Politics: Pelosi Didn’t Raid Social Security for Impeachment Inquiry - - PressFrom - US
  •   
  •   
  •   

Politics Pelosi Didn’t Raid Social Security for Impeachment Inquiry

02:20  12 october  2019
02:20  12 october  2019 Source:   factcheck.org

Pelosi to GOP: We are not dropping impeachment probe

  Pelosi to GOP: We are not dropping impeachment probe House Speaker Nancy Pelosi fired back at Kevin McCarthy, who earlier in the day asked his fellow Californian to drop the impeachment inquiry into President Trump. © Provided by MediaDC: Washington Newspaper Publishing Company, Inc.“I received your letter this morning shortly after the world witnessed President Trump on national television asking yet another foreign power to interfere in the upcoming 2020 elections,” Pelosi said Thursday, referring to Trump’s South Lawn comments in which he called on China to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden.

U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi diverted .4 billion from the Social Security fund to cover impeachment costs. And neither is the opposite of freedom, which for today’s purpose, is the impeachment of President Donald Trump. Counting legal fees for a slew of legal teams, experts, time

Bolstered by polls showing increased public support for impeachment , Pelosi has shown no signs of shifting her strategy. Trump’s stonewalling of impeachment comes as polls find that Americans are more likely to approve than disapprove of the inquiry , even as they divide on whether Trump should

Nancy Pelosi holding a sign posing for the camera© Provided by FactCheck.org
Quick Take

A viral, made-up story sowed confusion among social media users over whether House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has diverted Social Security money to the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump. She didn’t.

Full Story

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has not taken money away from Social Security in order to fund the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump.

That hoax is the product of America’s Last Line of Defense, a self-described “satirical” publication whose viral headlines across a network of websites often deceive social media users. Its story was published Oct. 4 on one its websites, potatriotsunite.com, with the headline, “Pelosi Diverts $2.4 Billion From Social Security To Cover Impeachment Costs.”

Pelosi blasts White House for refusing to cooperate in Trump impeachment probe

  Pelosi blasts White House for refusing to cooperate in Trump impeachment probe U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on Tuesday President Donald Trump "will be held accountable" after the White House said it would refuse to cooperate with the congressional impeachment inquiry of the Republican president. "The White House should be warned that continued efforts to hide the truth of the President’s abuse of power from the American people will be regarded as further evidence of obstruction," Pelosi, a Democrat, said in a statement."Mr. President, you are not above the law. You will be held accountable," she said.

The House of Representatives has undertaken the impeachment inquiry of a president only four times in American history. Each time, the House has set its own ground rules. The Constitution prescribes no specific process, nor does federal law.

The White House told Speaker Nancy Pelosi that Donald Trump and his staff would not be participating in her impeachment inquiry . White House counsel Pat Cipollone called the impeachment inquiry an illegal attempt to overturn the 2016 presidential election. 'Put simply, you seek to overturn the results

Observant users who clicked through to the full story might have noticed the many tags littered throughout the page indicating its fictitious nature: A banner at the top of the website, for example, reads, “Potatriots unite for satire, ridicule and mockery.”

But it appears many did not. More than two dozen people emailed FactCheck.org inquiring about whether the claim was true, and the story has been shared more than 100,000 times on Facebook, according to CrowdTangle data.

The bogus story appeared in political Facebook groups supportive of Trump — such as “The Common Thread (C) – Trump – Pence 2020,” “People who support President Trump,” and “Deplorables for Trump” — where it was often met by outrage.

Leslie Marshall: Pelosi's big win (and what it means for Trump)

  Leslie Marshall: Pelosi's big win (and what it means for Trump) Pelosi wanted a smoking gun and bipartisan support before moving forward with a vote on impeachment, and she just may get her way.How are Americans feeling about House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's impeachment inquiry? Well, if you’re a Democrat and among a majority in your party who wanted to see impeachment, you’re excited about the prospect, and perhaps relieved that the process seems to be headed toward an actual vote in the House. But for the more progressive wing of the Democratic Party, a mere inquiry doesn't go far enough.

