Opinion ‘White Women Voted for Trump’ Is the Worst Election Trope

16:05  01 december  2020
16:05  01 december  2020 Source:   nymag.com

Fact check: Claims on Clarence Thomas, Supreme Court and role in election are partly false

  Fact check: Claims on Clarence Thomas, Supreme Court and role in election are partly false Partly false posts claim Joe Biden tried to destroy reputation of Clarence Thomas, who is 'in control' of Supreme Court, which will decide election.In fact, amid the confirmation fight over Justice Amy Coney Barrett in September, Trump told reporters, "I think this will end up in the Supreme Court, and I think it's very important that we have nine justices," per USA TODAY.

The idea that a majority of white woman voted for Trump has become a meme ever since the 2016 election , featured in countless arguments that make sweeping claims about its meaning. (Ironically, the thing the exits are worst for—determining the demographic breakdown of the electorate— is the

The women who voted for Donald Trump - Продолжительность: 2:05 Quartz 17 965 просмотров. To The Women Supporting Donald Trump …

White women voted for Trump. Or so you have probably heard. In the immediate aftermath of Donald Trump’s 2016 victory, the finding from early exit polls that 53 percent of white women voted for Trump formed the basis for a million social-media posts, op-eds, and rally placards. That this “fact” is not true is not even close to the biggest problem with its ubiquitous place in progressive social-justice discourse.

a group of people in front of a crowd posing for the camera: Mark Ralston/AFP via Getty Images © Mark Ralston/AFP via Getty Images Mark Ralston/AFP via Getty Images

In the immediate aftermath of the 2016 election, Slate’s L.V. Anderson articulated what would become a ubiquitous theme in the social-justice media world: “White women sold out their fellow women, their country, and themselves last night.”

Republican National Committee, Michigan GOP ask state board to delay certifying election results

  Republican National Committee, Michigan GOP ask state board to delay certifying election results Michigan's elections board recommended certification, saying Detroit had fewer problems than the August primary and the 2016 presidential election. "As in past elections, some jurisdictions made errors in reporting unofficial results," the report said. "These errors are all attributable to human error in the operation of tools used to report unofficial results, did not affect the actual tabulation of votes, and were identified and corrected.

Early data suggest a clear majority of white women voted Republican, and supporters say Trump ’s offensive remarks didn’t affect their decision.

More than half of white women voted for the man who bragged about committing sexual assault on tape, who said he would appoint Supreme Court justices who would overturn Any woman who has had or might need an abortion, but who still voted for Trump , is guilty of the worst kind of selfishness.

The 53 percent figure turned out to be erroneous, and corrected analyses eventually pegged Trump’s share of the white female electorate closer to 47 percent. Nonetheless, the impulse that propelled so many writers to blame white women for electing Trump proved strong enough to survive even after the factual basis was undercut. Indeed, left-wing opinion writers continued churning out polemics based on the erroneous 53 percent figure for years. The production line has kept running right through the 2020 elections, which have yielded more shaky early-exit-poll data that has been turned into another round of flagellation of white women for their alleged collective sin.

A Washington Post op-ed by Lyz Lenz, headlined “White Women Vote Republican. Get Used to It, Democrats.,” uses white women’s alleged support for Trump to urge Democrats to stop focusing on winning them. Lenz bemoans “the amount of money and effort that went to flip suburban women, who had no intention of voting Democratic at all, while other groups of voters were taken for granted.”

Election 2020 updates: Michigan elections board faces deadlock; Trump requests recount in Georgia

  Election 2020 updates: Michigan elections board faces deadlock; Trump requests recount in Georgia Trump's efforts to change the election outcome continue this week with Michigan scheduled to certify its results on Monday and Nevada on Tuesday.Be sure to refresh this page often to get the latest information on the election and the transition.

Our general election was a fraud. The methods and manners of election fraud are numerous. The talking heads and progressive socialists continue to blather that there is no evidence In Michigan and Wisconsin, these unchecked, unverified ballots showed 138,339 voted for Biden and zero for Trump .

Trump won the election last night, taking Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and North Carolina, among anchor states like Florida and Texas. The TCF Center, formerly Cobo Hall, is where the absentee ballots are counted for Wayne County, which is the home of Detroit.

Lenz’s argument strings together a series of factual and logical missteps, each compounding the last. First, even after acknowledging that the 2016 exit polls showing Trump won white voters were wrong, she uses the 2020 exit polls anyway. (“Exit polling indicates that Trump’s support had increased among White women.”) Lenz then concedes the figure could, at some point, be “adjusted,” without considering the high probability that the adjustment will in fact negate her premise.

Second, she treats the supposed failure of white women to turn against Trump as a reason Democrats should do less to try to win their votes, while proceeding to treat Trump’s gains among nonwhite voters as a reason Democrats should do more to win their votes. Of course, the whole idea that political parties should ignore constituencies they don’t win is quite odd, but Lenz doesn’t even apply an internally consistent standard to her self-defeating principle.

