Opinion Trump Tells the Supreme Court It’s on His Election Team
USA TODAY/Suffolk Poll: Joe Biden leading Donald Trump by 7 points in pivotal Pennsylvania
A majority of likely Pennsylvania voters also said they do not support adding justices to the Supreme Court. "You start creating more justices to get the opinions you want," he said. "It's almost like 'well I gotta win and I'm just gonna create new facts.' " But Laws said that she supports adding justices to the Supreme Court, adding that it shouldn't be called court packing. "I believe it should be called court evening," Laws said. She said that she believes that the "minority shouldn't be ruling the majority," adding that the "the majority of the country is pro choice.
President Trump has spent weeks making increasingly undisguised pleas to the Supreme Court to hand him the election. He has predicted the election will be decided by the courts (“This scam that the Democrats are pulling — it’s a scam — the scam will be before the United States Supreme Court”) and demanded that Amy Coney Barrett should be seated in time to make a favorable decision on his behalf.
Around 3 a.m., Trump made an especially revealing plea directly to the Supreme Court’s justices:
If Sleepy Joe Biden is actually elected President, the 4 Justices (plus1) that helped make such a ridiculous win possible would be relegated to sitting on not only a heavily PACKED COURT, but probably a REVOLVING COURT as well. At least the many new Justices will be Radical Left!
Supreme Court lets Alabama ban curbside voting in November election
The unsuccessful challengers had pointed out the CDC recommends the practice "as a means of reducing the risk of spreading COVID-19 at the polls."Shorthanded following Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death, the court ruled 5-3, with the remaining three liberal justices dissenting.— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump)
This is a classic Trump appeal, formulated in terms of self-interest, which is the only form of motivation he believes humans are capable of acting upon. Trump is arguing that the Court should rule in his favor, because if Joe Biden wins, he will dilute the power of its incumbent members — either by packing the courts, or by implementing a reform that would rotate federal judges through the Supreme Court.
As Trump appeals go, this one isn’t bad. Biden probably won’t have the votes to pack the Court or even to implement a more modest reform. But he does support, and has promised to appoint a bipartisan commission to formulate a plan of action. So a Biden election certainly creates real risk for the Supreme Court.
Senate committee OKs Amy Coney Barrett. Here's what happens next in her Supreme Court confirmation
The Senate Judiciary Committee approved Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to the Supreme Court. Here's what happens next.The Senate Judiciary Committee's 12 Republican members approved her nomination in a 12-0 vote, setting up a final vote Monday before the full Senate.
But Trump’s argument also implicitly concedes that the Supreme Court has an interest in his election. That is in fact his entire point. Looked at from the opposite end, Trump’s claim can be seen as a confession that the Supreme Court has a serious conflict of interest that prevents it from adjudicating any election case fairly. One candidate is committed to preserving the power of its members, and the other is not.
Trump’s legal and political strategy is to prevent the tabulation of ballots that were mailed before November 3, and to count on Republican-appointed justices to rule in his favor on the basis of their shared interest in locking down a permanent Republican judicial majority. He’s just saying it out loud.
Fact check: Claim noting time between CARES Act and Barrett confirmation is true .
The Senate confirmed Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett in the fraction of the time it’s been considering a second coronavirus relief bill. © J. Scott Applewhite, AP Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., leaves the chamber after final roll call vote to put Amy Coney Barrett on the Supreme Court, at the Capitol in Washington, Monday, Oct. 26, 2020. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) On Oct.