•   
  •   
  •   

Politics Senate OK's appeals court judges over home-state opposition

01:55  12 december  2019
01:55  12 december  2019 Source:   msn.com

Appeals court refuses to revive Carter Page lawsuit

  Appeals court refuses to revive Carter Page lawsuit The former Trump adviser claimed he was a victim of terrorism after media reports linked him to Russian efforts to influence the campaign.With just a week to go before release of a hotly-anticipated Justice Department watchdog report on the FBI’s targeting of Page in a series of surveillance warrants, a federal appeals court made evident Monday that it saw little, if any, merit in Page’s civil suit.

Home - state senators traditionally are allowed to weigh in on judicial nominees before they move forward. The first came two weeks ago, when the Senate confirmed Seattle attorney Eric Miller to an appeals court seat despite opposition from the two Democratic senators representing Washington

Home - state senators traditionally are allowed to weigh in on judicial nominees before they move forward. The first came two weeks ago, when the Senate confirmed Seattle attorney Eric Miller to an appeals court seat despite opposition from the two Democratic senators representing Washington

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate has confirmed two conservative, Justice Department lawyers to posts on a California-based appeals court that President Donald Trump has tagged as a liberal bastion.

FILE - In this Sept. 23, 2014, file photo, former Montana Solicitor General Lawrence VanDyke, center, talks with law students Jason Collins, left, and Tyler Dugger before a Montana Supreme Court candidate forum at the University of Montana in Missoula, Mont. The Senate has confirmed VanDyke as a federal appeals court judge despite a “not qualified” rating from the American Bar Association and sharp opposition from his home-state senators. (AP Photo/Lido Vizzutti, File)© Provided by Associated Press FILE - In this Sept. 23, 2014, file photo, former Montana Solicitor General Lawrence VanDyke, center, talks with law students Jason Collins, left, and Tyler Dugger before a Montana Supreme Court candidate forum at the University of Montana in Missoula, Mont. The Senate has confirmed VanDyke as a federal appeals court judge despite a “not qualified” rating from the American Bar Association and sharp opposition from his home-state senators. (AP Photo/Lido Vizzutti, File)

The two nominees won seats on the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers a wide swath of Western states from Alaska to Arizona, despite sharp opposition from their home-state senators. The 9th Circuit handles cases of high interest to the Trump administration, such as immigration and detention and famously rejected Trump's proposed travel ban on Muslim-majority countries. The Supreme Court later upheld the ban.

Senate confirms eight Trump court picks in three days

  Senate confirms eight Trump court picks in three days The Senate confirmed eight of President Trump's court picks this week, underscoring the rapid pace the GOP-controlled chamber has set on judicial nominations. The confirmations came in back-to-back days with one district court nominee confirmed on Tuesday, five on Wednesday and two on Thursday. The votes bring the total number of judicial confirmations for Trump to 170 nominations since taking office in January 2017. Senate MajorityThe confirmations came in back-to-back days with one district court nominee confirmed on Tuesday, five on Wednesday and two on Thursday.

Senate backs Trump court nominee over home - state objections. WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump’ s nominee for a Philadelphia-based appeals court won Senate confirmation Tuesday, despite opposition from the two senators representing his home state of New Jersey.

The Senate voted 54-45 Tuesday to approve Paul Matey to the U. S . Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, giving the court a majority of Republican appointees. Home - state senators traditionally are allowed to weigh in on judicial nominees before they move forward.

Trump has called the 9th Circuit a "big thorn in our side" and “a complete and total disaster.”

Lawrence VanDyke, a deputy assistant attorney general from Nevada, and Patrick Bumatay, a federal prosecutor from California, were approved in separate votes. VanDyke was confirmed, 51-44, Wednesday, while Bumatay was confirmed Tuesday, 53-40.

Nevada Democratic senators Jacky Rosen and Catherine Cortez Masto, along with Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., opposed both nominees. Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., voted against VanDyke but was absent for the vote on Bumatay. She has spoken out against his nomination.

In separate speeches on the Senate floor, Rosen and Cortez Masto said that despite serving four years as Nevada's solicitor general, VanDyke's qualifications are inadequate and his ties to Nevada minimal.

After Trump's 9th Circuit pick confirmed, Biden warns of 2nd term ‘death grip’ on federal courts: report

  After Trump's 9th Circuit pick confirmed, Biden warns of 2nd term ‘death grip’ on federal courts: report While Democrats in Congress have been conducting impeachment hearings in recent weeks, President Trump has been filling judicial vacancies in the federal court system at a rapid clip – and that appears to have Joe Biden worried.

Senate backs Trump court nominee over home - state objections. President Donald Trump’ s nominee for a Philadelphia-based appeals court won Senate confirmation Tuesday, despite opposition from the two senators representing his home state of New Jersey.

Home . About The Court . Chief Judge Katzmann has issued an order directing that in cases in which a party is represented by a lawyer employed by the federal government, the filing requirements specified in the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and this Court ' s Local Rules will be tolled for

VanDyke, 47, served as solicitor general in Montana and assistant solicitor general in Texas before moving to Nevada in 2015.

Feinstein criticized both newly confirmed judges, saying both men had troubling records. Bumatay acknowledged working on the Trump administration's policy of separating families at the U.S.-Mexico border, Feinstein said, while VanDyke has taken “extreme positions” on a range of issues.

