•   
  •   
  •   

Opinion Men and Women Have Never Been More Politically Divided

15:27  19 october  2020
15:27  19 october  2020 Source:   nymag.com

History suggests Barrett won't help Trump with women (opinion)

  History suggests Barrett won't help Trump with women (opinion) Amy Coney Barrett's likely confirmation as Ruth Bader Ginsburg's successor shows the political tension between representation and feminism, says Laura Beers, who notes that historical precedents suggest President Donald Trump's gambit to win women voters with her nomination won't work.Amy Coney Barrett's appointment to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court goes to the heart of the question of what feminism actually is.

It is bad enough that some, through all- women shortlists believe that we should be politically divided by sex. These, and other comments, only make me more determined to stand up for our country against the monotonous, wearisome and never -ending bashing she undeservedly receives.

There are other reasons why equality is unattainable, Peterson explains: “ Many women around the The opposite is not true, and has never proven to be true, and is largely unsupportable. Peterson says that men and women are more similar than they are different, something strangely omitted in

In the Trump era, the U.S. electorate has become less divided by race.

a group of people standing in front of a crowd: Gender trouble, straight ahead. Barbara Alper/Getty Images © Barbara Alper/Getty Images Gender trouble, straight ahead. Barbara Alper/Getty Images

That might read like a typo. Throughout the 2016 campaign, pundits (including myself) posited that Donald Trump’s nomination would deepen the Republican Party’s woes with Black and Hispanic voters while potentially gaining the party some aggrieved white voters who had been deaf to its past nominees’ racial dog whistles — but could hear the billionaire’s foghorn loud and clear. Summarizing the conventional wisdom of four years ago, Peter Beinart wrote in The Atlantic that “by stigmatizing undocumented immigrants, Republicans have catalyzed the Latino cohesion that could be their undoing.” The election returns told a different story.

Leftist versus hardliner in Turkish Cypriot leadership vote

  Leftist versus hardliner in Turkish Cypriot leadership vote NICOSIA, Cyprus (AP) — Turkish Cypriots vote on Sunday in a leadership runoff that could decide whether they retain more control over their own affairs or steer even closer to an increasingly domineering Turkey. Veteran incumbent Mustafa Akinci, 72, backs the long-held federal framework for a deal with rival Greek Cypriots to reunify ethnically divided Cyprus. He’s also a champion of Turkish Cypriots who oppose Turkey’s complete domination of their affairs. © Provided by Associated Press In this photo taken on Sunday, Oct.

In anthropology and demography, the human sex ratio is the ratio of males to females in a population. More data are available for humans than for any other species

Previously most women had spent their lives at home, primarily as carers – of husbands and family There is a sense in which the development of rights for women freed men from the rigid American parents, for example, assume young people will never learn to act responsibly unless they are given

In 2016 exit polls, Trump boasted slightly higher support among Black and Hispanic voters than Mitt Romney had four years prior. Exit polls are infamously unreliable, and the difference between the Romney and Trump vote shares was tiny. So, the confounding 2016 results were plausibly disputed and then widely ignored. This year, however, the absence of “Latino cohesion” has become unmistakable.

In mid-September, the voting public as a whole was leaning about five points more Democratic than it had been in 2016 — and yet Hispanic voters were leaning nine points more Republican than they had been four years earlier. In a cycle with a more popular Democratic nominee — and a Republican incumbent presiding over an economic and public-health catastrophe that disproportionately harmed Hispanic communities — Trump nevertheless appears to enjoy more support within that community than he did before taking power. His standing among African American voters, meanwhile, appears to be the same or better than it was in 2016 in most national surveys, which is to say Joe Biden’s large improvement on Hillary Clinton’s performance in general-election polls is driven primarily by Democratic gains among whites. And this means that race is a less reliable predictor of voting preference in the Trump era than it was in the Obama one.

10 shows to watch if you like 'Emily in Paris'

  10 shows to watch if you like 'Emily in Paris' The new Netflix dramedy is full of campy plots and stunning Parisian views, and fans of the show might also enjoy "Sex and the City" and "Younger."

Trump is not a traditional politician, and he operates within a political culture that is qualitatively different from that which existed even 20 years ago. American politics today is characterized by furious ideological division , the demonizing and delegitimizing of opponents

Women in government are underrepresented in most , if not all, countries worldwide. In many countries, women have had inadequate opportunities in social participation

Of course, this does not mean that America isn’t riven by identity-based divisions. Our polity might not be as polarized by racial demographics as it was pre-Trump, but it is more polarized by attitudes toward racial inequality and immigration. And although 2016’s conventional wisdom about how Trump’s bigotry would reshape each party’s racial composition has proven false, the common sense about how Trump’s misogyny would reshape each party’s gender composition has been vindicated. In fact, to a large extent, the latter development explains the former.

