Politics: Everything you need to know about the Cambridge Analytica-Facebook debacle - - PressFrom - US
  •   
  •   
  •   

Politics Everything you need to know about the Cambridge Analytica-Facebook debacle

19:35  19 march  2018
19:35  19 march  2018 Source:   msn.com

Facebook suspends Trump-linked data firm Cambridge Analytica

  Facebook suspends Trump-linked data firm Cambridge Analytica Late Friday night, Facebook has announced it's suspending Strategic Communication Laboratories (SCL) from its site. While you may not have heard of SCL, its political analytics firm Cambridge Analytica has made headlines in the last few years due to its work for the Trump campaign and the Brexit initiative. According to former US Magistrate and current Facebook Deputy General Counsel Paul Grewal, this move is occurring because an app "thisisyourdigitallife" pulled in personal information of the 270,000 people who used it as well as information from their friends.

“ Cambridge Analytica ’s statistical models isolated likely supporters whom Parscale bombarded with ads on Facebook , while the Kogan, the Cambridge researcher who developed the tool that led to the Facebook suspension, had reportedly also received a grant from the Russian government to

Late on Friday, Facebook made an unexpected announcement: The data firm Cambridge Analytica , hyped as integral to President Donald Trump's election, was suspended from the social network for using

a person posing for the camera: A man walks past a mural in an office on the Facebook campus in Menlo Park, Calif., June 11, 2014 (Jeff Chiu/AP) © Provided by WP Company LLC d/b/a The Washington Post A man walks past a mural in an office on the Facebook campus in Menlo Park, Calif., June 11, 2014 (Jeff Chiu/AP)

Late on Friday, Facebook made an unexpected announcement: The data firm Cambridge Analytica, hyped as integral to President Trump’s election, was suspended from the social network for using data collected improperly from Facebook users.

Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Today’s most popular stories on The Washington Post

It is a complicated issue that many people might have missed, given the timing of the announcement. With that in mind, here is an overview of the groups involved, what happened — and what it means.

Cambridge Analytica data scientist says he'd testify before Congress

  Cambridge Analytica data scientist says he'd testify before Congress Aleksandr Kogan, the data scientist who gathered information on millions of Americans for Cambridge Analytica, wrote in an email obtained by CNN that he would be happy to testify before Congress and speak to the FBI about the work he did for the company. Aleksandr Kogan made the remarks in an email he sent to colleagues at Cambridge University this weekend that was obtained by CNN. "I've also seriously been asked if the FBI has reached out, if the two congressional committees in the United States have reached out, and if Parliament or any authorities in the UK have reached out. No one has—I suspect they realize I'm actually not a spy.

Our report that a political firm hired by the Trump campaign acquired access to private data on millions of Facebook users has sparked new questions about how the social media giant protects user information. Who collected all that data?

Late on Friday, Facebook made an unexpected announcement: The data firm Cambridge Analytica , hyped as integral to President Donald Trump's On the political side, it is much the same thing , with one tweak. While advertisers generally target consumers as groups, political campaigns need to

1. What is Cambridge Analytica?

Cambridge Analytica is a data firm that promises its customers insights into consumer or voter behavior.

On the commercial side, that means tools like “audience segmentation” — breaking out advertising audiences into smaller groups — and then targeting advertisements to those groups on “multiple platforms.”

On the political side, it is much the same thing, with one tweak. While advertisers generally target consumers as groups, political campaigns need to target specific people — registered voters receptive to a potential message.

“Combining the precision of data analytics with the insights of behavioral psychology and the best of individually addressable advertising technology,” the company’s website pledges, “you can run a truly end-to-end campaign.” And that is why Cambridge Analytica was created.

Mueller examining ties between Trump campaign, Cambridge Analytica: report

  Mueller examining ties between Trump campaign, Cambridge Analytica: report Mueller examining ties between Trump campaign, Cambridge Analytica: reportLoad Error

Cambridge Analytica is in the midst of a media firestorm after allegations of psychological manipulation, entrapment techniques and fake news Here's everything you need to know about the Cambridge Analytica scandal. Published Wed, Mar 21 20186:16 AM EDTUpdated Fri, Mar 23

Facebook says it knew about the breach, but had received legally binding guarantees from the company that all of the data was deleted. Cambridge Analytica Suspends CEO Alexander Nix Amid Scandals. The next body blow came to Cambridge Analytica , with the company suspending its CEO

Robert Mercer is a prominent conservative donor whose public profile rose sharply over the past few years. He and his daughter Rebekah invested millions in efforts to reshape conservative politics, funding Citizens United, the anti-mainstream-media Media Research Center and Breitbart News.

