•   
  •   
  •   

Politics Judiciary Committee’s minority blasts articles of impeachment report, ‘anemic case’

15:51  16 december  2019
15:51  16 december  2019 Source:   foxnews.com

Disruption at Impeachment Hearing Leads to Former InfoWars Host Getting the Boot

  Disruption at Impeachment Hearing Leads to Former InfoWars Host Getting the Boot The House Judiciary Committee's second hearing on the Donald Trump impeachment inquiry was instantly derailed on Monday when a supporter of the president launched a protest at the start of the proceedings. © Andrew Harnik/AP Photo A protestor speaks out as the House Judiciary Committee hears investigative findings in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump, Monday, Dec. 9, 2019, on Capitol Hill in Washington.

The House Judiciary Committee will convene Thursday morning to debate two articles of impeachment against President Trump, the final step before Democrats bring them to the House floor for an expected vote next week to charge the president with high crimes and misdemeanors.

The House Judiciary Committee sends two articles of impeachment against President Trump to the House floor for a final vote in the chamber. Approval by the committee on the articles charging abuse of power and obstruction of Congress comes after two dates of debate. The full House vote on the

Donald Trump wearing a suit and tie© Provided by FOX News

The House Judiciary Committee's minority blasted the committee's rush to impeach President Trump and wrote that history will not look kindly on how exculpatory evidence was ignored to meet a "self-imposed December deadline," according to the full articles of impeachment report released early Monday.

The minority, which is comprised of Republicans, blasted the Democrat-led majority for not making the case for impeachment and simply employing "holdover" arguments from other investigations to make their case. Despite the divide, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., the chairman of the committee, wrote for the majority that Trump is a threat to the Constitution and should be removed from office.

U.S. House Judiciary chair rejects Republicans' bid for impeachment witnesses

  U.S. House Judiciary chair rejects Republicans' bid for impeachment witnesses The Democratic head of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee on Monday rejected Republican lawmakers' request for eight witnesses to appear as part of the panel's impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump. © Reuters/JONATHAN ERNST House Judiciary Committee holds evidenciary hearing on Trump impeachment inquiry on Capitol Hill in Washington The requested witnesses fall "outside the parameters of the impeachment inquiry," Representative Jerrold Nadler said in a letter to the ranking Republican on the committee, Representative Doug Collins, as the committee heard evidence at a hearing on the

Staff lawyers and other House Judiciary Committee aides stood over Mr. Nadler as they reviewed a draft of the impeachment articles they would announce the following morning. ERIN: Reviewing the drafted articles of impeachment was really a group project with staff lawyers, members of Congress

Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler said the group will reconvene Friday at 10 AM Washington time (1500 UTC) to vote on articles of impeachment against U. S . President Donald Trump. The Democratic-controlled committee on Thursday rebuffed Republican attempts to weaken or throw out

CHAD PERGRAM: CONGRESS COULD SEE ITS BUSIEST WEEK EVER

The committee released a 658-page report on the impeachment resolution that lays out the case against Trump. Democrats have raised two articles of impeachable offenses, including abuse of power by soliciting Ukraine to interfere in the 2020 election and then obstructing  Congress during its investigation.

NADLER BRUSHES OFF POSSIBLE DEM DEFECTION

The minority wrote that both articles are supported by assumptions and hearsay. The minority, headed by Rep. Doug Collins, R-Ga., the ranking member of the committee, wrote that the majority decided to “pursue impeachment first and build a case second.”

The majority ignored exculpatory evidence but proclaimed the "facts are uncontested,” the minority wrote.

Judiciary panel to take first steps toward impeachment vote

  Judiciary panel to take first steps toward impeachment vote WASHINGTON (AP) — The House Judiciary Committee was taking the first steps Wednesday evening toward voting on articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, beginning a marathon two-day session to consider the historic charges. The Judiciary meeting is to mark up, or amend, the two articles of impeachment that Democrats introduced Tuesday. Those articles charge Trump with abuse of power and obstruction of Congress related to his dealings with Ukraine. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

The House Judiciary Committee passed two articles of impeachment against President Trump Friday Independent voters in New Hampshire greeted the House Judiciary Committee ' s decision to authorize articles of impeachment with skepticism, but By granting review of these cases now

The House Judiciary Committee has approved impeachment charges against President Donald Trump with a vote strictly along party lines. After debating articles of impeachment in a heated session on Thursday, the committee voted 23 to 17 to approve both articles as House Resolution

"The facts are contested, and, in many areas, the majority's claims are directly contradicted by the evidence," the minority wrote.  They continued that "not one of the criminal accusations leveled at the president over the past year—including bribery, extortion, collusion/conspiracy with foreign enemies, or obstruction of justice—has found a place in the articles. Some of these arguments are just holdovers from an earlier disingenuous attempt by the majority to weaponized the Russia collusion investigation for political gain."

The majority's actions were "unprecedented, unjustifiable, and will only dilute the significance of the dire recourse that is impeachment," they wrote.

