Politics: Republicans echo Trump in suggesting whistleblower complaint is politically motivated - PressFrom - US
  •   
  •   
  •   

Politics Republicans echo Trump in suggesting whistleblower complaint is politically motivated

01:15  21 september  2019
01:15  21 september  2019 Source:   washingtonpost.com

Jim Jordan, Mark Meadows, others in GOP blast 'whistleblower' case as 'highly partisan'

  Jim Jordan, Mark Meadows, others in GOP blast 'whistleblower' case as 'highly partisan' Republicans in Congress Friday parroted President Trump’s sentiments that a whistleblower who filed a complaint with the Inspector General over an apparent July phone call with Ukraine’s president is acting “highly partisan.”“It’s not like we haven’t seen this movie before," U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, told the Washington Post.

Trump dismissed the complaint from a whistleblower within the intelligence community - reported by several U.S. news House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy echoed Giuliani’s allegations about Biden and said the whistleblower could have brought his complaint directly to Congress, telling

The complaint involves President Trump 's communication with a foreign leader, as the Washington Post first reported Wednesday night and CBS News has confirmed. The unidentified whistleblower filed the complaint with the intelligence community inspector general, Michael Atkinson, on August 12.

Republicans responded with a collective shrug to explosive news that an intelligence official had lodged a complaint with the inspector general about President Trump’s communications with a foreign leader, the latest example of GOP lawmakers falling in line.

Jim Jordan wearing a suit and tie smiling at the camera: Sen. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) asks a question of Corey Lewandowski, former campaign manager for President Donald Trump, during a House Judiciary Committee hearing, Tuesday.© Jacquelyn Martin/AP Sen. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) asks a question of Corey Lewandowski, former campaign manager for President Donald Trump, during a House Judiciary Committee hearing, Tuesday.

Rank-and-file Republicans on Friday repeatedly dodged questions about a whistleblower allegation that a “promise” Trump made to a foreign leader jeopardized national security. Some even went so far as to dismiss the complaint as politically motivated — even though they hadn’t seen the full details of the allegation.

The only 7 countries that are on track to meet the Paris Agreement—and how they're doing it

  The only 7 countries that are on track to meet the Paris Agreement—and how they're doing it There are seven countries on track to meet the Paris Agreement, the ambitious climate action policy agreed upon by 195 countries in 2015. Find out what they are and how they’re achieving their goals.

Republicans , long advocates for strengthening whistleblower protections, are blaming the media and saying President Donald Trump might be entitled to some constitutionally mandated privacy. Former officials and whistleblower specialists are saying Congress needs to ensure this never happens again.

The details of a whistleblower complaint reported by The Washington Post described as an unspecified "promise" by US President Donald Trump to a foreign leader remain unknown, however, two people familiar with the matter told the outlet that the promise involved Ukraine.

“It's not like we haven't seen this movie before: Democrats come out, they're all spun up, [House Intelligence Committee Chairman] Adam B. Schiff makes all kinds of statements, and then when the facts come out: Whoa, different story!” said Trump-ally Rep. Jim Jordan (Ohio), the top Republican on the House Oversight and Reform Committee. He compared the latest allegations to claims that Trump worked with Russia to win in 2016. “This seems to be the same kind of deal.”

Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Today’s most popular stories on The Washington Post

The GOP’s nonchalance even extended to the decision by acting director of national intelligence Joseph Maguire not to share the complaint with Congress, though the law says explicitly that national security matters deemed “urgent” should be shared with intelligence committees on Capitol Hill.

Schiff says whistleblower wants to talk to House intelligence Committee

  Schiff says whistleblower wants to talk to House intelligence Committee House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Adam Schiff announced Tuesday that the whistleblower who filed a mysterious complaint, which includes allegations about President Donald Trump's conduct, would like to speak to the committee. The whistleblower has requested guidance from acting DNI Joseph Maguire on how to do so, Schiff said."We have been informed by the whistleblower's counsel that their client would like to speak to our committee and has requested guidance from the Acting DNI as to how to do so," Schiff tweeted.

The whistleblower lodged the complaint because they were deeply troubled by a phone call Trump had with a foreign leader, and in particular, a "promise" Trump made during the call. The House Intelligence Committee has demanded a full, unredacted copy of the complaint , but the Office of the

5 had suggested that Trump was withholding military aid to Ukraine to pressure it to investigate Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, who is on the board of a Ukrainian gas company. If whistleblowers file complaints under the law and the complaint is withheld from Congress, he said, it could have a

Congressional Republicans repeatedly used their oversight authority to investigate Democratic administrations, demanding documents and witnesses from previous White Houses. Republicans, for the most part, wouldn’t demand the complaint’s release.

“It would have a real chilling effect on dialogue between important leaders if they think that every time someone who overhears a conversation that wasn't even party to the conversation is going to file a whistleblower complaint and it'll end up on the front page of periodicals across the country,” said Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), one of Trump’s closest allies.

