Poll: Majority of Republicans think Trump a better president than Lincoln
A majority of Republicans believe President Trump is a better leader than Abraham Lincoln, who guided the nation through the Civil War. © Provided by Washington ExaminerThe Economist and YouGov conducted a poll from Nov. 24-26 of 1,500 American adults. In the wide-ranging poll, researchers asked Americans to compare Trump to past U.S. presidents.Fifty-three percent of Republicans said that Trump is a better president than Lincoln. For Democrats and Independents, Lincoln is considered to have been the better president with 94% and 78%, respectively.
WASHINGTON — Two minutes into Monday’s historic House Judiciary Committee hearing into the impeachment of President Trump — even before Representative Jerrold Nadler, the chairman, issued the customary call for decorum — a protester, screaming that Mr. Nadler was committing treason
WASHINGTON — House Democrats delivered a scathing summation of their impeachment case against President Trump on Monday, arguing that the president had put his personal and political interests above those of the nation in soliciting re-election help from Ukraine in a pattern of conduct
WASHINGTON — Two minutes into Monday’s historic House Judiciary Committee hearing into the impeachment of President Trump — even before Representative Jerrold Nadler, the chairman, issued the customary call for decorum — a protester, screaming that Mr. Nadler was committing treason, was dragged out of the grand columned hearing room by the Capitol Police.
It was the first clue that this was not going to be a somber session befitting the gravity of the occasion.
House Democrats release report outlining case for Trump's impeachment
USA-TRUMP/IMPEACHMENT-REPORT (URGENT):House Democrats release report outlining case for Trump's impeachment
Democrats must decide whether to limit their case to Mr. Trump ’s dealings with Ukraine, or include Afterward, he said Democrats were trying to “ Impeach me over NOTHING,” and setting a damaging On Wednesday, after the legal scholars told the Judiciary Committee the facts of the case met the
Faced with new allegations against President Trump and administration stonewalling, Democrats For the past two years, talk of impeachment had centered around the findings of the special At the heart of an impeachment inquiry is a nine-page whistle-blower complaint that names over two “The misguided Democrat impeachment strategy is meant to appease their rabid, extreme, leftist base
The hearing was intended as an opportunity for Democrats to lay out their case that Mr. Trump had violated the Constitution with a “brazen” scheme to enlist Ukraine to interfere in the 2020 election — and for Republicans to respond. But it quickly devolved from a staid courtroom drama into a raucous, gavel-banging, partisan verbal melee.
“You will not shout out — not shout out in the middle of testimony,” a frustrated Mr. Nadler exclaimed at one point, bringing the gavel down in a fruitless effort to shut down Republican parliamentary objections.
“Bang it harder — it still doesn’t make the point that you’re not doing it right,” Representative Doug Collins, the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, shot back.
Republicans brought big props, including two giant poster boards assailing Representative Adam B. Schiff, Democrat of California and the chairman of the Intelligence Committee, who led the fact-finding portion of the impeachment inquiry and has turned down Republican calls to testify about his work. “Where’s Adam?” one placard blared, in simple black and white. Another featured a red and white milk carton with Mr. Schiff’s picture under the word “MISSING.”
Trump says impeachment report is "a joke"
Trump says impeachment report is "a joke"LONDON — U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that the Democrats' impeachment report was a joke with no merit and complained that a hearing had been scheduled while he was out of the country.
WASHINGTON — Almost from the moment that Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her lieutenants decided this fall to pursue the impeachment of President Trump , they made a fateful judgment: If the president intended to do nothing but stonewall and subvert their inquiry
Having heard all the witness testimony in the impeachment case against Donald Trump , Congress began arguments on Monday on what that testimony Behind the Republican bench, party operatives set up placards that sought to make an issue of the absence of the lead Democratic investigator
Democrats brought big-name lawyers from New York: Daniel S. Goldman, a former federal prosecutor and MSNBC legal analyst who is the chief investigator for the Intelligence panel andknown as a relentless interrogator, currently working for the Judiciary. Mr. Berke wore two hats: After testifying alongside the Republicans’ lawyer, Stephen R. Castor, he questioned Mr. Goldman and Mr. Castor, rattling the Republican with his rat-a-tat style.
“Come on, Barry,” Mr. Castor complained at one point, his face scrunching in frustration.
From the start,whose off-duty passions include the Grateful Dead and the Philadelphia Phillies, gave off a workaday vibe. He brought his briefing papers in a reusable grocery bag from Fresh Market, prompting the food chain to seize on a marketing opportunity.
'It did nothing': White House blasts Judiciary Committee hearing as 'desperate charade'
The White House called the first day of impeachment testimony in front of the House Judiciary Committee a "bad day" for Democrats as they attempt to impeach President Trump. © Provided by Washington Examiner"Today was a good day for President Trump, and a bad day for the Democrats," White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said in a Wednesday statement. "The only thing the three liberal professors established at Chairman Nadler’s hearing was their political bias against the President. It did nothing to change the fact that, despite weeks of hearings in this sham process, the President did nothing wrong.
Democrats accuse Trump of abusing his power for his own political benefit and at the expense of US Photograph: Jonathan Ernst/AP. Over the nearly three months of the impeachment inquiry As Democrats erected once again a tower of testimony to support their case , Republicans tried to hold
WASHINGTON - Democrats laid out the case for the impeachment of President Donald Trump Monday as they prepared to issue formal charges against the US leader. Four months after an anonymous whistleblower sparked the investigation of Trump for seeking illicit political favors from
“We’d like to announce that we are the official briefcase maker of Steve Castor,” the chain, with a winking, tongue-wagging emoji and an offer of free bags.
