•   
  •   
  •   

Opinion The Amy Coney Barrett Sham Senate Confirmation Is Done. Now, Her Supreme Court Horror Show Begins.

03:50  28 october  2020
03:50  28 october  2020 Source:   thedailybeast.com

Fact check: True claim about Harris failing bar exam on first try and Barrett's law school rank

  Fact check: True claim about Harris failing bar exam on first try and Barrett's law school rank A post compares the early career qualifications of Judge Amy Coney Barrett and Sen. Kamala Harris. We rate this claim true.One user took to Facebook to compare the qualifications of the conservative Supreme Court nominee and the Democratic vice presidential nominee.

The Senate on Monday night will vote to confirm Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court . The Barrett confirmation fight was not nearly as chaotic as the previous fight over Justice Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation , which involved lurid accusations of sexual assault against the nominee

Amy Coney Barrett was confirmed by the Senate by 52 to 48 votes, filling Ruth Bader Ginsburg's seat and transforming the Supreme Court . An hour later she was sworn in by Clarence Thomas on the South Lawn of the White House in front of an audience which included her husband Jesse and First

With Democrats powerless and Republicans shameless, the foregone conclusion of Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation as a Supreme Court justice is, at last, concluded.

a woman wearing a pink shirt: Erin Schaff-Pool/Getty © Provided by The Daily Beast Erin Schaff-Pool/Getty

Justice Barrett was confirmed 52-48 by the Senate, and fittingly, given her shotgun-wedding of a confirmation, may begin deciding cases tomorrow, including two high-profile challenges to election rules.

Before the travesty fades from memory, however, we thought it would be useful to put all of the terribleness of her confirmation into one convenient top-ten list, summarizing everything that was wrong with this process from its beginning—all of one month ago—to now. Shall we?

Senate Democrats will boycott Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court confirmation hearing vote as GOP vows to move forward

  Senate Democrats will boycott Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court confirmation hearing vote as GOP vows to move forward Senate Democrats say they will boycott a committee hearing Thursday where Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court nomination is set to move forward.The Senate Judiciary Committee is set to vote tomorrow afternoon on Barrett's confirmation to the high court, a vote that was expected to pass along party lines and send her nomination to the full Senate for a Monday vote — just eight days before Election Day.

Amy Coney Barrett was confirmed to the Supreme Court late Monday by a deeply divided Senate , with Republicans overpowering Democrats to install President Donald Trump’s nominee days before the election and secure a likely conservative court majority for years to come.

Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett appears before the Senate Judiciary Committee on the third day of her Supreme Court confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill on October 14, 2020 in Washington, DC.Tom Williams.

1. Hypocrisy: President Barack Obama nominated Judge Merrick Garland on March 16, 2016. Republicans said that was too close to an election to confirm a new justice. Some even promised not to do so in 2020. Justice Barrett was nominated on September 29.

2. Disrespect: The actual, for-real dying wish of the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was that she not be replaced until after the election. Barrett’s nomination was announced three days after Ginsburg died, before she had even been buried.

3. Haste: In order to ram through their nominee before the election—it was the fastest nomination process since 1975—Republicans cut corners everywhere, with little investigation, a perfunctory and incomplete questionnaire, and a bogus process.

Biden-Trump debate, Amy Coney Barrett SCOTUS nomination: 5 things to know Thursday

  Biden-Trump debate, Amy Coney Barrett SCOTUS nomination: 5 things to know Thursday Trump and Biden face-off in the final presidential debate, Senate panel to vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination and more things to start your Thursday.Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.

The US Senate has confirmed the appointment of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to fill the seat previously held by the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg as an associate justice on the US Supreme Court .

Which would make sense that a supreme court justice nominee that serves a lifetime appointment should have bipartisan support, you know if we had A terrible real world example of why it's important to vote the entire ballot, not just presidents or props. The Republican controlled Senate did this.

4. Magical Thinking: Because of the COVID-19 pandemic having spread to the Senate floor, the Senate was actually not in session while the Barrett confirmation hearings took place. How were senators both in session and not in session at the same time? Magic, I guess.

5. Anti-Life: Speaking of the pandemic, two members of the Judiciary Committee had COVID-19 during the confirmation process. One attended a hearing in person. Barrett’s nomination party was a super-spreader event. So much for “pro-life.” Meanwhile, the Senate did nothing to pass additional Coronavirus relief, because Majority Leader Mitch McConnell worried that however it went, the vote might hurt Republicans’ reelection chances.

6. Evasion: More than any other nominee in history, Justice Barrett dodged every question of any substance. She said nothing about Obamacare, abortion, even the peaceful transition of power.

Senate committee OKs Amy Coney Barrett. Here's what happens next in her Supreme Court confirmation

  Senate committee OKs Amy Coney Barrett. Here's what happens next in her Supreme Court confirmation The Senate Judiciary Committee approved Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to the Supreme Court. Here's what happens next.The Senate Judiciary Committee's 12 Republican members approved her nomination in a 12-0 vote, setting up a final vote Monday before the full Senate.

Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett introduced herself to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday afternoon, vowing to apply the law “as written” and telling lawmakers she believed courts were not “designed to solve every problem or right every wrong in our public life.” “The policy decisions and

Judge Amy Coney Barrett has been confirmed as the latest Supreme Court Justice, following a swift and controversial move by Republicans to swear her in ahead of the Senators began debating in a rare Sunday night session, where all Republicans planned to vote in favor of Barrett , except for Sen.

