Politics Senate Republicans come around to idea of not having witnesses in impeachment trial

01:30  12 december  2019
01:30  12 december  2019 Source:   cnn.com

McConnell weighs impeachment back-up plan if talks with Schumer fall apart

  McConnell weighs impeachment back-up plan if talks with Schumer fall apart It's unclear if the Senate leaders will be able to reach a deal for rules to govern an impeachment trial. The Senate majority leader said that the first action he will take if the House impeaches President Donald Trump is to meet with Minority Leader Schumer to see if they can replicate the success of Senate leaders 20 years ago during the impeachment trial of Bill Clinton. But if that doesn’t work out, his next step is probably to go to his 53 members and see if they can pass a partisan package governing the rules of the trial.

The articles of impeachment move to the Senate , which then holds a trial . Whether or not it is necessary, it has not been clear whether a resolution to formally start an impeachment inquiry To date, Senate Republicans have given no indication that they would break with Mr. Trump, especially

Throughout the hearings, Republicans have argued that because Mr. Trump But Democrats decided that keeping the impeachment case specific to Mr. Trump’s Ukraine dealings focused the Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader, told reporters that an impeachment trial would most likely be

Senate Republicans are starting to coalesce around the idea of a shorter Senate impeachment trial -- one that, contrary to President Donald Trump's stated desire, wouldn't include witnesses.

John Barrasso, Mitch McConnell, Roy Blunt, Joni Ernst standing next to a person in a suit and tie© CNN McConnell

The layout of the Senate trial is still under deliberation and leaders have been clear that no final decisions about strategy or structure have been made, but in interviews over the last several days, GOP senators say they are beginning to see the benefit of keeping the process short, leaving out witnesses and instead, simply laying out the facts with a presentation from House managers and the White House.

Schumer to colleagues running for White House: Impeachment comes first

  Schumer to colleagues running for White House: Impeachment comes first Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) says Democratic colleagues running for president, such as Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), should prioritize the Senate impeachment trial over campaigning ahead of the Iowa caucuses.The trial could tie up senators on the Senate floor for the entire month of January, right before the first contest of the Democratic primary calendar scheduled in Iowa for Feb. 3. With the possibility of close votes on procedural questions such as what witnesses should be called to the Senate floor, Schumer says colleagues should make the trial their first priority, even if it might tread on their campaign plans.

Senate Republicans are preparing to forego calling witnesses during the likely Senate impeachment trial next month, saying they would instead like to see a speedy end to Democrats's attempt to remove President Trump from office.“At that point, I would expect that most members would be ready to vote.

The refusal comes as Senate Republicans have signaled it would be inappropriate for the impeachment proceedings, let alone a trial , to progress without the former vice president or his youngest son, Hunter, providing testimony. At the forefront of this push have been Sens.

"I would think the consensus would be let the House make their case, let the Senate make their case and then put forward a motion to vote," said Sen. Ron Johnson, a Wisconsin Republican.

That marks a shift from a few weeks ago when a number of Republican senators made clear they would go to great lengths to ensure that voters couldn't accuse them of cutting the process short. It was a position that tracked with the Trump White House, which has said publicly, and repeatedly, it wants to hear live testimony from individuals including Hunter Biden and the whistleblower.

As the House moves swiftly to a floor vote on impeachment, senators must grapple with what now looks inevitable: that they will act as a jury in a historic impeachment trial.

'End this': Republicans poised to call no witnesses during Trump impeachment trial in Senate

  'End this': Republicans poised to call no witnesses during Trump impeachment trial in Senate Senate Republicans do not expect to call witnesses President Trump might want to hear from most in an impeachment trial, conceding there are not the votes to summon key figures such as Hunter Biden and the unidentified government whistleblower whose complaint sparked the process. © Provided by Washington ExaminerSenate impeachment rules require a majority vote to call witnesses, and with just two out of 53 votes to spare, there is no “appetite” among Republicans to pursue testimony from people that Democrats blocked Republicans from subpoenaing during the House investigation.

Trump may not think Mitch McConnell shares his blood-lust for turning his impeachment trial into a counter- trial spectacle. Photo: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images. When the prospect of a Senate impeachment trial first came under serious discussion, its subject and object, President Trump

Washington Examiner: “ Senate Republicans do not expect to call witnesses President Trump might want to hear from most in an impeachment trial , conceding there are not the “ Senate impeachment rules require a majority vote to call witnesses , and with just two out of 53 votes to spare, there is no

Many questions remain unanswered, however, about how exactly such a trial would proceed. The decision of whether or not to call witnesses could have a significant impact on the way the process unfolds.

A Republican senator granted anonymity to speak candidly about concerns within the GOP conference said that the President's desire to have a long trial with many witnesses could backfire.