Earlier this month, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi referred to the US Constitution when rejecting a request by her Republican colleague Kevin McCarthy, who suggested that the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump should be temporarily suspended.

Republicans are poised to make impeachment an albatross for Democrats, particularly in red states where the move would nullify those who voted for On Wednesday, the White House sent a letter to House Democrats slamming the impeachment inquiry as an “illegitimate” and “partisan” effort to

One user opined: “This is nothing new..Pelosi and the Democrats think all the US money is theirs..to do whatever they want to at any whim. Only a Revolution..as distasteful as it sounds, on it’s face, maybe the only way to save our Country…The Politicians can’t or won’t do it….It’s coming…fasten your seatbelt.”

Another wrote: “ENOUGH!!!!!!! NO ONE IS SUPPOSED TO TOUCH THAT MONEY!!!! THAT’S ALL AMERICAN CITIZENS WHO PAID INTO IT EVERY PAYCHECK SINCE DAY ONE! AND THEIR EMPLOYERS MATCHED THE AMOUNT WE PAID INTO IT! IT’S OUR SAVINGS ACCOUNT FOR RETIREMENT!!! WHO Authorized that!!!!!???????”

It’s worth noting that Social Security is a pay-as-you-go system, meaning that current Social Security tax revenues are used to pay the cost of current benefits, as explained in a 2019 report by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. Surplus revenues can be used for other government expenses, but Social Security has run cash-flow deficits every year since 2010, CRS says, so there isn’t any surplus revenues that can be used for other government expenses. That rules out the possibility that Social Security funds can be used to cover the cost of an impeachment inquiry.

Giuliani outlines conditions for possible cooperation on impeachment inquiry

  Giuliani outlines conditions for possible cooperation on impeachment inquiry President Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani on Wednesday outlined his potential conditions for cooperating with House Democrats in their impeachment inquiry into Trump.Giuliani said in an interview with Hill.TV that he may try to invoke attorney-client privilege if the House moves forward on impeachment."I would sit down with my client and with the other lawyers and we'd discuss attorney-client privilege," Giuliani said on Hill.TV'sGiuliani said in an interview with Hill.TV that he may try to invoke attorney-client privilege if the House moves forward on impeachment.

Letter argued the House impeachment inquiry extends beyond the circumstances surrounding the president's call with Ukraine, pointing to the fact that the Judiciary and Intelligence Committees The president tweeted that he didn ' t want him testifying before a "a totally compromised kangaroo court."

Impeachment is the process by which a legislative body levels charges against a government official. Impeachment does not in itself remove the official definitively from office

And Social Security benefit payments are considered “mandatory spending” and are not subject to the annual appropriations process.

We do not know how much the impeachment inquiry proceedings against Trump will ultimately cost.

The Associated Press, citing records at the time, reported in 1999 that the five-month impeachment proceedings against former President Bill Clinton cost about $1.2 million — or nearly $1.9 million in today’s dollars, when adjusted for inflation.

Editor’s note: FactCheck.org is one of several organizations working with Facebook to debunk misinformation shared on social media. Our previous stories can be found here.

Sources

About Us.” Potatriotsunite.com. Accessed 11 Oct 2019.

Impeachment Work Cost $1.2 Million.” Associated Press. 16 Apr 1999.

Pelosi Diverts $2.4 Billion From Social Security To Cover Impeachment Costs.” Potatriotsunite.com. 4 Oct 2019.

Rybicki, Elizabeth and Michael Greene. “The Impeachment Process in the House of Representatives.” Congressional Research Service. 10 October 2019.

The post Pelosi Didn’t Raid Social Security for Impeachment Inquiry appeared first on FactCheck.org.

Survey: 54 percent Americans support Trump impeachment inquiry .
A majority of Americans endorse House Democrats' decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into President Trump and his administration's dealings with Ukraine, according to a new survey from the Pew Research Center. The survey, which was released on Thursday, found that 54 percent of Americans support the impeachment inquiry, while 44 percent oppose it. The figure represents a four-point increase in support from a similar survey in September. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 30
This is interesting!