•   
  •   
  •   

Politics Now on Trump's team, Dershowitz says, 'I haven't changed'

08:55  24 january  2020
08:55  24 january  2020 Source:   msn.com

Trump expected to add Ken Starr and Alan Dershowitz to impeachment defense team

  Trump expected to add Ken Starr and Alan Dershowitz to impeachment defense team President Donald Trump plans to add three seasoned lawyers to his impeachment legal defense team, people familiar with the matter said.President Donald Trump plans to add three seasoned lawyers to his impeachment legal defense team, people familiar with the matter said, including Kenneth Starr, the hard-charging prosecutor whose investigative work led to President Bill Clinton's impeachment.

Alan Dershowitz on Martha' s Vineyard, where he said he had been shunned for speaking out against the “And you have to pick a team .” But whether there is any room for nuance in a conversation about one of I ’m a liberal Democrat. I haven ’ t changed one iota in 50 years. I am not a Trump supporter.

Re “Why Did Alan Dershowitz Say Yes to Trump ?” (Op-Ed, nytimes.com, Jan. During the proceedings against President Bill Clinton, I testified in his favor and consulted with his defense team . While it is true that most other constitutional scholars believe that impeachment can be based on

WASHINGTON (AP) — Alan Dershowitz was in line at Mar-a-Lago's lavish Christmas Eve buffet last month when President Donald Trump stopped to chat.

FILE - in this Dec. 24, 2019, file photo, President Donald Trump speaks to attorney Alan Dershowitz, right, as he arrives for Christmas Eve dinner at Mar-a-lago in Palm Beach, Fla. Retired law professor Alan Dershowitz says he hasn't changed at all and has a long history of representing people whose views he doesn't necessarily agree with. Dershowitz is part of President Donald Trump's defense team at the Senate impeachment trial. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik, File)© Provided by Associated Press FILE - in this Dec. 24, 2019, file photo, President Donald Trump speaks to attorney Alan Dershowitz, right, as he arrives for Christmas Eve dinner at Mar-a-lago in Palm Beach, Fla. Retired law professor Alan Dershowitz says he hasn't changed at all and has a long history of representing people whose views he doesn't necessarily agree with. Dershowitz is part of President Donald Trump's defense team at the Senate impeachment trial. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik, File)

The retired Harvard law professor had already been asked by Trump's legal team to assist with the defense at his impeachment trial and, with the case opening in a matter of weeks, the president wanted to know: Was he onboard?

BREAKING: Alan Dershowitz Distances Himself From Trump Legal Team: ‘I’m Not a Full-Fledged Member’

  BREAKING: Alan Dershowitz Distances Himself From Trump Legal Team: ‘I’m Not a Full-Fledged Member’ Alan Dershowitz clarified his role on President Donald Trump’s legal defense team in an interview with Mediate founder Dan Abrams Friday. Dershowitz told Abrams that he is not a “full fledged” member of the Trump legal team — but that he will provide an hourlong constitutional defense of the president before the Senate. That would […]Dershowitz told Abrams that he is not a “full fledged” member of the Trump legal team — but that he will provide an hourlong constitutional defense of the president before the Senate. That would make the lawyer more of a witness for the Trump team than a member of his defense.

So why did Mr. Dershowitz say yes to Donald Trump and agree to represent him in his Senate impeachment trial? But on Sunday, Mr. Dershowitz was acting as one of Mr. Trump ’ s lawyers when he said to George Stephanopoulos that abusive or obstructive conduct is not impeachable and that

Now that he's part of President Trump ' s defense team , he argues that "without a crime, there can be no impeachment." Dershowitz disagreed and insisted again he hasn' t changed his views. "And I think your viewers are entitled to hear my argument without two bullies jumping on everything I say ."

“He said, ‘Everybody wants to do this thing, but I want you,'" Dershowitz recalled in an interview with The Associated Press.

Dershowitz, whose clients have included O.J. Simpson, Claus von Bulow and Mike Tyson, ultimately said yes, joining a legal team that, starting Saturday, will present the defense at only the third impeachment trial of a American president in U.S. history.

Trump’s attorneys say Dershowitz and Ken Starr, the former independent counsel during President Bill Clinton's impeachment, will have “discrete functions that they will be addressing" at trial.

Dershowitz's task is to make the argument — widely rejected among scholars — that an impeachable offense requires criminal-like conduct. Dershowitz joked Thursday that if he sounded sniffly, it was because he'd been buried in musty history and law books to prepare.

As Dems push for witnesses in Senate trial, Alan Dershowitz slams impeachment case

  As Dems push for witnesses in Senate trial, Alan Dershowitz slams impeachment case Rep. Adam Schiff, the lead House impeachment manager, and Alan Dershowitz discuss impeachment in separate interviews on ABC's "This Week."It's an argument that he said was successfully argued in President Andrew Johnson's impeachment trial.