The senator warned that for every witness called by the President's defense team who might testify in favor of the President, there could be another witness called by Democrats whose testimony could hurt him.

The senator specifically pointed to acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and former Trump national security adviser John Bolton as witnesses Democrats might try to hear from if Republicans call in Hunter or Joe Biden, the whistleblower or others.

The senator said the President's "urge for vindication" is understandable but "witnesses cut both ways. We wouldn't be the only ones who would be able to call witnesses."

McConnell: Senate won't take up impeachment trial before Christmas

  McConnell: Senate won't take up impeachment trial before Christmas McConnell and Schumer have yet to negotiate an agreement on the trial.“What is not possible obviously would be to turn to an impeachment trial or to do [the U.S.-Mexico-Canada agreement] in the Senate before we break for Christmas,” McConnell told reporters, while outlining the Senate’s agenda for the rest of the year.

Senate Republicans are weighing a speedy impeachment trial that could include no witnesses for President Trump’s legal team or for House The discussions come as the House is moving forward with articles of impeachment against Trump, teeing up a trial in the Senate that would start in January.

WASHINGTON — House Democrats delivered a scathing summation of their impeachment case against President Trump on Monday, arguing that the president had put his personal and political interests above those of the nation in soliciting re-election help from Ukraine in a pattern of conduct

'A pretty messy and unproductive process'

One Republican senator who has spoken to the President about the issue made clear that no strategic decisions would be made without the White House sign off, but said it wasn't impossible that the White House would sign off on the shorter trial.

As to Trump's view on the matter, the senator said only: "It depends on when you catch him."

A shorter trial is a position that tracks with the message Republicans senators, including Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, have privately conveyed to the White House over the last several weeks, according to several Republican senators familiar with the conversations.

The structure and rules of a potential trial have also been the subject of closed-door Senate GOP lunches for several weeks. More and more the view in the conference has started to shift, underscoring the desire to both avoid a messy process and clear the Senate floor for the chamber to work on other issues.

"Extending this for weeks on end and having lots of votes on motions to call witnesses, doesn't seem to me to be a good use of the Senate's time," Sen. John Thune, the second-ranked Republican in the chamber, told CNN..

McConnell will move to acquit Trump, not merely dismiss charges, 2 GOP senators say

  McConnell will move to acquit Trump, not merely dismiss charges, 2 GOP senators say Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is expected to hold a final vote to acquit President Donald Trump, should he be impeached, when a majority of senators believe his trial has run its course instead of holding a vote on dismissing the articles of impeachment, two Republican senators told CNN on Wednesday. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

The Senate sits as a High Court of Impeachment in which senators consider evidence, hear witnesses , and vote to acquit or convict the impeached official. In the case of presidential impeachment trials , the chief justice of the United States presides.

In fact, Republicans may not call any witnesses in an effort to move things along to a vote in the Senate , the “Many people have their minds pretty well made up.” House Democrats introduced articles of impeachment Tuesday Then it’s over to the Senate for an impeachment trial in January.

Still, Republicans acknowledge nothing is settled or has even been fully debated at this point internally. The sheer number of unknowns -- including whether McConnell and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer can reach agreement on the structure of a trial and what that agreement, if reached, would entail -- make any firm conclusions about what's coming next an impossibility.

But after watching the House impeachment inquiry play out, the thinking is that calling witnesses would quickly devolve into a messy, contentious battle that would reveal intra-party schisms and eat up precious floor time in an election year.

For Republicans who hail from swing states, a drawn-out debate that forces them to decide whether to call the whistleblower or Hunter Biden to the Senate floor, could have political costs on either side. Voting against the President's wishes could cost them base turnout and a critical Presidential tweet. Voting to call people like the whistleblower or Biden could cost them independents.

"I think people are starting to realize that that would be a pretty messy and unproductive process," Johnson said of the idea of bringing in witnesses.

'I am not in the camp of calling a bunch of witnesses'

Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham, a close ally of Trump, on Wednesday appeared to throw cold water on the idea of calling a large number of witnesses during a Senate trial.

Inside Senate Republicans' impeachment trial strategy

  Inside Senate Republicans' impeachment trial strategy GOP senators are unlikely to call any witnesses to defend Trump — but they're not ruling it out. The party is uniting around a strategy that could quickly acquit President Donald Trump of articles of impeachment while also giving them the opportunity to call witnesses later in the trial if Republicans and the president are not satisfied with how things are going, according to interviews with nearly a dozen Republican senators on Thursday.

Three powerful Senate Republicans seemed to have similar targets in mind on Friday. Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, the The missives came the day after Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced that she was directing senior Democrats to begin drafting impeachment articles against Mr. Trump.

