•   
  •   
  •   

Opinion Inside Glenn Greenwald’s Blowup With The Intercept

22:00  30 october  2020
22:00  30 october  2020 Source:   nymag.com

The 'shocking' impact of COVID-19: Americans, young and old, have lost 2.5 million years of life, Harvard researcher says

  The 'shocking' impact of COVID-19: Americans, young and old, have lost 2.5 million years of life, Harvard researcher says COVID-19 has cost Americans 2.5 million years of life and roughly half that loss comes from people who died in middle age, Harvard scientist says.A world-class molecular biologist and geneticist, Elledge felt like people were ignoring an important aspect of the COVID-19 pandemic. They kept talking about how the only people dying were old and would have died soon anyway.

On Thursday, Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist Glenn Greenwald denounced The Intercept, the news outlet he co-founded six years ago, and announced his immediate resignation.

a man wearing glasses and looking at the camera: Andrew Burton/Getty Images © Andrew Burton/Getty Images Andrew Burton/Getty Images

Best known for his reporting on NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, Greenwald claimed The Intercept was deliberating silencing him to protect Joe Biden. “The final, precipitating cause [of my resignation] is that The Intercept’s editors, in violation of my contractual right of editorial freedom, censored an article I wrote this week, refusing to publish it unless I remove all sections critical of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, the candidate vehemently supported by all New-York-based Intercept editors involved in this effort at suppression,” Greenwald wrote in a Substack post detailing his reasons for leaving.

Trump Finally Slaps Google, and Protects Democracy

  Trump Finally Slaps Google, and Protects Democracy Sometimes Donald Trump does the right thing, even if it may be for the wrong reasons. His Justice Department’s late-term assault on Google for its monopolistic tyranny over search and digital advertising is precisely what is needed. Some may paint this as the last desperate act of a fading tyrant, but in reality it may be the most important move to protect democracy in recent years. The anti-trust suit, filed just weeks before the election, is the latest example of the growing gap between the tech oligarchy and Trump on issues including the H1-B visas big tech depends on to keep labor costs down, web censorship, and, of course, Trump’s trade war with Silicon Valley’s close

Greenwald’s claim that The Intercept is in the tank for Biden baffled many of his now-former colleagues. “I don’t know of anyone on the editorial staff who really likes Biden,” Intercept national security editor Vanessa Gezari told Intelligencer. Said another Intercept writer who requested anonymity: “If you look at the way lots of people on the site have written about Biden, the way he’s described the site and its vehement support of Biden is nonsense.”

And in a searing statement, Intercept editor in chief Betsy Reed mocked “the preposterous charge that The Intercept’s editors and reporters, with the lone, noble exception of Glenn Greenwald, have betrayed our mission to engage in fearless investigative journalism because we have been seduced by the lure of a Joe Biden presidency.” The Intercept is well-known for its hostility to the Democratic establishment in general and Biden in particular. Toward the end of the Democratic primary, The Intercept published numerous pieces about allegations of sexual harassment against Biden.

Amy Adams, Glenn Close talk their major Hillbilly Elegy transformations

  Amy Adams, Glenn Close talk their major Hillbilly Elegy transformations Plus, Adams reveals what she named her wig. Close and Adams are nearly unrecognizable in their parts, something they both credit the makeup and hair departments for. Close is certainly no stranger to major transformations. "I played numerous characters where you really are in character when you're in full drag," she admitted, citing her 101 Dalmatians and Albert Nobbs roles as examples. As Mamaw, she said she specifically didn't want to see her own face in the mirror.

While Greenwald’s sudden resignation shocked both his colleagues and the broader world of media, his eventual break with The Intercept was all but inevitable. Greenwald, who did not respond to requests for comment, had already begun to plan his post-Intercept career. According to his post on Substack, he had already spent months having preliminary talks with other journalists and potential financial backers about starting a new media outlet. “I’m frankly surprised that he lasted as long as he did, because he’s clearly not a team player,” Intercept deputy editor Roger Hodge told Intelligencer. “He’s not somebody who can submerge himself in an organization and be part of a larger whole.”

Since the very beginning, Greenwald has been separate from The Intercept’s newsroom, living in Brazil for over a decade, far away from the U.S.-based staff of The Intercept. As a result most of the staff had little to no interaction with Greenwald, according to Intercept staffers who spoke with Intelligencer. Even as The Intercept built itself into a full-fledged  news organization — complete with robust editing like the kind Greenwald balked at — Greenwald remained apart, writing and publishing his columns with little to no editorial oversight. “He could have chosen to be a part of the mix, part of the conversation, the daily, weekly conversation about what we should be covering and what stories we were working on,” Hodge said. “But he never did that. He always held himself aloof from the newsroom and never ever soiled himself with the day-to-day business of newsgathering.”

