Politics Internal White House debate stifles release of Pence-Zelenskiy call
FACTBOX-Key dates in the U.S. House's impeachment inquiry into Trump
Key dates in the U.S. House's impeachment inquiry into TrumpRep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) arrives with Rep. Juan Vargas (D-CA) to hear testimony from U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland behind closed-doors, as part of the impeachment inquiry led by the House Intelligence, House Foreign Affairs and House Oversight and Reform Committees on Oct. 17.
WASHINGTON — It's been almost three weeks since Vice President Mike Pence said he had "no objection" to releasing a reconstructed transcript of. But as House Democrats' continues moving swiftly into its second month, the White House still has not made a decision on whether to make those details of Pence's call public.
The internal debate has divided White House officials over whetherwould help or hurt their flailing efforts to that President Donald Trump held up military aid to pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to investigate his political rivals, according to two people familiar with the discussions.
Trump impeachment probe to focus on more key witnesses this week
Trump impeachment probe to focus on more key witnesses this weekVeteran State Department officer William Taylor and at least four other witnesses will be the latest in a parade of career diplomats and current and former U.S. officials to speak before congressional committees, despite the objections of a Republican White House deriding the Democratic-led proceedings as a "kangaroo court.
One concern raised by some of Trump's allies is that releasing his call with Zelenskiy was a mistake because it fueled the impeachment inquiry rather than tamp it down, these people said. Another is that a comparison of Pence and Trump's calls with Zelenskiy could potentially make the president's self-described "perfect" conversation appear significantly less so.
"The media, Democrats are going to pick it apart," one of the sources said. "So there's a concern about that."
Earlier this month, Pence told NBC News his office was discussing the potential release "with White House counsel as we speak." An administration official tells NBC News that the issue "is still being reviewed by White House lawyers."
Ex-U.S. Ambassador Taylor arrives on Capitol Hill to testify
Former U.S. Ambassador William Taylor's testimony will be among the most anticipated in the string of diplomats and foreign policy officials being interviewed in the impeachment probe.
Some people close to the president have argued that publishing detailed notes from conversations with world leaders also sets a problematic precedent by watering down the strength of exerting executive privilege and opening up the administration to even more scrutiny.
Releasing additional conversations during the course of the impeachment inquiry also could give leverage to any effort by Democrats to pursue other transcripts of other relevant calls or meetings.
So far, the White House has refused to comply with House Democrats' requests for documents related to the withholding of aid to Ukraine or requests for investigations that could benefit Trump in the 2020 election.
Some people close to the vice president are arguing for the release of anything that would help "clear Pence's name," one person familiar with the debate said, adding that a reconstructed transcript of his Zelenskiy call could achieve that.
Defense Department official Laura Cooper to testify in impeachment inquiry about military aid to Ukraine
Congressional investigators want to ask Laura Cooper, who oversees Ukraine policy at the Pentagon, about the withholding of military aid to Ukraine.Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) arrives with Rep. Juan Vargas (D-CA) to hear testimony from U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland behind closed-doors, as part of the impeachment inquiry led by the House Intelligence, House Foreign Affairs and House Oversight and Reform Committees on Oct. 17.
The vice president's office declined to comment.
When pressed repeatedly by reporters earlier this month about whether he was ever aware of the president's efforts to pressure Zelenskiy to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, Pence did not directly answer the question and instead said "I never discussed the issue of the Bidens with President Zelenskiy."
Pence has maintained, on several occasions, that all of his conversations and contacts with Ukraine were "entirely focused on the broader issues of the lack of European support and corruption."
A readout of his call with Zelenskiy in September praised the Ukrainian "administration for its bold action to tackle corruption through legislative reforms, and offered full U.S. support for those efforts."
The conversation took place less than a week after nearly $400 million in security aid was eventually released.
Some in the White House counsel's office are frustrated with the consistently bad headlines coming from the variouson Capitol Hill and argue that circulating the Pence calls could help alleviate that.
"They don't have a lot of bullets in the chamber to fire back with and this is one," a former White House official said.
It's unclear whether the White House is still considering releasing Trump's April conversation with the Ukrainian leader, which officials have painted largely as a congratulatory call after his election.
Pence, who has been one of the president's fiercest defenders throughout impeachment, chose his words carefully on Sunday when pressed on CBS' Face the Nation about the issue of a perceived quid pro quo. He once again denied any wrongdoing on the president's behalf — focusing on the transcript of Trump's call with Zelenskiy.
"I can only tell you what I know," Pence said. "And what I know is that the transcript of the president's call with President Zelenskiy shows that there was no quid pro quo. He did nothing wrong."
Impeachment inquiry: How we got here and where we're going .
How a phone call and a request for a favor moved the nation closer to the possibility of seeing a president impeachedThose words have now prompted deployment of the ultimate political weapon, an impeachment process enshrined in the Constitution as a means other than the ballot to remove a president from office.