Politics: Trump's speech: Less analytical, more sure than predecessors - PressFrom - US
  •   
  •   
  •   

PoliticsTrump's speech: Less analytical, more sure than predecessors

22:46  11 february  2019
22:46  11 february  2019 Source:   msn.com

AP FACT CHECK: Trump's claims in his State of Union address

AP FACT CHECK: Trump's claims in his State of Union address The Associated Press is fact-checking remarks from President Donald Trump's State of the Union speech. Here's a look at some of the claims we've examined:WOMEN IN WORKFORCETRUMP, in prepared excerpts: "All Americans can be proud that we have more women in the workforce than ever before."THE FACTS: Of course, there are more women working than ever before. But that's due to population growth — and not something that Trump can credit to any his policies. The big question is whether a greater percentage of women is working or searching for a job than at any point in history. And on this count, women have enjoyed better times.

Trump's speech: Less analytical, more sure than predecessors© The Associated Press HOLD FOR RELEASE for 3 p.m. EST Monday; Researchers scored U.S. presidents on analytical thinking.;

WASHINGTON — Leaders are speaking far more simply and with more confidence than they did four score and seven years ago. Donald Trump's speech has accelerated that trend.

A new study says Trump talks less analytically, and more confidently, than all past U.S. presidents.

Psychologists at the University of Texas and Princeton University used a computer language program to study nearly 3 million texts going back to 1789, using speeches by leaders in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom and Australia, along with general stories in books and newspapers, movie subtitles and cable news transcripts.

Trump ditches coal when hyping 'revolution in American energy' in SOTU speech

Trump ditches coal when hyping 'revolution in American energy' in SOTU speech President Trump did not mention coal when he declared Tuesday night that his administration has "unleashed a revolution in American energy" that has lead to historic energy export highs and economic growth. 

Trump's speeches, debates and documents scored the highest among presidents on a scale that tries to measure confidence in language, more than twice that of low man William Henry Harrison. He ranks last in speaking analytically, scoring less than half of leader John Quincy Adams and substantially below recent presidents such as George W. Bush and Barack Obama.

Kayla Jordan, a psychology researcher at the University of Texas and lead author of the study, said the nature of leaders' communication began to change around the time of Woodrow Wilson, when radio and then other mass media began to emerge and when the voting population expanded to women, minorities and young people.

There's nothing wrong with being simple, she said: "You want everyone to understand what you're saying."

Trump blasts Schiff as 'political hack' over new investigation

Trump blasts Schiff as 'political hack' over new investigation President Trump on Wednesday denounced House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) as a "political hack" for opening a sweeping investigation into Trump's ties to Russia and his personal finances. 

The study is in Monday's Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Jordan said the team looked at how leaders spoke, not at what they said. The study looked at all sorts of utterances — but not tweets — including presidential debates in part to try to minimize the effects of professional speechwriters and get more "off the cuff" speech, Jordan said. They examined articles and prepositions — such as "the" and "of" as signs of more analytical thinking, because often those words signal a phrase that explains things. Personal pronouns and adjectives — "I'' and "beautiful" — are rated less analytical.

Words like "we" and "you," are rated more confident, while tentative and negative words, like "not," ''would" or "should," are rated as less confident, Jordan said. A computerized system developed by one of the study's authors called Linguistic Inquiry Word Count spits out a score for analytics and complexity.

Trump's second State of the Union clocks higher ratings than his first

Trump's second State of the Union clocks higher ratings than his first A third-year slump for the State of the Union? Not for President Trump. Tuesday's ratings are on track to top the comparable Barack Obama speech from eight years ago.

"We understand that Trump is very different in a lot of other metrics. We're focused on these two and in these two he's not outside of the norm," Jordan said. "This isn't capturing his intelligence or other traits."

Trump so far has averaged a 44 on a 1 to 100 scale for analytical thinking. The average presidential score was 90. Every president but Trump and Barack Obama scored over 70. John Quincy Adams topped the chart just a shade under 99. Trump hit an all-time low of 16 for analytic speech in a December 2015 debate.

Before Wilson, a former president of Princeton, the average presidential analytical score was 97.7. Since then it's has been 79.5. Obama's 69 was almost 13 points below George W. Bush.

When it comes to speaking with confidence, or what the researchers also call clout, Trump tops all the presidents with an 89 rating, far above the average of 64. Only four presidents averaged more than 80 on clout and they are all relatively recent: Trump's 89, Lyndon Johnson and Obama's 81 and George W. Bush's 80.

"The more simple a message is, the easier it is to be clear and certain about it. Complex messages don't lend themselves to high levels of certainty," said Pennsylvania State University communications professor Mary Stuckey, who wasn't part of the study. "So as messages simplify certainty will go up."

Will Trump’s Finest Speech Save His Presidency?

Will Trump’s Finest Speech Save His Presidency? A chastened president gave a great speech last night. But will it be enough?

Stuckey, who is editor of the Quarterly Journal of Speech, said the study was consistent with other, similar research, but that style of speech is only one component of political language. "It does a good job of measuring what it does," she said.

Jennifer Mercieca, a professor of political rhetoric at Texas A&M University who wasn't part of the study was skeptical of the way that system scored. She doesn't think the study's system takes into account seemingly contradictory and even ironic statements Trump makes.

___

Follow Seth Borenstein on Twitter: @borenbears .

___

The Associated Press Health & Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Trump administration to cancel $929 million in California high-speed rail funding.
The U.S. Transportation Department announced Tuesday it would attempt to cancel $929 million in federal grant funds for California’s troubled high-speed rail project. The move marks an escalation in the war between President Trump and California in the days since Gov. Gavin Newsom announced a rethinking of the bullet train project after years of cost overruns. The Transportation Department also announced it was “actively exploring every legal option to seek the return from California of $2.5 billion in federal funds.” It’s unclear whether it has the legal authority to do so, and California would probably oppose such a move.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!