Politics: House is investigating whether Trump lied to Mueller, its general counsel told a federal appeals court - - PressFrom - US
  •   
  •   
  •   

Politics House is investigating whether Trump lied to Mueller, its general counsel told a federal appeals court

19:45  18 november  2019
19:45  18 november  2019 Source:   washingtonpost.com

Closing arguments underway in Roger Stone trial

  Closing arguments underway in Roger Stone trial WASHINGTON (AP) — Closing arguments began Wednesday in Roger Stone’s federal trial on charges he lied to Congress. A veteran Republican political operative and longtime confidant of President Donald Trump, Stone was indicted in January as part of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian electoral tampering. He is accused of lying to lawmakers about his attempts to communicate with the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks, tampering with witnesses and obstructing a House Intelligence Committee investigation into whether the Trump presidential campaign coordinated with Russia to tip the 2016 election.

BREAKING: The statement came in arguments before appeals court judges in Washington, D.C., over Congress’s request to have secret grand jury evidence from former special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s report released urgently for its impeachment inquiry.

Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller testifies before a House Judiciary Committee hearing on the Office of Special Counsel's investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., July 24, 2019. REUTERS/Leah Millis © Thomson Reuters Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller testifies before a House Judiciary Committee hearing on the Office of Special Counsel's investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., July 24, 2019. REUTERS/Leah Millis

This story is developing and will be updated.

A federal appeals court in Washington is considering whether the Justice Department must immediately release to Congress secret grand-jury materials from former special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s investigation.

Congress can have access to eight years of Trump’s tax records, appeals court orders

  Congress can have access to eight years of Trump’s tax records, appeals court orders The D.C. Circuit let stand an earlier ruling against Trump, likely sending the case to the Supreme Court.

At the Monday hearing, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is reviewing a lower-court ruling that requires disclosure of evidence the House Judiciary Committee says it needs in its “urgent efforts” to determine whether President Trump committed impeachable offenses. 

Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Today’s most popular stories on The Washington Post

Last month, Judge Beryl A. Howell, chief of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, found that the House was legally engaged in a judicial process that exempts Congress from grand-jury secrecy rules.

The case is one of several separation-of-powers battles teed up for the Supreme Court. Trump’s private lawyers last week asked the high court to block a subpoena for his tax records from New York prosecutors and to stop a separate House subpoena for his personal and business records.

House investigating whether Trump lied to Robert Mueller

  House investigating whether Trump lied to Robert Mueller The House of Representatives is now investigating whether President Donald Trump lied to special counsel Robert Mueller in written answers he provided in the Russia investigation, the House's general counsel said in federal court Monday. © Getty Images NEW YORK, NY - AUGUST 08: Robert S. Mueller III, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), speaks at the International Conference on Cyber Security (ICCS) on August 8, 2013 in New York City. The ICCS, which is co-hosted by Fordham University and the FBI, is held every 18 months; more than 25 countries are represented at this year's conference.

The Justice Department’s appeal is being heard by a three-member panel made up of Judges Judith W. Rogers, Thomas B. Griffith and Neomi Rao.

The House Committee went to court in July seeking an order for the release of redacted portions of Mueller’s final report on the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, as well as grand-jury materials the report cited or referenced. The dispute predates the formal impeachment inquiry with its focus on Trump’s effort to pressure his Ukrainian counterpart to investigate a potential 2020 political rival.

Justice Department attorneys say the material should be off-limits because impeachment trials are not “judicial proceedings” but a legislative function carried out by lawmakers. There is no exception to grand-jury secrecy rules for impeachment proceedings, the department said in court filings.

House Dems, citing impeachment, request speedy ruling in McGahn subpoena fight

  House Dems, citing impeachment, request speedy ruling in McGahn subpoena fight House Dems, citing impeachment, request speedy ruling in McGahn subpoena fightThe Democrats’ five-page letter to U.S. District Court Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson centers on their lawsuit to enforce a subpoena against Don McGahn, the former White House counsel who showed up repeatedly in the special counsel’s final report detailing President Donald Trump’s potential acts of obstruction of justice.

In its appeal, the department called the order from Howell “an extraordinary abrogation of grand-jury secrecy: not only are the materials at issue squarely protected . . . but some relate to ongoing criminal investigations or prosecutions.”

After Attorney General William P. Barr declined House requests for the evidence, the committee subpoenaed Barr. The department did not comply.

House lawyers told the appeals court in filings that lawmakers need to view the materials to “aid the House in determining whether the President committed impeachable offenses, including attempted obstruction of the Special Counsel’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election and solicitation of Ukrainian interference in the 2020 Presidential election.”

Any delay, House lawyers said, will deprive the investigation of essential information.

In her 75-page opinion, Howell said the Judiciary Committee and the House, in determining whether to recommend articles of impeachment, are serving like a grand jury.

“In carrying out the weighty constitutional duty of determining whether impeachment of the President is warranted, Congress need not redo the nearly two years of effort spent on the Special Counsel’s investigation, nor risk being misled by witnesses, who may have provided information to the grand jury and the Special Counsel that varies from what they tell” the House, Howell wrote.

Ruling on test of White House witness immunity claims coming Monday

  Ruling on test of White House witness immunity claims coming Monday On Monday, a federal judge plans to make the first major court ruling in the fight between the House and the White House over impeachment witnesses. Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson says she will decide by the close of business whether former White House counsel Don McGahn must testify about President Donald Trump to Congress. Until this point, the case has lingered in the background, stemming from a subpoena the House Judiciary Committee sent to McGahn in April, well before the Ukraine impeachment scandal kicked House proceedings into high gear this fall.

Howell, a former Democratic Senate Judiciary Committee counsel and a 2010 nominee of President Barack Obama, said the need for continued secrecy was “minimal” because the Justice Department already had made redacted portions of the Mueller report available to certain members of Congress and because the Judiciary Committee agreed to negotiations to prevent release of information that would harm any ongoing investigations.

In opposing the release, Trump administration lawyers said a Watergate-era court ruling was wrongly decided in finding impeachment proceedings exempt from grand-jury secrecy rules.

Howell disagreed and rejected Justice Department claims that the House had not yet exhausted other means of obtaining the information, including through subpoena.

“These arguments smack of farce,” she wrote, citing a letter from White House counsel Pat Cipollone to House leaders saying the administration would not cooperate with the impeachment inquiry.

“The reality,” Howell wrote, “is that DOJ and the White House have been openly stonewalling the House’s efforts to get information by subpoena and by agreement, and the White House has flatly stated that the Administration will not cooperate with congressional requests for information.”

ann.marimow@washpost.com

spencer.hsu@washpost.com

Ex-White House lawyer moves to block judge's ruling requiring testimony .
Former White House counsel Don McGahn on Tuesday asked a judge to put on hold a ruling that would require him to testify.The court filing asking for the delay while he pursues an appeal followed U.S. District Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's ruling on Monday that rejected the Trump administration's legal claim that current and former senior White House officials cannot be compelled to testify before Congress.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 5
This is interesting!