This means the Senate impeachment trial could create a situation where a group of bipartisan lawmakers could clear President Trump during the Senate impeachment trial . Kyrsten Sinema has shown some independence in terms of not going in lockstep with Chuck Schumer on everything, so I

"There are people wanting to call (Secretary of State Mike) Pompeo, they want to call (Vice President Mike) Pence, they want to call Joe Biden, they want to call Hunter Biden. I am not in the camp of calling a bunch of witnesses, but that's just me," Graham told reporters. "I am in the camp of basing my decision based on the record prepared in the House."

"I think as an American, the best thing we can do is deep six this thing," Graham added. "Take the record that was prepared in the House and base an impeachment vote on if they get enough votes, use that same record to decide guilty or innocent, not call a bunch of people, you know that people dream of hearing from, like Pence, Pompeo, Joe Biden and Hunter Biden. There's a way to deal with that outside of impeachment."

GOP Sen. Mike Braun of Indiana predicted a Senate trial could be as short as 10 days and as long as four weeks.

"My opinion would be the shortest you move through this is 10 days to two weeks. And if it's belabored it might go three to four weeks. But if there is nothing new, I don't see how it can go into the long end of it," he said.

"I'd say keep it short and simple without truncating or shortening the basics that you need. Especially if there's no new information that comes forward," he added.

On witnesses, Braun said he respected Trump's desire to have exculpatory evidence presented at the trial but he cautioned that "witnesses would be a double-edged sword."

"We've heard him talk about a fully litigated defense in the Senate but I think once they get down to the strategy in the Senate, does that make sense? Does it turn into a circus? Where do you start and stop. How many witnesses?"

McConnell to work in 'total coordination' with White House on impeachment trial

  McConnell to work in 'total coordination' with White House on impeachment trial McConnell said he will have “total coordination” with the White House as President Donald Trump’s all-but-certain impeachment trial nears the Senate.Not long after, his Democratic counterpart, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, issued a pointed statement reminding senators must take an oath to be impartial.

May Skip Witnesses In 'Expedited' Impeachment Trial . While House Democrats are about to impeach President Trump for asking Ukraine to investigate the Bidens for what looks like obvious corruption - Senate Republicans have no interest in calling witnesses to determine whether Trump's

Senate Republicans on Tuesday suggested that they may not call up live witnesses to testify as part of a likely impeachment trial , slated to begin The probability of the Senate calling up live witnesses in also in question. "So I think that's a double edged sword that I have no idea how it will turn out."

How a trial could unfold

Republicans are beginning to see the Senate impeachment trial in two parts. The first, the presentations from the House managers and the White House. Then, there would be a decision. Do senators need to hear witnesses? Or, would they rather take the offramp and vote.

McConnell laid out the two scenarios to reporters on Tuesday, making clear that no decisions have been made at this point. But he made two central points as he did.

First, if after the two presentations 51 senators are in agreement that the trial should come to an end, teeing up final votes on the two articles of impeachment, then that's all it would take to make it happen. With Republicans in control of 53 seats in the Senate, even if Democrats took the position that they wanted to push forward with votes to hear from witnesses like Bolton and Mulvaney, it would take only Republican votes to snuff that idea out.

Second, McConnell also reiterated his view that finding the 67 votes to actually remove Trump from office is, at least at this point, a virtual impossibility -- something that would underscore the argument for not delaying what Republican senators view as an inevitable acquittal.

"I would be totally surprised if there were 67 senators to remove the President," McConnell said. "That remains my view."

Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, a Republican from West Virginia, told CNN she doesn't know how she will feel after the presentations of evidence from both sides, but that she might be ready to vote without hearing witnesses.

There's also the issue of whether senators have reached the point where they simply want to move on after the presentations, given the trial essentially shuts down all other business in the chamber and requires senators to be present, and in their seats, six days a week without the ability to speak.

"I think at some point people just going to get real tired of this," said Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican.

Asked if he would support moving forward with a vote without witnesses, Sen. John Kennedy, a Republican from Louisiana, wouldn't speculate how it shakes out.

"We haven't even agreed to the rules yet," Kennedy said.

Senate Dems ask that Mick Mulvaney and John Bolton testify at impeachment trial .
Minority Leader Chuck Schumer sent a letter to Majority Leader Mitch McConnell that drives a hard bargain on witnesses and documents.In a letter sent on Sunday evening to McConnell, the majority leader, Schumer says Senate Democrats want to hear testimony from four administration witnesses, including acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and former national security adviser John Bolton. There is almost no chance Senate Republicans would vote to subpoena those witnesses without assent from the White House and calling their own preferred witnesses.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 5
This is interesting!