Politics Analysis: Democrats Want to Impeach Trump. They Haven’t Decided Why.

19:40  22 october  2019
19:40  22 october  2019 Source:   theatlantic.com

Dems scramble to counter Trump with grassroots impeachment campaign

  Dems scramble to counter Trump with grassroots impeachment campaign Dems scramble to counter Trump with grassroots impeachment campaignFor several years now, the impeachment push has been defined by activists beating the drum on Trump — and powerful Democrats in Washington ignoring their calls. But in the two weeks since House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced an impeachment inquiry, this organizational hub has sprouted in D.C., commissioning polling, sponsoring ads and trying to guide the energy in the party toward a message and result the public will support, while counteracting a blistering, expensive anti-impeachment campaign from Trump and the Republican National Committee.

Lawmakers haven ’ t decided yet whether they should focus solely on Ukraine—or write a broader indictment of the president. Impeachment would be about Ukraine—and only about Ukraine. But while that decision helped quell years of frantic debate over whether and why and how Democrats

The House has voted to impeach President Donald Trump for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress -- both Remember this: Pelosi did not want to go down the impeachment path. She stood athwart her This story has been updated to reflect Wednesday's House vote to impeach Trump .

When House Speaker Nancy Pelosi gave her blessing to an impeachment inquiry three weeks ago, she also laid down a marker: The investigation wouldn’t center on any of the issues that Democrats have obsessed over for the last three years. Not Russian interference, or emoluments, or security clearances, or family separation. Impeachment would be about Ukraine — and only about Ukraine.

a person standing in a room © Pablo Martinez Monsivais / AP

But while that decision helped quell years of frantic debate over whether and why and how Democrats might seek to remove the president, it also foreshadowed the coming battle among House Democrats about what the actual articles of impeachment should look like. Democrats seem to have made strides in their investigation in recent weeks, but they still have this major hurdle to resolve — a hurdle that could have significant implications not just for the success of the inquiry, but for Democrats’ ability to keep control of the House in 2020.

Analysis: The impeachment inquiry is making Nancy Pelosi more popular.

  Analysis: The impeachment inquiry is making Nancy Pelosi more popular. Speakers usually lose popularity over time. Pelosi's bucking the trend.That’s not too surprising. Trump’s approval rating has been remarkably stable over his presidency’s 18 months. Moreover, it’s hard for the scandal to affect Trump supporters’ approval when most of his base either doesn’t think that the president asked Ukraine to investigate Joe and Hunter Biden or thinks that doing so was appropriate.

Some Americans want Trump to be impeached . Around 51% of them . He has never had an approval rating of even 50%, but more than that want I think that the “ DEMOCRATS “ who want to impeach President Trump (in the absence of any election laws broken) - they are juvenile, spoiled little bitches

The impeachment inquiry is energizing Trump voters, who believe Democrats are trying to Will Democrats do it? Probably not. Their ravenous base wants to brook no compromise. But because impeachment will be nothing more than an act of censure anyway, why not actually censure Trump

Some moderate lawmakers and rank-and-file Democrats — many of whom were reticent to support impeachment to begin with — are intent on keeping the focus of the inquiry as narrow as possible, as it is now under Pelosi’s direction. They’re worried that straying from Trump’s Ukraine-related offenses could create the appearance of a partisan fishing expedition. Others, though, including many progressives and members of the House Judiciary Committee, want to paint a broader portrait of the president and his alleged wrongdoing.

Through their debate over the articles, Democrats might have to decide what’s more important: pursuing a matter that they believe has the most obvious political utility — or making a more comprehensive statement about how an American president is allowed to act.

Democrats see impeachment proceedings taking longer than some initially expected

  Democrats see impeachment proceedings taking longer than some initially expected House Democrats are facing a time crunch to quickly wrap up their investigation into allegations President Donald Trump abused his office in pushing Ukraine to probe his political rivals, prompting growing expectations that votes on impeaching Trump could slip closer to the end of the year. Some Democrats had hoped that a narrow probe -- focused on whether Trump put on ice efforts to bolster relations with Ukraine and provide US military aid to the country until it carried through with a political favor -- could conclude swiftly, with a potential vote to impeach Trump by Thanksgiving.

