Opinion Kirsten Gillibrand’s Finally Winning Her Sexual Assault War With the Pentagon

03:25  04 may  2021
03:25  04 may  2021 Source:   thedailybeast.com

The big Pentagon internet mystery now partially solved

  The big Pentagon internet mystery now partially solved BOSTON (AP) — A very strange thing happened on the internet the day President Joe Biden was sworn in. A shadowy company residing at a shared workspace above a Florida bank announced to the world’s computer networks that it was now managing a colossal, previously idle chunk of the internet owned by the U.S. Department of Defense. That real estate has since more than quadrupled to 175 million addresses — about 1/25th the size of the current internet. ”It is massive. That is the biggest thing in the history of the internet,” said Doug Madory, director of internet analysis at Kentik, a network operating company.

Kirsten Gillibrand , appointed to fill Hillary Clinton’s New York seat in 2009, had been a rising star for a decade before her messy 2020 run for president , overplay of the woman card, and reluctance for nearly three months to join calls for Gov Andrew Cuomo to resign over serious charges of What’s changed, other than patience with the Pentagon , is a surprising convert to the cause in Republican Sen. Joni Ernst. She , who came to Washington to castrate pigs at the trough, has jumped into Gillibrand ’ s foxhole at the same time Sen. Claire McCaskill, an old ally turned skeptic, has departed.

Furthermore, Gillibrand has taken aim at the Pentagon ’ s supposed effort to ensure accountability. She says she asked the DoD for records on alleged sexual assaults last year, and 10 months later had only received a fraction of what she requested. Today, I've released a new military sexual assault At a Pentagon briefing held in connection with the release of last week’ s report, Dr Nathan Galbreath, senior executive adviser for the Pentagon ’ s Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office, said the military study offers an unusual glimpse into how sex crimes are perpetrated on male service members.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, appointed to fill Hillary Clinton’s New York seat in 2009, had been a rising star for a decade before her messy 2020 run for president, overplay of the woman card, and reluctance for nearly three months to join calls for Gov Andrew Cuomo to resign over serious charges of sexual misconduct—even though Ms. MeToo had led the march to force out Minnesota senator Al Franken of SNL fame over significantly less troubling charges.

a statue of a person walking down a city street: Bill Clark/Getty © Provided by The Daily Beast Bill Clark/Getty

But if hypocrisy held a person back forever, the Senate would be a lonely place. Now Gillibrand’s about to light up the sky. After years of challenging the defense establishment for its failure to control sexual assault in the military, she’s poised to succeed this year with her solution: remove sexual assault cases from the chain of command, where they go to die, and put them in the hands of trained military prosecutors where military justice could prove less of an oxymoron.

The unexpected Pentagon chief

  The unexpected Pentagon chief A media-shy Lloyd Austin works behind the scenes to carry out the president's plans.For Austin, a physically imposing but soft-spoken and intensely private man, this was not the plan. After retiring from the military as a four-star general in 2016, Austin settled into the private sector. He never built the traditional Washington political network, or campaigned for a post in the administration.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand arrives for a Capitol Hill news conference on sexual harassment, Dec. Her campaign has earned her some powerful enemies in the Pentagon , but Gillibrand makes no apology. She flew to Los Angeles to meet with the filmmakers over dinner, and took on the issue

Kirsten Gillibrand came up short Thursday in her yearlong campaign to overhaul military sexual - assault policies, falling five votes short of the 60 needed to overcome a filibuster. The New York Democrat’s bill, which would have removed the chain of command from prosecuting sexual assaults and other major military crimes, was derailed in the Senate on a 55-45 vote , closing out one chapter in a debate Gillibrand ’ s campaign went down to the final hours and minutes before the vote, and the outcome remained uncertain to the end as about a half-dozen Republicans and one Democrat — Sen.

