Politics: Fight Over Census Documents Centers on Motive for a Citizenship Question - - PressFrom - US
  •   
  •   
  •   

PoliticsFight Over Census Documents Centers on Motive for a Citizenship Question

04:00  13 june  2019
04:00  13 june  2019 Source:   nytimes.com

House Dems to hold Barr, Ross in contempt over census question

House Dems to hold Barr, Ross in contempt over census question The Oversight Committee wants key documents by Thursday.

But its mission to support and advocate for immigrants is front and center . Its latest fight is to contest the Trump administration’s contentious plan to add a citizenship question to the Furman found that Ross concealed his true motives for adding the question . The judge said the evidence showed that

The proposal to add a question about citizenship to the 2020 U.S. Census is reprehensible in any light. Recently discovered writings of the late Republican strategist Thomas B. Hofeller, who was behind the administration’s push to add the question , managed to show the motivation in an even

Fight Over Census Documents Centers on Motive for a Citizenship Question© Luke Sharrett for The New York Times Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, who oversees the Census Bureau, has long claimed that the government needs more accurate data on citizenship to enforce the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

The fight between Congress and President Trump over census documents revolves around one crucial issue: discerning the true motive of the Trump administration when it made a historic decision to ask all residents in the country if they were an American citizen.

Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, who oversees the Census Bureau, has long claimed that the government needs more accurate data on citizenship to enforce the Voting Rights Act of 1965. But a growing body of evidence — unearthed in lawsuits seeking to block the question — suggests that the administration added the question to entrench Republicans in power.

DOJ fires back at allegations over GOP strategist's role in census citizenship question

DOJ fires back at allegations over GOP strategist's role in census citizenship question The Department of Justice on Monday sought to refute new allegations that a GOP redistricting operative played a significant role in getting a citizenship question on the 2020 census, calling the claims false and without merit. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); In a new court filing, DOJ lawyers offered a biting rebuke to the allegations made against Trump administration officials of attempting to obscure the role of the late GOP operative Thomas Hofeller in adding the citizenship question.

Citizenship questions have also been included on prior decennial censuses . Adding a citizenship question would fatally undermine the accuracy of the 2020 Census and reduce response rates, especially among immigrant Scott Bomboy is the editor in chief of the National Constitution Center .

States decry census citizenship question . In another era, this would be COMMON SENSE but 19 attorneys general said they will fight the President if he dares to ask people if they are citizens . A citizenship question reappeared in 1970 on the long-form questionnaire sent to a sample of

Federal judges in three lawsuits have concluded that the Trump administration’s rationale for adding the question was contrived.

Judge Jesse M. Furman of the United States District Court in Manhattan, for instance, criticized Mr. Ross and his aides for giving false or misleading statements under oath as they struggled to explain their rationale.

Sign Up For the Morning Briefing Newsletter

The Commerce Department’s handling of the question, Judge Furman wrote in his decision, made it clear “that the goal of Secretary Ross and his aides was to launder their request through another agency — that is, to obtain cover for a decision they had already made.” In 54 years of Voting Rights Act enforcement, he noted, the Justice Department had “never before claimed that it had been hampered in any way” by a lack of detailed information on citizenship.

Trump administration denies deceit in census citizenship fight

Trump administration denies deceit in census citizenship fight Trump administration denies deceit in census citizenship fight

Three weeks of testimony in a federal courtroom about the 2020 census have focused on one question : Did the Trump administration add a citizenship question to the census for political gain? On Tuesday, the final day of the trial

Understanding the citizenship question , changing the census and the risks for data. The recent news that Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross had approved the inclusion of a question on citizenship status for the 2020 Census has brought the Census effort to the forefront this week.

And this month, documents found on the computer backups of a deceased Republican strategist offered the most persuasive evidence yet that the decision was driven not by policy, but by partisanship.

The files show that the strategist, Thomas B. Hofeller, had outlined in 2015 how Republicans could gain political power by basing new political maps on the number of voting-age citizens instead of total population — a strategy, he wrote, that could only be realized with data from a census citizenship question.

Democrats in Congress are seeking to unearth even more information about how the Commerce Department made its decision. Thousands of documents have already been turned up in lawsuits, but almost nothing is known about the extent to which the White House was directly involved.

After Mr. Trump invoked executive privilege to block disclosure of documents on the census, a House committee voted on Wednesday to recommend that the House hold Attorney General William P. Barr and Mr. Ross in contempt of Congress.

Judge delays decision in census citizenship case after hearing evidence of GOP scheme

Judge delays decision in census citizenship case after hearing evidence of GOP scheme "There is no smoking gun here, only smoke and mirrors," lawyers for the Justice Department said.

But its mission to support and advocate for immigrants is front and center . A sign on its front door in Its latest fight is to contest the Trump administration's contentious plan to add a citizenship Furman found that Ross concealed his true motives for adding the question . The judge said the evidence

WASHINGTON — A federal judge blocked the Commerce Department from adding a question on American citizenship to the 2020 census , handing a legal victory on Tuesday to critics who accused the Trump administration of trying to turn the census into a tool to advance Republican political

Challenges to the citizenship question are now before the Supreme Court, which is expected to issue a final ruling before the court’s term ends later this month. In arguments before the court in April, conservative justices seemed ready to accept the Trump administration’s argument that it had both the discretion and a sound reason to measure citizenship in 2020.