Why hasn' t the impeachment trial begun? Analysis by Zachary B. Wolf, CNN. Impeachment is two-step process in the House. First, members of Congress voted to impeach Trump on two The irony here is that Democrats moved impeachment through the House very quickly, without waiting for

So why did the Democrats decide to drag the probe-weary public through yet another witch hunt just weeks after the Mueller report failed to prove collusion Second, the Democrats are painfully aware that not one of their presidential pretenders stand a chance of defeating Trump in 2020. In fact, if the

Each of Trump’s offenses “have a legal and a literary dimension to them,” in that they tell a story to the American people, Representative Jamie Raskin of Maryland told me in a recent interview, comparing the articles of impeachment to the Declaration of Independence, in which Thomas Jefferson listed 27 grievances against King George III. “The story needs to come through as well,” said Raskin, a member of the Judiciary Committee. “It’s not just this random, one-off thing.”

Video by Reuters

For the most part, House Democrats agree that the Ukraine scandal is the most pressing of the allegations against the president: Trump asked a foreign leader, the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, and has subsequently tried to stonewall Congress’s attempts to investigate. Pelosi and others argue it’s the most straightforward example of Trump’s abuse of power; it’s more easily digestible than anything Special Counsel Robert Mueller dug up; and, because it involves a Democratic presidential frontrunner, it’s also much more relevant to the upcoming election. Plus: The president’s ask to Ukraine is what persuaded so many moderates to endorse an impeachment inquiry in the first place. That combination of clarity and urgency, many Democrats believe, should be enough to rustle up much more public support than before for the impeachment inquiry, which the latest national polls show a slim majority of Americans support.

Democrats zero in on 'abuse of power' in impeachment inquiry

  Democrats zero in on 'abuse of power' in impeachment inquiry Pelosi is said to favor one sweeping charge related to Ukraine, but there's some debate about the need for additional charges.As Democrats continue closed-door depositions with critical witnesses and prepare to move to the next phase of public hearings, they are wrestling over which elements and evidence to bring in, which to leave out. The goal is to explain to the public the reasoning and relevance of any eventual impeachment charges.

A Trump presidency is unconscionable to them and was from the start. Democrats and others in this new aristocracy had grown very used to having a GOP You may have hit upon the reason they want to impeach Trump now. Because it would stop Trump from nominating a replacement for Ginsburg

Democratic committee head Jerry Nadler decided to delay the vote until Friday after two days of acrimonious debate. A full vote by the Democratic -run House would then follow next week, with Mr Trump likely to become the third US president to be impeached .

“For me, it was a really discrete and comprehensive bite-sized example of something we should be concerned about,” Representative Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania told me. She was one of seven freshman lawmakers to endorse the inquiry for national-security reasons in an op-ed in late September. When it comes time to spell out the articles, her “personal preference,” she said, would be “to keep the focus narrow.”

The current plan is for Democrats, led by the House Intelligence Committee, to continue gathering information about Trump’s request of Ukraine through witness testimony and subpoenaed documents; on Tuesday, Democrats questioned the former ambassador to Ukraine, Bill Taylor. After reviewing the evidence, the Judiciary Committee will then decide if there are grounds for impeachment. If so, committee members will write the articles — a list of reasons why they think the president should be removed from office — and present them to the full House for a vote. Former President Andrew Johnson, for example, faced a total of 11 articles, spanning from his violation of the Tenure of Office Act to bringing “contempt, ridicule and disgrace” to the presidency. By contrast, former President Bill Clinton faced two: for lying under oath and obstruction of justice. If the House votes to approve any of the individual articles, Trump will be formally impeached, and his case will go to the Senate for trial.

CNN Poll: 50% support impeaching Trump and removing him from office

  CNN Poll: 50% support impeaching Trump and removing him from office Half of Americans say President Donald Trump should be impeached and removed from office, according to a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS. Your browser does not support this video require(["binding"], function (binding) { binding("wcVideoPlayer", "#video_player_605bca3e-2783-4f66-b7f3-a2c42a0f0a05").all(); }); Half of Americans say President Donald Trump should be impeached and removed from office, according to a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS, a new high in CNN polling on the topic and the first time that support for impeachment and removal has significantly outpaced opposition.

The Democrats want Trump out of office, they want him gone. They don’ t forgive him by winning the election when it was a free ride for them to win. And the Democrats will further not agree on anything Trump would propose even if is beneficial to the Country and People of the U.S

Politics · 2 years ago. Democrats want Trump impeached . Why haven ' t they filed articles against Pence too? Maxine Waters is a lunatic. Mr. Trump has done nothing to be impeached for. Besides, it could be a fake impeachment and stay in office like Bill Clinton did.

