PoliticsThe straightforward question House Democrats can’t answer

02:40  12 september  2019
02:40  12 september  2019 Source:   washingtonpost.com

White House lawyer, nominated as judge, stays mum at hearing

White House lawyer, nominated as judge, stays mum at hearing A White House lawyer nominated to be a federal appeals court judge declined to answer questions Wednesday from senators about his work in the Trump White House and Education Department. Steven Menashi, an associate White House counsel, has been nominated by President Donald Trump for the New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. At a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Menashi refused to answer questions from Democratic Sens. Dianne Feinstein of California and Dick Durbin of Illinois about his work on immigration issues, including a policy to separate migrant children from their families at the U.S.-Mexico border.

Over the past two weeks, House Democrats have provided no fewer than three different explanations for what steps the House Judiciary Committee is taking At this point, it’s hard to say, in part because House Democrats offer different, often-strained answers to a straightforward question : Has the

Nowhere can I find in plain english exactly spelled out from 1 to 10 what the health care plan is. What the rules and regulations are. I only find bits and pieces of someone elses opinion. So this is why you can ' t find a straightforward explanation of what the health care plan will encompass.

Depending on whom you ask, on Thursday morning, the House Judiciary Committee will vote on procedures to investigate whether to open an impeachment inquiry or to continue an already opened impeachment inquiry.

Or maybe there is no inquiry at all. At this point, it’s hard to say, in part because House Democrats offer different, often-strained answers to a straightforward question: Has the House begun an impeachment investigation of President Trump?

North Carolina Republicans vote to override a budget veto while Democrats were at a 9/11 ceremony

North Carolina Republicans vote to override a budget veto while Democrats were at a 9/11 ceremony The GOP state legislators did not have the votes to override the governor's veto as long as Democrats were present.

"It Takes A Village" Democrat Marxist Nannyism is Creating a Generation of Village Idiots. Clinton Can ' t Win the Presidency So Bloomberg Eyeing Hillary For Running Mate.

I don’t think it’s that Democrats can ’ t obstruct and get away with it. A year later, Democrats rode their opposition to President Bush to majorities in the House and Senate, so they definitely got away with it then! Liberals, having a more diverse value system that stems from having a more diverse array of supports cannot even be liberal without existing without compromise. Related Questions .

Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Today’s most popular stories on The Washington Post

As House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has taken a hands-off approach to what Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) in August labeled an impeachment inquiry, rank-and-file House Democrats have found themselves engaged in semantic battles over what exactly the House is doing on impeachment. You can watch examples of the various descriptions by Democrats of the status of impeachment in the video above.

The committee is scheduled to meet at 8 a.m. Thursday to vote on a resolution to expand its investigatory options to include rarely used procedures to look into Trump.

Over the past three days, House Democrats have characterized Thursday’s vote in three ways: as a procedural motion, as a formalizing of an existing impeachment inquiry and as the start of an impeachment inquiry.

Why some Democrats are holding out on impeachment

Why some Democrats are holding out on impeachment In short: The less competitive the district, the more likely a House Democrat is to support an impeachment probe. In the 135 House districts represented by Democrats who support launching an impeachment inquiry, Hillary Clinton won by an average of 35 percentage points. But that average margin of victory shrinks to just half of that, 18 points, in the 100 House districts represented by Democrats who do not support launching an impeachment inquiry.

Straightforward Pre-intermediate Second edition Macmillan Publishers Limited 2012. Zoe has just moved into the house next door to Hector. Listen to their conversation and decide if these sentences are Part 2 Choose the best title for the article. Do questions 710 before you answer this question .

If Democrats really wanted people to be able to purchase health insurance when they move or lose a job as easily as they purchase car insurance and home insurance (or haircuts, dog walkers, cars, food, computers), they could do it in a one-page bill Could there be a more straightforward alternative?

“We’re holding hearings for the purpose of investigating the possibility of voting [on] articles of impeachment,” Nadler told NBC News this week.

On Monday morning, a second member of the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Debbie Mucarsel-Powell (D-Fla.), told CNN that it was “no secret” that the committee was conducting an impeachment investigation.

Later on Monday, a third member of the committee, Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.), said Thursday’s vote would “formalize having an impeachment inquiry.”

And on Wednesday, a fourth member of the committee, Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), would not commit that an impeachment inquiry was underway.

“We’re in the midst of a Judiciary Committee investigation,” Jeffries said.

In fact, Nadler’s comments in August acknowledged that House Democrats had started an impeachment inquiry when the Judiciary Committee in July argued in a court filing that it needed the full, unredacted report from former special counsel Robert S. Mueller III because it “is conducting an investigation to determine whether to recommend articles of impeachment.”

DOJ files brief arguing against House impeachment probe

DOJ files brief arguing against House impeachment probe The Department of Justice (DOJ) argued Friday that a federal court should reject the House Judiciary Committee's efforts to obtain evidence and testimony from special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation in part because Democrats cannot agree on the scope of the panel's inquiry. The DOJ noted conflicting language used by House Democrats as to whether the Judiciary Committee's probe into obstruction of justice, among other things, amounted to an impeachment investigation, specifically citing reluctance among House leadership to label the inquiry as such.

Upon answering the question you may earn a different Professor level with regards to how satisfying the student felt the answer was. The best possible answers for all the questions in Fire Emblem: Three Houses are as follows: Ashe: I’m…kind of terrified to walk the monastery grounds at night.

We could ask the same question from the other side: Consider for a moment just how bad Hilary First of all, while Hillary Clinton is a heavy favorite to win the Democratic nomination, Democrats still have a Originally Answered : Why won' t democratic register as republicans and vote for trump how

Debating where impeachment stands is confusing and jargon-heavy. But Democrats’ semantic contortions this week are significant. They suggest a nonexistent or confusing messaging strategy on impeachment, which is the most serious investigation the House can consider.

The confusion also reflects two more realities for House Democrats: Most Americans and most House lawmakers oppose an impeachment inquiry, even as a majority of House Democrats support one.

Fourteen months before the 2020 presidential election, Democratic leadership does not have its impeachment messaging straight.

On Wednesday morning, House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) told reporters that an impeachment inquiry was not underway.

Less than two hours later, Hoyer offered a clarification that wasn’t exactly clarifying.

“I thought the question was in regards to whether the full House is actively considering articles of impeachment, which we are not at this time,” he said in a statement. “ … I strongly support Chairman Nadler and the Judiciary Committee Democrats as they proceed with their investigation ‘to determine whether to recommend articles of impeachment to the full House,’ as the resolution states.”

Rachael Bade and Amber Phillips contributed to this analysis.

Read More

Pelosi: Lewandowski should have been held in contempt 'right then and there'.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Wednesday that President Trump's former campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, should have been held in contempt "right then and there" when he refused to cooperate with Democrats during a hearing the day before. In a meeting on Wednesday with fellow Democratic lawmakers, Pelosi expressed frustration with Lewandowski's behavior during a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Tuesday, in which he largely refused to answer questions about his alleged role in the president's efforts to obstruct former special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation and used the hearing as a platform to promote his Senate campaign.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!