What’s changed, other than patience with the Pentagon, is a surprising convert to the cause in Republican Sen. Joni Ernst. She, who came to Washington to castrate pigs at the trough, has jumped into Gillibrand’s foxhole at the same time Sen. Claire McCaskill, an old ally turned skeptic, has departed. McCaskill, a former prosecutor and powerful member of Senate Armed Services, agreed wholeheartedly with Gillibrand’s take on the problem but broke ranks with her on the solution of stripping commanding officers of their authority. Many members shared her reservations, and they, joined by others who would rather eat glass than challenge the military with bases in their states, killed the bill.

Fast-forward to this Congress. McCaskill is now legislating on MSNBC (she lost to Biden-denier Josh Hawley in 2018). The Pentagon, after years of “there, there Senator Gillibrand, we got this” has moved closer to the analysis of former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey, that someone accused of sexual assault “with a rack of ribbons and four deployments and a Purple Heart, there is certainly the risk that we might be a little too forgiving of that particular crime.”

Senators introduce bill to change how military sexual assault cases are prosecuted

  Senators introduce bill to change how military sexual assault cases are prosecuted A bipartisan group of lawmakers announced a plan to overhaul the way the US military responds to sexual assault cases, arguing it's time to change the way the cases are prosecuted to finally change a pervasive culture within the ranks of the US military. © Pool Lawmakers seen Thursday announcing the new legislation targetting sexual assaults in the military. On Thursday, Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, Republican Sens. Chuck Grassley and Joni Ernst and others introduced a new bill aimed at cracking down on sexual assault in the military.

Gillibrand said that the number of sex crimes occurring in the U. S . military community is far greater than the Defense Department publicly reported. In an analysis of 107 sexual assault cases, Gillibrand said she found punishments to be too lenient. Information: New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (pictured) said in a scathing critique Monday that the Pentagon has refused to provide her information about sexual assaults at several major U. S . military bases. The senator said her analysis of 107 sexual assault cases found punishments that were too lenient and the word of the alleged assailant

Gillibrand ' s year-long battle to change the Pentagon reporting structure for sexual assault and rape fell short Thursday of the votes it needed to reach the Senate floor Photograph: Charles Dharapak / AP Photograph: Charles Dharapak/AP. The Pentagon ’s culture of disrespect and permissive behavior has burgeoned into sexual scandals and increased incidents of assault . Maybe you already know the recent history, but Thursday’s failed vote should be a reminder as reform seeks a new path toward law

Not just a little. An ugly report out of Fort Hood in Texas last year shows how dire the situation is. “Vulnerable and preyed upon” female soldiers exist in “survival mode,” afraid to report attacks, ostracized when they do, officers ignoring or covering up crimes, including an appalling number of suicides and murders.

Fort Hood is a chilling example of what the Pentagon finds when it takes the trouble to look. Every two years, the Pentagon conducts an anonymous survey to learn what’s really going on. In 2018, it found that more than 20,000 service members experienced some from of sexual assault, but only a third filed a formal complaint, an alarming lack of faith in the system. On top of that, of the 7,825 cases actually reported in 2019, a mere 7 percent ended in conviction.

Enter Ernst, with a haversack of cred to speak to the problem: a conservative, a gung-ho combat veteran—she calls herself the first female combat veteran elected to the Senate—a survivor of sexual abuse with a daughter at West Point texting her what it’s like on the ground. No wonder Gillibrand told the New York Times this week that “Adding Joni Ernst to this bill is the defining moment for passing it.”

Mullen now supports removing commanders from sexual assault prosecutions

  Mullen now supports removing commanders from sexual assault prosecutions Retired Adm. Michael Mullen says he now supports removing commanders from sexual assault prosecutions. "I'm at a point now where I am ready to support removal, which is a huge step for me because I recognize how serious that issue is," Mullen told Politico. "We just can't keep doing what we're doing because it hasn't worked."Mullen's comments come after Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) on Thursday released a bill with bipartisan support that would take away the power of military commanders to decide if a sexual assault case should be prosecuted.