The move by the administration to keep the complaint from Congress is just the latest in a months-long effort by the Trump administration to stonewall all congressional investigations related to the president. Legal experts say the pattern has undercut the separation of powers and could erode Congress’s authority in the future.

Whistleblower complaint declassified on eve of high-stakes testimony

  Whistleblower complaint declassified on eve of high-stakes testimony The whistleblower complaint at the center of the political firestorm involving President Trump's contacts with Ukraine's leader has been declassified, a member of the House Intelligence Committee announced late Wednesday. © Getty Images Whistleblower complaint declassified on eve of high-stakes testimony "BREAKING NEWS: The whistleblower complaint has been declassified. I encourage you all to read it," tweeted Rep. Chris Stewart (R-Utah). require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

The whistleblower 's potentially explosive complaint alleges wrongdoing in a reported private conversation Trump had with a foreign leader. He declared Friday that the complaint was made by a “partisan whistleblower ,” though he later said he did not know the identity of the person.

(RELATED: Mystery Whistleblower Complaint Involves Trump Phone Call With Foreign Leader). Details of the complaint have spilled into public view following a tense battle between House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff and Joseph Maguire, the acting director of national

The GOP response reflects the party’s go-to posture whenever the president has been awash in controversy. Republicans are loath to speak out against the president, who is extremely popular with their base. Those who do often face criticism from voters back home and an angry tweet from Trump; some have lost primaries to Trump-favored candidates.

A few Republicans did express concerns as details emerged, but they were reluctant to criticize the president or even suggest Trump had done anything wrong.

“I think it would be wildly inappropriate for an American president to invite a foreign country’s leader to get engaged in an American presidential election. That strikes me as entirely inappropriate,” said Sen. Patrick J. Toomey (R-Pa.) in a telephone interview.

But Toomey called back later to clarify: “I’m not acknowledging or alleging the president did that, I have no idea what the president said to anybody. I’m just making a general point.”

On Friday, Trump went on the attack against the whistleblower, writing in a tweet that the unnamed individual was “highly partisan.”

Pelosi alleges Trump tried to cover up effort to pressure Ukraine

  Pelosi alleges Trump tried to cover up effort to pressure Ukraine U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Thursday charged that President Donald Trump had engaged in an effort to cover up an attempt he made to pressure Ukraine into investigating Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden. © Provided by MediaDC: Washington Newspaper Publishing Company, Inc. Pelosi, speaking to reporters on Capitol Hill, also said an impeachment inquiry launched by House Democrats would focus narrowly on the Ukraine episode and that other instances in which Trump may have abused the power of his office would be considered later.

A whistleblower complaint filed by a member of the intelligence community has sent shockwaves through Washington, as it accuses President Donald The details surrounding the complaint are still hazy as the Trump administration is simultaneously denying the president did anything nefarious

A whistleblower complaint by an intelligence officer that the Trump administration is withholding from Congress involves a phone conversation had by the president, a former The fact that the complaint had been filed by an intelligence official was known, but the subject had been a closely guarded secret.

The Washington Post reported Wednesday that Trump’s interactions with the foreign leader included a “promise” that was regarded as so troubling that it prompted an unidentified U.S. intelligence official to file a whistleblower complaint in mid-August with the inspector general for the intelligence community. The Post reported late Thursday that the complaint centers on Ukraine.

Weeks before the complaint was made, Trump spoke with Ukraine’s new president, Volodymyr Zelensky, a call already under scrutiny by House Democrats examining whether Trump and his attorney Rudolph W. Giuliani sought to manipulate the Ukrainian government into helping the president’s reelection efforts.

Trump has denied doing anything improper. But during a CNN appearance Thursday night, Giuliani admitted that he spoke with Ukrainian officials about reopening an investigation Republicans think will make former vice president Joe Biden look bad. Biden leads in polls of the Democratic presidential candidates.

Late Friday, The Post reported that Trump pressed the leader of Ukraine to investigate Biden’s son in a call between the two leaders that is at the center of the complaint, according to two people familiar with the matter.

On Friday, many Republicans wouldn’t even say if it would be inappropriate for the president to ask a foreign government to investigate a political adversary. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) wouldn’t answer the question. Neither would senior Intelligence Committee member K. Michael Conaway (R-Tex..)

Ron Johnson troubled by whistleblower allegation of records 'lock down'

  Ron Johnson troubled by whistleblower allegation of records 'lock down' “I would not be happy. We’ll find out exactly what transpired here," the Wisconsin senator says.In an interview, the Wisconsin Republican, pointed to a reporter’s copy of the whistleblower report, singling out page three, which alleged that White House officials treated records of the Zelensky call differently than other calls.

President Donald Trump said Friday that a “highly partisan” whistleblower is behind a complaint filed against him over his interactions with a Trump wrote on Twitter. “They think I may have had a ‘dicey’ conversation with a certain foreign leader based on a ‘highly partisan’ whistleblowers ……statement.”

