•   
  •   
  •   

Politics State Dept official rejects claims of Ukrainian election meddling

20:15  03 december  2019
20:15  03 december  2019 Source:   politico.com

How much did Mike Pence know about pressure on Ukraine? Testimony suggests effort to flag concerns

  How much did Mike Pence know about pressure on Ukraine? Testimony suggests effort to flag concerns When Mike Pence and Volodymyr Zelensky met in a windowless conference room, the stalled aid was the first issue the Ukraine president raised.Nearly $400 million in U.S. military assistance that Ukraine was desperate for as a counter to Russian aggression had been on hold for weeks.

The State Department’s No. 3 official on Tuesday flatly rejected a conspiracy theory pushed by President Donald Trump and his personal attorney that it was Ukraine who systematically interfered in the 2016 election, not Russia.

David Hale wearing a suit and tie: State Department official David Hale.© Alex Brandon/AP Photo State Department official David Hale.

In a Senate Foreign Relations hearing on U.S. policy toward Russia, David Hale, the department’s undersecretary for political affairs, succinctly summed up the findings of the U.S. intelligence community in response to questioning from the panel’s top Democrat, Sen. Bob Menendez.

“Secretary Hale, did Russia interfere in the 2016 election in favor of Donald Trump?” the New Jersey Democrat asked.

Despite Fiona Hill warning, Sen. John Kennedy says Ukraine may be behind 2016 DNC hack

  Despite Fiona Hill warning, Sen. John Kennedy says Ukraine may be behind 2016 DNC hack Sen. John Kennedy said that despite the U.S. intelligence community's conclusion that Russia hacked the DNC in 2016, "it could also be Ukraine."During an appearance on "Fox News Sunday," host Chris Wallace asked Kennedy if he believed Russia or Ukraine was behind the computer hack.

“Yes, the intelligence community assessed that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at our presidential election,” Hale replied, reading from what appeared to be a prepared response.

“Was the Kremlin’s interference in our 2016 election a hoax?” Menendez followed up, echoing the president’s own language, and eliciting a swift “no” from Hale.

“Are you aware of any evidence that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 U.S. election?” Menendez continued, to which Hale responded: “I am not.”

Menendez then quoted from the public impeachment testimony of Fiona Hill, the former top Russia expert on the White House National Security Council, who two weeks ago described the theory pushed by Trump and his lawyer Rudy Giuliani as a “fictional narrative that is being perpetrated and propagated by the Russian security services themselves.”

Democratic Rep. Van Drew to vote against Trump impeachment, says others could join him

  Democratic Rep. Van Drew to vote against Trump impeachment, says others could join him Democratic Rep. Jeff Van Drew said that he will vote against articles of impeachment that outline the case for President Trump's removal from office.Van Drew, a Democrat who represents a district in New Jersey that favored Trump by five points in 2016, has been a vocal opponent to the impeachment effort examining whether Trump pressured Ukraine to investigate his political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden. Trump denies the allegations and has called the inquiry a "hoax.

“Do you have any reason to disagree with Dr. Hill?” Menendez asked Hale on Tuesday.

“I do not,” he replied.

After more back and forth, Menendez returned to the subject. "Is our national security made stronger or weaker when members of the administration or members of Congress insist on repeating debunked Russian lies?" he asked.

"That does not serve our interest," Hale answered.

Hale’s series of responses is a departure from Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who told reporters a week ago that he saw merit in investigating such allegations.

“Any time there is information that indicates that any country has messed with American elections, we not only have a right, but a duty to make sure we chase that down,” he said during a press briefing in Foggy Bottom.

And Trump, too, has continued pushing the debunked claims that have formed — in part — the basis of his criticisms of Ukraine and set off the series of events resulting in the impeachment inquiry winding its way through the House.

Trump denounces charges as Democrats announce articles of impeachment

  Trump denounces charges as Democrats announce articles of impeachment Trump lashed out against Democrats on Twitter after they announced articles of impeachment accusing him of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.In social media, television interviews, and public statements, Trump and his aides denounced the impeachment charges as baseless and politically motivated, and claimed he would be vindicated in a Senate trial.

Trump and Giuliani have found some support for their claims among other GOP lawmakers, who Hill lacerated in her public testimony for giving voice to the conspiracy theory.

“Some of you on this committee appear to believe that Russia and its security services did not conduct a campaign against our country — and that perhaps, somehow, for some reason, Ukraine did,” Hill told the Republican members of the House Intelligence Committee, adding that she refused to aid their efforts "to legitimize an alternate narrative that the Ukrainian government is a U.S. adversary, and that Ukraine — not Russia — attacked us in 2016.”

That conclusion was borne out in special counsel Robert Mueller's nearly two-year investigation into 2016 election interference, and the Republican-controlled Senate Intelligence Committee separately found no evidence that Ukraine waged a top-down interference campaign akin to the Kremlin’s efforts to help Trump win in 2016.

The Indispensable Man: How Giuliani Led Trump to the Brink of Impeachment .
Not so long ago, it seemed to Rudolph W. Giuliani that he would be presiding over a hefty part of the world. Holding court a few nights after the 2016 election in a private cigar bar on Fifth Avenue, glass of Macallan at hand, Mr. Giuliani boasted to friends that President-elect Donald J. Trump would soon nominate him to the most prestigious of cabinet posts. “How about,” Mr. Giuliani asked, “secretary of state?” Chief global representative of the United States in war, peace and trade.Sign Up For the Morning Briefing NewsletterIt would be a sublime reward for having thrown in with Mr.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!