Opinion The US should help Palestinians vote regardless of potential outcomes

22:50  15 april  2021
22:50  15 april  2021 Source:   thehill.com

Colts eager to see what second-year QB Jacob Eason can do with full offseason work

  Colts eager to see what second-year QB Jacob Eason can do with full offseason work Indianapolis hasn't signed a veteran backup, but the Colts have also been consistent that Jacob Eason's evaluation is incomplete.Carson Wentz will get almost all of the attention, and rightfully so, as Indianapolis bets hard that Frank Reich can get Wentz back to the player he was before an ugly 2020 season made him available on the trade market.

The ghost of 2006 hangs heavy over the heads of United States policymakers anticipating Palestinian elections scheduled for May 22. Hamas's surprise victory over a divided Fatah in 2006 upended the plans of those within the Bush administration who had advocated for allowing the elections to proceed, notwithstanding the participation of a group designated as a foreign terrorist organization. When the results became evident, the United States and its Quartet partners adopted a series of conditions for future engagement, which Hamas has never come close to meeting.

a man standing in front of a crowd: The US should help Palestinians vote regardless of potential outcomes © Getty Images The US should help Palestinians vote regardless of potential outcomes

Today, the United States attitude toward the upcoming elections can best be described as ambivalent. The Biden administration has not issued any statements welcoming the elections as a much-needed expression of the democratic will of Palestinian population. Indeed, many believe that the United States would prefer a postponement of the elections to avoid an anticipated Hamas victory, which would inevitably complicate efforts to revive a diplomatic dialogue that ruptured during four years of Trump administration hostility toward the Palestinians.

Voter fraud has swung election outcomes, but narrative-obsessed media can't admit it

  Voter fraud has swung election outcomes, but narrative-obsessed media can't admit it The New York Times has adopted wholesale the Democratic Party's line on voter fraud and election laws and isn't trying to hide it. David Leonhardt, in his April 7 newsletter, flatly misled his readers, favoring narrative over facts. © Provided by Washington Examiner Leonhardt wrote, as if undisputed fact, the following false assertion: “Voter fraud is exceedingly rare. There is no reason to believe it has determined the outcome of a single U.S. election in decades.” No reason? None?Just two years ago, North Carolina had to re-do its 9th District congressional election because of (Republican) voter fraud.

While the dilemma posed by a potential Hamas electoral victory is real, the administration's current posture is a mistake. First, 2006 should not be the sole reference point for projecting the outcome. Forty percent plus of the registered Palestinian electorate have never voted according to an analysis by the National Democratic Institute and providing this group a "voice" could change Palestinian political dynamics in a dramatic fashion.

Second, the new election system is now similar to Israel - based on proportional representation within a single national constituency. This system is much more forgiving of a now even more divided Fatah. Thus, unlike 2006, where the multi-member district election system severely impacted Fatah's electoral prospects, the current system will place an emphasis, again much like in Israel, on post-election negotiations among Fatah factions, as well as with Hamas and others.

Blinken resumes funding for Palestinians as lawmakers decry terrorist payments

  Blinken resumes funding for Palestinians as lawmakers decry terrorist payments Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced the United States will renew aid for Palestinians, touting the funding as a valuable humanitarian gesture that supports peace talks despite Republican complaints that Palestinian officials finance terrorism. © Provided by Washington Examiner “U.S. foreign assistance for the Palestinian people serves important U.S. interests and values,” Blinken said Wednesday. “It provides critical relief to those in great need, fosters economic development, and supports Israeli-Palestinian understanding, security coordination, and stability.

Third, the Israeli election results, with the inclusion of a far-right party in the Knesset and potentially in a new coalition, may provide political maneuverability for the United States in terms of engaging with a government that includes Hamas. Specifically, the United States can remain adamant about not interacting with Hamas officials in or outside a new government, while maintaining constructive relations with the non-Hamas ministers in the Palestinian Authority. This model has been used by the United States in Lebanon, where Hezbollah has participated in several recent governments, and a variant is being contemplated in the context of a prospective role for the Taliban in Afghanistan.

Finally, as in all peace process contexts, the United States should consider mechanisms for encouraging the most radical outliers to join negotiations. A revised framework for engagement might recognize that Hamas is unlikely to change their charter in the short term, but that their presence at the negotiating table is essential to improve prospects for a longer-term peace. In applying this new framework, the United States would insist that Hamas refrains from committing acts of violence and permits negotiations based on the framework established by the Palestinian Liberation Organization agreements with the United States and Israel.

Washington resumes aid to the Palestinians, defends a two-state solution

 Washington resumes aid to the Palestinians, defends a two-state solution © provided by the L ES announced on Wednesday the recovery of their help to the Palestinians, against the opinion of Israel , and reaffirmed their support for a two-state solution, refocusing their position compared to that adopted by Donald Trump . This assistance to the UN agency that deals with Palestinian refugees will reach $ 235 million. In detail, the United States will again contribute to the financing of this agency of $ 150 million.

No doubt, a dramatic Hamas electoral victory would upend prospects for serious reengagement, but at least then the United States could justifiably explain a posture of "disengagement" until the political dynamics change. But a postponement of the elections also would have negative consequences: increased Palestinian population frustration and retention of the same leaders as primary interlocutors.

Even without encouragement from the United States, Palestinians have a ready excuse for postponing the elections. Based on prior precedents, they are insisting that Israel allow a certain number of Jerusalemites to physically cast their ballots at post offices within Jerusalem's municipal borders. To date, Israel has shown no inclination to authorize such a procedure and the international community is unlikely to exert pressure on Israel to do so.

Given current political realities, the Palestinian leadership should accept, even while duly contesting the political implications, that interested Palestinian residents of Jerusalem will have to vote outside the municipal borders or to postpone the election. Indeed, during the 2006 elections, a colleague working for United Nations Development Program on Palestinian elections told me just over 3000 Palestinians voted in Jerusalem post offices as compared to 15,000 who voted outside the municipal boundary; thus, the preclusion of voting at post offices will have limited substantive impact on the outcome. Moreover, in this pandemic year, many countries have adopted creative approaches to extend voting rights when in-person voting at a nearby polling site proves impractical.

The current divided governance structure creates real hardship for ordinary Palestinians and the next generation deserves an electoral voice. Postponing the elections now, which would accelerate the continued drifting apart of Gaza and the West Bank, would compromise the Palestinian cause and would be detrimental to the prospects for peace. The United States and other international actors should encourage the Palestinians to proceed.

Larry Garber is an international election expert and the former USAID West Bank/Gaza Mission Director.

Tony Blair Fast Facts .
Read CNN's Fast Facts and learn about the life of former British Prime Minister Tony Blair. © Provided by CNN PersonalBirth date: May 6, 1953 Birth place: Edinburgh, ScotlandBirth name: Anthony Charles Lynton BlairFather: Leo Charles Blair, a lawyerMother: Hazel (Corscadden) BlairMarriage: Cherie (Booth) Blair (1980-present)Children: Leo, Kathryn, Nicholas and EuanEducation: St. John's College, Oxford, B.A., 1975Religion: Roman CatholicOther FactsAlthough born in Scotland, Blair spent most of his childhood in Durham, England.

usr: 0
This is interesting!