Politics: Ukraine whistleblower's lawyers say client's identity no longer relevant - - PressFrom - US
  •   
  •   
  •   

Politics Ukraine whistleblower's lawyers say client's identity no longer relevant

23:25  25 october  2019
23:25  25 october  2019 Source:   thehill.com

One person is missing in the Democrats' impeachment inquiry: the whistleblower

  One person is missing in the Democrats' impeachment inquiry: the whistleblower Democratic lawmakers leading an impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump have heard days of testimony from a parade of senior government officials. But they have yet to hear from the whistleblower who sparked the probe. And it may stay that way. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); In the end, it may not matter, some Democratic lawmakers said, because the other officials who have testified, Trump's own statements, a trove of texts between top U.S.

The lawyers who represent the whistleblower who first came forward with allegations about President Trump's contacts with Ukraine are arguing that the identity of their client is no longer relevant now that more information about the complaint has publicly come to light.

Donald Trump wearing a suit and tie: Ukraine whistleblower's lawyers say client's identity no longer relevant© The Hill Ukraine whistleblower's lawyers say client's identity no longer relevant

Lawyers Andrew Bakaj and Mark Zaid wrote in an op-ed published Friday in The Washington Post that witnesses interviewed by House Democrats have "substantiated" the whistleblower complaint that raised concerns about Trump pressing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to open an investigation into one of his top 2020 political rivals, former Vice President Joe Biden.

Trump might expose whistleblower, Schumer tells Intel officials

  Trump might expose whistleblower, Schumer tells Intel officials As President Donald Trump continued his attacks on the Ukraine whistleblower on Monday, Chuck Schumer is asking the intelligence community what is being done to protect the source from harm. © Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. The Senate Minority leader asked both the acting director of national intelligence and the inspector general on Monday afternoon to outline what "specific steps" they are taking to protect the whistleblower.

Their op-ed comes, they write, amid increased speculation over the whistleblower's identity, particularly as the president and his supporters seek to "fanatically" reveal their client's identity.

"Much of what has been disclosed since the release of our client's complaint actually exceeds the whistleblower's knowledge of what transpired at the time the complaint was submitted," the lawyers write.

In particular, they point to the transcript of the Trump-Zelensky July phone call that the White House released and text messages between three U.S. diplomats related to discussions of the investigations and a potential quid pro quo, as well as from "congressional testimony by people intimately involved with the circumstances the whistleblower first raised concern about."

We represent the whistleblower. Their identity is no longer relevant.

  We represent the whistleblower. Their identity is no longer relevant. The public now knows more about the call with Ukraine than what was in the complaint.Our client’s whistleblower complaint about President Trump’s efforts to solicit interference from Ukraine in the 2020 U.S. election was publicly released a month ago, and since then, speculation about the whistleblower’s identity has only increased. As each allegation in the complaint is substantiated by new witnesses, the president and his supporters remain fanatically devoted to bringing our client into the spotlight. But the reality is that the identity of the whistleblower is irrelevant.

"Because our client has no additional information about the president's call, there is no justification for exposing their identity and all the risks that would follow," they continue.

The lawyers noted that the intelligence community inspector general found that the whistleblower not only followed the proper procedures in filing a complaint, but that their complaint was both "urgent" and "credible."

The two lawyers said despite the new information about Trump's contacts with Zelensky, the president has continued to attack the whistleblower and look to reveal the individual's identity.

They also voiced concern that the president's defenders are aiding in those attacks.

"The reckless attacks on our client are particularly disturbing because they undermine an already frail system meant to protect honorable whistleblowers who lawfully disclose a reasonable belief that there has been a violation of law, rule or regulation, or an abuse of authority," they wrote.

"Exposing the identity of the whistleblower and attacking our client would do nothing to undercut the validity of the complaint's allegations."

Whistleblower now willing to take Republican questions, lawyer abruptly announces .
Responding to a torrent of complaints from Republicans that the impeachment inquiry against President Trump is secretive and one-sided, a lawyer for the anonymous whistleblower who raised alarms about the presidents' dealings with Ukraine said Sunday his client is willing to answer written questions submitted by House Republicans. "Obviously, per House rules GOP is beholden to DEMs," whistleblower attorney Mark Zaid wrote on Twitter. "We, however, are not." require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 0
This is interesting!