•   
  •   
  •   

Politics North Carolina redistricting cases could offer map to others

23:00  02 november  2019
23:00  02 november  2019 Source:   msn.com

Can James Wiseman and Memphis topple the NCAA as we know it? | Giannotto

  Can James Wiseman and Memphis topple the NCAA as we know it? | Giannotto Memphis, through its support of James Wiseman and Penny Hardaway, is electing to be the first university to rebel in the growing war against the NCAA.Of how this case could be about so much more than just a top recruit and a basketball team’s season.

When the U.S. Supreme Court this year declared federal judges had no business deciding cases about political gerrymandering, it also said state courts had every right to address the issue — and have they ever in North Carolina . Within four months, state judges hearing two separate cases struck down.

The North Carolina court decisions could prompt similar lawsuits in other states challenging partisan gerrymanders on state constitutional grounds, particularly following the next round of mandatory redistricting after the 2020 census. "I would expect to see a large increase in the number of state

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — When the U.S. Supreme Court this year declared federal judges had no business deciding cases about political gerrymandering, it also said state courts had every right to address the issue — and have they ever in North Carolina.

FILE - In this Monday, July 15, 2019 file photo, a state districts map is shown as a three-judge panel of the Wake County Superior Court presides over the trial of Common Cause, et al. v. Lewis, et al, in Raleigh, N.C.  North Carolina has often been cited as an example of political gerrymandering. Now court rulings against its legislative and congressional districts also could become an example for other states. (AP Photo/Gerry Broome, File)© Provided by The Associated Press FILE - In this Monday, July 15, 2019 file photo, a state districts map is shown as a three-judge panel of the Wake County Superior Court presides over the trial of Common Cause, et al. v. Lewis, et al, in Raleigh, N.C. North Carolina has often been cited as an example of political gerrymandering. Now court rulings against its legislative and congressional districts also could become an example for other states. (AP Photo/Gerry Broome, File)

Within four months, state judges hearing two separate cases struck down dozens of North Carolina legislative districts and stopped the use of the congressional district map in 2020 elections. In both cases, judges said evidence indicates Republican lawmakers violated the state constitutional rights of free elections, free speech and equality by shuffling Democratic voters into districts in ways that made it nearly impossible for the GOP to lose its majorities.

Can James Wiseman and Memphis topple the NCAA as we know it? | Giannotto

  Can James Wiseman and Memphis topple the NCAA as we know it? | Giannotto It was a back and forth battle between Baylor and TCU, but the Bears were able to keep their perfect record intact after topping the Mountaineers in the third overtime. Check out the game's top plays.

The North Carolina court decisions could prompt similar lawsuits in other states challenging partisan gerrymanders on state constitutional grounds, particularly following the next round of mandatory redistricting after the 2020 census. "I would expect to see a large increase in the number of state

The North Carolina court decisions could prompt similar lawsuits in other states challenging partisan gerrymanders on state constitutional grounds, particularly following the next round of mandatory redistricting after the 2020 census. "I would expect to see a large increase in the number of state

In response, the Republican-led General Assembly has redrawn its own districts and is likely in November to also reshape congressional districts. That could lead to Democratic gains in next year's elections.

The North Carolina court decisions could prompt similar lawsuits in other states challenging partisan gerrymanders on state constitutional grounds, particularly following the next round of mandatory redistricting after the 2020 census.

"I would expect to see a large increase in the number of state court cases filed around the country in 2021," said Paul Smith with the Campaign Legal Center in Washington, which has represented gerrymandering plaintiffs in North Carolina and Wisconsin.

Can James Wiseman and Memphis topple the NCAA as we know it? | Giannotto

  Can James Wiseman and Memphis topple the NCAA as we know it? | Giannotto Redshirt freshman quarterback Jarren Williams broke a Miami Hurricanes passing record by throwing his sixth touchdown of the game against Louisville in this ACC Must See Moment!

The North Carolina court decisions could prompt similar lawsuits in other states challenging partisan gerrymanders on state constitutional grounds, particularly following the next round of mandatory redistricting after the 2020 census. "I would expect to see a large increase in the number of state

The North Carolina court decisions could prompt similar lawsuits in other states challenging partisan gerrymanders on state constitutional grounds, particularly following the next round of mandatory redistricting after the 2020 census. “I would expect to see a large increase in the number of state

The North Carolina judges said extreme political gerrymandering violates a free elections clause in the state constitution — the same reasoning cited by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court when it struck down that state's Republican-drawn congressional map in January 2018.

North Carolina and Pennsylvania are among 30 states with similar state constitutional requirements for "free" elections, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Of those, 18 also require "equal" or "open" elections, and 15 further protect the right to vote from interference by "civil or military" powers.

This past week's injunction against North Carolina's congressional districts also cited the state constitution's guarantee of "equal protection" for all people and its right to free speech and association — common provisions in other state constitutions.