7. Denial: Despite Trump and the Republican platform explicitly promising that he would appoint judges to overturn Obamacare and Roe v. Wade, Republican senators, and Justice Barrett, clutched their pearls in astonishment that anyone would ever suggest such a thing.

8. Puppet Theater: Except for a brilliant half-hour lecture by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, hardly anyone mentioned the dark-money-funded networks, staffed by religious extremists, that have now placed three justices on the Supreme Court (and dozens on other courts) and that often bring the conservative-activist cases that their handpicked justices then decide.

9. Anti-Democracy: Republican presidents have now placed 15 of the last 19 justices on the court, despite losing the popular vote in 6 of the last 7 presidential elections. The Republican majority in the Senate represents 15 million fewer people than the Democrat minority. Our system, designed in the 18th century, never anticipated this.

And most importantly:

10. Delegitimization: Despite the best efforts of Chief Justice John Roberts, the Supreme Court has again lost legitimacy in the eyes of the American public. All three Trump justices are under a cloud: the first is in a seat stolen from President Obama; the second was pushed through despite serious rape allegations, which have only been further corroborated since his confirmation; and the third was appointed to the Court with all the seriousness and deliberation of a Las Vegas wedding.

Pack the court? Battles between Republicans and Democrats fuel clash over Supreme Court's future

  Pack the court? Battles between Republicans and Democrats fuel clash over Supreme Court's future The Constitution does not set the number of justices. Created in 1789 with six, the court has veered from five to 10, settling at nine 150 years ago.Fuming at what President Donald Trump and Republicans have done since 2016 to turn the court to the right, they could fight back with legislation, Senate rules changes – even by granting statehood (and two Senate seats) to the District of Columbia or Puerto Rico.

AMY Coney Barrett was formally sworn in Tuesday as the Supreme Court 's ninth justice, her oath administered by Chief Justice John Roberts. Her first votes on the court could include two big topics affecting the man who appointed her.

UP NEXT. NOW PLAYING: other.

And the reasons are transparently anti-democratic: to end abortion, same-sex marriage, Obamacare, civil rights laws, voting rights laws, environmental regulations, gun control, campaign finance regulations, compassionate immigration laws, labor laws, and all the other things that large majorities of Americans support and the Republican party opposes.

Make no mistake: All of these are on the Court’s docket, either now or in the immediate future, and if this 6-3 majority is allowed to stand, they will indeed end.

In the short term, Justice Barrett may rule on two pending election challenges from Republicans, who are trying to stop as many people from voting as they can. Just as the Senate was voting on her confirmation, Justice Brett Kavanaugh authored an opinion on a third one, throwing out an extended deadline for mail-in ballots in Wisconsin.

For good measure, Justice Kavanaugh cited Bush v. Gore, which he helped to litigate in 2000, for the principle that the Supreme Court can overturn state courts’ election-law decisions if need be. Because look how well that turned out the last time.

A similar case is pending from Pennsylvania after an earlier 4-4 deadlock, which Justice Barrett may now break. That’s right, Justice Barrett’s first act may be to make it harder for people to vote.

Senate to vote on Amy Coney Barrett's confirmation to Supreme Court following all-night Senate session

  Senate to vote on Amy Coney Barrett's confirmation to Supreme Court following all-night Senate session Judge Amy Coney Barrett is poised become the ninth justice on the Supreme Court on Monday, solidifying a 6-3 conservative majority on the high court.The Republican-led Senate is expected to confirm her to the Supreme Court in a vote Monday evening, capping off a sprint to place Barrett on the high court before Election Day over Democratic objections.

The Supreme Court’s ultra-conservative supermajority doesn’t think like America, doesn’t look like America (racially, religiously, or in countless other ways), and doesn’t interpret the Constitution in a way that makes sense in America. (“Originalism” is preposterously selective–to take but one example, there’s no right to corporate personhood, or even corporations existing, in the Constitution, because the Founders generally hated corporations and thought they shouldn’t exist. But try telling that to the “Originalists” on the Court.)

But then again, neither do Republicans. The Grand Old Party is looking especially Old these days, is likely to lose big in next week’s election, and if Republicans don’t find a way to broaden their appeal beyond Trump’s rabid base of non-college-educated, mostly-older white men, together with their wives and assorted religious extremists, they’re going to lose even bigger in elections to come.

That’s true even if their hand-picked Court allows them to gerrymander, suppress the vote, and allow unlimited dark money to manipulate our elections. Which it has already been doing. It just might take a little longer.

Fortunately, even moderate Democrats are now out for blood. After Garland/Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and now Barrett, there is growing support for increasing the size of the Court, imposing term limits on justices, or both. (My own proposal: immediate term limits for all justices, which would create two immediate vacancies.)

No doubt, Republicans will cry that Democrats are threatening the legitimacy of the Supreme Court. They’re exactly wrong. In fact, structural change is the only way to restore it.

Read more at The Daily Beast.

Fact check: There is no Sen. Rob Donaldson, so posts of his speech about Barrett are fake .
A post on new Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett originated as a hypothetical. It took off, with many people assuming it was from a real senator.Several Facebook posts shared in the wake of those hearings include a long comment appearing to be a transcript of a speech made by a Sen. Rob Donaldson before the committee.

usr: 8
This is interesting!