Politics: Vindman testified he was convinced Ukraine aid became part of Trump's demand for Biden investigations - - PressFrom - US
  •   
  •   
  •   

Politics Vindman testified he was convinced Ukraine aid became part of Trump's demand for Biden investigations

23:10  30 october  2019
23:10  30 october  2019 Source:   cnn.com

NSC official's testimony appears to contradict Rick Perry Ukraine claims

  NSC official's testimony appears to contradict Rick Perry Ukraine claims Testimony from a senior White House official on Tuesday appeared to contradict Energy Secretary Rick Perry's ardent denials that he ever heard former Vice President Joe Biden or his son Hunter discussed in relation to U.S. requests that Ukraine investigate corruption. © Alex Wong/Getty Images Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman. In his opening statement, Lt. Col.

The top Ukraine expert at the White House will tell impeachment investigators he twice reported concerns about President Trump ’ s pressure tactics While Colonel Vindman ’s concerns were shared by a number of other officials, some of whom have already testified , he was in a unique position.

Trump admits he called on Biden to be investigated - alleging the Democrat 2020 Trump is being investigated for allegedly withholding military aid to Ukraine in a bid to get the country to probe Biden . "I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a US citizen

a group of people standing together in uniform: Army Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman, Director for European Affairs at the National Security Council, arrives at a closed session before the House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs and Oversight committees October 29, 2019 at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC.© Alex Wong/Getty Images Army Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman, Director for European Affairs at the National Security Council, arrives at a closed session before the House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs and Oversight committees October 29, 2019 at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC.

Top White House Ukraine expert Alexander Vindman told congressional investigators he was convinced President Donald Trump was personally blocking $400 million in military aid to Ukraine to force that country to publicly announce an investigation into Joe Biden and his family, two sources present at the deposition told CNN.

Army Veteran Says Attacks by Trump Allies on 'Wounded Warrior,' Purple Heart Recipient Vindman are 'Disgusting'

  Army Veteran Says Attacks by Trump Allies on 'Wounded Warrior,' Purple Heart Recipient Vindman are 'Disgusting' Will Goodwin called Trump's comments about the veteran "disgusting" and "disgraceful." Many have been quick to criticize Trump for his statements to discredit the Purple Heart recipient's testimony.

Vindman , who is the first White House official to testify as part of Democrats' impeachment inquiry, said in an opening statement that he was "concerned" by the July 25 call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy when he requested that Ukraine open an investigation

Specifically, Trump said, “There’ s a lot of talk about Biden ’ s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so Vindman does have other ties to the Oval Office, though they are indirect and professionally related. He was sent as a part of a presidential delegation

Vindman, a decorated Army officer, on Tuesday testified that he was convinced that a quid pro quo existed by July 10, which was before Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in a phone call that is now at the heart of the House's impeachment inquiry. Trump has repeatedly said he did nothing improper on the call and has cited it as the sole reason for the impeachment inquiry.

The sources at the deposition said Vindman believed the existence of a quid pro quo was clear during a July 10 meeting between American and Ukrainian officials. In his opening statement, Vindman wrote that date is when US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland told Ukrainian government officials that they would need to deliver "specific investigations in order to secure the meeting" with Trump that they so desired.

Sondland emerges as key target after Vindman testimony

  Sondland emerges as key target after Vindman testimony House Democrats are weighing whether to take action against European Union (EU) Ambassador Gordon Sondland, who some lawmakers believe misled impeachment investigators during his closed-door deposition earlier this month.Upon hearing from a series of career foreign service and national security officials, some Democrats say Sondland lied to three House committees investigating President Trump's contacts with Ukraine, particularly in regard to pressure on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to launch two investigations that would help President Trump politically.

Some Trump allies, looking for ways to discredit Vindman , questioned the colonel’ s loyalties because he was born in the region. But the line of attack was Vindman attended Zelenskiy’ s inauguration with a delegation led by Energy Secretary Perry, and he and Hill were both part of a Ukraine briefing with

Army lieutenant colonel to describe his concerns Trump ’ s Biden plot was undermining US foreign policy in Ukraine .

In a separate meeting of US officials immediately afterward, "Sondland emphasized the importance that Ukraine deliver the investigations into the 2016 election, the Bidens, and Burisma," Vindman testified.

But the fact that the $400 million in aid, including desperately needed military assistance, was also being used by the President didn't become clear until the next month, Vindman testified.

Then-national security adviser John Bolton instructed Vindman to prepare a decision memo by August 15 for Bolton and others in the administration to present a government-wide interagency argument to the President that he should release the assistance funds to Ukraine as soon as possible.

On August 16, Bolton and other senior Cabinet officials, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Secretary of Defense Mark Esper, traveled to Trump's resort in Bedminster, New Jersey, to discuss a number of national security issues with the President.

