•   
  •   
  •   

Politics House Judiciary Committee abruptly adjourns after marathon debate, will vote on articles of impeachment Friday morning

08:20  13 december  2019
08:20  13 december  2019 Source:   washingtonpost.com

Judiciary panel to take first steps toward impeachment vote

  Judiciary panel to take first steps toward impeachment vote WASHINGTON (AP) — The House Judiciary Committee was taking the first steps Wednesday evening toward voting on articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, beginning a marathon two-day session to consider the historic charges. The Judiciary meeting is to mark up, or amend, the two articles of impeachment that Democrats introduced Tuesday. Those articles charge Trump with abuse of power and obstruction of Congress related to his dealings with Ukraine. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

House Judiciary Committee Chair Jerry Nadler gaveled in a hearing of the House Judiciary Committee at 7 p.m. on Wednesday, kicking off the committee 's marathon session to approve two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump for debate and approval

House Judiciary Committee Chair Jerry Nadler gaveled in a hearing of the House Judiciary Committee at 7 p.m. on Wednesday, kicking off the committee 's marathon session to approve two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump for debate and approval

The House Judiciary Committee spent more than 14 hours Thursday locked in a rancorous and contentious debate about whether to approve two articles of impeachment against President Trump, with Democrats making an abrupt decision before midnight to hold off on the history-making vote until Friday morning.

The all-day debate ended as it began, with angry exchanges, personal insults and recycled arguments about process and propriety as the committee moved toward voting to impeach Trump for “high crimes and misdemeanors.”

'Disgusted.' Trump rails against Democrats after House committee approves impeachment articles

  'Disgusted.' Trump rails against Democrats after House committee approves impeachment articles President Trump lashed out at Democrats less than an hour after the House Judiciary Committee voted to approve two articles of impeachment against him. "It's a scam," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. "The people are disgusted."Trump accused Democrats of "trivializing impeachment."Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.The House Judiciary Committee approved the articles of impeachment against Trump in back-to-back votes Friday morning.

WASHINGTON — The House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday will begin formal consideration of two articles of impeachment against President Trump, convening an evening “markup” session for lawmakers to start what is expected to be a two-day debate about Democrats’ charges of abuse of

The House Judiciary Committee will convene Thursday morning to debate two articles of impeachment against President Trump, the final step before Democrats bring them to the House floor for an expected vote next week to charge the president with high crimes and misdemeanors.

Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Today’s most popular stories on The Washington Post

“It has been a long two days of consideration of these articles, and it is now very late at night,” said Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), at 11:15 p.m. “I want the members on both sides of the aisle to think about what has happened over these last two days and to search their consciences before we cast our final votes.”

He then banged his gavel and said lawmakers should return on Friday at 10 a.m. for the final votes to send articles of impeachment to the House floor next week.

Republicans on the committee, who appeared blindsided by the decision to delay the vote, erupted in frustration.

“This is the kangaroo court we’re talking about,” Rep. Douglas A. Collins (Ga.), the committee’s ranking Republican, said after Nadler made his announcement.

Lindsey Graham invites Rudy Giuliani to Judiciary panel to discuss recent Ukraine visit

  Lindsey Graham invites Rudy Giuliani to Judiciary panel to discuss recent Ukraine visit "Rudy, if you want to come and tell us what you found, I'll be glad to talk to you,” Lindsey Graham says.In an interview airing on Face the Nation Sunday, the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman said that Giuliani, who is serving as the president’s personal attorney, could appear before his committee separately from the impending Senate impeachment trial.

After more than a dozen hours of debate , the House Judiciary Committee delayed an expected vote on impeachment articles against President Trump. Here’s a sampling of what they requested. 1. Killing both articles of impeachment . The committee debated slashing the first article , on abuse of

After a long night of contentious debate , the House Judiciary Committee is set for a Thursday morning vote on the first article of impeachment against President Trump. NBC's Peter Alexander reports for TODAY.Dec. 12, 2019.

“Stalinesque,” added Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Tex.).

