Opinion The Conservative Disinformation Campaign Against Nikole Hannah-Jones
The UNC tenure controversy is a lot bigger than Nikole Hannah-Jones (and she knows it)
The opacity is particularly thick for faculty of color, men and women alike, who are less likely than their white counterparts to be hired in the first place, let alone tenured. The UNC board of trustees cited Hannah-Jones’ lack of a “traditional academic-type” background in its rejection — although many tenured and tenure-track university positions, from business schools to the arts and humanities, do not require traditional credentials like doctorate degrees. Besides, the Knight Foundation endowment program is designed specifically to attract leading reporters, not communications scholars.
There was no reason to think Nikole Hannah-Jones’ tenure wouldn’t come through. Hannah-Jones, an acclaimed journalist, was recruited for a tenured Knight chair in race and investigative journalism in the University of North Carolina’s Hussman School of Journalism and Media, a position designed to bring professionals to campus. With 20 years of newsroom experience, a Pulitzer Prize, and a MacArthur “genius” grant, Hannah-Jones’ case sailed through the lengthy and rigorous tenure process and was approved by the school, the university, and the provost. We both teach at UNC—Daniel at the Hussman school—and were thrilled to have Hannah-Jones on campus.
EU beefs up disinformation code to prevent digital ad profit
LONDON (AP) — European Union officials unveiled plans Wednesday to beef up the bloc's code of practice on online disinformation, with the aim of preventing digital ad companies from profiting off of “fake news.” EU officials said they were strengthening the three-year-old voluntary code to make it more effective at fighting the false information flooding tech platforms. “We want to cut the systemic producers of disinformation off the money,” Vera Jourova, a vice president of the European Commission whose brief includes rule of law issues and disinformation, said in Brussels during a media briefing.
But then her tenure case reached the university’s conservative majority Board of Trustees, where it apparently lingered without action. In the end, the board took the of the case at all. When the news became public, there was a . Hannah-Jones’ legal team gave the Board of Trustees to reconsider tenure. Why, despite all her qualifications, did the Board of Trustees refuse to grant Hannah-Jones tenure?
Democrats fight to keep up with the changing landscape of political disinformation
Democrats are bracing for a deluge of disinformation in next year's midterm elections, and they view leading Republicans, not foreign actors or armies of online trolls, as the biggest disinformation threat. © OLIVIER DOULIERY/AFP/Getty Images In this January 6, 2021, file photo, supporters of President Donald Trump are seen from behind scaffolding as they gather outside the US Capitol's Rotunda in Washington.
The answer seems to lie in conservative disinformation campaigns against Hannah-Jones, her influential 1619 Project, and the very idea of critical race theory. These disinformation campaigns muster false information, distorted stereotypes, and mischaracterizations as part of a long-term conservative battle against public higher education and the teaching of American racial history. Only by identifying these campaigns as disinformation can we counter them.
Debate and disagreement are at the heart of academia—but conservative disinformation campaigns areto advance particular political and ideological goals. In the Hannah-Jones case, the board was under tremendous pressure from groups and to intervene in the appointment. Hannah-Jones founded , an effort to center the history and legacy of slavery and the experiences of Black Americans in U.S. history.
Prominent journalists, athletes and academics denounce UNC decision to deny Hannah-Jones tenure
More than 200 prominent journalists, athletes and academics signed a letter on Tuesday denouncing the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill's decision to deny New York Times Magazine journalist and The 1619 Project lead author Nikole Hannah-Jones tenure.The letter, published by The Root, called Hannah-Jones's tenure denial "egregious," and said the Board of Trustees' decision was "almost certainly tied" to her involvement in the 1619 Project, which examines the role slavery played in the United States' founding.
The 1619 Project is a pet target of right-wing media, who imagine it at the center of its latest liberal bogeyman, “critical race theory.” Critical race theory is a decades-old branch of scholarship that analyzes the role of race in American society. It tells us that racism is not simply a matter of individual prejudices or attitudes, but something structural and systemic, underpinned by institutions. Work that is informed by critical race theory, and the 1619 Project, asks us to hold broader systems accountable for the historical legacy of slavery in the United States, and understand how laws were created to maintain racial division and inequality.
in particular, conservative think tanks, commentators, and news media have waged an all-out disinformation war on their version of critical race theory, which is a catch-all for diversity efforts, anti-racist education, “cancel culture,” and unconscious bias training—or any talk of racial inequality at all.
Conservatives have also cynically embraced widespread social concern over “polarization” and “declining trust” to cast Nikole Hannah-Jones, the 1619 Project, and critical race theory as grave threats to American society. According to conservatives, critical race theory is a racist (aka anti-white) and “” ideology that is so that it needs to be . Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in March that it is “teaching kids to hate their country and to hate each other.” According to , critical race theory undermines the United States by transforming it into “a nation riven by groups, each with specific claims on victimization” which will weaken the “public and private bonds that create trust and allow for civic engagement.”
