Politics Why Turnout Shifts in Alabama Bode Well for Democrats
Committee blew it: Alabama is the wrong choice
Let us begin with a simple admission. The College Football Playoff selection committee had no great answers here. Selecting among Alabama, Ohio State and USC (though it appears the Trojans didn’t get any consideration at all) as the No. 4 seed was a comparison of three deeply flawed teams that did not clearly state their case during the regular season to get in. None of them are in position to complain about how the committee called it.
Over the last eight years, political analysts had come to think that Democrats were at a distinct disadvantage in midterm elections, since their younger and nonwhite coalition was less likely to turn out than older and white voters.
It is time to retire that notion. Tuesday in Alabama, Democrats benefited from strong turnout that plainly exceeded midterm levels, while white working-class Republicans voted in weaker numbers. It was enough to send Doug Jones to the Senate instead of Roy Moore, in one of the reddest states in the country.
All-SEC title game on horizon? Alabama gets nod over Ohio St
Back in January 2012, the day after Alabama beat LSU in the BCS championship game, the commissioners of the FBS conferences gathered in New Orleans to discuss the future of the college football postseason. There had already been movement toward tearing up the unpopular Bowl Championship Series, but the all-Southeastern Conference championship game was the final blow. The College Football Playoff was created soon after.On Sunday, the field for the fourth College Football Playoff was set and for the first time two teams from the same conference made it.
This has been a pattern in all of this year’s major special elections, as well as in the Virginia general election. It is consistent with a long-term trend toward stronger turnout by the party out of power in off-year elections. It also suggests that President Trump’s less educated and affluent version of the Republican coalition has eroded the party’s traditional turnout advantage.
To the extent that there had been any weakness in Democratic turnout so far this year, it had been among black voters. In Georgia’s Sixth Congressional District, for instance, black turnout barely eclipsed midterm levels even as all other voters surged well past it. A similar pattern appeared in Virginia. In majority-black Petersburg, the turnout was even lower than it was in 2013, even as turnout surged in Northern Virginia.
Three takeaways from Villanova's big win over Gonzaga
Villanova used a dominant first half to beat Gonzaga in Tuesday's Jimmy V Classic matchup.The Wildcats led by 13 points at the break and never looked back, improving to 9-0 on the season.
But in Alabama, black turnout was far stronger than white Republican turnout, based on county-level data and the exit polls. Black voters probably represented an even larger share of the electorate than they did in 2012 or 2008.
A reasonable initial estimate is that black turnout probably reached 30 percent above 2014 levels — that’s the increase in total votes, not the overall turnout rate. Statewide, the turnout increase for all voters was just 13 percent.
It will be easier to make a more precise estimate of the increase in black turnout when precinct-level data becomes available in Alabama’s diverse, urban centers or when the voter file becomes available.
At the same time, Mr. Jones benefited from an extremely favorable turnout pattern among white voters, especially along educational lines.
Over all, there was a clear relationship between the change in a county’s turnout and its educational composition.
Liberal Outsiders Pour Into Alabama Senate Race, Treading Lightly
With only hours until the polls open in the unlikeliest of battleground states, Democrats are deploying a multimillion-dollar get-out-the-vote operation in an effort to steal away a Senate seat.SELMA, Ala. — In the poinsettia-trimmed pulpit of Ebenezer Missionary Baptist Church on Sunday morning, the Rev. James Perkins Jr., the first black mayor of a city where the right to vote was won in blood, announced his support for the Democrat Doug Jones in Alabama’s special Senate election. He reminded his Selma congregants, without telling them how to vote, that sheep are to follow their shepherd.
In Alabama’s two best-educated counties — Madison County and predominantly white Shelby County — turnout surged 30 percent above 2014 levels. These are two Republican-leaning counties, which would seem to suggest that Mr. Jones was winning and turning out Republican-leaning voters, not just benefiting from low G.O.P. turnout or high Democratic turnout.
Mr. Jones won 18 percent more raw votes in Shelby County than Hillary Clinton did in 2016, and it is not plausible to suggest that he did so by tapping into Democratic voters who didn’t turn out in the much-higher-turnout presidential race.
The pattern repeated itself across well-educated metropolitan areas and enclaves, including college towns like Auburn and Tuscaloosa.
There was no such turnout surge in white, working-class Alabama. In fact, turnout was lower than it was in 2014 in many of Alabama’s mostly white, working-class counties. In Alabama’s least-educated, predominantly white counties, the turnout was often far lower than it was in 2014. In Fayette County, where just 13 percent of voters have a college degree, turnout landed at just 69 percent of 2014 levels.
Where Alabama Senate candidates stand on 8 key issues
Jones and Moore differ on the issues facing the country, though matters of policy have been largely overshadowed by the scandal dogging Moore's campaign.Voters in the Cotton State will choose between conservative former Chief Justice of the state Supreme Court Roy Moore, accused by nine women of sexual misconduct but embraced by President Donald Trump and the state Republican party, and Democrat Doug Jones, a former U.S. attorney who put two Ku Klux Klan members behind bars but whose view on abortion may prove the deciding factor.
Mr. Moore, whose candidacy was troubled by allegations of sexual misconduct with teenagers, nonetheless fared very well in these mostly white, working-class counties. It was enough to keep him competitive, even as he badly underperformed in more diverse and metropolitan parts of Alabama.
Obviously, a turnout surge in well-educated Democratic areas and a tepid turnout in white working-class areas will hurt Republicans just about anywhere, as it did in Alabama. It also poses a particular danger to the G.O.P. in a number of carefully gerrymandered districts where Republicans count on rural white voters to cancel out well-educated, liberal Democratic enclaves.
Districts like Texas’ 21st and Second and Seventh — which run from the University of Texas and Rice University to the outer exurbs and countryside far from downtown Austin and Houston — are obvious candidates. So are Michigan’s Eighth, which includes Lansing, Mich., and a number of districts in North Carolina and Pennsylvania.
It is difficult to read too much into the results of this election, given that Mr. Moore was such an unusually weak candidate.
But the turnout lesson is fairly clear. Alabama is only the latest, if most extreme, example of this year’s major turnout patterns, and these shifts pose a big challenge to Republicans in 2018.
Inmates make up 1 in 5 on Thomas fire lines .
SANTA BARBARA, Calif. - For well over a week, hundreds of inmates have chain-sawed through relentless thickets of chaparral, cutting lines through the backcountry to thwart the fire's sudden rushes at homes. On Thursday, they were deep in the Los Padres National Forest, covered in wood grit, soot and sweat, as the Thomas fire continued to grow - becoming the fourth-largest in modern California history.In the morning, commanders stressed the dangers of the work and urged them to be careful even while mopping up hot spots, cutting burned trees or striding though charred rubble.Hours later, a San Diego fire engineer, Cory Iverson, died on the fire lines.
FOX News Sunday With Chris Wallace - Nov 12, 2017
Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas); Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.); panel discussion with Michael Needham, Julie Pace, Gillian Turner and Charles Lane; Cary Summers of the Museum of the Bible.
Clinton or Trump: What Political Scientists Can Tell Us
What can political scientists predict about the outcome of the 2016 election? And what can presidency scholars tell us about the governing styles of a Clinton or Trump presidency? Given the...