The fight teed up a historic clash on the House floor next week to send the articles of impeachment to the Senate for a trial in January. Trump would be only the fourth president in U.S. history to face official impeachment charges. That prospect has exposed raw emotion between his defenders and critics in Congress.

After the surprise recess Thursday night, Republicans accused Democrats of breaching faith on an agreement they had made during the late-night break in the marathon proceedings.

Collins said Republicans promised to limit their amendments to wrap up debate earlier in the evening and vote. But as soon as lawmakers agreed to cut off amendment debate, Nadler suddenly moved to delay the vote until the morning.

A furious Collins said his members were supposed to be on flights and trains in the morning and accused Democrats of trying to move the vote time to the morning so they could get better television coverage.

Schiff: I'd impeach Obama if he did the same as Trump

  Schiff: I'd impeach Obama if he did the same as Trump If Obama had done what the current president is accused of, the House Intelligence Committee chairman told ABC's "This Week," then "every one of these Republicans would be voting to impeach him."Schiff made the comments in an interview with ABC's "This Week," in which he lamented the staunch support for Trump among congressional Republicans in the face of the impeachment investigation.

Who: The 41 members of the House Judiciary Committee will debate two articles of impeachment against President Trump. For only the third time in modern history, lawmakers on the House Judiciary Committee will formally consider articles of impeachment against a sitting president.

The House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday started debate on the two articles of House Judiciary Committee Chair Jerry Nadler gaveled in a hearing of the House Judiciary Committee of a House floor vote next week. "Taken together, these two articles charge President Trump, with

“This is the most ludicrous thing I have seen in my entire life!” he said. “To not even consult the ranking member, to not even give us a heads up! … This is why people don’t like us, this crap!”

Slideshow by photo services

U.S. House begins voting on articles of impeachment against Trump

  U.S. House begins voting on articles of impeachment against Trump USA-TRUMP/IMPEACHMENT-START (URGENT):U.S. House begins voting on articles of impeachment against TrumpThe first vote, scheduled to last 15 minutes, is on abuse of power. Once that concludes, the House will hold a five-minute vote on obstruction of Congress.

inquiry: House Judiciary Committee votes on articles of impeachment . The House continues markup of the Trump impeachment articles , which began Wednesday at 7 p.m House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against the president and will hold a final vote sometime

Lawmakers on the House Judiciary Committee will begin marking up articles of impeachment against President Trump on Wednesday night. Washington Post congressional reporter Mike DeBonis, NPR White House correspondent Franco Ordoñez and CBS News legal analyst Kim Wehle spoke to

A Democratic aide rebutted the notion that there was any agreement to have a vote this evening. But behind the scenes, aides noted that both sides originally agreed to finish by 5 p.m. Thursday — and the GOP changed its mind at the last minute and dragged the hearing out, prompting Democrats to chart a new course.

Democrats cast the move as a way to hold the historic vote in the light of day, rather than face charges that they sought to oust Trump in the dark of night.

Trump faces impeachment for “abuse of power” and “obstruction of Congress” over his dealings with Ukraine. Democrats allege that Trump withheld military aid and a White House meeting while pressuring Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to launch political investigations targeting Democrats. Trump’s blanket refusal to cooperate with the Democratic investigation is the basis of the “obstruction of Congress” impeachment article.

Thursday’s hearing began around 9 a.m. with the judiciary panel’s chief clerk, Madeline Strasser, reading the charges against Trump.

“Resolved that Donald J. Trump, president of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors,” she said. “Articles of impeachment exhibited by the House of Representatives of the United States of America, in the name of itself and the people of the United States of America against Donald J. Trump.”

From there, the process quickly devolved into a partisan battle, complete with parliamentary maneuvers, personal insults and shouting matches interrupted by a slammed gavel. Frustration on both sides of the aisle boiled over as lawmakers cast aside decorum and traded barbs on issues ranging from drug abuse to sexual impropriety to a congressman’s past DUI arrest.