Trump is for the boys.

Barring a giant polling error, the 2020 election will witness the largest gender gap in partisan preference since women gained the franchise. As CNN’s Harry Enten observed earlier this month, Biden’s average lead among women in recent interview polls is about 25 points; no nominee of either party has ever led by that much among women in a final preelection survey, not even in the landslide years of 1964 and 1984. And yet, in those same surveys, Trump leads among men by three points. In 2016, the gender gap in voting preference was 20 points; if current polls hold steady, it will be 28.

Divided Cyprus eyes impact of Turkey's man winning northern vote

  Divided Cyprus eyes impact of Turkey's man winning northern vote Breakaway northern Cyprus has elected the Ankara-backed right-wing nationalist Ersin Tatar as its leader in a surprise win at a time of heightened tensions in the eastern Mediterranean. - Northern Cyprus is a centrepiece of Turkey's strategy in the eastern Mediterranean, including a bitter dispute with Greece and Cyprus over oil and gas reserves. The EU has deplored Turkey's drilling for hydrocarbons in disputed waters and warned Ankara against further "provocations".In a call with Tatar after his victory, Erdogan said their cooperation would continue -- "starting with activities related to hydrocarbons".

Women have historically lived much longer than men , but that is changing as men give up heavy manual labour and more women take on the stress of The gap in life expectancy between men and women has dropped to less than four years, official figures show. Women have historically lived

Slavery itself was never widespread in the North, though many of the region’s businessmen grew rich on the slave trade and investments in southern Marriages between enslaved men and women had no legal basis, but many did marry and raise large families; most slave owners encouraged this

The historic salience of gender in our politics partially explains Trump’s surprisingly resilient standing with nonwhite voters. In a Fox News poll released earlier this month, Trump’s support among nonwhite men was two and a half times higher than his support among nonwhite women (25 and 10 percent, respectively). Last week, Jennifer Medina of the New York Times reported on the centrality of machismo to Trump’s appeal among Mexican American men:

[W]hat has alienated so many older, female and suburban voters is a key part of Mr. Trump’s appeal to these men, interviews with dozens of Mexican-American men supporting Mr. Trump shows: To them, the macho allure of Mr. Trump is undeniable. He is forceful, wealthy and, most important, unapologetic. In a world where at any moment someone might be attacked for saying the wrong thing, he says the wrong thing all the time and does not bother with self-flagellation.

… They said they saw his defiance of widely accepted medical guidance in the face of his own illness not as a sign of poor leadership, but one of a man who does his own research to reach his own conclusion. They see his disdain for masks as an example of his toughness, his incessant interruptions during the debate with Mr. Biden as an effective use of his power.

It's men, not women, driving Trump's numbers down

  It's men, not women, driving Trump's numbers down Whatever happens over the next two weeks, it does not appear that women will much change their minds about Trump. They've had his number for years. Instead, men's votes will be the ones to watch on election night. In short, a Biden win may well be powered by women, but a Trump loss likely will be attributable to men.Lara M. Brown is director of the Graduate School of Political Management at George Washington University and the author of "Amateur Hour: Presidential Character and the Question of Leadership." Follow her on Twitter @LaraMBrownPhD.

Men are more likely than ever to embrace the idea of gender equality, but when it comes to the Multiple surveys and studies have documented men ’s changing attitudes toward women in recent A new survey found that younger opposite-sex couples are no more likely to divide home chores

Men are more likely to spend about more than women for clothing and accessories spending about per month, compared to But both men and women are fairly similar with one particular shopping preference - shopping alone. Sixty-two per cent of women and the same amount of men

“We saw him being a boss,” said Edwin Gonzales, 31, who held a large American flag outside the Trump campaign office. “And for him to go down the escalator is basically the same thing — it’s like, ‘Dang, the boss has stepped down and he’s putting himself out there to be the president.’ That’s what’s exciting.”

As these quotes indicate, the fact that Trump’s performance of masculinity resembles a misandrist caricature — with its compulsive braggadocio, bawdy innuendos, and shameless, nigh-simian dominance displays — is a prime cause of 2020’s unprecedented gender polarization.

And yet, it would be a mistake to attribute this year’s gender gap entirely to Trump’s personal attributes. After all, women have been trending left, as men trend right, for decades now. And this development is not unique to the United States — rather, it is present across nearly all advanced democracies. Viewed in this context, Trump looks as much like a product of the gender gap as he does like a cause: It’s quite plausible that Trump would not have won the 2016 GOP nomination if the Republican coalition hadn’t already grown heavily male (in multiple state primaries, Trump performed significantly better among men than women).

a man in a blue motorcycle: Guys bein’ dudes. Jeremy Hogan/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images © Jeremy Hogan/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images Guys bein’ dudes. Jeremy Hogan/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

America’s ongoing racial diversification has loomed large in popular accounts of our democracy’s future. And for good reason. But our justified fixation on the perils and promise of an increasingly multiethnic America has led some political analysts to give the ongoing transformation of gender roles short shrift. The emergence of a gender gap in voting preferences throughout the postindustrial world suggests that the forces pulling men and women into opposite political camps long predated Trump’s political career — and will be shaping our politics long after he’s gone.