In 2013, Robert Mercer partnered with a British firm called SCL Group and its elections director Alexander Nix to test SCL’s methodology in Virginia’s governor’s race, as the New York Times reported. Their candidate, Republican Ken Cuccinelli, lost. But the Mercers moved forward with a political data strategy anyway, partnering with Nix to create Cambridge Analytica, which would use SCL’s data and methodology for political work.

2. What prompted the Facebook suspension?

The key part of the Cambridge Analytica sales pitch is that “insights of behavioral psychology” line.

U.S. House panel formally asks Facebook CEO to testify on user data

  U.S. House panel formally asks Facebook CEO to testify on user data The leaders of the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee wrote Facebook Inc. chief executive Mark Zuckerberg detailing new concerns."The hearing will examine the harvesting and sale of personal information from more than 50 million Facebook users, potentially without their notice or consent and in violation of Facebook policy," wrote chairman Representative Greg Walden, a Republican who chairs the panel, Frank Pallone, the top Democrat, and other committee leaders.

Cambridge Analytica claims to use data 'to change audience behaviour'. But now a whistleblower This right. don't We don't work for facebook page that we don't have facebook data and we do use PagesBusinessesMedia/news companyThe GuardianVideosEverything you need to know about the

CNBC InternationalVideosHere's everything you need to know about the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

There are lots of data companies that can tell you who’s registered to vote, and there are lots of companies that compile consumer data on those same voters. This, in fact, was an instrumental part of Facebook’s sales pitch to political campaigns (back before it quietly buried that pitch in the wake of questions about Russian interference in the 2016 election). After the 2014 election, we wrote about how Facebook offered campaigns a place to overlap their voter data (who’s registered and basic demographic information) with Facebook’s vast array of data on its users’ behavior. While most firms that collect data on consumer behavior do so by tracking the bread crumbs we leave around our consumer culture — grocery store rewards cards, magazine subscriptions, etc. — Facebook has the advantage that so many Americans tell the company precisely what they like, by quite literally clicking the “like” button.

Facebook’s database of personal information may be the largest in the world, given that nearly a third of the globe has an account with the company. If you are a company looking to provide data services, you would justifiably be jealous of the information Facebook possesses. So Facebook (recognizing an opportunity when it sees it) provides a way for software developers to build on top of their platform, allowing other companies to use their data under certain conditions. It used to be fairly trivial, in fact, for developers to build an application that would then pull a great deal of information from the site, including information about your friends’ activity. In May 2014, the site announced it was tightening that access, beginning the following year.

Cook County sues Facebook, Cambridge Analytica after alleged misuse of millions of Illinoisans' data

  Cook County sues Facebook, Cambridge Analytica after alleged misuse of millions of Illinoisans' data Cook County is suing Facebook and Cambridge Analytica for allegedly violating an Illinois fraud law after reports that the political consulting firm used ill-gotten Facebook data in an effort to influence voter behavior. Cambridge Analytica, which was hired by President Donald Trump's campaign, deceived the millions of Illinois Facebook users whose information it collected, alleges the lawsuit, filed Friday in Cook County Circuit Court. And Facebook failed to protect its users' privacy and misrepresented how their data would be used, the lawsuit says.

Facebook knew about Cambridge Analytica 's data policy violations since at least August 2016, but did nothing but send a legal notice to delete the information. Genuinely academic research shouldn't need to rely on manipulative viral quizzes to study these technologies at the heart of society.

( Cambridge Analytica maintains it complied with Facebook 's initial request and denies having used the data in question during the 2016 presidential campaign.) Facebook initially took a lot of heat for its response. Their early response to the controversy was to argue about the use of the word "breach"

That change came slightly too late.