Current White House official willing to testify publicly in impeachment probe: Source

  Current White House official willing to testify publicly in impeachment probe: Source Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the first current White House official to cooperate with impeachment investigators, is willing to testify publicly, according to a source. A National Security Council official Ukraine specialist, Vindman told investigators earlier this week that he was so "concerned" by the president’s comments on a July phone call with the Ukrainian president, he notified a White House lawyer.

But Vindman ' s testimony is particularly poignant because he is the first official with direct knowledge Vindman ' s revelation is noteworthy because it directly undercuts parts of Sondland' s testimony to Trump loyalists launched a smear campaign against Vindman when it became clear he would hurt

Trump says that Biden pressured Ukraine to sack a prosecutor who was investigating an energy company that Biden ’ s son Hunter was on the board of A career diplomat, he was number two at the Ukraine embassy under Marie Yovanovitch. Kent testified before House investigators in October

Vindman learned after their meeting that Trump still refused to allow the security assistance funds to go to Ukraine, which made Vindman think the President was still waiting for the "deliverable," as Bill Taylor, the top American diplomat in Ukraine, referred to it in his own deposition -- the announcement of an investigation into the Bidens that Ukrainian officials needed to deliver in order to get the money they wanted.

While this conclusion by Vindman was perhaps the most consequential news to come out of his deposition, the source present tells CNN, some House Republicans seemed more focused on trying to undermine the National Security Council member.

One of the sources present at the deposition describes Rep. Lee Zeldin, R-New York, as asking questions that seemed to suggest that by meeting with Ukrainian government officials, Vindman -- the point person on the White House National Security Council for Ukraine policy -- was perhaps involved in nefarious deeds. Vindman responded that it was his job to meet with those officials as a representative of the US government.

Joe Biden accuses Trump of covering up misdeeds with Ukraine

  Joe Biden accuses Trump of covering up misdeeds with Ukraine Former Vice President Joe Biden accused President Trump of covering up malfeasance in the president's relationship with Ukraine.Biden, who is running in the Democratic primary to challenge Trump for office in 2020, made the comments in a PBS News Hour clip of an interview released on Friday. Biden answered affirmatively when asked if he believed the president was engaged in a cover-up.

Vindman testified that: "In Spring of 2019, I became aware of outside influencers promoting a false and alternative narrative of Ukraine inconsistent with the ^ "White House official to tell impeachment investigators he feared President Trump ' s demands of Ukraine would undermine national security".

Alexander Vindman told House investigators that he listened to Trump ’ s July 25 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and reported his concerns to He was the director for European affairs and a Ukraine expert under Fiona Hill, a former official who testified earlier in the impeachment probe.

Zeldin also questioned why Vindman had not carried out the President's order to push for the Ukrainians to investigate the Bidens. Vindman said he felt the order was improper, according to that source present at the deposition. Vindman added that he would disregard an improper order from a general, too.

When Zeldin suggested that Vindman felt that way because carrying out the order would not be to the benefit of Ukraine, Vindman said he was not worried about how the move would affect Ukraine, but instead that he felt the order was wrong. He added that it also would not be to the benefit of Ukraine since such a move would undermine the bipartisan nature of American support for that country, but that a strong Ukraine was in America's national security interest.

"That's 100% untrue, and that's why you should be able to watch these depositions live," Zeldin told CNN when asked about the source's description. "That's why you should be able to read the transcrtipts immediately after."

Zeldin described multiple post-deposition leaks as "not true or they tell 3% of the story, or 30% of the story." Zeldin, a veteran, said that he could not comment on what he did ask about.

"Maybe it's my military training, maybe it's just the way the rules work," he said, "... but they say you cannot talk about the substance of the depositions. I would love to be able to give you additional insight. I wish I could tell you every single question that has was asked and every single answer that was given."

The same source present at the deposition said that Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, focused on the word "demand" in Vindman's response to Trump bringing up investigating the Bidens in his phone call with Zelensky.

"I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government's support of Ukraine," Vindman wrote in his opening statement.

Ratcliffe asked why Vindman believed it was a demand.

Vindman replied that when the most powerful person in the world asks the President of a country on the brink, such as Ukraine, to do something, he's going to do it.

Rachel Stephens, a spokeswoman for Ratcliffe, responded to the description by saying, "Chairman Schiff's rules prevent discussion of the actual testimony. I can clarify, however, that the source summary you provided is not accurate in several respects." She did not elaborate.

Two sources present at the deposition tell CNN that Zeldin, Ratcliffe and others asked a number of questions that seemed designed to figure out the identity of the whistleblower.

Former diplomat Kurt Volker says Rudy Giuliani was a 'direct conduit' to Ukraine and demanded they publicly announce an investigation into the Bidens .
Giuliani pushed discredited allegations that the Bidens were involved in corruption, and the conspiracy that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 election.Volker testified as part of the ongoing impeachment inquiry into Trump, which centers around a whistleblower complaint claiming that the Trump administration withheld a $400 million military aid package in exchange for Ukraine announcing an investigation into the Ukrainian oil and gas company Burisma Holdings - where former Vice President Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden served on the board from 2014 to 2019

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks
usr: 15
This is interesting!