Debate transcript: Trump, Biden final presidential debate moderated by Kristen Welker

  Debate transcript: Trump, Biden final presidential debate moderated by Kristen Welker Here is the full transcript of the final presidential debate between President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden, moderated by Kristen Welker in Nashville on Oct. 22, 2020. Headers have been added for ease of reading. © Mario Tama, Getty Images People are pictured watching the final debate between President Donald Trump and Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden at The Abbey in West Hollywood, California. [0:00] Welker: A very good evening to both of you. This debate will cover six major topics.

Women used to lean right.

In the U.S., women have been voting to the left of men for four decades now. As a result, many contemporary political observers consider the female population’s relative liberalism to be a law of the political universe: Of course, women would, in the aggregate, favor the party of reproductive autonomy and social welfare, given their inherent interest in the former and their relatively greater propensity for empathy and cooperation.

And yet, a half-century ago, the common sense about women’s political leanings was quite different. Summarizing the conventional wisdom about female voting preferences in 1963, the political scientists Gabriel Almond and Sidney Verba wrote, “Wherever the consequences of women’s suffrage have been studied, it would appear that women differ from men in their political behavior only in being somewhat more frequently apathetic, parochial, [and] conservative.”

Indeed, throughout the 1950s, women were more likely to vote for Republicans than men were in the United States, while in Western Europe, men were still voting to the left of women in the early 1970s.

The dominant explanations for women’s conservatism in this period concerned their greater likelihood of attending church and abstaining from the labor force, according to the comparative political scientists Ronald Inglehart and Pippa Norris. At a time when trade unions anchored parties of the left, the underrepresentation of women in organized workplaces made them less likely to vote with labor. In many European countries, meanwhile, women’s greater religiosity made them more likely than men to occupy the pews of a church aligned with the center-right Christian Democrats.

Women donors emerge as new power brokers in 2020 election as Democrats look to flip the Senate

  Women donors emerge as new power brokers in 2020 election as Democrats look to flip the Senate Record-high campaign contributions from women helped Democrats take the House in 2018 and now women have their sights set on the Senate. Your browser does not support this video In the 15 most competitive Senate races, an average 43% of the large-dollar donors to Democratic candidates are women compared to 28% of donors to Republicans, according to a USA TODAY analysis of data from the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. © Nam Y. Huh, AP Lindsey Schwartz wears a mask with a message as she holds a sign during the Women's March in downtown Chicago, Saturday, Oct. 17, 2020.

In some contemporary polls, women across nations also expressed more conservative ideological views than men (although it is unclear whether this should be seen as a cause or effect of their partisanship). One possible explanation for why women might have leaned conservative in this period — but not in our own — is that the median female voter’s ideology evolved with her economic position: When a larger percentage of women in Western Europe and the U.S. depended on husbands for financial security, they arguably had a material interest in some aspects of social conservatism, such as its emphasis on familial obligation and the stigmatization of (male) infidelity. As remunerative employment became more available to all genders, however, more women came to understand such conservatism less as a safeguard against deprivation than an affront to their autonomy.

Regardless, over the ensuing five decades, gender-based voting patterns gradually flipped. The shift came first to the United States. In 1980, as Ronald Reagan firmly aligned the Republican Party with the “pro-life” movement, American women voted sharply to the left of men for the first time — and have remained to their left ever since.

For a while, comparative political scientists struggled to theorize the exceptional liberalism of U.S. women. But by the end of the 1990s, the American pattern had spread through much of Western Europe, which first witnessed gender de-alignment — as women ceased to be more conservative than men — and then gender realignment, as the contemporary gender gap asserted itself. Today, the “women, left; men, right” pattern is nearly uniform across advanced democracies.

The modern gender gap is (arguably) one of postindustrial capitalism’s signature products.

In a paper published at the turn of this century, Inglehart and Norris put forth a “developmental theory” of the gender gap. Whereas other analysts of the phenomenon often attributed it to factors peculiar to a given nation — such as the heightened salience of issues that tended to polarize men and women during a specific campaign — Inglehart and Norris argued that there was an inherent relationship between the postindustrial stage of economic development and the appearance of the modern gender voting gap.

