•   
  •   
  •   

Politics Trump ‘violates all recognized democratic norms,’ federal judge says in biting speech on judicial independence

13:30  08 november  2019
13:30  08 november  2019 Source:   washingtonpost.com

Analysis: How 'do us a favor' led to Trump impeachment inquiry

  Analysis: How 'do us a favor' led to Trump impeachment inquiry How we got here is something of a play in three acts, involving machinations by Ukrainians, Trump and Democrats in turn, with the fourth act to be written. ___THE BLACK EARTHUkraine is a land of dark, fertile soil where corruption and assorted American conspiracy theories have taken root along with the wheat and cabbage. Trump's preoccupation with Joe Biden and his son Hunter flourished there.A true if flawed democracy on Russia's doorstep, Ukraine in 2014 ushered out a pro-Russian leader who tolerated corruption and replaced him with an anti-Russian leader who tolerated somewhat less corruption.

U.S. District Judge Paul L. Friedman of the District of Columbia said Trump ’s rhetoric “ violates all recognized democratic norms ” during a speech at the “I have a judge who is a hater of Donald Trump ,” the then-candidate said in May 2016, describing Curiel and accusing him of bias because of

U.S. District Judge Paul L. Friedman of the District of Columbia said Trump ’s rhetoric “ violates all recognized democratic norms ” during a speech at the “I have a judge who is a hater of Donald Trump ,” the then-candidate said in May 2016, describing Curiel and accusing him of bias because of

In an unusually critical speech that lamented the public’s flagging confidence in the independence of the judicial branch, a federal judge slammed President Trump for “feeding right into this destructive narrative” with repeated attacks and personal insults toward judges he dislikes.

Donald Trump wearing a suit and tie: President Trump arrives to speak at a ceremony to present the Presidential Citizens Medal posthumously to Rick Rescorla on Thursday. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)© Patrick Semansky/AP President Trump arrives to speak at a ceremony to present the Presidential Citizens Medal posthumously to Rick Rescorla on Thursday. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Today’s most popular stories on The Washington Post

U.S. District Judge Paul L. Friedman of the District of Columbia said Trump’s rhetoric “violates all recognized democratic norms” during a speech at the annual Judge Thomas A. Flannery Lecture in Washington on Wednesday.

Bolton willing to defy White House and testify if court clears the way, according to people familiar with his views

  Bolton willing to defy White House and testify if court clears the way, according to people familiar with his views The former national security adviser is expected to confirm his deep alarm about the Ukraine pressure campaign, they said.

U.S. District Judge Paul L. Friedman of the District of Columbia said Trump ’s rhetoric “ violates all recognized democratic norms ” during a speech at the “I have a judge who is a hater of Donald Trump ,” the then-candidate said in May 2016, describing Curiel and accusing him of bias because of

U.S. District Judge Paul L. Friedman of the District of Columbia said Trump ’s rhetoric “ violates all recognized democratic norms ” during a speech at the “I have a judge who is a hater of Donald Trump ,” the then-candidate said in May 2016, describing Curiel and accusing him of bias because of

“We are in unchartered territory,” said Friedman, 75, an appointee of President Bill Clinton. “We are witnessing a chief executive who criticizes virtually every judicial decision that doesn’t go his way and denigrates judges who rule against him, sometimes in very personal terms. He seems to view the courts and the justice system as obstacles to be attacked and undermined, not as a co-equal branch to be respected even when he disagrees with its decisions.”

The White House did not immediately return a request for comment early Friday on Friedman’s speech.

Other judges have raised similar concerns about Trump’s rhetoric and the increasingly partisan interpretation of judicial rulings, but as a senior judge and secretary of the American Law Institute, Friedman’s criticism carries weight.

Was Trump call with Ukraine 'perfect'? GOP has many answers

  Was Trump call with Ukraine 'perfect'? GOP has many answers WASHINGTON (AP) — Republicans have no unified argument in the impeachment inquiry of Donald Trump, in large part because they can't agree on how best to defend the president — or for some, if they should. That would require a level of consensus that Trump's call with the Ukraine president was "perfect," as he insists. Or it would take a measure of GOP independence from Trump to suggest there may be a need to investigate. Instead, it's everyThat would require a level of consensus that Trump's call with the Ukraine president was "perfect," as he insists. Or it would take a measure of GOP independence from Trump to suggest there may be a need to investigate.

U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman slammed President Trump for political attacks on federal judges In an unusually critical speech that lamented the public’s flagging confidence in the independence of the judicial “I have a judge who is a hater of Donald Trump ,” the then-candidate said in May 2016

U.S. District Judge Paul L. Friedman of the District of Columbia said Trump ’s rhetoric “ violates all recognized democratic norms ” during a speech at the “I have a judge who is a hater of Donald Trump ,” the then-candidate said in May 2016, describing Curiel and accusing him of bias because of

Trump has bitterly denounced judges who have halted some of his administration’s most hotly debated policies, from his threats to withhold federal funds from sanctuary cities to his attempt to end Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), which protects many young undocumented immigrants from deportation. He has also attacked judges over rulings that negatively affect him personally.

In 2017, Trump tweeted how a judge’s decision not to imprison Bowe Bergdahl, an Army sergeant who was captured by the Taliban in 2009 after walking away from his battalion in Afghanistan, was a “total disgrace to our Country and to our Military.” On the campaign trail, then-candidate Trump had suggested Bergdahl was a “dirty rotten traitor” who should be sentenced to death.

