PoliticsPolitics, policy and procedure of Mueller’s upcoming Congressional testimony

11:30  12 july  2019
11:30  12 july  2019 Source:   foxnews.com

Mueller testimony delayed by one week

Mueller testimony delayed by one week It's unclear why Robert Mueller’s testimony was delayed until July 24.

Published July 12. Politics , policy and procedure of Mueller ’ s upcoming Congressional testimony . Politics , policy and procedure . Politicians may quibble as to whether the politics are right about an issue. Are members politically in step with their districts or states on a topic?

Mueller has stated that his congressional testimony would not go beyond what is contained within his report. Negotiations over the scope of Mueller ’ s testimony have taken place under a veil of secrecy. Justice Department officials have been discussing the parameters of Mueller ’ s testimony with him

Politics, policy and procedure of Mueller’s upcoming Congressional testimony© Al Drago/AP Photo Special counsel Robert Mueller departs dinner at Martin's Tavern in Georgetown, Monday, May 6, 2019, in Washington. (AP Photo/Al Drago)

Three omnipresent factors dominate everything on Capitol Hill. They’re known as “the three P’s.” Politics, policy and procedure.

Politicians may quibble as to whether the politics are right about an issue. Are members politically in step with their districts or states on a topic? Maybe so. Maybe not. They don’t have to be. And, if a lawmaker strays too far afield from his or her voters, they often pay the price.

Ex-Obama attorney apologizes, deletes tweet that Fox not covering Mueller hearing

Ex-Obama attorney apologizes, deletes tweet that Fox not covering Mueller hearing Former U.S Attorney Joyce Vance apologized after deleting a tweet falsely claiming that Fox News would not air former special counsel Robert Mueller's upcoming House hearing. Vance, who served under former President Obama, said the tweet was meant to be ironic, but deleted it to limit any confusion. "I've deleted an earlier tweet I intended ironically, but that some took as factual regarding Fox news coverage of Mueller's testimony," Vance tweeted. "My apologies to anyone I confused. I don't like to delete tweets but that seems a better course than unintentionally misinforming people.

While Mueller ’ s testimony on Wednesday did not immediately move the needle on impeachment, other measures suggest the investigation into Russian Morning Consult is a nonpartisan media and technology company that provides data-driven research and insights on politics , policy and business

Special counsel Robert Mueller could testify before the House Judiciary Committee as early as next week, in what could become the most consequential congressional hearing of the Trump administration.

Lawmakers wrestle constantly about policy. This is the right approach for defense. No, this is the right policy for defense. No, you’re both wrong. Pols may be at odds over how to handle issues at the border, immigration, health care or even the debt ceiling. Their disposition may be right or flawed. But it doesn’t matter. Lawmakers don’t have to be right on the policies they support or reject.

And then there is procedure.

The politics can be off-kilter. The policy can be iffy. But the procedure cannot be out of alignment. Congressional rules are the Congressional rules. The Constitution is the Constitution. House and Senate precedent is House and Senate precedent. The only one of the three P’s which must be on target is the procedure.

This brings us to next Wednesday’s hearings with Special Counsel Robert Mueller before the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees. The committees are still negotiating with Mueller’s team about the structure of the hearing. First of all, Mueller was only willing to come under a subpoena. So, the House issued a subpoena. Now, Mueller’s agreed to only submit to two hours of questioning apiece for both panels. But two hours may not be sufficient.

Democrat confident majority of Democrat caucus will be in favor of impeachment after Mueller testimony

Democrat confident majority of Democrat caucus will be in favor of impeachment after Mueller testimony Robert Mueller's much-anticipated testimony may have been delayed for a week, but at least one Democrat has already made up his mind on what should happen after the former special counsel speaks on the Hill. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); House Budget Chairman John Yarmuth D-Ky., said he's confident at least half of the Democratic caucus will come out in favor of impeaching President Trump if Mueller's congressional testimony goes according to plan.

Politics Mueller testimony : Live updates from today' s congressional hearing. Based on Justice Department policy and principles of fairness, we decided we would not make First, public testimony could affect several ongoing matters. In some of these matters, court rules or judicial orders limit the

WASHINGTON — Robert S . Mueller III, the former special counsel, has agreed to testify in public before Congress next month about his investigation into Russia’ s election interference and possible obstruction of justice by President Trump, House Democrats announced on Tuesday night.

There is a time problem. House Rule XI, Clause 2(J) says that “each committee shall apply the five-minute rule during the questioning of witnesses in a hearing until such time as each member of the committee who so desires has had an opportunity to question in each witness.”

In other words, everyone is required to get five minutes to pose questions.

The Judiciary Committee is comprised of 41 members: 24 Democrats and 17 Republicans. If the committee abides by the House rule, that’s 205 minutes of Q&A alone. Three hours and 25 minutes. And things on Capitol Hill always consume much more time than expected.

Things are a little better for the Intelligence Committee. That panel has 22 members: 13 Democrats and nine Republicans. That would entail 110 minutes or an hour and 50 minutes. Still, there’s not much wiggle room.

Consider this: There are almost always opening statements by the chair, ranking minority member and the witness. Housekeeping consumes a few minutes. At a hearing of this magnitude, there’s a high possibility for disruptions from the audience and “parliamentary inquiries” from members about how the panel is proceeding. Those issues could start to devour the allocations pretty fast.

