•   
  •   
  •   

Politics Lindsey Graham: Impeachment inquiry is 'invalid' without whistleblower's testimony

23:00  10 november  2019
23:00  10 november  2019 Source:   cnn.com

Judge fast-tracks case over former White House official's refusal to testify in impeachment inquiry

  Judge fast-tracks case over former White House official's refusal to testify in impeachment inquiry A federal judge on Thursday fast-tracked a case involving a key impeachment witness caught between House Democrats seeking to compel his testimony and a White House order to defy a congressional subpoena. Judge Richard Leon, a George W. Bush appointee to the federal district court in D.C., called the legal dispute over the testimony of Charles Kupperman, a former deputy to former national security adviser John Bolton, a "matter of great publicJudge Richard Leon, a George W. Bush appointee to the federal district court in D.C.

Graham : Impeachment inquiry is ' invalid ' without whistleblower ' s testimony . Washington (CNN) Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham asserted Sunday that the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump is " invalid " unless the identity of the anonymous whistleblower whose

Lindsey Graham : Impeachment Probe ‘ Invalid ,’ ‘a Complete Joke’ Without ‘ Whistleblower ,’ Hunter Biden Testimony . Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-SC) insisted on Sunday that the impeachment inquiry would be “ invalid ” and “a complete joke” without testimony

Lindsey Graham wearing a suit and tie: US Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) speaks during a press conference on the impeachment of US President Donald Trump at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, on October 24, 2019. (Photo by Andrew CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / AFP) (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images)© Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP/Getty Images US Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) speaks during a press conference on the impeachment of US President Donald Trump at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, on October 24, 2019. (Photo by Andrew CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / AFP) (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images)

Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham asserted Sunday that the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump is "invalid" unless the identity of the anonymous whistleblower whose complaint sparked House Democrats' probe is revealed.

Graham, whose committee would be at the center of Trump's trial in the Senate should the House approve articles of impeachment against the President, also said in his Sunday interview with Fox News that the process would be "dead on arrival" in the Republican-controlled chamber if the whistleblower doesn't testify before Congress.

Grassley: Up to whistleblower to reveal identity

  Grassley: Up to whistleblower to reveal identity Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said Monday that it is up to the whistleblower at the center of the impeachment inquiry to decide whether or not to come forward after President Trump urged the media to reveal the individual's identity."That's strictly up to the whistleblower," Grassley told reporters.

Solved: Washington (CNN)Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham asserted Sunday that the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump is. He continued: "It' s impossible to bring this case forward in my view fairly without us knowing who the whistleblower is and having a chance to

Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham asserted Sunday that the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump is " invalid " unless the identity The whistleblower ' s testimony is therefore redundant and unnecessary," the letter, obtained by CNN Saturday night, read. Schiff also argued in

"I consider any impeachment in the House that doesn't allow us to know who the whistleblower is to be invalid because without the whistleblower complaint, we wouldn't be talking about any of this and I also see the need for Hunter Biden to be called to adequately defend the President and if you don't do those two things it's a complete joke," Graham, a South Carolina Republican, said.

He continued: "It's impossible to bring this case forward in my view fairly without us knowing who the whistleblower is and having a chance to cross examine them about any biases they may have. So if they don't call the whistleblower in the House, this thing is dead on arrival in the Senate."

CNN has reached out to Graham for clarification on what he means by "invalid."

'A bunch of B.S.': Lindsey Graham refuses to read Ukraine transcripts

  'A bunch of B.S.': Lindsey Graham refuses to read Ukraine transcripts Sen. Lindsey Graham says he will not read newly released transcripts of private testimony given by U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland and former U.S. special envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker. © Provided by MediaDC: Washington Newspaper Publishing Company, Inc.Sondland and Volker testified in a closed session to House lawmakers in the Democrat-driven impeachment investigation against President Trump. The House passed a resolution approving the impeachment proceedings and authorizing the release of transcripts of the closed-door testimony on Oct. 31. "I've written the whole process off ...

Washington: Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham on Sunday asserted that the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump would be " invalid " Graham ' s remarks came a day after House Republicans and Democrats sparred over whether the whistleblower would provide testimony as

Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham asserted Sunday that the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump is “ invalid ” unless the identity of the anonymous whistleblower whose complaint sparked House Democrats’ probe is revealed.

The comments from Graham come a day after House Republicans and Democrats sparred over whether the whistleblower would provide testimony as part of the impeachment inquiry, an aspect of the process that was seen as critical during the start of it, but was put to rest Saturday by House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff.

