Politics: Justice Dept. Seeks to Question C.I.A. Officers in Russia Inquiry Review - PressFrom - US
  •   
  •   
  •   

PoliticsJustice Dept. Seeks to Question C.I.A. Officers in Russia Inquiry Review

02:00  13 june  2019
02:00  13 june  2019 Source:   nytimes.com

The option Robert Mueller didn't have

The option Robert Mueller didn't have Michael Zeldin and Julian Zelizer write that special counsel regulations did not permit Mueller to submit a report to Congress, which makes it imperative for Congress to consider resurrecting the independent counsel statute -- allowing the House of Representatives to be advised of any substantial and credible evidence that may constitute grounds for an impeachment. In reaction to what some perceived as Starr's "salacious" public report, however, in 1999, Congress allowed the independent counsel law to lapse. In its place, the Department of Justice issued the special counsel regulations.

The president raised questions about C . I . A . involvement in the origins of the Russia investigation, and Dan Coats, the director of national intelligence, pledged to cooperate with the review but also The intelligence agencies already have a degree of unease over the Justice Department ’s ability to

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department ’s internal watchdog intends to complete by May or June his investigation into aspects of the Russia inquiry , including whether law enforcement officials abused their powers in surveilling a former Trump campaign aide

Justice Dept. Seeks to Question C.I.A. Officers in Russia Inquiry Review© Sarah Silbiger/The New York Times Gina Haspel, the C.I.A. director, has told senior officials at the agency that it will cooperate with the Justice Department review of the origins of the Russia inquiry.

WASHINGTON — Justice Department officials intend to interview senior C.I.A. officers as they review the Russia investigation, according to people briefed on the matter, indicating they are focused partly on the intelligence agencies’ most explosive conclusion about the 2016 election: that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia intervened to benefit Donald J. Trump.

The interview plans are the latest sign the Justice Department will take a critical look at the C.I.A.’s work on Russia’s election interference. Investigators want to talk with at least one senior counterintelligence official and a senior C.I.A. analyst, the people said. Both officials were involved in the agency’s work on understanding the Russian campaign to sabotage the election in 2016.

Senior House Democrat says support lacking for formal Trump impeachment inquiry

Senior House Democrat says support lacking for formal Trump impeachment inquiry Senior House Democrat says support lacking for formal Trump impeachment inquiry

WASHINGTON (AP) — A Justice Department review of the origins of the FBI’s Russia investigation is “broad in scope and multi-faceted,” and intelligence agencies have already been asked to preserve records and make witnesses available, according to a letter sent to Congress on Monday.

WASHINGTON (AP) — A Justice Department review of the origins of the FBI's Russia investigation is "broad in scope and multi-faceted," and intelligence "As the Attorney General has stated publicly at congressional hearings and elsewhere, there remain open questions relating to the origins of this

Sign Up For the Morning Briefing Newsletter

While the Justice Department review is not a criminal inquiry, it has provoked anxiety in the ranks of the C.I.A., according to former officials. Senior agency officials have questioned why the C.I.A.’s analytical work should be subjected to a federal prosecutor’s scrutiny. Attorney General William P. Barr, who is overseeing the review, assigned the United States attorney in Connecticut, John H. Durham, to conduct it.

[The attorney general is reviewing the Russia inquiry. Here’s what we know about its origins.]

The Justice Department has not submitted formal written requests to talk to the C.I.A. officers, but law enforcement officials have told intelligence officials that Mr. Durham will seek the interviews, two of the people said. Communications officers for both the C.I.A. and the Justice Department declined to comment.

State Dept. official ousted after assisting arms sales to Saudi Arabia, UAE: report

State Dept. official ousted after assisting arms sales to Saudi Arabia, UAE: report A senior State Department official left the Trump administration after helping develop a plan that steered billions of dollars to the defense firm he once lobbied for, according to the Wall Street Journal.Charles Faulkner, a former lobbyist for Raytheon Co., was part of a move by the Trump administration to bypass congressional review and fast-track $8 billion in arms sales to the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, according to the WSJ, citing current and former U.S. officials. Faulkner left his post as a deputy assistant secretary at the State Department after playing a role in efforts leading to the emergency declaration, according to the newspaper.

The inquiries by the Justice Department and Congress began after the disclosure last week that the C . I . A . had videotaped the 2002 interrogations The C . I . A . did not provide the tapes to the commission that investigated the 9/11 attacks or to authorities that have sought to prosecute terrorism suspects in

WASHINGTON (AP) — A Justice Department review of the origins of the FBI's Russia investigation is "broad in scope and multi-faceted," and intelligence agencies have already been asked to preserve records and make witnesses available, according to a letter sent to Congress on Monday.

The C.I.A. director, Gina Haspel, has told senior officials that her agency will cooperate — but will still work to protect critical pieces of intelligence whose disclosure could jeopardize sources, reveal collection methods or disclose information provided by allies, according to current and former American officials.

