Opinion The Right Is Waging its Culture War By Turning its Base into Bounty-Hunters
How to mess with Texas' anti-abortion bounty? Apply it to gun sales
Gun-ownership advocates would rail against such a law as circumventing Heller, just as abortion advocates are railing against the Texas law as circumventing Roe. But it would be hard for the courts to uphold the civil mechanism of the anti-abortion law without also upholding the identical mechanism in the anti-gun law.Creating this "shoe on the other foot" challenge would bring home the dangerous implications of the Texas bounty approach which, if not stopped, could undercut the authority of the Supreme Court to enforce other constitutional rights.
When Texas recently passed S.B. 8, it not only turned Roe v. Wade on its head, leaving millions of women more vulnerable, it unveiled the latest and trickiest weapon in the conservative culture wars.
S.B. 8 outsources enforcement to private citizens, allowing any person to sue abortion providers or people who “aid or abet” them. In the wake of the law taking effect, many commentators (darkly or excitedly) imaginedCould, say, New York confer standing on its citizens to sue gun shops?
Cubans still reside on Guantanamo Bay base decades after US-Cuba relations fractured
Sixty years after the United States' failed Bay of Pigs invasion, the remnants of the US and Cuba's fractured relationship are tucked away in a small neighborhood of the US Naval base at Guantánamo Bay. Nineteen Cubans still live on the base almost 60 years after the base closed its borders with the island nation it sits on the edge of. © Ellie Kaufman/CNN Noel West, 89, is one of the 19 Cuban Special Category Residents who still live in US Naval Station Guantánamo Bay. In the early 60s, the border between the US and Cuba closed on the base, and some Cubans working on the base decided to stay on the US side, including West.
This weapon is already being deployed throughout the country. In Tennessee,if they “encounter a member of the opposite (biological) sex in a multi-occupancy restroom…” In Florida, any student who claims to have been “deprived of an athletic opportunity” because a transgender athlete took their place is now bestowed with a . Missouri ,” which not only serves as an assault on the supremacy clause, but grants $50,000 in damages to any party whose right to bear arms is deprived. And Kentucky citizens can now file a complaint with the Attorney General if a resulting in withdrawn funding from the school.
DOJ Swings Back at Texas, and Whiffs | Opinion
When the Supreme Court allowed the Texas Heartbeat Act to go into effect, Planned Parenthood lost the first round in a new fight for life in the state. As a result, unborn children's hearts that would have been stopped by chemicals, forceps or vacuums continue to beat today. © Mandel NGAN / AFP/Getty Images US Attorney General Merrick Garland holds a press conference to announce a lawsuit against Texas at the Department of Justice in Washington, DC on September 9, 2021 - The US Justice Department filed suit against the state of Texas on Thursday over its new law that bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.
To see through the stratagem of this tactic, it helps to have a rudimentary understanding of “standing:” The bedrock legal concept that anyone filing a complaint must first show that (1) they’ve been injured; (2) the defendant caused the injury; and (3) a court can address that injury.
By making everyone except the state a possible enforcer of the law, S.B. 8 robs potential challengers of a defendant, and thus the standing to sue. Put another way, the state of Texas didn’t cause your injury, women, lawmakers did, and if you don’t like it your only remedy is to vote them out. (Or perhaps wait around for aand be sued.)
Five members of the United States Supreme Court were so charmed by Texas’s gambit they were able to ignore not only the unseemliness of deputizing anti-abortion citizen bounty-hunters, but also how S.B. 8 radically upended the doctrine of standing.
‘No possible life’ under Taliban rule: Afghan women fear murder, oppression after US withdrawal
"If the Taliban returns to power, I along with other women who work in the government will either be stoned to death or executed in public."These memories are invariably the stuff of nightmares.
S.B. 8 violates norms in another crucial way too: By granting standing to everyone—parties who otherwise would not have it—to enforce the new law. Consequently, and rather perversely, not only are the people most impacted by S.B. 8 deprived of the means to challenge the law, but the court doors were swung open to those impacted the least. How can the bounty-hunters empowered by this law possibly claim to be injured? That’s the threshold question a court would ordinarily ask before agreeing to hear such a case. There isn’t a good answer to that question, only that the statute itself—S.B. 8—implicitly presumes an injury.
rIt’s no small coincidence that the new laws cropping up in Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee and Florida all use the same tactic and cater to the same trumped-up fears and outright bigotry. Ordinarily, being offended isn’t an injury and won’t get you before a judge. But these laws are another front in the culture war. It is crucial that each bestows standing on persons who would not otherwise have it, because such rights can’t otherwise be found in the US or state constitutions. Laws like Tennessee’s and Florida’s targeting of transgender students serve as a preemptive first-strike at activity another court might one day find constitutionally protected.
Defense secretaries in their own words: US 'invented reasons' to stay in Afghanistan
The Taliban blitz exposes the failure of the 20-year Afghanistan war and portends terrorism threats, say former defense secretaries Panetta and Hagel.Afghan security forces, trained and equipped at the cost of $83 billion, wilted before Taliban fighters. With few exceptions, the Taliban rolled through provincial capitals without a fight despite a force of Afghan troops that was supposed to number more than 300,000. In reality, there were far fewer Afghan forces because of desertions and commanders who reportedly pocketed the pay of ghost soldiers they had kept on rolls. For those who remained and fought, there wasn't enough ammunition and food, to say nothing of pay.