To apply its “insights of behavioral psychology” to national politics, as the Mercers intended, the SCL/Cambridge team needed a lot of information about a lot of Americans. According to the Times’s report, a Cambridge employee named Christopher Wylie encountered a researcher at Cambridge University named Aleksandr Kogan. Kogan built an application that leveraged Facebook’s tools to pull information from the site and then pitched its use using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, a tool that allows developers to hire humans (sometimes then referred to as “turkers”) to do simple tasks for small fees.

The Intercept reported on how it worked last year.

“The task posted by ‘Global Science Research’ appeared ordinary, at least on the surface. The company offered turkers $1 or $2 to complete an online survey. But there were a couple of additional requirements as well. First, Global Science Research was only interested in American turkers. Second, the turkers had to download a Facebook app before they could collect payment. Global Science Research said the app would ‘download some information about you and your network … basic demographics and likes of categories, places, famous people, etc. from you and your friends.’ ”

Global Science Research was Kogan. Using this method, he gathered information on tens of millions of Americans. (The Times says more than 50 million; other outlets say 30 million.) That information was then used to build out SCL/Cambridge Analytica’s profiles.

Facebook reportedly tweaks data storage on upcoming video chat device

  Facebook reportedly tweaks data storage on upcoming video chat device Facebook has been working on a smart home device called Portal -- a video chat gadget powered by facial recognition that could reportedly suggest a call when two users are both near their respective devices. In January, reports surfaced that Portal might launch this year, but yesterday, Bloomberg reported that Facebook won't be unveiling its home products at its F8 developer conference in May as was initially planned. The pullback is attributed to the ongoing Cambridge Analytica controversy and growing concerns over how Facebook handles its users' data.

This week Steve and Susana discuss the issues and future impact of the Cambridge Analytica debacle that's been all over the news. What is Facebook doing to combat this issue and future issues? and How will this affect marketers who advertise on the Facebook platform?

Facebook is desperately trying to mend its damaged reputation following the continued fallout of a massive data scandal. In response to the story, Facebook said that when it learned about the data leaks, it sought to ban Kogan's app and legally pressured both Kogan and Cambridge Analytica to

In building his Facebook application, Kogan had pledged that his data collection was only for research purposes and that it would remain anonymized — not able to be linked to specific people. When the Guardian reported in late 2015 on the link between Kogan and Cambridge, it prompted Facebook to promise to investigate the situation. (The Guardian’s story was pegged to Sen. Ted Cruz’s (R-Tex.) presidential campaign using Cambridge Analytica for its voter contact efforts. Cruz was strongly supported by the Mercers, who also created well-funded outside groups to promote his candidacy.)

In its statement on Friday announcing the suspensions, Facebook carefully put the blame on Kogan misusing its tools and explained it had demanded in 2015 that Kogan, SCL and Cambridge delete its Facebook data. The suspension was prompted by learning last week — apparently after being contacted by the Times — that Cambridge was still in possession of some of the Facebook data. (The company denies that.)

3. What does Cambridge Analytica’s data actually look like?

It is not clear, but we do have one hint.

A professor at New York’s New School named David Carroll was studying ad targeting when he realized Cambridge’s link with SCL meant the company might be subject to Britain’s broader data-access laws, allowing him to potentially see what data the company had collected on him. In March 2017, he got a response.

It is not clear how Cambridge/SCL developed that profile of Carroll (which he described on Twitter as “accurate”), but one can see how Facebook data might help inform those categories.

Report: Cambridge Analytica hasn't deleted all of its dodgy data

  Report: Cambridge Analytica hasn't deleted all of its dodgy data According to Cambridge Analytica, it already deleted the Facebook data it collected from 50 million users years ago -- it even announced that it's undertaking a third-party audit to verify that claim. Based on a new report by UK broadcaster Channel 4, though, that might not be true at all. The broadcaster says it has discovered a cache of the data CA harvested, and it contains information on 136,000 individuals from Colorado, including their personality results and psychological profiles created from the info the firm collected.

What to know about Cambridge Analytica . Who's the bad guy in all this? Depends on your point of view. Cambridge Analytica , through a third party contractor, definitely made the most of the tools available to them to mine Facebook for every ounce of data it could reach without breaking the law

What you need to know about Facebook 's data debacle . Cambridge Analytica said in a statement that the undercover Channel 4 report was "edited and scripted to grossly misrepresent the nature of those conversations and how the company conducts its business."