Fox News Exclusive: Trump says Mueller made a ‘fool’ of himself

Fox News Exclusive: Trump says Mueller made a ‘fool’ of himself President Trump, in an exclusive interview with Fox News’ Laura Ingraham, alluded to some of the confusion generated by former Special Counsel Robert Mueller's public statement.

‘Infiltrated or Surveilled’ His CampaignTrump Demands Inquiry Into Whether Justice Dept . In a series of tweets on Sunday morning, President Trump repeated suggestions that the special counsel investigation was a partisan exercise seeking to undermine Republican prospects in the midterm

WASHINGTON (AP) - A Justice Department review of the origins of the FBI's Russia investigation is "broad in scope and multi-faceted," and intelligence agencies have already been asked to preserve records and make witnesses available David Ortiz flown to Boston after being shot in a bar.

Ms. Haspel will not block the interviews and has told the agency that talking with Mr. Durham need not jeopardize secrets and is consistent with cooperating with Mr. Barr’s inquiry.

Mr. Barr, who was sworn in four months ago, has said he wanted to review why the F.B.I. opened a counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign to determine whether law enforcement officials abused their power.

Justice Department officials have given only broad clues about the review but did note that it is focused on the period leading up to the 2016 vote. Mr. Barr has been interested in how the C.I.A. drew its conclusions about Russia’s election sabotage, particularly the judgment that Mr. Putin ordered that operatives help Mr. Trump by discrediting his opponent, Hillary Clinton, according to current and former American officials.

Kamala Harris: Justice Dept. has ‘no choice’ but to charge Trump if he loses in 2020

Kamala Harris: Justice Dept. has ‘no choice’ but to charge Trump if he loses in 2020 The 2020 hopeful has called for Trump's impeachment following special counsel Robert Mueller's report.

The Justice Department and the C . I . A . opened a preliminary inquiry on Dec. 8, and Mr. Mukasey said Wednesday that he had concluded from that review In the late 1990s he was assigned as a special attorney in Boston leading an inquiry into allegations that F.B.I. agents and police officers had been

conspiracy to obstruct justice (witness tampering). On March 13, 2019, Manafort was sentenced to serve 73 months in prison, with 30 months to run On March 1, 2018, the court granted a motion to dismiss without prejudice the charges against Gates, following his guilty plea in a related case in the

Mr. Barr wants to know more about the C.I.A. sources who helped inform its understanding of the details of the Russian interference campaign, an official has said. He also wants to better understand the intelligence that flowed from the C.I.A. to the F.B.I. in the summer of 2016.

During the final weeks of the Obama administration, the intelligence community released a declassified assessment that concluded that Mr. Putin ordered an influence campaign that “aspired to help” Mr. Trump’s electoral chances by damaging Mrs. Clinton’s. The C.I.A. and the F.B.I. reported they had high confidence in the conclusion. The National Security Agency, which conducts electronic surveillance, had a moderate degree of confidence.

Last month, President Trump granted Mr. Barr broad powers to declassify intelligence as part of his examination. Critics of the administration say the review is simply an attempt to discredit the Russia inquiry that was taken over by Mr. Mueller and could threaten to reveal closely guarded secrets. They have pointed to Mr. Barr’s adoption of “spying,” a term invoked by critics of the Russia inquiry, to describe investigative activities.

Putin fires police officers involved in journalist's case

Putin fires police officers involved in journalist's case Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday dismissed two senior police officers involved in the arrest of an investigative journalist on drug charges that were later dropped for lack of evidence, in a case that provoked national outrage. The firings, which came a day after massive arrests at a protest rally in the Russian capital, reflect a careful balancing act by the Kremlin, which seeks to assuage public anger while maintaining a tight lid on dissent.

The Justice Department has agreed to allow congressional investigators to interview a key FBI employee The House of Representatives seeks contempt citations(?) against the Andrew McCabe as long as he's not questioned about special counsel Robert Mueller's ongoing Russia investigation.

WASHINGTON — After months of conceding to demands from a small group of House Republicans for more visibility into continuing investigations, the deputy attorney general, Rod J. Rosenstein, pushed back on Tuesday, declaring that the Justice Department “is not going to be extorted.”.

Justice Dept. Seeks to Question C.I.A. Officers in Russia Inquiry Review© Pool photo by Yuri Kadobnov The interview plans suggests that the inquiry will focus in part on the C.I.A.’s analytical conclusion about President Vladimir V. Putin’s leadership of Russia’s interference campaign.

[People are trying to figure out William Barr. He’s busy amassing power.]

Supporters of Mr. Barr say the review is merited and the attorney general can be trusted to focus it on investigators who overreached their mandate or how improper conclusions were made.

The review is unlikely to be confined only to the activities of the F.B.I. and C.I.A. It could also look into the work of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and other agencies. The people whom Mr. Durham intends to interview offer some hints about what he is interested in learning.