Trump also attacked U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel, when the federal jurist from the Southern District of California was assigned to preside over a fraud case involving Trump University, a real estate seminar program. Trump suggested Curiel, an appointee of President Barack Obama, could not remain impartial in the case because of his Mexican heritage, despite the fact that the federal judge was born in Indiana and the case had nothing to do with immigration or foreign affairs. Trump ultimately settled the suit, which alleged the seminars used false advertising to ensnare attendees, for $25 million.

Historic impeachment hearings are set to begin, with GOP and Democrats pushing dueling messages on Trump’s conduct

  Historic impeachment hearings are set to begin, with GOP and Democrats pushing dueling messages on Trump’s conduct The two parties signaled how they planned to present radically different interpretations of the president’s actions and whether they were impeachable. Democrats expressed confidence that Wednesday’s hearing would begin a serious and somber process of publicly exposing Trump’s misconduct, narrated by career diplomats who were alarmed by the president’s push to have Ukraine investigate former vice president Joe Biden and his son, as well as a debunked theory concerning the 2016 election, in exchange for military aid and a White House visit coveted by Ukraine’s new leader.

U.S. District Judge Paul L. Friedman of the District of Columbia said Trump ’s rhetoric “ violates all recognized democratic norms ” during a speech at the “I have a judge who is a hater of Donald Trump ,” the then-candidate said in May 2016, describing Curiel and accusing him of bias because of

U.S. District Judge Paul L. Friedman of the District of Columbia said Trump ’s rhetoric “ violates all recognized democratic norms ” during a speech at the “I have a judge who is a hater of Donald Trump ,” the then-candidate said in May 2016, describing Curiel and accusing him of bias because of

“I have a judge who is a hater of Donald Trump,” the then-candidate said in May 2016, describing Curiel and accusing him of bias because of his ethnicity. Later, Curiel was assigned to rule on Trump’s plans to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border, and ruled in the president’s favor.

Friedman evoked Curiel to criticize Trump for encouraging others to lob “personal ad hominem attacks” at judges.

“This was beyond a dog whistle,” he said of Trump’s comments on Curiel’s ethnicity. “This was a shout.”

Trump has also referred to decisions he dislikes as the “tyranny of the judiciary” and a “gift to the criminal and cartel element in our country,” Friedman noted. He listed the ways Trump has denigrated judges: “so-called judge,” “disgraceful” and “political,” “a complete and total disaster."

The federal judge also recalled a political promise Trump made to voters that he said threatens the independence of the judicial branch: “If it’s my judges,” Friedman recounted Trump saying during his campaign in June 2016, “you know how they’re going to decide.”

Read George Kent Full Opening Statement at the First Public Hearing in Trump’s Impeachment Inquiry

  Read George Kent Full Opening Statement at the First Public Hearing in Trump’s Impeachment Inquiry The U.S. State Department official with decades of experience in Ukraine policy appeared Wednesday morning before the House Intelligence Committee. Both officials have expressed alarm in previous closed-door testimonies about Trump’s conduct with regards to Ukraine — highlighting allegations that he pressured President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate his political rival, Democratic 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden, and used his personal attorney Rudy Giuliani to subvert normal diplomatic channels in this pursuit.

U.S. District Judge Paul L. Friedman of the District of Columbia said Trump ’s rhetoric “ violates all recognized democratic norms ” during a speech at the “I have a judge who is a hater of Donald Trump ,” the then-candidate said in May 2016, describing Curiel and accusing him of bias because of

U.S. District Judge Paul L. Friedman of the District of Columbia said Trump ’s rhetoric “ violates all recognized democratic norms ” during a speech at the “I have a judge who is a hater of Donald Trump ,” the then-candidate said in May 2016, describing Curiel and accusing him of bias because of

Friedman rebuked Trump for his political attacks against judges. He noted that Trump is not the first president to accuse the judiciary of overreaching, playing politics and “legislating from the bench.” Thomas Jefferson tried to make federal judges’ seats elected positions. Theodore Roosevelt tried to add six friendly justices to the Supreme Court — “a bad idea then and a bad idea now,” Friedman said. And Dwight D. Eisenhower later referred to appointing Earl Warren as chief justice of the United States as one of his biggest mistakes. But none of those former presidents used rhetoric as inflammatory as Trump’s, which has been “markedly different,” the federal judge said.

“This is not normal,” he said. “And I mean that both in the colloquial sense and in the sense that this kind of personal attack on courts and individual judges violates all recognized democratic norms.”

Friedman said he does not object to criticism of judges, but suggested that incivility and political scorn had escalated to unacceptable levels in recent years. He also criticized journalists and other politicians, who he said increasingly identify judges by the president who appointed them.

“The reality is that when the Trump Administration has lost cases in the courts, it is not because of Clinton or Obama judges,” Friedman said, “but because of judges who are trying to follow the law and the Constitution.”

Friedman took one final stab at Trump in his closing remarks, criticizing the president’s tendency to bend the truth.

“Unlike the other two branches of government, the courts are charged with making decisions grounded in facts,” he said, “never on alternative facts.”

New testimony ties Trump more directly to Ukraine pressure campaign .
The acting ambassador to Ukraine described a phone call in which the president checked on the status of “the investigations.”William B. Taylor Jr., the acting ambassador to Ukraine, told lawmakers that the phone conversation between the president and U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland in Kyiv was overheard by one of his aides. Afterward, Sondland told the aide that Trump cared more about investigations of former vice president Joe Biden than other issues in Ukraine, Taylor said.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 3
This is interesting!