One can also see how, once the profile was developed, the Facebook data underlying it would become unnecessary. It is as though you sneaked a peek at the secret recipe for Kentucky Fried Chicken and then developed your own recipe based on it. You may not be in possession of the recipe, but that is sort of beside the point.

4. Where does the Trump campaign fit into this?

Trump’s digital team was run by Brad Parscale, who last month was named campaign manager for Trump’s 2020 effort. Trump’s general election campaign was slow to get geared up after the primary, and, by mid-2016, there was a debate over how to invest in digital marketing. Bolstered by Parscale’s advocacy (and Jared Kushner’s championing) the campaign hired Cambridge Analytica, over then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort’s apparent objections. The decision may have been made easier, too, by Cambridge/SCL’s role in the successful Brexit campaign in Britain the same month.

As noted above, the Mercers had been hoping Cruz would be the Republican nominee. Once Trump won the Republican nomination, though, they shifted their focus. (The extent to which the hiring of Cambridge Analytica greased that transition is not clear.) They were reportedly instrumental in the August 2016 overhaul of Trump’s campaign, recommending the hiring of both Stephen K. Bannon (from Breitbart) and Kellyanne Conway, who had been working for one of their pro-Cruz PACs.

Over the last few months of the campaign, Parscale’s team invested heavily in Facebook advertising, even hosting a Facebook employee at their Texas war room who helped guide their work. The advertising the campaign deployed was informed by Cambridge Analytica’s data.

Bloomberg reported on the data team shortly before the election and how Parscale managed the competing data from Cambridge and the Republican Party.

British lawmakers publish evidence from Cambridge Analytica whistleblower

  British lawmakers publish evidence from Cambridge Analytica whistleblower A committee of British lawmakers on Thursday published written evidence provided by a whistleblower who says information about 50 million Facebook users ended up in the hands of political consultancy Cambridge Analytica. Christopher Wylie, who worked for Cambridge Analytica, alleges that the data was used to help to build profiles on American voters and build support for Donald Trump in the U.S. presidential election.He also claims that Canadian firm AggregateIQ (AIQ) was involved in the development of the software used to target voters.

Facebook is under fire over claims Cambridge Analytica used the data of 50 million users that was collected without their Facebook ’s Cambridge Analytica Controversy Could Be Big Trouble for the Social Network. Get The Brief. Sign up to receive the top stories you need to know right now.

“Parscale was building his own list of Trump supporters, beyond the RNC’s reach,” Bloomberg’s Joshua Green and Sasha Issenberg wrote. “Cambridge Analytica’s statistical models isolated likely supporters whom Parscale bombarded with ads on Facebook, while the campaign bought up email lists from the likes of Gingrich and Tea Party groups to prospect for others.”

One footnote: Campaign adviser Michael Flynn also contracted with SCL shortly before the end of the campaign, though he apparently never did any work for the company.

5. Does this mean Trump won the election unfairly?

Well, this is a broader question: Does Cambridge actually help win elections? Or, put another way: How much of Cambridge’s rhetoric about psychographics is just hype?

6. Fine. Where has Cambridge Analytica won elections?

In most cases, it is very hard to identify one particular factor that made the difference in a political campaign. Despite the ubiquity of politicking, campaigns do not happen that often and, when they do, there are thousands of factors that make each contest unique. So analyzing the effects of campaign tactics means perusing a small sample in which we are asked to compare apples to oranges to grapes to dogs to stars to love to six.

This is hugely advantageous for political consulting firms because it is often hard to check their claims about how effective they are. Politicians are deeply superstitious and seize on their own and others’ past successes to guide their decisions moving forward. What’s more, the field of data-driven political persuasion is fairly new, meaning a company that can claim success in a realm many career politicians do not really understand has a huge marketing advantage. Say that you have cracked the code to targeting voters with specific messages, and a lot of campaigns will write you checks.

Cambridge Analytica has not been around that long, but they have been involved in several successful campaigns. There was Sen. Thom Tillis’s (R-N.C.) Senate campaign in 2014, which he won by 1.5 points. There was the “Leave” campaign in the United Kingdom in 2016 which won by 3.8 points. And there was Trump, who lost the popular vote by 2.1 points but who won the electoral college.