One of the C.I.A. officers he wants to question works at the agency’s counterintelligence mission center that would have been one conduit for the C.I.A. to pass intelligence to the F.B.I. about Russian attempts to reach out to the Trump campaign, or information that the agency uncovered about Moscow’s interference campaign. C.I.A. officers at the center work closely with the F.B.I. on complex cases like hunting down traitors and helping validate the agency’s informants.

The senior analyst whom the Justice Department wants to talk to was involved in the C.I.A. assessment of Russian activities in 2016, the people familiar with the inquiry said.

Republicans press for hearing on Hillary Clinton emails review that found 30 security incidents

Republicans press for hearing on Hillary Clinton emails review that found 30 security incidents Republicans are calling on the Democrat-led House Oversight Committee to hold a hearing focusing on the State Department's review of mishandled classified information associated with former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's private email server. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

For starters, Justice Department lawyers could refuse to follow Mr. Trump’s orders even before an For decades, White House aides have routinely sought to shield presidents from decisions related to “ I look at what’s happening with the Justice Department ,” he said in a radio interview a year ago.

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department , accused by President Trump of “slow walking” its response to a congressional inquiry into the F.B. I .’s handling of the Hillary Clinton email case, said on Sunday that it was appointing a United States attorney to speed the production of documents.

The ties between the efforts by the C.I.A. and the F.B.I. to examine Russia’s election interference are broader. In the summer of 2016, the intelligence community formed a task force housed at the C.I.A. to investigate Russian interference. The group shared intelligence with F.B.I. investigators who opened the bureau’s Russia inquiry in an effort to determine whether any Americans were working with the Russians on their interference during the election.

People familiar with the setup said the F.B.I. would ask the task force for information on certain names, for instance, but agents did not share anything about the Americans under investigation.

The C.I.A. focuses on foreign intelligence and is not supposed to investigate Americans suspected of wrongdoing. It is supposed to pass on to the F.B.I. any information it acquires in the course of its espionage work about the actions of Americans.

In a letter to Congress this week, the Justice Department wrote that while Mr. Barr has the power to declassify intelligence, it was of great importance to “protect classified information.” The review team had asked intelligence agencies to preserve information and “ensure the availability of witnesses,” wrote Stephen E. Boyd, an assistant attorney general.

Conservative critics of the intelligence assessment and the Mueller report have questioned the conclusion that Mr. Putin actively favored Mr. Trump, as opposed to simply wanting to sow chaos and weaken Mrs. Clinton.

“Putin is all about Russia’s interest, which is destabilization,” Andrew McCarthy, a former assistant United States attorney and contributing editor at National Review, a conservative publication, said at a House Intelligence Committee hearing on Wednesday. Mr. McCarthy, who was called as a witness for the Republicans, added that it was “a mistake to portray him on one side or another.”

Schiff: House in the dark about DOJ’s 2016 campaign spying probe

Schiff: House in the dark about DOJ’s 2016 campaign spying probe Attorney General Bill Barr said he wanted to find out whether there was inappropriate government “spying” on the Trump campaign.

A Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment. Mr. Trump has questioned findings by national security officials that Russia interfered in “Bruce Ohr is in a unique situation because he is still a current federal employee,” Mr. Zaid said. “If an agency had said about an employee what Sarah

But the Senate Intelligence Committee has endorsed the intelligence community’s full assessment, calling it sound and saying the varying confidence levels among agencies “appropriately represents analytical differences.” And the 448-page report released in April by Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel, also reinforced the conclusion that Russian officials were trying to benefit Mr. Trump.

And there is ample evidence that Russia intervened to favor Mr. Trump, whether it be hacking Democratic servers and publicly releasing the contents it found or the social media campaign that broadly sowed division by exploiting divisive issues but also included the purchase of advertisements that promoted Mr. Trump and the staging of pro-Trump rallies in the United States.

Justice Department officials have said Mr. Durham’s review is not a criminal inquiry, but if he finds criminal wrongdoing he can pursue it. Mr. Boyd called the review a “collaborative” effort with the intelligence agencies.

Ms. Haspel’s willingness to cooperate — shared by Dan Coats, the director of national intelligence — could be influenced by a perception in the agency that Mr. Durham has treated the C.I.A. fairly in the past. He has previously investigated the C.I.A. and the actions of Ms. Haspel, and twice exonerated agency officials.

In 2010, Mr. Durham concluded an investigation into the destruction of videotapes that depicted the torture of suspected terrorists without bringing any criminal charges, officials have confirmed. His report remains secret. Ms. Haspel was the chief of staff to the C.I.A. official who ordered the destruction of the tapes.

The attorney general at the time, Eric H. Holder Jr., had expanded the inquiry to examine questions about the C.I.A.’s mistreatment of detainees. Mr. Durham focused on the deaths of two terrorism suspects in C.I.A. custody, but ultimately decided no criminal charges were warranted.

Matthew Rosenberg contributed reporting.

Schiff: House in the dark about DOJ’s 2016 campaign spying probe.
Attorney General Bill Barr said he wanted to find out whether there was inappropriate government “spying” on the Trump campaign.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 13
This is interesting!