Trump's nomination of VanDyke "sets a dangerous precedent for the Senate and would allow future administrations to nominate virtual outsiders to communities across the country over senators’ objections,'' Cortez Masto said.

She and Rosen called VanDyke an extreme partisan and said he has a record of using cases to advance an ideological agenda. Liberal groups have criticized VanDyke as a zealot who opposes gun regulations and poses a threat to women and the LGBT community.

Appeals court divided over emoluments lawsuit against Trump

  Appeals court divided over emoluments lawsuit against Trump A federal appeals court grappled over how to handle a lawsuit against President Trump that alleges he is violating the constitution's emoluments clauses.The 15 judges on the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals appeared divided over whether to advance a case from the D.C. and Maryland attorneys general accusing the president of illegally profiting off his hotels and other private businesses.

Senate backs Trump court nominee over home - state objections. Home - state senators traditionally are allowed to weigh in on judicial nominees before they move forward. The vote marked just the second time that a judicial nominee was approved despite opposition from both home - state senators .

The court is assisted by the service of retired judges who have been recommended and approved as senior judges . As the highest court for the District of Columbia, the Court of Appeals is authorized to review all final orders, judgments and specified interlocutory orders of the Superior Court of the

Democrats and other critics cited a letter from the American Bar Association rating VanDyke “not qualified” and calling him “arrogant, lazy, an ideologue and lacking in knowledge of the day-to-day practice including procedural rules.''

The Giffords Law Center, a gun safety group, decried VanDyke's “uniquely troublesome record" and said his "legally unsupported views on gun policy ... disqualify him for a life-tenured seat on the federal bench.''

The Alliance for Justice, a liberal advocacy group, said VanDyke has "repeatedly attacked the rights of women,'' including support for an Arizona anti-abortion law and opposition to contraceptive coverage mandated by the Affordable Care Act.

VanDyke also has expressed concerns about gay parenting and same-sex marriage.

Carrie Severino, policy director of the Judicial Crisis Network, a conservative advocacy group, said Trump is “in the midst of completely remaking the historically-unruly 9th Circuit,'' adding: “VanDyke will be yet another solid addition, bringing his intelligence, humility, and dedication to the rule of law.''

McConnell tees up votes on 13 Trump judicial picks ahead of break

  McConnell tees up votes on 13 Trump judicial picks ahead of break Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is teeing up the Senate to vote on more than a dozen judicial nominations as he tries to wrap up the chamber's work for the year. McConnell filed cloture on 13 of President Trump's district court picks on Monday, a procedural move that will allow them to start coming up for votes on the Senate floor as soon as Wednesday. Under a rules change implemented by Senate Republicans earlier this year, each nomination will be subject to an additional two hours of debate once it overcomes an initial procedural hurdle.It's unclear if Democrats will agree to speed up the votes on the judicial nominations.

The appointment and confirmation of Justices to the Supreme Court of the United States involves several steps set forth by the United States Constitution

In the United States , a recess appointment is an appointment by the President of a federal official when the U. S . Senate is in recess. Under the U. S . Constitution' s Appointments Clause, the president is empowered to nominate, and with the advice and consent (confirmation) of the United States Senate

Severino, a classmate of VanDyke at Harvard Law School, said on Twitter that VanDyke was “another victim of left’s tiresome smear train and the ABA’s sham evaluation process. But thankfully the @SenateGOP called out the brazen ideological bias against him, and VanDyke’s sterling character, impressive record, and razor-sharp legal acumen won the day.''

Severino called Bumatay’s confirmation “yet another step toward restoring sanity" on the 9th Circuit.

“Bumatay has fearlessly prosecuted drug cartels and organized crime, and helped shape the response to our nation’s opioid crisis. He is also a committed originalist and textualist,'' she said.

Maine Sen. Susan Collins was the only Republican to vote against VanDyke. She supported Bumatay. Democrats unanimously opposed both men.

Conservatives blasted the ABA's negative rating of VanDyke, calling it just the latest example of the group's leftward tilt. "The ABA has lost its credibility as a neutral arbiter. It should be treated no differently than any other special interest group,'' said Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah.

The VanDyke and Bumatay nominations continue a trend in which Trump has ignored opposition from home-state Democrats to nominate conservative lawyers to the bench. Presidents typically consult with home-state senators before announcing judicial appointments, a practice Trump has abandoned.

VanDyke served as a Nevada solicitor general for four years before joining the Justice Department's environment and natural resources division earlier this year. A Texas native, VanDyke graduated from Montana State University and ran unsuccessfully for the Montana Supreme Court in 2014. A member of the conservative Federalist Society, VanDyke supports Trump's efforts to expand oil and gas exploration on public lands.

Bumatay, 41, has served in a variety of positions at the Justice Department, most recently as assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of California.

Venezuelan court overturns congress decision to allow virtual votes .
Venezuelan court overturns congress decision to allow virtual votesMagistrate Juan José Mendoza announced the ruling that voting remotely on legislation violates the Venezuelan constitution which requires a lawmaker be present. Mendoza also urged the Prosecutor's Office to investigate the National Assembly's decision on Tuesday, citing potential criminal conduct.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 0
This is interesting!