makes voters think only of their deepest tribal identities. To put it differently: Americans who define themselves as “pro-life” or as socially conservative might consider voting for Joe Biden if the issue at stake is the botched pandemic response. If the issue is conservative judges versus liberal judges, then they may stick with the Republicans.

Given the quirks of the American electoral system, these undecided voters matter, even more than the fired-up, well-organized inhabitants of liberal enclaves. The Democratic base may now be making record donations to Democratic campaigns, but if money was the only thing that mattered, Jeb Bush would be president. On its own, the Democratic base can’t determine the outcome of presidential elections, let alone the Senate majority. These contests are settled in a small number of states by a tiny number of independents and disillusioned partisans, the kinds of voters who used to be “Reagan Democrats,” but who now might become “Biden Republicans.” And they may well be spooked by the prospect of “liberal judges,” a phrase designed to evoke lawlessness, degeneracy, and disorder.

Fact check: Viral posts falsely claim Ruth Bader Ginsburg had already died

  Fact check: Viral posts falsely claim Ruth Bader Ginsburg had already died Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died Sept. 18, but some viral posts falsely claim she died up to 2 years ago.Ruth Bader Ginsburg reflects on being 'notorious' in first appearance since cancer treatment

3 election . Speaking to reporters at the White House before a trip to Ohio, Mr. Trump added that he was considering five women for the position, and that he Asked about the timing of the vote, he said that there is “a great deal of time before the election ” but that it would be “up to Mitch in the Senate

Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, don ' t attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any advocating or wishing death/physical harm, and other rule violations can result in a Justice Kennedy retired, therefore opening a spot on the court . That spot was filled by Kavanaugh.

[David Frum: 4 reasons to doubt Mitch McConnell’s power]

The Republican Party knows how to use polarizing rhetoric to split people along tribal lines. Donald Trump spent most of the 2018 midterm campaign talking up the “caravan,” the Central American refugees who were marching toward the U.S. border seeking asylum. Their numbers were small to begin with, and they dwindled further as they neared the border. Nonetheless, they made a useful talking point for Republicans, who wanted to remind their base on which side of the ideological divide they belonged. When Trump sent the U.S. military to the border, the subsequent outrage was justified, but it was also a trap: It drew attention away from real-life issues and encouraged voters to think they had to make a false choice between the caravan, crime, and illegal immigration on the one hand, and tradition, safety, and law and order on the other.

Supreme Court is shorthanded but could play key role in election

  Supreme Court is shorthanded but could play key role in election The death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg adds a new layer of intrigue to a pandemic-infused election that's been challenged from Alabama to Wisconsin.On SCOTUS ‘all Democrats can do is plan retaliation’ expert says

When you lose the election , sometimes things don ’ t work out well.” People visited a memorial set up outside the Supreme Court on Saturday. The death on Friday of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg immediately led to questions about how Republican senators would proceed.Credit Jason Andrew

Senators argued the election was happening too soon (though it was almost eight months away) and that appointing a new justice would prevent Americans from having their say. Now, since Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death last week, Republicans say they will hold hearings on a nomination quickly.

In a few key states, that gimmick worked. “The caravan helped him,” former Senator Claire McCaskill of Missouri bluntly said after she lost to Josh Hawley, a Republican. She noted that her opponent was also helped by the “Kavanaugh thing,” meaning the story, presented by Republican media, of an upright conservative—a man trying to protect families—smeared by dangerous liberals.

Inciting a culture war didn’t work everywhere. And in places where it didn’t—in all those suburban House seats won by centrist Democrats, for example—that was often not because candidates loudly denounced the president’s use of troops at the border, but because they changed the subject. When undecided voters were thinking about jobs and health care, they were prepared to break their habits and vote for Democrats.

[Read: What Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death means for America]

Politicians in other parts of the world also use culture wars to their advantage. In 2018, I wrote about the Philippines, a country whose president, Rodrigo Duterte, managed to keep voters’ minds on his shocking policy of murdering drug dealers. Rather than thinking about poverty or illiteracy, his electorate argued about whether they were for him (and thus for “law and order”) or against him (and thus—as he would put it—in favor of “crime and drugs”). A recent study I helped design also showed, among other things, how the Italian populist Matteo Salvini gained traction by keeping Italians focused on the polarizing subject of migrants, even as the number of actual migrants dropped dramatically. Polarization is a well-known authoritarian tactic, too. Russian President Vladimir Putin has his state-controlled media cover the perfidy of the West rather than the country’s declining living standards. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has used anti-Greek rhetoric in the run-up to elections to avoid discussing his own country’s economic mess.

Fact check: Ruth Bader Ginsburg planned to stay on Supreme Court at least a few more years

  Fact check: Ruth Bader Ginsburg planned to stay on Supreme Court at least a few more years A viral meme suggesting that Ruth Bader Ginsburg said her Supreme Court seat should have been vacated in 2019 is false.Trump casts doubt on Ginsburg's dying wish

More voters say they want whoever is elected president in November to fill the seat left vacant by Ruth Bader Ginsburg as Trump makes steps toward Fifty per cent of registered voters say he next person election president should nominate the Supreme Court Justice to fill Ruth Bader Ginsburg's seat.

The court said the electoral commission committed “illegalities and irregularities” in the election . The commission chairman urged the court to quickly release Odinga was fiercely critical of the electoral commission. “There are more fundamental decisions to made in the days ahead, including who will

Democrats shouldn’t fall into the same trap. It’s not going to be easy, but Democratic politicians and activists, and even ordinary voters who use social media, should concentrate as much as they can on the tangible issues that people grapple with every day—why their children aren’t in school, why their business has shut down, why their health-care plan is insufficient, why 200,000 people have died—and why the choice of president affects those issues so profoundly.

To turn the focus away from the Republican Party’s abuse of the nomination process does not mean that this abuse isn’t outrageous. The power grab represents an assault on one of our core constitutional values, the principle of an apolitical Supreme Court. But any response or remedy—any legislation or changes to the Senate’s procedural rules, for example—requires the Democrats to win not just the White House, but the Senate. And to win the Senate, it is really important that past Republican voters switch sides. Let’s make it easier for them. This advice may sound strange, but anyone who cares about the future of the Supreme Court needs to speak as little as possible about the Supreme Court, at least from now until November.

Trump nominates Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court. What happens next in Senate confirmation process .
Now that Trump has named Amy Coney Barrett as his nominee to the Supreme Court, the Senate can start its nomination process.How will President Trump's Supreme Court nomination impact Ohio voters?

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks
usr: 1
This is interesting!