The minority also claimed procedural missteps by the majority by not allowing a "minority day of hearings," despite several requests to Nadler. They called the denial “blatant” and “intentional.” They claim Nadler also refused a request to subpoena witnesses.  They wrote that there was a complete absence of “fact witnesses” and the case rested with the testimony from four academics and another with a panel of Congressional staffers.

Trump considering adding Alan Dershowitz to impeachment legal team: Sources

  Trump considering adding Alan Dershowitz to impeachment legal team: Sources Donald Trump is gearing up for his impeachment defense in the Senate.Dershowitz attended an event Wednesday at the White House and was asked to speak briefly by the president ahead of signing an executive order on anti-Semitism.

The House Judiciary Committee released its full report on the impeachment of President Donald Trump after midnight Sunday, ahead of The report , a 658-page document, is an explanation in four parts of the committee ' s process and justification for recommending two articles of impeachment

The House Judiciary Committee ' s Republican minority blasted the committee ' s rush to impeach Trump and wrote that history will not look kindly on how exculpatory evidence was ignored to meet a "self-imposed December deadline." Trump and the White House repeatedly have denied he did

The majority claimed that they were transparent. The majority wrote that the minority wanted to hear testimony from the whistleblower, but the majority stressed the importance of protecting the person’s identity. The minority's request to hear from Hunter Biden—the son of  Joe Biden—was "well outside the scope of the inquiry," the majority wrote.

At the heart of the first charge, is Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Democrats have relied on a whistleblower’s complaint that claimed that there was at least an implied quid pro quo during the phone conversation. Trump was also accused of using agents "within and outside" the U.S. government to compel Kiev to investigate the Bidens and their business dealings in the country. The claim is that Trump withheld $391 million in essential military funds to pressure Kiev on the investigations.

Adam Schiff wearing a suit and tie: House Intelligence Chair Adam Schiff joins Chris Wallace on 'Fox News Sunday.'© FoxNews.com House Intelligence Chair Adam Schiff joins Chris Wallace on 'Fox News Sunday.'

Both Trump and Zelensky deny there was ever any implied or explicit quid pro quo.

Lindsey Graham invites Rudy Giuliani to Judiciary panel to discuss recent Ukraine visit

  Lindsey Graham invites Rudy Giuliani to Judiciary panel to discuss recent Ukraine visit "Rudy, if you want to come and tell us what you found, I'll be glad to talk to you,” Lindsey Graham says.In an interview airing on Face the Nation Sunday, the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman said that Giuliani, who is serving as the president’s personal attorney, could appear before his committee separately from the impending Senate impeachment trial.

The House Judiciary Committee on Friday voted to adopt two articles of impeachment against President Trump – capping a contentious three-day session that Republicans panned as a “kangaroo court.” The committee adopted both articles , alleging abuse of power and obstruction of Congress

The House Judiciary Committee released a 658-page report on the articles of impeachment The report was released at 12:30 a.m. ET., and included a dissent from the committee ' s minority that Click here for the fox news app. The president insists he did nothing wrong and blasts the

The newly released report also claims that Trump directed key players in the inquiry from participating.

Trump "interposed the powers of the Presidency against the lawful subpoenas of the House of Representatives, and assumed to himself functions and judgments necessary to the exercise of the ‘‘sole Power of Impeachment’’ vested by the Constitution in the House of Representatives,” the report said.

The report listed John “Mick” Mulvaney, Trump’s acting chief of staff, and Robert B. Blair, a senior adviser to Mulvaney, as officials who have denied subpoenas.

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., on Sunday proposed in a letter to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., that Mulvaney be subpoenaed to testify in an impeachment trial. McConnell told Fox News last week that the chances of Trump being removed from office are zero.

GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Republicans say Democrats are impeaching the president because they can’t beat him in 2020. Democrats warn Americans can’t wait for the next election because they worry what Trump will try next.

The House is expected to vote on the articles next week, in the days before Christmas. That would send the impeachment effort to the Senate for a 2020 trial.

The majority claimed that the impeachment inquiry was performed in a fair manner and pointed out that the purpose of the inquiry was to determine if Trump “may have committed an impeachable offense.” Trump was offered the opportunity to participate, but he declined, the majority wrote. The president has refused to participate in the proceedings.

At about the time the impeachment report was being released, Trump was on Twitter touting his record and slamming the allegations. He wrote that despite the impeachment and "obstruction," he had one of the most successful presidencies in history.

The Associated Press and Bradford Betz contributed to this report

DOJ tells court McGahn subpoena is moot after impeachment vote .
The Trump administration told a court on Thursday that the House subpoena ordering former White House counsel Don McGahn to testify in the impeachment inquiry "appears to be moot" now that the president has been impeached. © Getty Images DOJ tells court McGahn subpoena is moot after impeachment vote The Department of Justice submitted a brief with the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals arguing that the House Judiciary Committee overstepped its authority by seeking a court order to compel McGahn to testify and that it plans to take the fight to the Supreme Court if it loses on appeal.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 0
This is interesting!