Opinion Klobuchar proposes stripping Section 230 protections for 'health misinformation'
Hillicon Valley: Surgeon general issues health misinformation advisory | Biden administration stepping up efforts to respond to ransomware attacks | Cyber bills gain new urgency after rash of attacks
Welcome to Hillicon Valley, The Hill's newsletter detailing all you need to know about the tech and cyber news world from Capitol Hill to Silicon Valley. If you don't already, be sure to sign up for our newsletter by clicking HERE.Welcome and Happy Thursday! Follow our cyber reporter, Maggie Miller (@magmill95), and tech team, Chris Mills Rodrigo (@millsrodrigo) and Rebecca Klar (@rebeccaklar), for more coverage. The Biden administration putWelcome and Happy Thursday! Follow our cyber reporter, Maggie Miller (@magmill95), and tech team, Chris Mills Rodrigo (@millsrodrigo) and Rebecca Klar (@rebeccaklar), for more coverage.
Senate Democrats introduced new legislation Thursday to hold social media platforms accountable for health-related misinformation during public health emergencies, a move that could cause more censorship during crises similar to the coronavirus pandemic.
The Health Misinformation Act, introduced by Democratic Sens. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico, would amend Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the controversial liability shield for user-generated content online. If passed, the legislation would allow social media giants, such as Facebook and YouTube, to be sued for dangerous health misinformation on their platforms.
Sunday shows preview: Feds slam social media over COVID-19 misinformation
The federal government's criticism of social media for the rapid spread of COVID-19 misinformation amid the Biden administration's push for vaccinations is expected to dominate this week's Sunday news circuit. On Thursday, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy issued a health misinformation advisory calling false claims regarding COVID-19 "a serious threat to public health" as the White House aims to get more Americans vaccinated."It can causeOn Thursday, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy issued a health misinformation advisory calling false claims regarding COVID-19 "a serious threat to public health" as the White House aims to get more Americans vaccinated.
The bill would direct the Health and Human Services secretary to issue guidelines about what constitutes health misinformation.
“The coronavirus pandemic has shown us how lethal misinformation can be and it is our responsibility to take action,” Klobuchar said in a statement. “For far too long, online platforms have not done enough to protect the health of Americans. These are some of the biggest, richest companies in the world and they must do more to prevent the spread of deadly vaccine misinformation."
In her statement, Klobuchar cited a recentthat found social media platforms failed to act on 95% of coronavirus-related disinformation reported during the pandemic. She also highlighted a recent by the Kaiser Family Foundation that found two-thirds of people not vaccinated against the coronavirus believe problematic myths about the vaccine.
Klobuchar: If Breyer is going to retire from Supreme Court, it should be sooner rather than later
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) on Sunday said if Justice Breyer decides to retire from the Supreme Court, he should do so "sooner rather than later.""He makes his own decision about if he's going to retire, but if he's going to retire, it should be sooner rather than later, if you are concerned about the court, because what happens in the U.S. Senate matters," Klobuchar told host Dana Bash on CNN's "State of the Union."Klobuchar said she was"He makes his own decision about if he's going to retire, but ... if he's going to retire, it should be sooner rather than later, if you are concerned about the court, because what happens in the U.S.
However, the bill's removal of Section 230 protections for social media platforms may not actually result in less health misinformation online because the law only protects platforms from getting sued for illegal content on their websites — misinformation is technically not illegal by itself.
Theis also focused on making online platforms liable for content they actively amplify through an algorithm, not for content simply posted on a platform.
"Sen. Klobuchar’s new bill [that] would task the Department of Health and Human Services to define what constitutes 'medical misinformation' almost certainly violates the First Amendment and would never hold up in court," said Evan Greer, director of the digital advocacy group Fight for the Future.
"Which is frustrating because this is a real problem that requires real solutions. The bill falls into two interrelated traps: buying into the twin ideas that the federal government dictating how platforms moderate content and weakening Section 230 will make platforms moderate more responsibly," Greer added.
Ex-Trump Cybersecurity Head Krebs Sees Smilarities Between Vaccine and Election Misinformation
"[Vaccine misinformation] is now so pervasive that it exists just naturally within the ecosystem on Facebook and elsewhere," Christopher Krebs said on Sunday.Krebs joined CBS News' John Dickerson for Sunday morning's Face the Nation show. The conversation began with Krebs' take on the misinformation swarming the vaccine. Dickerson asked the former CISA director if he noticed a similarity to his fight against election misinformation.
If made into law and executed as intended, Greer said the bill would result in social media platforms suppressing and censoring content unnecessarily to avoid getting sued, including important and accurate information on public health.
Defining what is and isn't health misinformation is complicated and often in flux. Most medical experts and social media platforms, for example, did an about-turn regarding the theory the coronavirus originated from a lab in Wuhan.
Thewas considered misinformation last year. Now, it's being seen as a , including by the Biden administration.
The bill's sponsors say the federal government needs to do more to rein in social media giants that have caused significant harm by allowing misinformation to flourish.
“Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, social media companies like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube did little while COVID-19 related misinformation spread on their platforms — fueling distrust in public health officials, promoting conspiracy theories, and putting lives at risk," Lujan said in a statement. “As COVID-19 cases rise among the unvaccinated, so has the amount of misinformation surrounding vaccines on social media. Lives are at stake."
Klobuchar urges limits on protections for Big Tech
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) said Sunday that social media companies "greatly contributed" to misinformation over the coronavirus, adding that liability standards for those companies should be changed. © Greg Nash Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) "I think we also should look at changing the liability standards when it comes to vaccine misinformation. Senator Warner and Hirono and I already introduced a bill that would focus on discriminatory content and the like," Klobuchar said on CNN's "State of the Union.
Tech companies themselves are opposed to the bill because they say it would give the government too much power over online speech.
“We all want less misinformation online, but this approach would turn future Republican presidents into the speech police,” said Adam Kovacevich, CEO of the Chamber of Progress, an advocacy group backed by Amazon, Facebook, and Google.
“When President Ron DeSantis's HHS Secretary deems pro-choice and transgender speech 'misinformation,' Democrats would regret this," he added.
Tags:, , , , , , , , ,
The True Meaning of ‘Misinformation’ .
Public safety is an old justification for persecuting political opponents.As others have noted, the legal effect of the bill would amount to exactly nothing, because even without the liability shield, American law provides no liability for the passive dissemination of medical misinformation. It is mostly theater. On the other hand, sometimes political theater has real consequences, especially when the intent — as with Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Court-packing plan — is to intimidate and deter.