UNC and right-wing cancel culture
UNC's cherished history of excellence is being challenged by right-wing political yahoos interfering in its academic affairs. The latest is the refusal of the Chapel Hill board of trustees to grant tenure to New York Times journalist Nikole Hannah-Jones for an endowed Knight chair at the Hussman School of Journalism. They claim it's because of her lack of academic credentials. That - I think - is a lie. The Knight chairs are intended to enlist top people from journalism to complement the faculty's academics. None of the previous UNC Knight chairs were from an academic background - and all got tenure.
Unsurprisingly, theseThey are often based on quotes taken out of context or from poorly conceived diversity training efforts—not the of and American history, institutions, and inequalities. Many of them build on and (the group of German émigré intellectuals who were during the WWII and postwar eras). And they tie into a of right-wing campaigns to . In fact, one of the pressuring the UNC Board of Trustees about Hannah-Jones is devoted to scrutinizing North Carolina higher education for ideological bias, while promoting conservative free market ideology.
such as the and the , which count among their contributors conservative critic , helped engineer the campaign against critical race theory. Think tank and media strategists’ talking points are echoed in Trump’s 2020 “Combatting Race and Sex Stereotyping,” which forbid federally funded diversity training. Calling critical race theory a “destructive ideology,” Trump claimed that racial sensitivity trainings are racist, and that understanding systemic racism will “divide us and … prevent us from uniting as one people in pursuit of one common destiny for our great country.” The order was reportedly .
Tishaura Jones wants to reimagine policing in St. Louis. Amid rising crime and a push to 'defund,' can she do it?
Mayor Tishaura Jones wants St. Louis — and the rest of the country — to rethink what a safe city means but with rising crime it won't be easy.On one side of a 6-foot black steel fence closest to the Catholic-based homeless shelter's entrance are clergy, dignitaries and other stakeholders.
Since Biden reversed Trump’s executive order, Republicans inincluding Texas, Arizona, Tennessee, and, of course, North Carolina have introduced or passed bills to ban teaching critical race theory in the classroom, parroting the same disinformation. An Oklahoma community college instructor recently that her summer class on race and ethnicity was canceled because of one such bill.
The 1619 Project is perhaps the most frequently mentioned target of conservative attacks on critical race theory. They useto discredit it as a complete “ ” and work of “ .” An oft-repeated sentiment is that the 1619 Project will make white children “ ,” rather than disinvest from their racial privilege. Conservative pundits and publications have constructed a false narrative that claims the 1619 Project is fabricated to hurt and punish white people, and white children in particular.
has that these types of lies, moral accusations, misrepresentations, and are often used to justify hate and harassment. In this case, disinformation is being used to deny a decorated Black journalist tenure and ban the teaching of America’s racial history in our schools.
Of course, it’s possible that some people repeating these talking points are doing so in good faith. But what distinguishes disinformation from its less malevolent cousin misinformation is an unwillingness to acknowledge when one is wrong; in the latter case, a newspaper printing a retraction, for instance. Even giventhat their characterization of critical race theory often isn’t correct—and that their targets often aren’t even examples of critical race theory—much of the conservative establishment has doubled-down on its campaign. This serves conservatives well. Overly broad interpretations of critical race theory and close off much discussion of white supremacy, even as these appeals to whites shore up the conservative base against the common enemy of liberals. The repetition of the same talking points by pundits, think tanks, and policymakers alike also speaks to a strategically engineered, coordinated campaign.
Russia is using the power of 'Black PR' to destroy political reputations and spread disinformation in the West
Moscow has used disinformation tactics since the Soviet era to sow division and doubt in the west. Social media is now powering those tools.The agency told Grasset, a popular science blogger, that it would pay him a "colossal" amount of money if he publicly cast doubt on the effectiveness of Pfizer's coronavirus vaccine.
It is unsurprising that the disinformation campaigns against the 1619 Project and critical race theory come directly after 2020, a year in which many Americanspolice brutality, anti-Blackness, and white privilege. They directly construct and reinforce the idea that traditional and whites’ status at the top of the economic, political, and cultural hierarchy in the US is under threat, which argue led to Trump’s electoral college victory in 2016. And, like many other disinformation narratives, they build on pre-existing about race and inequality—that to talk about race is to be divisive, that critiquing the United States is unpatriotic, and that racial inequality is due to individual failings rather than systemic inequalities.
And yet it is precisely actions, or more accurately inactions, like those taken by the UNC Board of Trustees that demonstrate that systemic racism exists and the 1619 Project is vital.
Exclusive: Iran Steps up Efforts to Sow Discord Inside the U.S. .
Exclusive: Iran Steps up Efforts to Sow Discord Inside the U.S.Social media accounts tracked to troll farms run by the Iranian government have ramped up disinformation after several major events this year, including Biden’s effort to return the U.S. to the Iran nuclear deal, the April 14 announcement of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, the guilty verdict of Derek Chauvin on April 20, and the 11-day war between Israel and Hamas that started on May 10. “It’s a significant level of activity,” one official tells TIME. “It’s active enough that we’re tracking it.” The officials did not offer details on the specific disinformation activity after the events.