Fact check: Trump lawyer Sidney Powell falsely stated he won election 'by a landslide'

  Fact check: Trump lawyer Sidney Powell falsely stated he won election 'by a landslide' A meme correctly quotes onetime Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell. But her assertion that he won the election "by a landslide" is false.“We are not going to be intimidated. We are not going to back down. We are going to clean this mess up. President Trump won by a landslide and we are going to prove it. We are going to reclaim the United States of America,” reads a Facebook meme.

With Pennsylvania, Trump is at 265 electoral votes . And that means Trump only needs one other state to clinch the win. Publicly voice your support for Trump to continue fighting the fraud and fighting for America. We are just one state away from victory against the communists, the globalists

The Trump campaign issued a statement Sunday night announcing Sidney Powell is not a member of President Trump ’s legal team. Sidney is staying the course to prove the massive deliberate election fraud that robbed the American people of our votes for President Trump and many Republican

The most fundamental problem with Lenz’s argument is revealed in her dismissive suggestion “White women are not a swing voting bloc.” The word swing applies to states in the Electoral College. Because the system awards votes on a winner-takes-all basis, states that might swing from one candidate to another command most of the resources. Demographic blocs don’t work like that. It doesn’t matter if you “win” white women or Latino men or any other constituency. The margins are what matter.

Lenz is hardly alone in this fallacy. What makes her column worthy of close analysis is not that her reasoning is uniquely wrong but that it’s unremarkably so.

The conceptual fallacy undergirding all these polemics is a reduction of every facet of human thought to race and gender, so that — when taken to an extreme, which it often is — a person’s beliefs and actions simply reflect the identity category to which they belong. The “white women voted for Trump” genre is simply a political application of the anti-racism liturgy that diversity trainers like Robin DiAngelo have so profitably spread, with its quasi-religious tropes and emphasis on rituals of confession and expurgation of sin.

Fact check: Nevada's AG did not admit to changing signature verification manually in election

  Fact check: Nevada's AG did not admit to changing signature verification manually in election A claim that Nevada's attorney general admitted to changing signature verification for thousands of votes is false.One Facebook user on Nov. 16 claimed: "Nevada AG Admits to Changing Signature Verifications Manually for Over 200,000 Votes.

For instance:

As a young white woman, I realize that white women did not do the work needed to keep Mr. Trump, and his boasts about sexual harassment, from the White House. They did not rise to the uncomfortable challenge of convincing other white women to support not just their own interests, but those of women and men of color, L.G.B.T. Americans, immigrants and people in poverty.

Or (in a column headlined “White Women Need to Admit We Let This Happen”):

How could white women have let this happen? … Our white privilege has us convinced that whatever happens next will not happen to us. We think our privilege will protect us.

The dogma can run so deep that its adherents who observe different political viewpoints within the “white female” category literally cannot make any sense of it. One column concluded that the white female participation in anti-Trump demonstrations must have been deceptive:

Following the 2016 election, an estimated three million women turned out in droves to protest Trump’s inauguration. Yet following the most recent election, and seeing white women’s support for Trump increase, that turnout feels performative.

Obviously, there’s no contradiction whatsoever between the facts that a subset of the white female demographic has left-wing views, expressed through attending protests and buying anti-racist books, while the total universe of white female voters could be more conservative. (Again, it isn’t: The exit-poll finding about rising white female support for Trump is almost certainly false.)

Trump slams 60 Mins for 'ridiculous, one-sided' interview

  Trump slams 60 Mins for 'ridiculous, one-sided' interview By Tim ReidLOS ANGELES, Nov 27 (Reuters) - The top U.S. cybersecurity official fired by Republican President Donald Trump for saying the Nov. 3 electionChris Krebs, a lifelong Republican, was fired by Donald Trump by tweet on November 17, after he declared the election to be 'the most secure in American history.

Here’s another, juxtaposing demand for anti-racist books this past summer against the supposed increase in white female support for Trump:

We received countless anti-racism book orders. And yet, despite all of the learning that supposedly took place via these books, in early November 2020 exit polls stated that among white women, Trump still held their support: An estimated 55 percent of white women voted for Trump. This is at least a two-point increase for this demographic since the previous election.

It’s not mysterious at all to imagine that some white women might have political views left wing enough to read radical books about racism, while the majority of white women might be conservative enough to vote for Trump. The population of anti-racist-book buyers is a fraction of the size of the electorate. It’s only a contradiction if you assume white women are a singular unit.

There is certainly value in prodding people who enjoy privilege to examine how being white, or male, or wealthy affords them privilege. But the crudest version of this practice flattens every other individuating characteristic into a simple binary experience of privilege versus oppression. Only a person who has been deeply inculcated into this pattern of thought would consider it normal to apologize for the fact that other people who share her skin color and gender voted differently than she did.

Even if you somehow assume that forcing people who voted Republican to apologize constitutes a viable political strategy, forcing Democrats to apologize because they share demographic traits with people who voted Republican surely does not.

President Trump seeks to join Supreme Court lawsuit challenging election results in 4 key states .
The president did not present evidence of fraud. To back up his request, he cited partisan polls purporting to show Americans distrust the election.Attorneys for the president asked the justices to let Trump intervene in a lawsuit brought by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and endorsed by 17 other Republican state attorneys general that claims the four battleground states illegally expanded mail-in balloting that helped President-elect Joe Biden.

usr: 0
This is interesting!