Trump knocks Mueller after deal struck for him to testify

Trump knocks Mueller after deal struck for him to testify President Trump knocked former special counsel Robert Mueller on Friday and Saturday after he struck a deal with the House Intelligence and Judiciary committees to give extended testimony.The July 24 testimony will help illuminate Mueller's report into Russia's election interference and potential obstruction of justice by Trump for a nationally televised audience.Seeking to preempt the appearance, the president turned to Judicial Watch, a conservative advocacy group, to hit at the former special counsel. "This is one of the most horrible abuses of all. Those texts between gaga lovers would have told the whole story.

Politics |Justice Dept. The department told the House Intelligence and Judiciary Committees last week that it was opposed to the testimony and had communicated its view to the two former members of Mr. Mueller ’ s team, Aaron Zebley and James L. Quarles III, according to a senior congressional

Mueller ' s testimony is poised to be the most-anticipated congressional hearing in years, and represents a huge moment for House Democrats who have "He was and is deeply reluctant to come testify, but nonetheless he has agreed to respect the subpoena," Schiff told CNN on Tuesday evening.

On the first day of confirmation hearings for Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh last September, senators wrangled for one hour and 17 minutes over procedure, documents, dilatory tactics and endured various crowd disruptions before Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) could finally read more than 12 words of his opening statement. All of that was even a couple of weeks before anyone heard anything about Kavanaugh’s accuser Christine Blasey Ford.

So what happens if lawmakers don’t get to engage Mueller in questions? Unclear. But the procedure would be off.

No one is quite sure where this is going.

House Judiciary Committee Democrats held a lengthy, closed-door session about the structure of the hearing on Wednesday night. Most lawmakers emerged with few answers. Nearly all replied that things were “in flux.” Reporters staking out the conclave even asked if “in flux” was a unified talking point Democrats agreed to. They denied it.

“These are ongoing discussions,” said Rep. Lou Correa (D-CA) as he headed down a corridor to avoid reporters.

Mueller report shows evidence Trump committed crimes, House Judiciary chairman says

Mueller report shows evidence Trump committed crimes, House Judiciary chairman says The top Democrat on the U.S. House Judiciary Committee said Sunday he believes there is "substantial evidence" that President Donald Trump committed high crimes and misdemeanors, and he plans to ask former Special Counsel Robert Mueller to present those facts at a congressional hearing on Wednesday. "The report presents very substantial evidence that the president is guilty of high crime and misdemeanors, and we have to let Mueller present those facts to the American people and then see where we go from there," House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler said on "Fox News Sunday.

“Is this going to be settled tonight?” asked yours truly.

“It’s ongoing discussions,” replied Correa. “It may not be settled until the day of the hearing.”

Rep. Debbie Mucarsel-Powell (D-FL) is a freshman member of the Judiciary Committee. She’d likely be one of the last members to question Mueller, due to her lack of seniority. Reporters asked if she’d be allowed to question Mueller.

“We are talking on the format. We haven’t decided yet,” replied Mucarsel-Powell. “We’re still negotiating with Mueller’s team on the timing and how much time we’re going to have.”

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) is one of the most outspoken members on the Democratic side of the aisle. She rarely shies away from a reporter’s question in the hall or a TV camera. But not Wednesday night. Jackson Lee headed straight for the elevator.

“We are preparing for a full hearing with Mr. Mueller,” said Jackson Lee matter-of-factly as she slid into an elevator, the door closing on cue.

And it’s not just Democrats who are perturbed.

“I’m really irritated,” said Judiciary Committee member Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-AZ), who just joined the House 14 months ago. “I don’t even get to question him? This is just plain wrong. I’ve been elected just like anybody elsewhere and for the leadership in the committee to decide that only certain members and certain members even on (the Democratic side) of the aisle – that’s just plain wrong.”

Adam Schiff wants Mueller to bring his report ‘to life’

Adam Schiff wants Mueller to bring his report ‘to life’ There's "a pretty damning set of facts that most American people are not familiar with," the House Intelligence chairman said.

Rep. Martha Roby (R-AL) tried to engage Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) on the issue during a meeting of the panel Thursday morning.

“Could you lay out for us what exactly, with respect to the Muller hearing next week, what exactly you agreed to and why you agreed to it?” asked Roby.

Nadler finally responded after a pregnant and awkward pause.

“I’m not going to comment on that at this hearing. It is beyond the scope of this hearing,” replied Nadler.

The consternation for this hearing anyway, exacerbated by the time constraints. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said she wouldn’t infuse herself into the debate in an effort to preserve the institution’s rules or to broker an agreement.

“I wish we had more time. But I’m glad we have the time we have,” said Pelosi. “On distribution of timing in committees, I’ll leave that up to the chairmen.”

So, Mueller is coming next Wednesday. The politics of having Mueller come could be right or wrong. The policy stances of Democrats and Republicans on the Russia probe could be right or wrong.

And if they only stick to two hours for each committee – thwarting many members from asking questions under House rules, the procedure is wrong.

Read More

Trump lashes out as House investigators prep more subpoenas.
The White House has consistently stonewalled requests for information made by Democrats, oftentimes invoking executive privilege to block testimony. But a number of those facing subpoenas Thursday have not worked in the White House, potentially stripping Trump of the ability to employ such a tactic. Now the Democrats have asked to see 12 more people who have already spent hours with Robert Mueller, and spent a fortune on lawyers in so doing. How many bites at the apple do they get before working on Border Loopholes and Asylum. They also want to interview the highly……— Donald J.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!