Glenn Greenwald accused media of 'elevating fear levels' about Trump and white supremacy to assert 'power and control'

  Glenn Greenwald accused media of 'elevating fear levels' about Trump and white supremacy to assert 'power and control' A top liberal political pundit says major media outlets in the United States are using President Trump and his supporters to drive up interest and money. © Provided by Washington Examiner During an interview released on Wednesday with podcast host Joe Rogan, Intercept co-founder Glenn Greenwald accused media outlets of overplaying the severity of domestic terrorist threats, claiming it enriches their institutions while exerting "power and control" over political conversations through moderation and censorship of wrongthink. "So many institutions are profiting, I don't just mean financially ...

Ryan Grim, The Intercept’s D.C. bureau chief, told Intelligencer that Greenwald’s conflict with The Intercept was part of a larger culture clash between Greenwald, a civil libertarian who objects in the strongest possible terms to any limitations on freedom of speech, and some of his younger, left-leaning colleagues, who believe that they have a responsibility to call out and try to shut down what they consider hateful or harmful speech. Greenwald wrote that he eventually concluded that The Intercept itself embraced this so-called “cancel culture,” reluctant to publish anything (such as his Biden column) that might lead to accusations of aiding Trump and his hateful supporters.

“There’s a phenomenon that exists everywhere from Corporate America to media where the politics of younger people are different from the politics of some of the older people in these places,” Grim said. “The whole ‘woke debate’ that is played out endlessly on Twitter, he felt like there was too much of that going on at The Intercept.”

Once such example is a previously unreported incident from November 2018, a group of Intercept staffers joined a virtual protest about Topic magazine, which was owned by the Intercept’s parent company, First Look Media. According to four First Look Media employees, the staffers went on the company’s Slack channel to object to Topic editor in chief Anna Holmes’s decision to publish a story about women who belonged to far-right groups, which included glamorous portraits of the women. The protest offended a number of senior Intercept editors including Greenwald, who objected to the targeting of Holmes, a Black woman, and the suggestion that certain articles shouldn’t be published. (Nothing came of the protest, but Topic was shuttered in 2019 for unrelated financial reasons.)

The Intercept Co-Founder Glenn Greenwald Resigns, Alleging ‘Censorship’ of Views ‘Critical’ of Joe Biden

  The Intercept Co-Founder Glenn Greenwald Resigns, Alleging ‘Censorship’ of Views ‘Critical’ of Joe Biden Greenwald wrote that the article his editors wanted to censor referred to newly-released documents pertaining to Joe Biden.Greenwald said he would continue publishing a freelance column, joining a number of journalists such as Matt Taibbi and Andrew Sullivan who have moved their work to the independent publishing platform Substack. Sullivan announced in July that he would leave New York Magazine, writing at the time that editors and writers at the publication were forced to commit to “critical theory in questions of race, gender, sexual orientation, and gender identity.

Following the protest, Greenwald published a column that very pointedly criticized “the growing so-called ‘online call-out culture’ in which people who express controversial political views are not merely critiqued but demonized online and then formally and institutionally punished after a mob consolidates in outrage, often targeting their employers with demands that they be terminated.”

Another flashpoint occurred in June of this year, when Intercept reporter Akela Lacy publicly called out her colleague Lee Fang for “racist” behavior, including tweets about violence and Black Lives Matter protests. While Fang later released a thoughtful apology, many outside commentators saw him as a victim of cancel culture. In his resignation essay, Greenwald specifically criticized The Intercept’s “decision to hang Lee Fang out to dry and even force him to apologize when a colleague tried to destroy his reputation by publicly, baselessly and repeatedly branding him a racist.” Fang did not respond to a request for comment.

These generational and cultural dynamics have divided a number of newsrooms during the Trump administration. The most well-known example occurred earlier this year, when a number of New York Times journalists publicly called out the paper’s opinion editor James Bennet for publishing an op-ed by Republican senator Tom Cotton which called on President Trump to deploy the U.S. military to major cities experiencing protests against police violence. The controversy over the op-ed cost Bennet his job and prompted Bari Weiss, a Times opinion editor who frequently inveighed against “cancel culture,” to publicly resign from the paper. In Greenwald’s view, The Intercept was founded in order to resist such censorious impulses but have since succumbed to them, as he put it in his resignation essay:

Roundup: Trevor Lawrence Tests Positive; Hologram Robert Kardashian Appears; ScarJo and Colin Jost Marry

  Roundup: Trevor Lawrence Tests Positive; Hologram Robert Kardashian Appears; ScarJo and Colin Jost Marry How sports owners give big politically without attaching their names Self-driving car fails at its one job Managing nursing homes at this time seems lik e an extremely difficult task .... How long until Andrew Cuomo loses all his momentum or has that already happened ... NFL Media's Erica Tamposi on her life as a gay woman in football ... Deadly terrorist knife attack in France ... Julian Edelman goes under the knife ... Imagining a sports world in 2030 ... The Chicago White Sox are really going to have Tony La Russa managing Tim Anderson ... Donald Trump building up quite a coalition of rappers ...