House Republicans had submitted to Democrats earlier Saturday a list of witnesses they'd like to testify as part of the chamber's impeachment inquiry into Trump and Ukraine, seeking testimony from the whistleblower, former Vice President Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden and former US special envoy for Ukraine Kurt Volker, among others.

"As of right now, they are giving us no witnesses," California Rep. Devin Nunes, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, told Fox News Saturday night. Democrats have so far received testimony from 15 witnesses that they called before the committee.

Graham now says Trump's Ukraine policy was too 'incoherent' for quid pro quo

  Graham now says Trump's Ukraine policy was too 'incoherent' for quid pro quo A day after saying he wouldn’t bother reading transcripts released by House Democrats in the impeachment inquiry into President Trump, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., now says he did read the testimony, and his conclusion is that the administration’s Ukraine policy was too “incoherent” for it to have orchestrated the quid pro quo that is at the heart of the probe. © Provided by Oath Inc. Sen. Lindsey Graham at an Oct. 24 press conference on impeachment. (Photo: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images) Testimony released Tuesday included depositions from Gordon Sondland, U.S.

South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham says we need to know what the background is of the whistleblower . FOX News operates the FOX News Channel (FNC)

Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham asserted today that the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump is " invalid " unless the identity of the anonymous whistleblower whose complaint sparked House Democrats' probe is revealed.

But Schiff, in his letter to Nunes on Saturday, said the whistleblower's testimony would be "redundant and unnecessary."

"The impeachment inquiry, moreover, has gathered an ever-growing body of evidence -- from witnesses and documents, including the President's own words in his July 25 call record -- that not only confirms, but far exceeds, the initial information in the whistleblower's complaint. The whistleblower's testimony is therefore redundant and unnecessary," the letter, obtained by CNN Saturday night, read.

Schiff also argued in his letter that "in light of the President's threats, the individual's appearance before us would only place their personal safety at grave risk."

The President has been encouraging media outlets to out the whistleblower, and he wrote in a September tweet that "Like every American, I deserve to meet my accuser."

The whistleblower's complaint at the heart of the House's inquiry alleges that Trump pushed Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden, the former vice president's son and the 2016 election in order to help the President politically and that the White House took steps to cover it up. Trump has denied doing anything improper.

Adam Schiff says whistleblower testimony is 'redundant and unnecessary'

  Adam Schiff says whistleblower testimony is 'redundant and unnecessary' House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff made clear on Saturday that the Ukraine whistleblower won't be testifying in the impeachment inquiry, arguing that the individual's testimony would be "redundant and unnecessary."House Republicans earlier Saturday had submitted a list of witnesses to Democrats that they'd like to testify as part of the chamber's impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump and Ukraine. The list included the whistleblower and former Vice President Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden.

Lindsey Graham also argued a "high crime" was simply an important person hurting someone of low Graham also acknowledged the gravity of Clinton’ s impeachment trial, noting that all presidents to come Cammarata, Sarah. “ Lindsey Graham Decries Whistleblower Complaint as ‘All Hearsay.'”

Graham : Impeachment inquiry is ' invalid ' without whistleblower ' s testimony . "I also see the need for Hunter Biden to be called to adequately House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, has already argued that exposing the identity of the whistleblower is unnecessary since

Trump has pushed an unproven accusation that then-Vice President Biden improperly tried to help his son by pressuring the Ukrainian government to fire the country's prosecutor general. Hunter Biden served on the board of the Ukrainian natural gas company at the time.

There is no evidence of wrongdoing by either Joe or Hunter Biden in Ukraine.

Asked during a Sunday interview on Fox News about the possibility that outing the person could send a "chilling message" to other government officials looking to file complaints, White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said protecting whistleblowers is important but so is questioning their motivations.

"Whistleblower protections are important," she said. "But you can't just not question the motivations of this whistleblower."

But at least one Republican lawmaker, Texas Rep. Will Hurd, has spoken out against revealing the identity of the whistleblower.

"I think we should be protecting the identity of the whistleblower, I've said that since the very beginning," Hurd told Fox News in a Sunday interview, adding: "How we treat this whistleblower will impact whistleblowers in the future."

Johnson opens door to subpoenaing whistleblower, Schiff, Bidens .
Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) opened the door on Thursday to subpoenaing a cadre of top Republican targets as part of his panel's oversight work. Pressed if he would issue subpoenas for House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), former Vice President Biden or his son Hunter Biden or the whistleblower at the center of the impeachment inquiry, Johnson stressed that he was still trying to collect information.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!