[Read: The common misconception about ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’]

The intra-caucus disagreement — with House leadership and moderates on one end and progressives and some Judiciary Committee members on the other — is likely to complicate this plan. In recent interviews, several lawmakers in the latter camp told me that they would want to lead the articles with Ukraine-related allegations, but they would not rule out listing other offenses, including potential emoluments violations and the 10 possible instances of obstruction of justice noted in the special counsel’s report. Each lawmaker I spoke with had a slightly different take on what the articles should contain.

“Mueller all but said [Trump] committed a crime,” Representative Gerry Connolly of Virginia told me. “I don’t think we can afford to ignore that. That sets a precedent.”

Representative Pramila Jayapal of Washington told me the articles should address Ukraine; Trump’s “obstruction of Congress,” related to both the Ukraine scandal and Mueller’s investigation; and emoluments. “Those are the top three,” said Jayapal, who is on the Judiciary Committee.

If there are 10 articles, “one or two might deal with Ukraine,” said Representative Ro Khanna of California. But “any articles that are referred should be broad and inclusive.”

Defense Department official Laura Cooper to testify in impeachment inquiry about military aid to Ukraine

  Defense Department official Laura Cooper to testify in impeachment inquiry about military aid to Ukraine Congressional investigators want to ask Laura Cooper, who oversees Ukraine policy at the Pentagon, about the withholding of military aid to Ukraine.Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) arrives with Rep. Juan Vargas (D-CA) to hear testimony from U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland behind closed-doors, as part of the impeachment inquiry led by the House Intelligence, House Foreign Affairs and House Oversight and Reform Committees on Oct. 17.

Slideshow by photo services

Some progressive activists I spoke with are pushing lawmakers to go even broader. “The bigotry and racism of Trump’s administration are impeachable offenses,” said Anthony Torres, the communications and political director for By the People, a progressive organization advocating for impeachment. The group is lobbying House Democrats to develop a more wide-ranging set of articles that would include the Trump-administration policy change that led to family separations at the border.

“The underlying principle behind going bigger is that we cannot normalize what this very not-normal president has done,” said Adam Green, the co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, a political-action committee. “Everything before Ukraine was not okay.”

But tacking on more grievances against Trump — grievances that some members never considered impeachable to begin with — could appear to voters as though Democrats are engaged in a purely partisan project. That’s precisely what many lawmakers want to avoid, especially those representing red or swing districts where impeachment is likely less popular. They think they can sell their constituents on the discrete idea that Trump’s ask to Ukraine was wrong, or at least avoid alienating them. While caucus leadership expects the impeachment process to be settled by the end of the year, these lawmakers— some of whom are the so-called “majority makers” who won Democrats the House last year — are worried about the inquiry’s effects not only on their own reelection chances, but also on the balance of power in Washington.

“The problem Democrats have with this is convincing these voters that this crazy thing [Trump] did is different from all the other crazy things he did,” said one senior Democratic aide associated with the moderate wing of the caucus, who requested anonymity in order to speak more candidly. “How you do that is by actually communicating that there is bipartisan concern here.” Some GOP senators have already expressed worry about the president potentially engaging in a quid pro quo with Ukraine. And given some of their recent comments, it’s possible, if still unlikely, that a few House Republicans could support an impeachment vote involving just the Ukraine allegations. To add additional, more wide-ranging articles would be to “give Republicans an off-ramp,” the aide said.

Ultimately, it could be the short time frame that determines Democrats’ approach: They’ve said that they want to vote on articles of impeachment by Thanksgiving, which gives them only six weeks to hear testimony, compile evidence, and determine which, if any, offenses move forward for a full House vote. In other words, House Democrats simply might not have enough time to make a broad case against the president. But however they decide to narrow down the articles, they see making an effective case as crucial. “If Democrats execute this poorly, the worst-case scenario could happen,” said the aide. “The worst-case scenario is Trump gets reelected, we lose the House, and there’s no check on this guy.”

Republican protest delays impeachment testimony from Pentagon’s Ukraine expert .
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Laura Cooper was expected to answer questions about the mechanics of U.S. security assistance for Ukraine.Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Laura Cooper was due to speak at 10 a.m. in a closed-door session about the mechanics of U.S. security assistance for Ukraine and the fallout from the White House’s decision to withhold it for several months over the summer. But her session was disrupted as it was about to begin, with members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus refusing to leave the area where impeachment witnesses have met with lawmakers.

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!