Kirsten Gillibrand ’ s staff has been keeping a large whiteboard whip chart to tally her uphill fight for a military sexual assault measure. On Friday, her staff made a big change to the chart – and to Gillibrand ’ s momentum: They moved Sen. Rand Paul’s name from the “maybe” category into the She met at the Pentagon and in her Senate office with military leaders like Marine Corps Commandant Gen. James Amos and Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh, as well as lawyers from the Judge Advocate General’s Corps representing the different service branches. She also talked with the

Kirsten Gillibrand and Republican Sen. * Finally * elected leaders from both sides of the aisle are seeing the obvious: our military fails to effectively hold themselves to account with sexual assault cases. But military sexual assault survivors have made it clear — the status quo has to

Not a moment too soon. It’s been a long hard slog since Gillibrand first held eye-opening hearings on the epidemic of sexual crimes in the military, one soldier on another, on bases, in military towns, even in the Pentagon parking lot. Sexual assaults among the troops don't get the attention of those in Hollywood but the men with stripes flashing their power differential night and day is a pervasive, extenuating circumstance. Imagine one of Harvey Weinstein’s victims having to salute in the morning, drop, and give him 20. The setting for the attacks isn’t a hallway in a restaurant or an office, however menacing. The most dangerous place for a private, Gillibrand said, isn’t the battlefield but the path to the latrine at night.

But report that encounter and a service member is abused twice: first by the assault and then by friendly fire, official and unofficial; she is shunned by bunkmates drilled in basic training to respect their superiors. Gillibrand had to convince the military she wasn’t accusing COs of being bad people but of being naturally biased, far more likely to have a drink at the officers’ club with the perpetrator they can’t believe would do such a thing than the victim, usually junior to her (or sometimes his) attacker. Until recent adjustments, a commanding officer could, with the swipe of a pen, overturn a guilty verdict in a court martial. Even the Secretary of Defense couldn’t reverse it.

The Pentagon's Inspector General Is Investigating the Pentagon's UFO Investigation Program

  The Pentagon's Inspector General Is Investigating the Pentagon's UFO Investigation Program The military UFO plot has, somehow, thickened yet again: The Inspector General of the Department of Defense is itself investigating the Pentagon’s program to investigate reports of unidentified aerial phenomena. © Screenshot: To The Stars Academy of Arts & Science (Fair Use) The top investigatory and oversight watchdog at the Pentagon announced the “subject evaluation” in a light-on-details letter that clarified its scope is to “determine the extent to which the DoD has taken actions regarding Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP).

Changes have been made at the margins. A commanding officer has to jump through more hoops to undo a verdict, a victim is entitled to an attorney, a conviction means an automatic dishonorable discharge, and there’s an effort to move a victim to another post while charges work their way slowly up the chain.

But to solve the problem at the heart of sexual assaults—with ramifications domestic and foreign, for wars, hot and cold—it will take an act of Congress, namely inserting Gillibrand’s 2013 bill into this year’s National Defense Authorization Act. A New York Times survey of lawmakers found that those who hesitated to inject an independent judge advocate into the process have waited long enough for the military to come around. They are set to vote with Gillibrand.

And that’s the making of a supernova. A member of Congress, if wise and dogged and lucky enough, might get one big piece of legislation per lifetime. It’s fortunate that Gillibrand’s presidential race went nowhere and she returned to her unfinished work in the Senate. Not since gays were allowed to wear the uniform has institutional change of such magnitude been possible. Maybe not tomorrow but someday, the generals will salute her.

Read more at The Daily Beast.

Trump’s VA Secretary missed chance to save sick veterans, critics say .
Former Trump administration Veterans Affairs Secretary Robert Wilkie grew up at Fort Bragg surrounded by Vietnam veterans affected by the toxic chemical Agent Orange. His father, too, was grievously wounded in Vietnam. Still, when given the chance to change policies at the Department of Veterans Affairs to help post-9/11 service members suffering from diseases related to toxic chemical exposure, critics say he chose not to. © Provided by Washington Examiner In an exclusive interview with the Washington Examiner, Wilkie said he did not know if he had the authority to make such changes, and he “would have to go back and look.

usr: 0
This is interesting!