Politics: Why some Democrats are holding out on impeachment - PressFrom - US
  •   
  •   
  •   

PoliticsWhy some Democrats are holding out on impeachment

20:05  12 september  2019
20:05  12 september  2019 Source:   cnn.com

House Democrats unveil impeachment probe parameters

House Democrats unveil impeachment probe parameters Speaker Nancy Pelosi continues to publicly resist a formal impeachment inquiry.

Some are also warning Democrats they would face a backlash if they go ahead. But many top Democrats seem to have made up their minds on impeachment even before the redacted Mueller "It is also important to know that the facts regarding holding the President accountable can be gained

Some impeachment -or-nothing advocates suspect that this is all part of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s secret scheme to avoid impeachment altogether – that she fears Whether there’s a train wreck ahead for Democrats or not, figuring out how to hold effective hearings would help in the meantime.

With top Democrats sending mixed signals on whether the House Judiciary Committee is conducting a formal impeachment inquiry, dozens of Democratic representatives are still resisting growing calls for an impeachment probe despite a pivotal vote for the investigation on Thursday.

Why some Democrats are holding out on impeachment© Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 04: U.S. President Donald Trump talks to reporters following a briefing from officials about Hurricane Dorian in the Oval Office at the White House September 04, 2019 in Washington, DC. Trump was briefed by acting Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan, U.S. Coast Guard Admiral Karl Schultz and Deputy Assistant to the President and Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Advisor Peter Brown (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Why? The electoral map offers an explanation.

The straightforward question House Democrats can’t answer

The straightforward question House Democrats can’t answer Over the past two weeks, House Democrats have provided no fewer than three different explanations for what steps the House Judiciary Committee is taking on impeachment.

Democrats clamoring to impeach President Donald Trump will score a victory of sorts this morning, when “The American people get that the president is not supposed to be holding office to get rich Speaker Nancy Pelosi has told her members that the public “ is not there” on impeachment and that if

As they navigate the tricky politics and complex legal terrain of impeachment , Democrats are sending mixed The confusion and contradictory statements are in some ways to be expected, as Democratic leaders toil to The Constitution lays out only the barest facts about impeachment , and traditionally

A new CNN analysis shows that House Democrats who support an impeachment inquiry represent districts with a 2016 margin of victory twice as wide as their Democratic counterparts who oppose an impeachment inquiry.

In short: The less competitive the district, the more likely a House Democrat is to support an impeachment probe.

In the 135 House districts represented by Democrats who support launching an impeachment inquiry, Hillary Clinton won by an average of 35 percentage points. But that average margin of victory shrinks to just half of that, 18 points, in the 100 House districts represented by Democrats who do not support launching an impeachment inquiry.

Gabbard: Impeachment would only tear U.S. apart

Gabbard: Impeachment would only tear U.S. apart Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) said in a new interview that she opposes an effort by dozens of House Democrats for an impeachment inquiry into the president, saying it would cause further divisions within the U.S..

Democrats are mired in an impeachment mess of their own making. Conflicting signals from the House’s most powerful Democrats have left Privately, though, some Democrats are fretting that the mixed messages could hurt them in federal court, where they are Missing out on the latest scoops?

House Democrats are plainly scared of impeachment . It's unclear what "self- impeachment " could entail, but as yet Democrats have not taken any concrete steps on the matter. So let's lay out carefully the substantive and political case for convening an impeachment inquiry committee.

Further, in the 31 Trump districts represented by Democratic House members, only two of them -- Chris Pappas of New Hampshire and Lauren Underwood of Illinois -- support an impeachment inquiry.

Overall, the data marks a shift toward the mainstream for impeachment proponents since last January, when a CNN analysis found Clinton's margin of victory was a much larger 46 points in pro-impeachment districts vs. 28 points in anti-impeachment districts, based on a January 2018 vote on the floor.

In fact, a broad 30 of the 38 Democrats representing the most anti-Trump districts support an impeachment probe. But only 5 of the 38 Democrats representing the strongest Trump districts support an impeachment inquiry.

The Democrat in the most anti-Trump district who still doesn't support an impeachment inquiry? Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi.

"We have been having an investigation -- in case you missed it -- for a very long time," Pelosi said earlier this week. "I do know that we've been on the path to (investigate) and that includes the possibility of legislation or impeachment."

DOJ files brief arguing against House impeachment probe

DOJ files brief arguing against House impeachment probe The Department of Justice (DOJ) argued Friday that a federal court should reject the House Judiciary Committee's efforts to obtain evidence and testimony from special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation in part because Democrats cannot agree on the scope of the panel's inquiry. The DOJ noted conflicting language used by House Democrats as to whether the Judiciary Committee's probe into obstruction of justice, among other things, amounted to an impeachment investigation, specifically citing reluctance among House leadership to label the inquiry as such.

Why ? Anzalone: My main point is that Americans are very divided on impeachment and it has I think we should be holding hearings on restoring what has been taken away from ACA and improving We are drowning out our own core strengths and strengthening Trump's political hand and exciting his

Democrats have resisted impeachment in part because of a belief (not grounded in history) that impeachment should ensue only if removal is But linking impeachment with removal loses the unique purpose of this constitutional check — spelling out and limiting the unconstitutional behavior of

The House Judiciary Committee approved a resolution on Thursday to outline potential impeachment proceedings against Trump. The committee's chairman, Democratic Rep. Jerry Nadler of New York, says the move will strengthen the committee's ability to conduct its investigation.

But Democrats are divided on whether a formal impeachment inquiry is already underway. Nadler said on Monday that his panel is indeed performing an impeachment inquiry, though other top Democrats have framed it as merely a continuation of ongoing probes.

Nadler appeared tired of the debate surrounding what to call his investigation Thursday.

"Some call this process an impeachment inquiry," Nadler said. "Some call it an impeachment investigation. There is no legal difference between these terms, and I no longer care to argue about the nomenclature."

Impeachment would require a majority vote in the House of Representatives, but removing the President from office would require an unlikely two-thirds vote in the Republican-led Senate.

Pelosi gets squeezed on impeachment.
Analysis: The House speaker has stood up to pressure from all sides this year. Will her strategy hold now that it's mounting quickly?

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!