State Court Bars Using North Carolina House Map in 2020 Elections

  State Court Bars Using North Carolina House Map in 2020 Elections A North Carolina state court effectively threw out the state’s map of congressional districts on Monday, saying critics were poised to show “beyond a reasonable doubt” that it was an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander favoring Republicans. The ruling, by a three-judge panel in Superior Court in Raleigh, technically imposes a temporary ban on using the map in primary elections next spring. But the judges signaled that they were unlikely to change their minds by inviting plaintiffs in the case to seek a summary judgment ending the case in their favor.

The North Carolina court decisions could prompt similar lawsuits in other states challenging partisan gerrymanders on state constitutional grounds, particularly following the next round of mandatory redistricting after the 2020 census.

The North Carolina court decisions could prompt similar lawsuits in other states challenging partisan gerrymanders on state constitutional grounds, particularly following the next round of mandatory redistricting after the 2020 census. “I would expect to see a large increase in the number of state

Similar cases in other states may hinge on whether judges — some of whom hold office under Republican or Democratic banners — are willing to act as assertively as those in North Carolina.

"It's not so much an issue of magic words or something like that," said Michael Li, a redistricting attorney at the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law. "It's really more whether courts are willing to take the values that may be in state constitutions and then apply them to an area that they've never applied it to."

Some advocates would prefer permanent changes to how lines are drawn, through ballot initiatives and legislation that remove mapmaking power from legislators and gives it to independent commissions.

"Litigation is a hard and painful road," said Kathay Feng, national redistricting director for Common Cause. The group was a plaintiff in the U.S. Supreme Court case decided in June , which also focused on North Carolina's congressional map. The goal, Feng said, is to "make changes where each 10 years we're not facing that same uphill ... climb."

Michigan State standout linebacker Joe Bachie suspended by Big Ten for failed drug test

  Michigan State standout linebacker Joe Bachie suspended by Big Ten for failed drug test Michigan State linebacker Joe Bachie has been declared ineligible for a failed drug test. The school plans to appeal.According to the university, Bachie tested positive “for a substance that is classified as a performance-enhancing substance banned by the league. Michigan State plans to file an immediate appeal with the Big Ten regarding the testing.

The North Carolina court decisions could prompt similar lawsuits in other states challenging partisan gerrymanders on state constitutional grounds, particularly following the next round of mandatory redistricting after the 2020 census.

Redistricting is the process by which new congressional and state legislative district boundaries are drawn. Each of North Carolina 's 13 United States representatives and 170 state legislators are elected from political divisions called districts.

Common Cause was also a plaintiff, along with Democratic voters and the state Democratic Party, in the state court lawsuit leading to the Sept. 3 ruling striking down nearly 80 state legislative districts. It was the first state court decision nationwide against partisan gerrymandering since the U.S. high court's June decision.

That ruling effectively ended similar federal court cases alleging partisan gerrymandering by Republican-led legislatures in Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin. It also overturned a ruling against a Maryland congressional district that had been gerrymandered by Democrats.

But unlike in North Carolina, none of those other claims were revived with new state court lawsuits. Political circumstances changed in the other states. Michigan and Ohio voters approved 2018 ballot measures designed to decrease partisan influence in redistricting after the 2020 census. Wisconsin voters in 2018 replaced Republican Gov. Scott Walker with Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, who could veto redistricting plans from a Republican-led Legislature.

In North Carolina, Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper lacks that veto power.

Republicans have criticized the recent North Carolina court decisions as judicial activism spurred by Democrats trying to regain power they held for decades before the GOP won legislative majorities in 2011 and pressed a right-leaning agenda on taxes, spending and social issues. The two North Carolina state court cases have been bankrolled in part by an arm of a national Democratic group.

The judges have shown "a flawed approach to redistricting law" and "found something in the constitution that no one has seen before," Republican Senate leader Phil Berger told reporters after the congressional decision.

Republicans didn't appeal the judges' legislative redistricting ruling, deciding instead to draw replacement maps in accordance with the court order. That has resulted in an improved process, members of both parties say, signaling the litigation could have a long-term impact on North Carolina mapmaking.

The new state legislative districts had to be drawn in open committee meetings and on computer screens that were posted online. The judges also barred the use of partisan data and election results.

Republican House Speaker Tim Moore said he now anticipated a similar process with a new congressional map.

"It will happen in an open, transparent way, just as we had before," Moore said.

__

Lieb reported from Jefferson City, Missouri.

North Carolina ruling could cost GOP House seats .
A North Carolina court ruling on Monday ordering the state legislature to redraw congressional district boundaries has Republican members of Congress reconsidering their future in what is almost certain to be a boon for Democrats. © The Hill illustration North Carolina ruling could cost GOP House seats The ruling by a panel of three state judges is likely to give Democrats the chance to compete for several more U.S. House districts in North Carolina, where Republicans hold 10 of the 13 seats. Republicans acknowledged Tuesday they could lose at least one, and as many as three, of those seats.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 3
This is interesting!