•   
  •   
  •   

Opinion Confirmation Hearings Shouldn’t Be So Worthless

14:16  16 october  2020
14:16  16 october  2020 Source:   nationalreview.com

Amy Coney Barrett hearings: Nominee to face supercharged atmosphere in the age of coronavirus

  Amy Coney Barrett hearings: Nominee to face supercharged atmosphere in the age of coronavirus Amy Coney Barrett heads before the Judiciary Committee less than a month before the election. You couldn’t slather the hearing room walls with turpentine, give the senators cigarette lighters and expect a more incendiary mix. Some of this hearing will be remote with senators beaming in their questions due to a COVID-19 outbreak in the Senate. And no one is clear on the public’s role in this. Health officials shuttered the complex to the public since the pandemic struck in winter.

Confirmation Hearings Shouldn ’ t Be So Worthless . It’s one thing to commit to vote a certain way in a given case; it’s another to conceal basic views on the law Judge Amy Coney Barrett acquitted herself very well at her confirmation hearings , which means, quite often, she refused to answer questions.

As the country prepares for what are likely to be some of the most polarizing Supreme Court confirmation hearings since the nomination of In 1995, law professor Elena Kagan, who would be confirmed as a justice 15 years later, neatly summarized this consensus, dismissing all of the

Amy Coney Barrett acquitted herself very well at her confirmation hearings, which means, quite often, that she refused to answer questions.

a group of people sitting at a table in a room: Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett is sworn in during her confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill, October 12, 2020. © Greg Nash/Pool via Reuters Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett is sworn in during her confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill, October 12, 2020.

Barrett is an exemplary nominee who was knowledgeable, clear, and composed throughout the three days of questioning, but not always responsive.

The Latest: Barrett tells senators she's not a Scalia clone

  The Latest: Barrett tells senators she's not a Scalia clone WASHINGTON (AP) — The Latest on the Senate confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett (all times local): 9:30 a.m. Judge Amy Coney Barrett says if she's confirmed to the Supreme Court she'll be her own justice. Barrett has said the late Justice Antonin Scalia was a mentor to her and she was a former clerk for him. But when she was asked about her views on how she interpreted the Constitution and law at her confirmation hearing on Tuesday, she said that if confirmed the country would not be “getting Justice Scalia, you would be getting Justice Barrett.

Tom Price, the health and human services pick, Scott Pruitt, chosen to lead the E.P.A., and others faced aggressive questioning at hearings but avoided major stumbles. Scott Pruitt, the Oklahoma attorney general, during his confirmation hearing on Wednesday.Credit Gabriella Demczuk for The

These confirmation hearings should be treated like how questions are asked in courts - a question is asked no speeches are permitted except for the opening/closing statements given by the defending and prosecuting lawyers. Confirmation hearings would go that much quicker and everyone's lives would

She can’t be blamed for this. She played the game as the rules have been established for decades, and played it well. It is to take nothing away from her to wonder whether this longstanding norm of nominees running away from many substantive questions serves the Senate or the country well.

The Court has taken on an outsize role in our national life, while at the same time nominees say less than ever about their views during the one chance the senators have to vet them publicly. This is a bizarre disconnect. You’d think we’d want to hear more from a prospective member of a body that elections are explicitly fought over and that, for better or (mostly) worse, determines how we are governed.

Senators to grill Amy Coney Barrett on third day of Supreme Court confirmation hearings

  Senators to grill Amy Coney Barrett on third day of Supreme Court confirmation hearings Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court confirmation hearings will continue on Wednesday with senators asking more questions on healthcare, abortion and gunsMembers of the Senate Judiciary Committee will get another chance to question Barrett on her views on the law and a number of hot-button issues that could come before the court.

Supreme Court confirmation hearing . Close. Live coverage of the US Senate Judiciary Committee as it begins hearings into Amy Coney Barrett's nomination.

Yes, it's hard to muster much sympathy for complaints on this score from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who subjected a prospective attorney general to the longest confirmation wait for any Cabinet nominee and outright refused to hold hearings for a highly qualified Supreme Court candidate.

It was the confirmation battle over Robert Bork, of course, that changed everything. As Ilya Shapiro notes in his recent book, Supreme Disorder, there were five days of the hearings involving Bork himself, who was highly accomplished but acerbic and uncoachable.