“Rather than offering a venue for airing dissent, marginalized voices and unheard perspectives, [The Intercept] is rapidly becoming just another media outlet with mandated ideological and partisan loyalties, a rigid and narrow range of permitted viewpoints (ranging from establishment liberalism to soft leftism, but always anchored in ultimate support for the Democratic Party), a deep fear of offending hegemonic cultural liberalism and center-left Twitter luminaries, and an overarching need to secure the approval and admiration of the very mainstream media outlets we created The Intercept to oppose, critique and subvert.”

The final straw for Greenwald was an editing dispute, though according to Hodge, it was less about specific edits and more about the fact that he was being edited at all.

“Glenn considers editing censorship,” Hodge said. “That’s his general position. He regards any editorial intervention as censorship.”

Hodge told New York magazine that Greenwald’s opinion columns were not subject to any editing, but his reported pieces — including his investigations into animal cruelty — were subject to editing and legal review. Greenwald’s main editor on the non-political pieces was Peter Maass, a veteran journalist who joined The Intercept shortly after its founding in 2014. In light of the high-profile and controversial nature of Greenwald’s planned column on Hunter Biden, Intercept editor in chief Betsy Reed told Greenwald that Maass would edit the column.

On Tuesday, Maass sent a lengthy memo to Greenwald, outlining what he said were the draft’s strengths and weaknesses and suggesting that he adopt a sharper focus on media criticism rather than litigate questionable evidence of Joe Biden’s corruption based on purported documents from his son Hunter published by the New York Post.

Glenn Greenwald: The Intercept didn't want articles that would 'reflect negatively on Joe Biden'

  Glenn Greenwald: The Intercept didn't want articles that would 'reflect negatively on Joe Biden' Glenn Greenwald, co-founder of the news site The Intercept, said Friday that he resigned from the publication in order to maintain his "editorial freedom," adding that editors were wary of publishing articles of his that were critical of Democratic nominee Joe Biden."I would never accept somebody telling me that I can't publish my views or perspectives without having other people first agree with what it is that I'm saying," Greenwald told"I would never accept somebody telling me that I can't publish my views or perspectives without having other people first agree with what it is that I'm saying," Greenwald told Hill.TV's "Rising.

Greenwald viewed Maass’ memo as an attempt to censor him.

“I want to note clearly, because I think it’s so important for obvious reasons, that this is the first time in fifteen years of my writing about politics that I’ve been censored – i.e., told by others that I can’t publish what I believe or think – and it’s happening less than a week before a presidential election, and this censorship is being imposed by editors who eagerly want the candidate I’m writing about critically to win the election,” he wrote in an email to Maass on Wednesday morning, which he later published on Substack where he’ll continue to write on a subscription basis.

Rather than revise the piece in line with Maass’ suggestions, Greenwald said that he wanted to exercise an option in his contract to publish the piece outside of The Intercept. After Intercept editor in chief Betsy Reed told Greenwald to say that it would be “unfortunate and detrimental to The Intercept” if he published the story for another outlet, Greenwald decided to resign.

Greenwald joins a number of big-name writers who have recently left mainstream publications and found homes on Substack. In April, Rolling Stone columnist Matt Taibbi moved his regular column from the magazine to his personal Substack (though he continues to contribute feature stories to Rolling Stone). And in June, former New York writer Andrew Sullivan launched his own Substack newsletter.

Not only may Substack be able to give Greenwald the kind of six-figure salary he had at The Intercept, it may be able to give him something even more valuable — the ability to publish whatever he wants, free of any editorial oversight and colleagues who hold a different view of speech.

“Glenn’s idea of The Intercept was a chorus of Glenns, people who agree with Glenn,” Hodge said. “That was his vision, and that was why he became increasingly frustrated with the newsroom.”

Intercept co-founder Jeremy Scahill says long-term damage is already done even if Trump loses .
Jeremy Scahill, co-founder of The Intercept, said on Thursday that the Republicans have already won regardless of whether President Trump wins reelection.Speaking with Hill.TV's "Rising" host Krystal Ball, Scahill explained that Trump has acted as a "Trojan horse" for an agenda that the Republican Party would have never been able to push if they had former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (R) or Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) as a presidential candidate.

usr: 3
This is interesting!