The intelligence official filed the formal whistleblower complaint on August 12th. Such a complaint is lodged through a formal process intended to protect a whistleblower from retaliation. Questions about Trump ’s discussions with the Ukrainians involve his allies, including his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani

“There’s always a chance that he was misquoted,” Conaway said when a reporter told him that Giuliani argued on TV Thursday night: that the president has a right to ask a foreign leader to investigate a political adversary.

Asked if such actions were okay, generally, he added: “I don’t think you can make a blanket statement one way or the other.”

Even Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill), who occasionally speaks out against Trump, was fairly reserved when asked about the matter: “In theory, no U.S. instrument of power in foreign policy or otherwise can be used to affect an election … That said, all these stories, about 90 percent of them, end up far different than what it is the first couple days. . I think we'll know more on Monday, I just think this is all new and we'll see.”

Most Republicans also dodged questions when asked whether Congress should see the report at all. Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), a member of Senate GOP leadership who also sits on the Intelligence Committee, refused to answer repeated questions about the reports or whether he thought it was improper for the director of national intelligence to block a whistleblower from coming to Congress.

“I can’t talk about that,” he said. “I don’t want to talk about it …. Maybe next week.”

Newly elected Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) took the same tack, saying “I don't know enough about it to register opinion.” When asked if Congress should see the complaint to learn more Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.) said: “No not necessarily … I’m not going to get into that.”

Even Jordan, who helped lead the House GOP’s investigation of the 2013 IRS controversy and the 2012 Benghazi terrorist attack, said he’d leave it to the administration to decide what Congress gets: “That’s up to the president, and the president’s got to look at what’s in the best interest of the United States. He’s got to look at the big picture, and I trust him to do that.”

Whistleblower in Ukraine scandal under federal protection: report

  Whistleblower in Ukraine scandal under federal protection: report The whistleblower behind the explosive complaint involving President Trump's efforts to persuade Ukraine's president to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter is currently under federal protection, CBS News reported Sunday. © Provided by News Communications, Inc. Whistleblower in Ukraine scandal under federal protection: report "60 Minutes" host Scott Pelley announced the network had obtained a letter indicating the whistleblower is under protection because they fear for their safety.

A whistleblower complaint against President Donald Trump reportedly involves Ukraine, two sources familiar with the matter each told The Washington Post and The New York Times on Thursday. The Post first reported on an intelligence official’s complaint on Wednesday, writing that the official

WASHINGTON — The whistleblower complaint that has triggered a tense showdown between the US intelligence community and Congress involves President Trump ’s communications with a foreign leader, according to two former US officials familiar with the matter.

Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-Wis.), a former Marine who worked in intelligence, seemed torn. On the one hand, he said, “the fact is, the president, to quote [famous former Rep.] John Marshall, is the ‘sole organ’ of U.S. external relations and has to have conversations in confidence with foreign leaders.”

“There's no practical way to conduct diplomacy without it,” he said.

But on the other hand, “I’m in favor of transparency,” he added: “So if, as the White House claims, there's no ‘there’ there, then probably the best way to dispel all of these Schiff-instigated rumors is to allow the report to go to the requisite national security committees.”

There was one exception to the nearly unified GOP response: Rep. Chris Stewart (Utah), a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said that he was not only “concerned” that Congress had not received the whistleblower’s complaint, he thought it was possible Republicans would join Schiff in subpoenaing the records if Maguire continues to deny them.

“I don’t think it’s impossible. I think we probably would. To be clear: I don’t know yet. But I’m telling you that it’s certainly on the table,” he said of Republicans joining in a subpoena. “And when I say that I want to protect congressional oversight, I really mean that, so I think we have to resolve this.”

Stewart, like Democrats, has argued that the whistleblower followed the process, intending for his complaint to reach lawmakers.

But McCarthy challenged that presumption Friday, arguing that “if they wanted it to go to Congress they could have come directly to Congress.”

“I want to know who the whistleblower is, what are they saying — but they could have come to Congress and given it to us,” he said. “There’s channels to come directly to Congress, so I don’t know.”

McCarthy’s argument would seem to isolate the intelligence community’s inspector general, who wrote to the congressional intelligence committees more than once this month to alert them to the existence of the complaint and the fact that Maguire was refusing to transfer it to Congress, despite his assessment it was both “urgent” and “credible.”

Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), a member of the Intelligence Committee, said McCarthy was wrong and the whistleblower would not have been authorized to share classified information with Congress. The individual could face criminal charges if he contacted lawmakers.

Colby Itkowitz contributed to this report.

[email protected]

No matter how the whistleblower complaint arose, its contents still matter .
Do you remember when emails were published making Hillary Clinton's campaign look bad and the Democratic National Committee look biased against Bernie Sanders, and the Democratic establishment reacted by insisting that the only story here was the hacking that exposed the email? The jawboning forced the media to earnestly defend reporting on their contents. In short, the logic went as such: Their hack and release was unquestionably illegal and wrong, but the information itself, once it was out there, deserved to be reported on as truth.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 7
This is interesting!