The journalist Theodore White famously said upon hearing Barry Goldwater’s unapologetic 1964 convention speech, “My God, he’s going to run as Barry Goldwater!” Likewise, Bork testified as Bork — brilliant and provocative — and it was a political debacle.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg set the new standard. As Shapiro writes, Ginsburg executed a “pincer movement” at her hearings, refusing to discuss both specific fact patterns (because they might come before the Court) and abstract matters (because “a judge could deal in specifics only”).

This didn’t leave much to discuss. Justices John Roberts and Elena Kagan deflected the same way Ginsburg had. For her part, Barrett relentlessly hewed to the Ginsburg rule. She commented on her own past writings and decisions and general legal philosophy but wouldn’t get drawn out on much else.

Fact check: Image showing fly on Amy Coney Barrett’s shoulder during hearing posted as a joke

  Fact check: Image showing fly on Amy Coney Barrett’s shoulder during hearing posted as a joke A viral image of a fly on Amy Coney Barrett's shoulder during her Senate hearing is satirical. The poster and video footage confirm there was no fly.A viral image appears to show a fly on Barrett’s shoulder as she sat during the first day of her Senate hearings. A timestamp in the top left corner of the images reveals that it was taken at 2:08 p.m. ET on Capitol Hill.

Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch and Senate Judiciary Committee members gave opening statements for day one of his confirmation hearing . Judge Gorsuch outlined his judicial record, saying that 97 percent of the cases he had heard were decided unanimously, and his opinion sided with the

Kavanaugh Hearings Should Change Nothing About His Confirmation . So, while the hearings got the country no closer to the truth about Ford's accusation, they did highlight the depths Democrats will go to stop conservatives from reaching positions of power.

For long stretches, the only drama was whether she could say, once again, that she couldn’t answer without betraying any impatience with senators asking the same thing over and over again.

The rationale for this, going back to Ginsburg, is that a judge can’t comment on matters that might come before the Court, a category so capacious that it includes almost anything of public interest.

This is much too far-reaching a standard. It’s one thing to commit to vote a certain way in a given case; it’s another to conceal basic views on the law behind a curtain of judicial impartiality.

On top of this, the Ginsburg rule makes what a nominee will talk about completely arbitrary. We know a fair amount about how Barrett views gun rights because she wrote a dissent in a gun case and couldn’t avoid discussing it. But if she could talk about that in detail, why not other important questions?

No fair-minded person would conclude that, having engaged on the Second Amendment openly in a confirmation hearing, she is now unfit to hear gun cases on the Supreme Court. Indeed, if making your views clear on such matters is disqualifying, all the current Supreme Court justices — extensively on the record about all manner of legally fraught questions — should be replaced by people with no known views.

Trump-Biden town halls, Amy Coney Barrett hearings, Medicare open enrollment begins: 5 things to know Thursday

  Trump-Biden town halls, Amy Coney Barrett hearings, Medicare open enrollment begins: 5 things to know Thursday NBC and ABC host dueling town halls with Trump and Biden, final day of hearings in Amy Coney Barrett's nomination and more things to know Thursday.Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.

Koichi confirms with Bernard the detail order information. Koichi ask Bernard to spell of something unclear - Like the new company name and explaining the meaning of roll out. When connection is bad, Koichi asks Bernard to send a e-mail for confirmation .

It tends to be a very poor reason,” Mangan says. “ Be successful at something and money will follow, as opposed to the other way around. Focus on doing the stuff that you love that you’ll be so enthusiastic about, people will want to give you a job. Then go and develop within that job.”

The Ginsburg rule is highly convenient to all administrations when they make appointments. A change would have to be forced by the Senate, acting collectively to demand that future nominees discuss and debate the law with a forthrightness we haven’t seen since Bork. But that won’t happen. Neither party would want to make the process even harder on its nominees and, more broadly, Congress is the least self-respecting branch, almost never standing up for its prerogatives.

Senators can express great frustration at not getting answers to their questions, but this is a practice they’ve long tolerated and won’t change.

© 2020 by King Features Syndicate

More on National Review

  • Barrett Rising
  • Progressives Flip on ‘Nasty Woman’
  • Amy Coney Barrett Is Right about Guns and Voting

Republicans on Senate panel to vote on Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court nomination as Democrats boycott hearing .
The Senate Judiciary Committee will vote on Amy Coney Barrett's confirmation to the Supreme Court on Thursday, setting up a full Senate vote Monday.The Senate Judiciary Committee is set to meet at 9 a.m. EDT. Barrett is expected to be approved by Republicans who hold the majority on the panel, with Democrats saying they will boycott the day's proceedings. The full Senate is expected to take a final vote on Barrett's confirmation on Monday, eight days before Election Day.

usr: 0
This is interesting!