Opinion The Thought Police Come for Individual Lines of Dialogue in Novels
Survivors of so-called 'Gone Girl' case reflect on the life-changing experience
Denise Huskins called her experience a love story with a happy ending. Huskins and Quinn married in 2018 and had a daughter, Olivia, who was born five years to the day that Huskins was released by her kidnapper, she said. © Aaron Quinn and Denise Huskins Aaron Quinn and Denise Huskins were married in 2018. “You can go through any kind of trauma to where it leaves you devastated and in a place where you just think, ‘This is impossible to move forward from. What do I do next?’” she told ABC News’ Amy Robach. “I think ours is an example of that. There is hope.
Here’s a bit of a watershed in American publishing: Social-media commenters are now successfully editing already-published books in order to alter the remarks of fictional characters.
It’s unbelievable, yet true: Best-selling writer Elin Hilderbrand, who writes beach books with titles suggesting upper-middle-class-white-lady luxury, was so cowed by a few posts on Instagram complaining about a passage in one of her books that she agreed to strike the language from future editions.
In her latest novel, Golden Girl, one of Hilderbrand’s characters makes a mildly tasteless joke about Anne Frank: Examining an attic where a friend has offered her a place to stay for a summer, “Vivi” says, “You’re suggesting I hide here all summer? Like . . . like Anne Frank?” The omniscient narrator of the book follows up, “This makes them both laugh — but is it really funny, and is Vivi so far off base?”
Police oversight boards are proliferating, but do they actually work?
Experts say civilian oversight boards can be a factor in reforming police conduct, but they have to be empowered with the right tools. The idea behind the civilian oversight of police is to benefit not only those making complaints against officers but the community and even departments themselves. This can work in numbers ways including providing an independent avenue for complaints, discipline and policy changes, according to National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement, a non-profit that works with individuals and police agencies to establish and improve civilian oversight.
Anne Frank jokes area new phenomenon, and as Frank is something like the Jewish equivalent of a saint, she has been the inspiration for outré and ribald humor. In 2019, the Harvard Lampoon published (and later apologized for) a photoshopped image that Kardashianized Frank by joining her face to the body of a bikini model. Hilderbrand’s joke was tame by the standards of the genre.
“As a Jewish woman, one who lost 18 members of her family in the holocaust I’m disgusted in you as a publisher that you allowed that line to be published. It’s inexcusable,” Instagram user Cecile Leana wrote to Hilderbrand on Instagram. This was enough for Publishers Weekly, which posted an article citing that comment and one other as evidence of “readers angered.”
Ring's new police request policy is only the first step on a long road
Commentary: The new measures won't stop police abuse, but they'll make it easier to track.But for all its security improvements, Ring, which is owned by Amazon, never substantively responded to criticisms of its police partnerships.
Tying an author to the views expressed by fictional characters represents a breathtaking new advance for the cause of asininity in our culture. Hilderbrand’s response should have been to remind all readers that Norman Lear is not Archie Bunker, and her publishing house Little, Brown should have clarified that it does not submit its published books for re-editing by the mob.
Instead, Hilderbrand unwisely groveled, apologized, and said the reference to Anne Frank would be stripped from the novel in future editions. “I want to wholeheartedly apologize for this,” she wrote on Instagram. “It was meant as hyperbole but was a poor choice, that was offensive and tasteless. I have asked my publisher to remove the passage from digital versions of the book immediately and from all future printings.” Mentioning her children, she said, “I want them to be proud of every word.”
This development is not just discouraging, it’s alarming. Little, Brown is one of America’s most formidable literary houses, having published Evelyn Waugh, J. D. Salinger, Tom Wolfe, Thomas Pynchon, David Foster Wallace, Gore Vidal, and P. G. Wodehouse. We should shiver at the prospect of rancorous readers now feeling emboldened to pore over everything anyone has ever published looking to sanitize the thoughts and dialogue of every fictional character.
Canadian police say Muslim family targeted by deadly attack
TORONTO (AP) — A driver plowed a pickup truck into a family of five, killing four of them and seriously injuring the other in an attack that targeted the victims because they were Muslims, Canadian police said Monday. Authorities said a young man was arrested in the parking lot of a nearby mall after the incident Sunday night in the Ontario city of London. Police said a black pickup truck mounted a curb and struck the victims at an intersection. “This was an act of mass murder perpetuated against Muslims,” London Mayor Ed Holder said. “It was rooted in unspeakable hatred. The magnitude of such hatred can make one question who we were as a city.
An even more craven and idiotic retraction was pressed upon a different author over another throwaway line, this time for the thoughtcrime of “normalizing Israel” by referring to its existence. In Casey McQuiston’s 2019 novel Red, White & Royal Blue, a fictional U.S. president is heard to say, “Well, my UN ambassador f***ed up his one job and said something idiotic about Israel, and now I have to call Netanyahu and personally apologize.” A Twitter user with 738 followers complained that the line “normalizes the genocide & war crimes done by Israel that will always be backed up & unashamedly supported by America.” Another Twitter user, this one with 1,329 followers, quoted the passage while suggesting McQuiston “could have simply not said this in their book,” adding in a follow-up tweet, “Stop being stupid.do better.”
McQuiston, an ardent progressive whose authoroffers a link to a group that solicits bail funds for accused criminals while “working towards a world without prisons, policing, prosecution, surveillance or any form of detention or supervision,” replied meekly, “I wrote this line as a dig at US presidential diplomacy. It was an attempt to punch up at liberal American politics, not a statement of my beliefs. I could and should have made that clearer. It has been changed for all future printings.”
Biden, Putin agree to launch new dialogue on arms control
President Biden and Russian President Vladimir Putin released a joint statement following their summit Wednesday agreeing to resume a dialogue on strategic stability on nuclear arms control.The decision to begin the new dialogue is one of the few concrete deliverables emerging from the three-hour summit between Biden and Putin in Geneva, Switzerland, their first face-to-face meeting since Biden took office in January.The meeting also touchedThe decision to begin the new dialogue is one of the few concrete deliverables emerging from the three-hour summit between Biden and Putin in Geneva, Switzerland, their first face-to-face meeting since Biden took office in January.
Like many other trends in the New York-based book business, where major houses have proven willing toon the eve of publication if they inspire the slightest controversy, young-adult novels regularly insane social-media campaigns that attack the very idea of authorial imagination and sometimes succeed in causing books to be withdrawn, and employees their bosses to pull books by high-ranking public officials on grounds that anyone on the right side of the political fence is a bigot, the new tendency represents a sickening affront to the spirit of publishing. Woke mobs should be ignored, or told to grow up; instead, they’re being indulged. They will grow ever bolder as more authors and publishing houses effectively cede control of their works to the least reasonable readers.
More on National Review
The U.S. and Mexico must revamp institutions supporting their joint efforts .
Systematic dialogue, rules to manage our interactions and specific programs or organizations — all broadly described as bilateral institutions — provide stability to the relationship. They help us work out issues ranging from the management of our shared river basins along the border, to dealing with transnational organized crime, eradicating the screwworm, to establishing efficient regional supply chains. They also facilitate follow-up which is often key to assure that joint initiatives are successfully implemented.