As the markup approached its 12th hour — running well past predictions by officials on both sides of the aisle — one GOP lawmaker implored his colleagues to wrap up the fight. Rep. Tom McClintock (R-Calif.) complained that “I have not heard a new point or an original thought from either side in the last three hours,” calling the hearing an “institutional embarrassment.”

DOJ tells court McGahn subpoena is moot after impeachment vote

  DOJ tells court McGahn subpoena is moot after impeachment vote The Trump administration told a court on Thursday that the House subpoena ordering former White House counsel Don McGahn to testify in the impeachment inquiry "appears to be moot" now that the president has been impeached. © Getty Images DOJ tells court McGahn subpoena is moot after impeachment vote The Department of Justice submitted a brief with the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals arguing that the House Judiciary Committee overstepped its authority by seeking a court order to compel McGahn to testify and that it plans to take the fight to the Supreme Court if it loses on appeal.

The Judiciary Committee is continuing debate on articles of impeachment ahead of a vote later Thursday. Watch CBSN Live. Judiciary Committee debates impeachment articles ahead of vote — live updates. By Kathryn Watson, Melissa Quinn and Stefan Becket.

The day foreshadowed a likely partisan showdown on the House floor next week, as Democrats seek to shore up support within their ranks and Republicans remain largely united in defending Trump from his greatest political threat thus far.

Trump spent much of the day on Twitter, posting more than 100 times to attack what he described as an unfair attempt to oust him from office. Many of his tweets included video clips of Republicans defending him during the Judiciary Committee hearing.

Even as Democrats and Republicans fought over impeachment, congressional leaders and White House officials worked together behind closed doors to reach a spending agreement to fund the government. Negotiators said the deal in principle would authorize $1.3 trillion and avert a government shutdown next week.

The announcement, from House Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Nita M. Lowey (D-N.Y.) and Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Richard C. Shelby (R-Ala.), came after Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin visited Capitol Hill at midday to review a final list of sticking points.

Video by Reuters

The tentative agreement sets the stage for a remarkable sequence of events next week in the House, with a presidential impeachment sandwiched between bipartisan deals on federal spending and North American trade.

Some moderate Democrats whose votes were in doubt announced support for impeaching Trump on Thursday, signaling that there are adequate votes in the House to pass both articles next week. Rep. Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.) said in a statement that he would support both articles of impeachment, saying that Trump’s actions regarding Ukraine “were illegal and he obstructed justice by refusing to cooperate with congressional investigations.” Rep. Conor Lamb (D-Pa.) told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on Thursday that the two articles “go together” and that the “the story’s clear” on what Trump did — meaning the House needs “to carry out our own obligations” and impeach him.

Still, Democrats braced for some defections among moderates in swing districts who are concerned a vote to impeach Trump could cost them their seats in November.

Congress has impeached only two presidents in history: Andrew Johnson in 1868 and Bill Clinton in 1998. President Richard Nixon resigned in 1974 before the full House could vote on articles of impeachment in the Watergate scandal. The House Judiciary Committee voted to advance three articles of impeachment against Nixon before he stepped down.

The debate in the Judiciary Committee on Thursday was especially acrimonious, as partisan accusations flew back and forth across the dais.

Rep. Cedric L. Richmond (D-La.), a senior House Judiciary Committee member, compared Republicans’ support of Trump to Judas’s betrayal of Jesus.

Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.) argued that impeaching Trump for obstruction of Congress doesn’t make sense because Republican lawmakers were “sent here to obstruct this Congress.” Nadler shot back, calling it “terrible ignorance” to suggest obstruction is a good thing.

In an especially dramatic moment, Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) chided Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) for attacking Hunter Biden, the son of former vice president Joe Biden, for a substance abuse issue, making an oblique reference to Gaetz’s 2008 arrest for drunken driving. The charges against him were eventually dropped.

“The pot calling the kettle black is not something that we should do,” Johnson said, without specifically naming Gaetz.

Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) blasted Republicans for defending Trump’s behavior, saying the president backed a scheme that left Ukraine vulnerable to Russian aggression.

“People died in Ukraine at the hands of Russia,” he said at 8:30 p.m. “You may not want to think about that and it may be hard for you to think about that. But they died when this selfish, selfish president withheld the aid for his own personal gain.”