Experts say that adding a citizenship question would deter immigrants and minority residents from responding to the census, leading to an undercount in the predominantly Democratic areas where the bulk of them live. In addition, a census that reveals with precision where noncitizens live is crucial to plans by some conservatives to base political districts not on total population, but on the number of voting-age citizens. That, too, would benefit Republicans, particularly in states like Texas and California with large numbers of foreign-born residents.

Suspicions that an ulterior motive lay beneath Mr. Ross’s decision have been further bolstered by the way that decision was made — almost totally in secret and without testing of its language, in contrast to the years of surveys and consultation that have preceded every previous change in the census questionnaire.

Contempt vote likely after DOJ rejects demand for census docs

Contempt vote likely after DOJ rejects demand for census docs The attorney general and commerce secretary didn't comply with a Thursday deadline to turn over documents.

Study all questions or take a practice Citizenship test online for free. The 100 civics (history and government) questions and answers for the naturalization test are listed below. fought for civil rights. worked for equality for all Americans.

The plaintiffs argued that including a question on citizenship in the census would depress responses from the There is “no possibility of a do- over if it turns out to be flawed,” he said. Reinstating the citizenship question ultimately protects the right to vote and helps ensure free and fair elections for

Terri Ann Lowenthal, a consultant on census matters who managed the issue for the Obama transition team in 2008, said that virtually everything about the administration’s handling of the citizenship question “raised significant alarm bells.”

“The traditional process for determining census questions is done primarily in the public arena,” she said. “And that simply did not happen this time.”

When Mr. Ross announced his decision to add a question on citizenship to the census, he cast it as the culmination of months of intensive research by Census Bureau experts and advice from members of Congress, businesses and interest groups with a stake in an accurate head count and the public.

That was true only in the narrowest of senses. Evidence in the lawsuits shows that interest in the question dated to the fall of 2016, when a transition team preparing for the Trump presidency added it to a list of issues to consider. That suggestion came from Mr. Hofeller, the mastermind of a string of gerrymanders drawn in 2011 that locked the Republican Party into a decade of control in state legislatures nationwide.

Mr. Ross has repeatedly said that he decided to add a citizenship question only after the Justice Department requested it, saying better citizenship data would assist Voting Rights Act enforcement. Evidence in the lawsuits has showed, though, that Mr. Ross pressured the department to request the citizenship question, not the other way around.

Opponents of citizenship question on 2020 census ask Supreme Court to delay ruling based on new allegations

Opponents of citizenship question on 2020 census ask Supreme Court to delay ruling based on new allegations Opponents of the Trump administration's effort to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census asked the Supreme Court not to decide the issue now.

Reinstating the citizenship question ultimately protects the right to vote and helps ensure free and But documents disclosed as part of the lawsuit revealed that Ross was interested in adding the Top Census Scientist's Testimony Casts Doubt On Motives For Study On Citizenship Question .

The Trump administration's decision to ask people about their citizenship in the 2020 Census set off worries that non- citizens will dodge the survey altogether, diluting political representation for states that tend to vote Democratic. (March 27) AP.

Adding the question appeared to be a top priority for the commerce secretary.

Less than two weeks after taking office in 2017, Mr. Ross tasked an aide with researching whether recent censuses had asked about citizenship (they had not) and whether noncitizens were included in population counts used for redistricting (they were).

That April, at the request of Mr. Trump’s chief strategist, Stephen K. Bannon, Mr. Ross talked about the census with Kris Kobach, at the time the Kansas secretary of state and a virulent opponent of immigration. In a subsequent email, Mr. Kobach told Mr. Ross that adding a citizenship question was essential to solve “the problem that aliens who do not actually ‘reside’ in the United States are still counted for congressional apportionment.”

Mr. Ross later said he did not act on Mr. Kobach’s advice.

It was not until December that the Justice Department formally requested a citizenship question in a three-page request saying that adding the query was “critical” to getting precise enough data on noncitizens to enforce the Voting Rights Act.

In the months that followed, expert analysts there concluded that the question would deter at least 630,000 households with millions of residents from filling out the census form, and offered Mr. Ross alternatives that they said would produce much the same data. Both public comments on the proposal and the response from businesses and experts were almost uniformly opposed to adding the question.

Mr. Ross, however, was undeterred, and the Commerce Department later said that his wooing of the Justice Department was not evidence of skulduggery, but a civics-book example of how policy is made.

“Executive branch officials discussing important issues prior to formulating policy is evidence of good government,” a spokesman, Kevin Manning, said in a statement. “Executive branch officials worked together to ensure that Secretary Ross received all of the information necessary to make an informed decision.”

Sheelagh McNeill contributed research in New York

Read More

Judge in census case: New evidence alleging political motivation behind citizenship question 'raises a substantial issue'.
In a blow to the Trump administration, a federal trial judge said Wednesday that he believes new evidence presented in a challenge to the 2020 census citizenship question "raises a substantial issue." require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); The decision could lead to reopening one of three federal trials into the citizenship question and lead to further examinations of Republican redistricting consultant Thomas Hofeller's role in developing the question.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 3
This is interesting!