Justin Turner tests positive for COVID-19, removed from Game 6

  Justin Turner tests positive for COVID-19, removed from Game 6 Justin Turner was pulled from Game 6 of the World Series after seven innings on Tuesday night, and the world found out the shocking reason why: Turner tested positive for COVID-19. © Tim Heitman-USA TODAY Sports Turner started and began the game for the Los Angeles Dodgers as the No. 3 hitter and third baseman. But he was pulled before the start of the eighth, with Enrique Hernandez going to second, Chris Taylor moving to left, and Edwin Rios playing third.There was no explanation for why Turner was removed until after the Dodgers won the World Series 3-1.

Their theory goes (roughly) like this: Almost all preindustrial societies strictly circumscribed women’s social role, assigning them responsibility for child-rearing and discouraging their full participation in market economies. These social expectations persisted in weakened form through the first waves of industrialization in the West. But as these societies grew wealthier — and as the imperatives of capital gained ever-more supremacy over those of tradition — women grew less dependent on, and tolerant of, patriarchal convention. Meanwhile, relative prosperity also served to increase the prevalence of “post-material” politics — which is to say, a politics that privileges questions of personal freedom, self-expression, and gender equality over those of physical and material security — as a new, historically economically comfortable generation sought to shimmy up Maslow’s hierarchy of needs.

These developments produced mutually reinforcing economic and cultural changes, which together fostered the modern gender gap in political preferences. Women’s mass entrance into the labor force increased their participation in the union movement as well as their aggregate level of concern with the provision of social-welfare services that could render the dual burdens of breadwinning and caretaking more manageable. Women also tended to become less religious. All these developments served to pull women toward the parties of the left. And this change in women’s social role and power further heightened the prominence of “post-material” questions in politics, which tended to polarize male and female opinion more than “the class politics of economic and physical security” ever had. Through an elaborate analysis of World Values Survey data, Inglehart and Norris demonstrated that women’s leftward shift was not wholly reducible to structural factors such as changes in their aggregate religiosity, class position, age, or rate of labor-force participation. All these variables were relevant. But a nation’s level of “post-materialism” was more predictive of how its women voted than any of those structural factors by themselves.

One can pick many bones with this theoretical framework (the millennial generation has an awful lot of material concerns, which seem to be reflected in its voting patterns; the decline of class politics is arguably more attributable to the imposition of anti-labor economic policies than the achievement of mass affluence; it’s hard to see how “gender equality” is not a materialist issue). But it’s difficult to dispute the paper’s basic empirical finding: that postindustrial development tends to produce a gender gap in voting behavior, as generations of women socialized into traditional gender roles are displaced by generations who were not.

In the 1990s, women in developing countries voted to the right of men – no matter their age – just as they had in the U.S. 40 years earlier. But in the advanced industrialized world of the 1990s, generational differences’ in women’s politics were stark:

Put Trump’s glittering misogyny to one side. Forget the GOP’s theocratic streak. The data above, compiled 20 years ago, would be sufficient to explain a large gender gap in 2020, through generational churn alone.

We’re likely to “mind the gap” for decades to come.

Neither the societal shift away from traditional gender roles nor the downstream cultural consequences of that shift are anywhere near complete. As Rebecca Traister has incisively argued, the growing prevalence of singledom among America’s rising generation of women is one of the most potent forces in contemporary politics. In 2009, for the first time in history, there were more unmarried women in the United States than married ones. And today, young women in the U.S. aren’t just unprecedentedly single; they also appear to be unprecedentedly uninterested in heterosexuality: According to private polling shared with Intelligencer by Democratic data scientist David Shor, roughly 30 percent of American women under 25 identify as LGBT; for women over 60, that figure is less than 5 percent.

It’s possible that this is more of a life-cycle effect than a generational change. But then one could have said that about a chart showing higher support for left-wing parties among young women 20 years ago. The (gradual) liberation of women from patriarchal gender roles is among the most profound changes in social organization that humanity has witnessed since the advent of representative democracy. It would be odd if a change this epochal — and ongoing — had the same cultural and political consequences for the third generation of women raised in its wake as it did for the first.

The future is a different country. There, the Trump presidency is ancient history and the confident predictions of today’s pundits brim with dramatic irony. But surveys of Zoomers bring us tidings from Tomorrowland. And they appear to describe a place where politics is (at least) as fraught with gender conflict as our own.

Justin Turner tests positive for COVID-19, removed from Game 6 .
Justin Turner was pulled from Game 6 of the World Series after seven innings on Tuesday night, and the world found out the shocking reason why: Turner tested positive for COVID-19. © Tim Heitman-USA TODAY Sports Turner started and began the game for the Los Angeles Dodgers as the No. 3 hitter and third baseman. But he was pulled before the start of the eighth, with Enrique Hernandez going to second, Chris Taylor moving to left, and Edwin Rios playing third.There was no explanation for why Turner was removed until after the Dodgers won the World Series 3-1.

usr: 1
This is interesting!