With articles of impeachment and voting records in the foreground, House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) and Ranking Member Doug Collins (R-Ga.) manage the rancorous debate by members of the House Judiciary Committee Thursday.© Melina Mara/The Washington Post With articles of impeachment and voting records in the foreground, House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) and Ranking Member Doug Collins (R-Ga.) manage the rancorous debate by members of the House Judiciary Committee Thursday. Collins shot back, calling Swalwell’s remark “the most ridiculous comment” that exposed a “reading comprehension problem.”

The freewheeling debate stretched well into the night, even as the outcome was well known to lawmakers before the vote.

The committee was still debating Republicans’ first amendment three hours after the hearing began. That amendment, from Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), proposed to strike the entire first impeachment article charging Trump with abuse of power. But lawmakers stopped referring to it as the discussion degenerated into a rehash of partisan talking points.

Republicans also tried to offer an amendment to throw out the “obstruction of Congress” charge against Trump, saying it was rushed and unwarranted.

“The Democrats have no case when it comes to obstruction,” said Rep. Guy Reschenthaler (R-Pa.), more than eight hours into the debate. “This obstruction charge is completely baseless and bogus.”

Democrats dismissed Republican attempts to amend or delete the language in the articles, accusing their GOP colleagues of trying to cover for the president.

As the hearing was taking place, Trump’s political advisers briefed reporters on his reelection campaign, seeking to make the case that impeachment had helped their efforts.

“This lit up our base, lit up the people that are supporters of the president. They’re frustrated, they’re upset, and that motivates voters,” Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale told reporters Thursday. “They have ignited a flame underneath them.”

While Trump has claimed that impeachment would help Republicans up and down the ballot, his case was undermined when Democrats won major victories during last month’s elections in Virginia, Louisiana and Kentucky. Since public hearings began, support and opposition for impeachment and removal of Trump has remained about split, 47 percent to 45 percent, while Trump’s approval has remained in the low 40s, according to a Washington Post average of public polling.

a man wearing a suit and tie: Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) waits for House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) to recognize him during the rancorous debate by members of the House Judiciary Committee during the markup of articles of impeachment Thursday.© Melina Mara/The Washington Post Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) waits for House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) to recognize him during the rancorous debate by members of the House Judiciary Committee during the markup of articles of impeachment Thursday. With the expectation that House Democrats are likely to impeach Trump next week, the White House has begun trying to strategize with Republicans in the Senate about a trial next year.

White House counsel Pat Cipollone and legislative affairs director Eric Ueland met with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Thursday.

“We’re having good close communication and conversation with Senate Republicans in the event the House goes ahead and actually produces articles of impeachment,” Ueland said after the meeting. “We’re going to continue to work closely with Senate Republicans as well as other members of Congress on the questions, and we’ll continue to be very cooperative and very collaborative with our friends up here on the Hill as we work through this process.”

The Senate has begun considering what kind of impeachment trial to have in January; many Republicans are advocating for a short proceeding to quickly acquit Trump.

Cipollone has rejected House entreaties to participate in the impeachment probe and present the White House’s side.

The White House said it would not legitimize a “sham” process and would wait until it moved to the Senate to engage.

rachael.bade@washpost.com

john.wagner@washpost.com

colby.itkowitz@washpost.com

toluse.olorunnipa@washpost.com

Mike DeBonis, Karoun Demirjian, Emily Guskin and Michael Brice-Saddler contributed to this report.

DOJ tells court McGahn subpoena is moot after impeachment vote .
The Trump administration told a court on Thursday that the House subpoena ordering former White House counsel Don McGahn to testify in the impeachment inquiry "appears to be moot" now that the president has been impeached. © Getty Images DOJ tells court McGahn subpoena is moot after impeachment vote The Department of Justice submitted a brief with the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals arguing that the House Judiciary Committee overstepped its authority by seeking a court order to compel McGahn to testify and that it plans to take the fight to the Supreme Court if it loses on appeal.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 3
This is interesting!