There were also losing campaigns. Before Trump, the highest-profile effort Cambridge undertook was Cruz’s — and he lost. Sure, he ended up in second place in the delegate count despite being fairly unpopular the year before, but his strategy was like Trump’s: leverage a core base of support to ride out a crowded field of candidates.

In June 2016, Politico reported that Cruz’s team “was disappointed in Cambridge Analytica’s services and stopped using them before the Nevada GOP caucuses in late February, according to a former staffer for the Texas Republican.”

So it is hard to say in the abstract the effect Cambridge might have had in Trump’s race — and it is harder still to say what role the laundered Facebook data played.

Two days before the election, Cambridge’s Nix said in an interview that his firm actually wasn’t able to leverage its psychographics on Trump’s behalf.

Here is Nix, speaking to TechCrunch:

“We just didn’t have the time to rollout that survey. I mean, Christ, we had to build all the IT, all the infrastructure. There was nothing. There was 30 people on his campaign. Thirty. Even Walker it had 160 (it’s probably why he went bust). And he was the first to crash out. So as I’ve said to other of your [journalist] colleagues, clearly there’s psychographic data that’s baked-in to legacy models that we built before, because we’re not reinventing the wheel. [We’ve been] using models that are based on models, that are based on models, and we’ve been building these models for nearly four years. And all of those models had psychographics in them. But did we go out and rollout a long form quantitative psychographics survey specifically for Trump supporters? No. We just didn’t have time. We just couldn’t do that.”

An important asterisk: Two days before the election, Nix (and nearly everyone else in America) likely thought Trump was going to lose. A good way for a political consulting company to cover its back in the event of a loss is to say that it did not have the time to deploy its core value proposition.

7. Is special counsel Robert S. Mueller III tracking this whole thing?

Apparently.

Given that the Trump campaign and Cambridge invested so much in targeting people online and given that we know Russian actors tried to leverage Facebook ads and social media to influence voters, there is a natural question as to whether those two efforts had any coordination.

In July, McClatchy reported Mueller’s team was looking specifically at that.

“Congressional and Justice Department investigators are focusing on whether Trump’s campaign pointed Russian cyber operatives to certain voting jurisdictions in key states,” Peter Stone and Greg Gordon wrote. They quoted a former Pentagon staffer named Mike Carpenter. “There appears to have been significant cooperation between Russia’s online propaganda machine and individuals in the United States who were knowledgeable about where to target the disinformation,” Carpenter said.

8. So are there links to Russia?

Well, it depends on what you mean by “links.” We are in this weird moment where any even tangential link to Russia or a Russian person is heralded as a sign of questionable collusion.

So here is what we know.

The Times reports that SCL Group had spoken with the Russian oil giant Lukoil in 2014 and 2015, and that the company “was interested in how data was used to target American voters, according to two former company insiders who said there were at least three meetings with Lukoil executives in London and Turkey.” (In an interview with the “Today” show on Monday, Wylie reiterated this claim.)

The paper also notes that Cambridge included questions about Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2014 focus groups, though we will note this was also the time period in which Russia’s seizing of Crimea became central to American foreign policy conversations.

Late last year, the Daily Beast reported that Nix had contacted WikiLeaks’s Julian Assange before the election offering to host emails stolen from Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman to create a searchable database. Assange declined the offer. Those emails are believed to have been stolen by Russian hackers linked to the country’s intelligence agencies.

One other link is worth mentioning. Kogan, the Cambridge researcher who developed the tool that led to the Facebook suspension, had reportedly also received a grant from the Russian government to research social media.

“Nothing I did on the Russian project was at all related to Cambridge Analytica in any way,” Kogan told the Guardian.

British lawmakers publish evidence from Cambridge Analytica whistleblower .
A committee of British lawmakers on Thursday published written evidence provided by a whistleblower who says information about 50 million Facebook users ended up in the hands of political consultancy Cambridge Analytica. Christopher Wylie, who worked for Cambridge Analytica, alleges that the data was used to help to build profiles on American voters and build support for Donald Trump in the U.S. presidential election.He also claims that Canadian firm AggregateIQ (AIQ) was involved in the development of the software used to target voters.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!