•   
  •   
  •   

Politics 3 big takeaways from Bill Taylor’s full transcript

22:25  06 november  2019
22:25  06 november  2019 Source:   washingtonpost.com

White House Ukraine Expert Sought to Correct Transcript of Trump Call

  White House Ukraine Expert Sought to Correct Transcript of Trump Call Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that the White House transcript of a July call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to restore them failed, according to three people familiar with the testimony. The omissions, Colonel Vindman said, included Mr. Trump’s assertion that there were recordings of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. discussing Ukraine corruption, and an explicit mention by Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, of Burisma Holdings, the energy company whose board employed Mr.

Analysis Interpretation of the news based on evidence, including data, as well as anticipating how events might unfold based on past events. 4 big takeaways from Bill Taylor ’ s full transcript . The Fix’s Aaron Blake analyzes the key takeaways from ambassador William B. Taylor Jr.’s testimony to House Taylor says elsewhere in his testimony that he didn’t know the full details at the time but that he came to understand that the condition was that Ukraine would announce certain investigations, including one involving the company that employed former vice president Joe Biden’s son Hunter.

Those are the three biggest takeaways from over 300 pages of testimony by William Taylor , the top US diplomat in Ukraine, released on Wednesday by the House Intelligence Committee — and much of it further damages the president’ s defense against impeachment. Taylor spoke to three House Per Taylor last month, that’ s exactly what the president did. In just his opening statement, he said that Trump made the aid contingent on the new Ukrainian government publicly announcing it would reopen an anti-corruption probe into Burisma, a Ukrainian gas company that Hunter Biden, Joe’ s son, once

The House impeachment inquiry on Wednesday released the full testimony of the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, Bill Taylor.

We already knew Taylor was the first U.S. official to indicate that an explicit quid pro quo was communicated to top Ukrainian officials, based upon his publicly released opening statement. That claim that has since been confirmed by White House aide Tim Morrison and European Union Ambassador Gordon Sondland, who personally conveyed the quid pro quo.

Top diplomat in Ukraine directly ties Trump to quid pro quo

  Top diplomat in Ukraine directly ties Trump to quid pro quo "That was my clear understanding, that security assistance money would not come until the president (of Ukraine) committed to pursue" investigations, Bill Taylor told Congress.The transcript of Taylor's closed-door testimony before the three House committees leading the impeachment inquiry into Trump — the latest in a series of witness transcripts made public — confirms NBC News' reporting about his more than nine hours of testimony last month. It also contains new details about the language he used in describing the White House's attempted quid pro quo with Ukraine that shed light on his level of concern about the matter.

22.10.2019 · Full Transcript : William Taylor ' s Opening Statement on Ukraine Ambassador William Taylor is escorted by U.S. Capitol Police as he arrives to testify before House committees as part of the Democrats' impeachment investigation of President Donald Trump, at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, Oct. 06.11.2019 · 4 big takeaways from Bill Taylor ’ s full transcript Aaron Blake 11/6/2019. Ga. to probe voting issues in majority minority counties. DC National Guard members test positive for virus.

4 big takeaways from Bill Taylor ’ s full transcript - … Перевести эту страницу. In his opening statement Taylor said: “As the Committees are now aware, I said on September 9 in a message to Ambassador Gordon Sondland that withholding security assistance in exchange for help

Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Today’s most popular stories on The Washington Post

Below are some takeaways from Taylor’s full testimony.

1. A second quid pro quo?

The quid pro quo that we knew Taylor had explicitly outlined was one involving military aid; he said he had been told that Sondland told the Ukrainian official that the investigations Trump wanted would need to be announced for the aid to go through.

But in his further testimony, he also indicates he was told in some slightly less-certain terms that there was a quid pro quo involving a meeting with Trump. Taylor hinted at this in his opening statement, but he clarified it in his testimony:

Q: On page 5 of your testimony, in the third paragraph, you say: “But during my subsequent communications with Ambassador [Kurt] Volker and Sondland, they relayed to me that the President, quote, “wanted to hear from Zelensky,” unquote, “before scheduling the meeting in the Oval Office. It was not clear to me what this meant.” Now, I take it, ambassador, you used that word “before” deliberately -- that is, they wanted to hear from Zelensky before they would schedule this meeting. Is that right?
A: That is correct.

Taylor says elsewhere in his testimony that he didn’t know the full details at the time, but that he came to understand that the condition was that Ukraine would announced certain investigations, including one involving the company that employed Joe Biden’s son Hunter.

GOP Challenges Taylor Knowledge of Events: Impeachment Update

  GOP Challenges Taylor Knowledge of Events: Impeachment Update The first public hearing in the formal impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump began Wednesday, as the House Intelligence Committee heard testimony from two State Department officials. © Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg Adam Schiff and Devin Nunes wait for the start of an impeachment inquiry hearing in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Nov. 13, 2019. The committee, led by Chairman Adam Schiff, received testimony from William Taylor, the acting U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, and George Kent, deputy assistant secretary of State in the European and Eurasian bureau.