To be sure, the intent of these laws doesn’t appear to be the promotion of actual vigilantism or bounty-hunting. (Though it’s hard to imagine they won’t at some point accomplish that too.) But rather the laws create the looming specter of vigilantism and bounty-hunting to act as an economic disincentive so that Republicans can live in a world where things they dislike cease to exist. In response to the passage of S.B. 8, abortion providers in Texas shut down. High schools in the south stopped teaching critical race theory (precious few were actually teaching it to begin with). It’s working, at least for the moment.
This trend of Republican state legislators deputizing “private attorney generals” to vindicate imaginary offenses derives from legitimate ancestry: The False Claims Act. The Act permits whistle-blowing citizens to bring qui tam lawsuits on behalf of the government if a federal contractor is engaging in fraud. But there are enormous differences between a qui tam lawsuit and what’s happening now. For starters, the government isn’t disclaiming its own standing to bring a suit or prosecute. Instead, it is assigning additional standing to whistleblowers, because they’re better situated to identify fraud and might not otherwise call it out without an incentive. By contrast, the above-mentioned southern states pit citizen against citizen in court on contentious culture war issues, and place their thumb squarely on the side of the scale where their bases reside.
Kyrie Irving following and liking conspiracy theories about COVID-19 vaccines
Irving, who serves as a vice president on the executive committee of th e players’ union, recently started following and liking Instagram posts from a conspiracy theorist who claims that “secret societies” are implanting vaccines in a plot to connect Black people to a master computer for “a plan of Satan.” This Moderna microchip misinformation campaign has spread across multiple NBA locker rooms and group chats, according to several of the dozen-plus current players, Hall-of-Famers, league executives, arena workers and virologists interviewed for this story over the past week.
It’s striking how much likethis moment feels, given the increasingly dim view the conservative justices on the Supreme Court have taken on standing over the years. The justices have routinely shut the court’s doors to numerous plaintiffs, often to avoid issuing rulings on the merits of contentious issues. If you’re a citizen possibly being surveilled by the US military [ ], or a member of a group being ignored by census takers [ ], or a constituent in a gerrymandered district [ ], or an environmental organization out to protect endangered species [ ], the conservative justices take out their microscopes and depict standing as the eye of a needle through which few can pass.
Perhaps the Supreme Court’s narrowest opinion on the subject is the 2016case, where it effectively gutted the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which had conferred standing on consumers whose credit reports were mishandled. The Court rejected certain class action members, reasoning that even if inaccurate information makes its way into a consumer’s credit file, it “doesn’t make a sound” unless it’s later disclosed to a third party. Such disclosures are inevitable, but Justice Kavanaugh found the notion too speculative and denied standing. Justice Thomas went further in a strident concurrence. He keyed in on the distinction between plaintiffs seeking to vindicate private or public rights: “The Court has said time and again that, when a plaintiff seeks to vindicate a public right, the plaintiff must allege that he has suffered a ‘concrete’ injury particular to himself.”
Brian Laundrie's Parents Called Police to Report Dog the Bounty Hunter on Their Property
The 911 dispatcher said, "We just have the female from that 10-20 call 911 in reference to the situation with the male" during an audio clip posted on Twitter.Police confirmed to multiple news outlets that they received a 911 call from Roberta Laundrie on Saturday stating that Chapman was at their North Port home. The same day, the bounty hunter was seen knocking on the family's door.
But even as the Supreme Court vigilantly guards the front door to the courthouse, Republican state legislators found the back door wide open and have been streaming on in.
So far as standing is concerned, S.B. 8 and its ilk aren’t substantially different from the Fair Credit Reporting Act at issue in Spokeo. But there is one key difference: The former are state statutes and the FCRA was passed by Congress.The basis for federal standing is found within Article III of the U.S. Constitution, which the states are free to ignore. But while they aren’t strictly bound to follow Lujan and Spokeo as precedent, state courts, by and large,similarly. The Texas Supreme Court even that the “Texas standing requirements parallel the federal test for Article III standing” requiring plaintiffs to “allege [a] personal injury fairly traceable to the defendant’s allegedly unlawful conduct and likely to be redressed by the requested relief.” If there’s a principled federalism argument that might reconcile the outcome in Spokeo with these new laws, the state courts haven’t yet articulated it.
Given how great an obstacle standing often is for plaintiffs, you’d be tempted to think that this trend of state lawmakers handing out private causes of action to their base to wage culture war on its political opponents will be short-lived. These laws target the vulnerable by outsourcing the enforcement of what Justice Thomas might even admit are “public rights” to an angry, now-empowered mob of people who would otherwise have no right to enforce.
Lawmakers opting to go this route not only benefit from the opportunity to feed their followers, but also to insulate themselves from political blowback by getting out of the enforcement game.
And any challenge to these laws first requires—you guessed it—standing.
Brian Laundrie Was at Fort De Soto Campsite With Parents Before Going Missing .
Attorney Steven Bertolino said the Laundrie family went camping from September 6 to September 8, before leaving the park together. JUST IN. #Laundrie family attorney confirms all three family members camped at Fort De Soto campground from September 6-7th and left park together. #BrianLaundrie #GabbyPetito (via @WFLAJustin) pic.twitter.