Politics: Judge skeptical of Trump effort to keep records from House - PressFrom - US
  •   
  •   
  •   

PoliticsJudge skeptical of Trump effort to keep records from House

21:50  14 may  2019
21:50  14 may  2019 Source:   msn.com

Trump lawyers: House Dems will share 'substantial portions' of congressional subpoenas

Trump lawyers: House Dems will share 'substantial portions' of congressional subpoenas President Trump's attorneys said in a court filing on Wednesday that lawmakers have agreed to provide them with "substantial portions of the subpoenas" issued for financial records tied to Trump, his family members and his private businesses.In a letter to District Judge Edgardo Ramos for the Southern District of New York, Trump attorney Patrick Strawbridge wrote that the president's legal team and attorneys for the House were able to strike on deal on sharing the documents requesting financial records from Capital One and Deutsche Bank.

Judge skeptical of Trump effort to keep records from House © The Associated Press In this May 13, 2019, photo, President Donald Trump listens to a question during a meeting with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán in the Oval Office.

WASHINGTON — A federal judge suggested Tuesday he is skeptical of President Donald Trump's efforts to block Congress from obtaining some of his financial records.

Judge Amit Mehta spent about an hour and a half holding a hearing on Trump's effort to keep financial records from Congress. Mehta did not rule during the hearing whether the House's subpoena of Trump financial records is a valid exercise of legislative power, but he said he would do so "promptly."

Dems agree to give Trump details on their quest for his bank records

Dems agree to give Trump details on their quest for his bank records President Trump is about to get some insight into just what House Democrats are hoping to find.

The lawsuit before Mehta comes amid a widespread effort by the White House and the president's attorneys to refuse to cooperate with congressional requests for information and records. In asking Mehta to block the subpoena, Trump is in essence asking the judicial branch to stop the legislative branch from investigating his past.

Trump and his business organization sued the House oversight committee in April in an attempt to block a subpoena issued to Mazars USA, an accountant for the president and Trump Organization. Trump's lawyers argued the subpoena "has no legitimate legislative purpose" and accused Democrats of harassing Trump and wielding their new majority in Congress to try to stain the president's standing.

Judge sets Trump lawsuit over congressional subpoenas on track for quick decision

Judge sets Trump lawsuit over congressional subpoenas on track for quick decision A judge in Washington, D.C., on Thursday said he is fast-tracking to trial the legal fight over whether to temporarily block a congressional subpoena issued for President Trump's financial records.U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta wrote in the order that he has received full briefs on whether the House Oversight and Reform Committee has the authority to issue the subpoena to the accounting firm Mazars, "and the court can discern no benefit from an additional round of legal arguments." "Nor is there an obvious need to delay ruling on the merits to allow for development of the factual record," Mehta, an Obama nominee, wrote.

But House lawyers told the judge that the Constitution gives Congress broad powers to investigate and that it doesn't need to tie an investigation it is undertaking to a specific piece of legislation it is considering.

Mehta, who was nominated to his position by President Barack Obama, suggested during the hearing that Congress has wide latitude to investigate. He told Trump lawyer William Consovoy that there isn't a case since 1880 where the Supreme Court or an appeals court found that Congress overstepped its boundaries in issuing a subpoena.

Douglas Letter, an attorney for the House, told the judge that "President Trump has no chance of success here." And he said Trump has taken the position that Congress is "just getting in his way" of running the country.

Mehta did suggest to Letter that the subpoena does seem to be an effort to get into Trump's private affairs. And he asked Letter whether there are any limits on what Congress can obtain. Letter acknowledged that there are some outer limits, suggesting a request for the president's blood or his diary from when he was a child might be too extreme. But he said the subpoena for financial records is clearly permissible.

The judge seemed to be looking to resolve the case quickly, though he said he would accept additional materials until Friday.

"We're not going to drag this out," he said at one point.

Consovoy, Trump's lawyer, indicated near the end of the hearing that his client would appeal if the judge ruled against him.

Read More

Trump appeals ruling allowing banks to hand his financial records to Congress.
The Trumps and Trump Organization appealed a court order allowing Deutsche Bank AG and Capital One to hand their financial records over to Democratic lawmakers. They are asking the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan to overrule U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos, who on Wednesday refused to block the banks from responding to subpoenas issued last month by two U.S. House of Representatives committees. Deutsche Bank, Capital One, the House Financial Services Committee and House Intelligence Committee did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!