5 takeaways from Bill Taylor ’ s and George Kent’s impeachment testimony. Taylor ’ s testimony includes something he learned after his Oct. A big question now is what assurances that might have been based upon, beyond the Trump-Zelensky call, in which Zelensky expressed openness toward

Taylor was last seen in those much-circulated text messages fretting to fellow diplomats Gordon Sondland and Kurt Volker about the idea that U. S . military aid to Ukraine was being held up for political reasons. Of those three diplomats, he seemed to be the most alarmed about the possibility of a quid Taylor provides perhaps the most compelling evidence yet that this quid pro quo didn’t just exist but was explicitly communicated to Ukraine. Taylor said he was told by National Security Council aide Tim Morrison that Sondland, the ambassador to the European Union, directly communicated that quid pro

“By mid-July, it was becoming clear to me that the meeting President Zelensky wanted was conditioned on investigations of Burisma and alleged Ukrainian influence in the 2016 elections,” Taylor said in his opening statement. “It was also clear that this condition was driven by the irregular policy channel I had come to understand was guided by Mr. Giuliani.”

2. He points the finger at Giuliani, not at Trump personally

I wrote earlier Wednesday about how the testimonies of Volker and Sondland appears to be pointing in the direction of Republicans laying all this at the feet of Trump’s lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani. The two of them suggested they never had an explicit quid pro quo conveyed to them, and Sondland said he instead just “presumed” one was in place. What’s more, they both indicated Giuliani’s actions were problematic, if not illegal.

And Taylor’s testimony also stops short of directly implicating Trump. Taylor indicates the quid pro quo was coming from Giuliani and said he didn’t know if Trump was behind it.

5 key takeaways from the 1st day of the public impeachment hearing

  5 key takeaways from the 1st day of the public impeachment hearing The House on Wednesday convened its first impeachment hearing in more than 20 years. Here are the key takeaways.(Pictured) Donald Trump, accompanied by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, speaks on Oct. 23 in the Diplomatic Room of the White House in Washington, D.C.

* A truncated transcript follows. A full transcript can be found at www.marblejar.net. *** * Hi, everyone! This is Lara Hammock from the Marble Jar channel and in today’ s video, I’ll share some of my summary and takeaways from the paradigm shifting book The Righteous Mind by moral How can we possibly come to any shared conclusions when we seem to be having totally different conversations and arguing about completely different things? And how is it that two people can take such different meanings away from the same action? The Righteous Mind answers this question for

Bill Taylor , the US' s chief envoy in Ukraine, and George Kent, a top State Department official overseeing Ukraine policy, were the first two witnesses to testify in Congress' bombshell impeachment hearings into whether Trump abused his public office for private gain. Ambassador Bill Taylor during the House Intelligence Committee hearing. Reuters/Joshua Roberts. Here are the biggest takeaways from Wednesday' s impeachment hearing: The Democrats' lawyer ran circles around the Republicans' lawyer.

REP. LEE ZELDIN (R-N.Y.): So where was this condition coming from if you’re not sure if it was coming from the President?
TAYLOR: I think it was coming from Mr. Giuliani.
ZELDIN: But not from the president?
TAYLOR: I don’t know.

That doesn’t mean Trump wasn’t involved; indeed, someone like Taylor would have a difficult time knowing that, given he wasn’t central to this effort. (He didn’t even get read in on Trump’s July 25 call with Ukraine’s president, for instance.) But it’s significant that he stops short of saying he could trace this to Trump.

3. Taylor is going to be a very important witness next week

Taylor is one of two witnesses slated for the first public hearing of the impeachment inquiry next week, along with George Kent. And his testimony on Nov. 13 is looming larger than ever.

Volker and Sondland have shown that they aren’t terribly interested in blowing the lid off the Ukraine scandal, with Volker denying knowledge of a quid pro quo and Sondland only disclosing his after others implicated him (he issued a clarification to his testimony on Monday).

Taylor, by contrast, seemed to come into the job wary of the Giuliani set-up, and he describes a process of gradually having his worst fears confirmed. He also says he has “always kept careful notes, and I keep a little notebook where I take notes on conversations, in particular when I’m not in the office.”

Those notes could prove crucial, as could Taylor’s willingness to say things that other political appointees are warier of.

5 key takeaways from testimony by former Ukraine Amb. Marie Yovanovitch .
Former Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovich got the chance to tell her side of the story amid the ongoing House impeachment inquiry on Friday. Here are the key moments.Marie Yovanovitch, former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, is sworn in to testify before a House Intelligence Committee hearing as part of the impeachment inquiry, on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on Nov. 15.

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!