It all unfolded on a split-screen day in Washington, with the scene in the hearing room countered by the release of aby the Justice Department’s inspector general that debunked President Trump’s accusations that former leaders of the F.B.I. engaged in a politicized conspiracy to sabotage him.
Hovering over the proceedings — unseen but very much heard — was the president,in the hearing. He made an appearance of sorts, thanks to Mr. Nadler’s team, which showed him on videotape declaring “I have an Article 2 where I have the right to do whatever I want as president,” a clear indication, Democrats argued that the president thinks he is above the law.
House Democrat says he plans to vote against all articles of impeachment
Rep. Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey, one of two Democrats to vote against formalizing the impeachment inquiry, said he plans to vote against all the articles of impeachment "unless there's something that I haven't seen, haven't heard before."Rep. Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey, one of two Democrats to vote against formalizing the impeachment inquiry, said he plans to vote against all the articles of impeachment "unless there's something that I haven't seen, haven't heard before.
House Democrats have laid out the constitutional grounds for their case to impeach President Donald Trump , as the process gathers pace. It also aims to rebut some of the key defences made by Republicans and the White House against how the process has been conducted.
“The administration must hand over the whistleblower report, as required by law, so Congress can investigate these claims “ Democrats have put all their eggs in the impeachment basket.” It’s time for House Democrats to start working with all Republicans on the priorities of the American people
And Mr. Trump could not stay away on Twitter. “Witch Hunt!”in his first missive of the day, followed “The Do Nothing Democrats are a disgrace!”
To those who remember the somber Watergate hearings of 1974, or even the more partisan 1998 hearing featuring Ken Starr, the independent counsel whose investigation led to the impeachment of President Bill Clinton, Monday’s hearing was still striking in its rancor — so much so that Robert Dallek, the presidential historian, thought it might come to fisticuffs.
“It’s so unpleasant, nasty, out of sync with traditional American politics,” Mr. Dallek said. “Not because politics is a soft business or an easy business, but there are degrees and degrees. Frankly, as I watched some of this stuff, it seemed to me like it could become almost physically violent.”
The session opened shortly after 9 a.m., with the bespectacled Mr. Nadler,presiding. Mr. Nadler was a few sentences into his opening statement when which jumped out of his seat, hollering about treason and an “impeachment scam.” The Capitol Police rushed in to escort him out.
One House Democrat goes on record opposing Trump impeachment
Eight other lawmakers in competitive districts are currently on the fence ahead of the full House vote, according to an NBC News tally.An NBC News survey of more than 40 vulnerable House Democrats found only Rep. Jeff Van Drew, who represents the southern tip of the state, plans to vote against the articles of impeachment.
House Democrats laid out their case for impeachment in a report that takes great liberties with US as well as European history. Now, aside from the absolute absurdity of harking back to the waning days of the Kingdom of France to make its point, the overt assertion here is that Trump was somehow
Democrats laid out the case for the impeachment of President Donald Trump on Monday as they prepared to issue formal charges against the US leader. Four months after an anonymous whistleblower sparked the investigation of Trump for seeking illicit political favors from Ukraine
For a couple of hours after that, the session was relatively calm — albeit a recitation of alternate versions of reality.
Mr. Berke laid out the case for impeaching Mr. Trump, as Democrats saw it. Mr. Castor said there were no grounds.
Mr. Goldman, a former mob prosecutor, repeatedly used the word “scheme” as he unspooled the by now well-known narrative of Mr. Trump’s pressure campaign in Ukraine — including the July 25 call in which Mr. Trump asked President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine to “do us a favor” and investigate former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and his son.
Mr. Castor portrayed the call as one of “pleasantries and cordialities,” adding, “Simply put, the call is not the sinister mob shakedown that some Democrats have described.”
But things took a turn for the explosive once the questioning began. As Mr. Berke grilled Mr. Castor, Republicans cried foul.
“Is this when we just hear staff ask questions of other staff and the members get dealt out of this whole hearing?” Representative Matt Gaetz, Republican of Florida, and one of Mr. Trump’s most ardent defenders on Capitol Hill.
“The gentleman will suspend!” Mr. Nadler declared, with another bang of the gavel, using a slightly politer congressional euphemism for silencing an interruption.
When Mr. Berke was done questioning, Mr. Collins stepped in for the Republicans to hammer away at Mr. Goldman. “Answer the question!” he said sharply, as Mr. Goldman paused before responding. “Mr. Berke had so much free rein — let’s go at it.”
In a sense, said Mr. Dallek, the historian, the session was a reflection of the president himself: partisan, combative, not willing to give an inch. In his opening statement, Mr. Berke offered insight into the mind-set of Democrats as he recounted an anecdote involving his young son.
“He said ‘Dad, does the president have to be a good person?’” the lawyer said, before offering his own answer: “I said, ‘Son, it is not a requirement that the president be a good person, but that is the hope.’ ”
'Impeachment will be their legacy': House erupts during Scalise speech ripping Democrats .
Democrats erupted in the House chamber after GOP Rep. Steve Scalise accused them of pushing forward on impeachment because they "hate" the nearly 63 million Americans that voted for President Trump. © Provided by Washington ExaminerScalise delivered his remarks on the House floor Wednesday during the debate leading up to a vote on two articles of impeachment against Trump. Scalise defended the president and accused Democrats of impeaching Trump over policy disagreements and for personal reasons."You don’t impeach a president because you don’t like his foreign policy," Scalise said.