“We haven ’ t seen the Trump team present anything,” said Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), one of Trump ’ s trial advisers. “Everybody’s wanting to suggest right now that their preemptive strike by an uninformed House manager is somehow going to change the narrative.”

Now that he's part of President Trump ' s defense team , he argues that "without a crime, there can be no impeachment." Anderson Cooper asked Dershowitz about the apparent discrepancy between those views on CNN Monday night. Dershowitz said he still believes you don' t need a "technical crime

While it's just another high-profile case in a career full of them, Dershowitz's defense of Trump has befuddled associates, friends and former students, who struggle to make sense of his forceful advocacy for the president and who fervently disagree with the legal positions he's taken and even the facts he's advanced in Trump's defense.

FILE - In this Dec. 2, 2019, file photo, attorney Alan Dershowitz talks to the press outside federal court, in New York. Retired law professor Alan Dershowitz says he hasn't changed at all and has a long history of representing people whose views he doesn't necessarily agree with. Dershowitz is part of President Donald Trump's defense team at the Senate impeachment trial. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, File)© Provided by Associated Press FILE - In this Dec. 2, 2019, file photo, attorney Alan Dershowitz talks to the press outside federal court, in New York. Retired law professor Alan Dershowitz says he hasn't changed at all and has a long history of representing people whose views he doesn't necessarily agree with. Dershowitz is part of President Donald Trump's defense team at the Senate impeachment trial. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, File)

“Rubbish” is how one law professor who studied under Dershowitz, Frank Bowman at the University of Missouri, described his views on impeachable offenses. A longtime Harvard Law School colleague, Laurence Tribe, wrote in a Washington Post opinion piece that the argument “has died a thousand deaths" but nonetheless “staggers on like a vengeful zombie." Some, meanwhile, have seized on video of a 1998 interview when Dershowitz expressed virtually the opposite view of what he's saying now about an impeachable offense requiring a crime.

White House adds eight House Republicans to Trump impeachment team

  White House adds eight House Republicans to Trump impeachment team The White House has named eight Republican House members to aid in President Trump's defense in his Senate impeachment trial. The White House released the names of the lawmakers on Monday night. They include Reps. Doug Collins of Georgia, Mike Johnson of Louisiana, Jim Jordan of Ohio, Debbie Lesko of Arizona, Mark Meadows of North Carolina, John Ratcliffe of Texas, Elise Stefanik of New York, and Lee Zeldin of New York.

Trump ' s team isn' t expected to push back on a Saturday start time, according to multiple sources familiar with the thinking, because there’s a desire to get the trial over with in what they believe will be an acquittal rather than expend political capital on something they’re not too worked up about.

Mr. Dershowitz says he is not advocating for Mr. Trump , but defending civil liberties, as he has always done. Mr. Dershowitz said he voted for Hillary Clinton and fund-raised for her, and that he would have similarly defended her against calls for impeachment had she won the election. “ I ’m not a part of his

For his part, Dershowitz maintains there's nothing inconsistent or unusual about the positions he's taking.

Though he's been a vocal defender of Trump the last three years, he insists it's not about this particular president. Rather, he's trying to prevent impeachment from being weaponized into a “partisan process," where any president can be removed over non-criminal abuses of power.

“I’ve always taken positions that are principled and often unpopular and often in defense of people I don’t particularly support," Dershowitz said, citing his defense of Neo-Nazis who wanted the right to march through Skokie, Illinois.

“I haven’t changed at all. I’ve had the same consistent policy of defending people I don’t like, people I do like, without regard to party, without regard to partisanship."

Nancy Gertner, a retired federal judge in Boston who has known Dershowitz for years, says it's true that he hasn't changed — he still gravitates toward the media spotlight, high-profile cases and “positions he thinks will prove how principled he is."

But she says it's impossible to reconcile his statements on behalf of Trump, and his extraordinarily expansive view of presidential authorities, with the civil libertarian bent he's expressed over the decades and his stated opposition to unchecked government power. Some of what she's heard him say is “horrifying."

Dershowitz on impeachment reversal: 'I am much more correct right now'

  Dershowitz on impeachment reversal: 'I am much more correct right now' Constitutional lawyer and Trump impeachment legal team member Alan Dershowitz said Monday that he is "much more correct right now" in his current views on what qualifies a president for impeachment than his near-opposite views during the Clinton impeachment. Dershowitz, a recent addition to President Donald Trump's team, said Sunday that the framers of the Constitution intended for impeachable conduct to mean "criminal-like conduct" and that both of Trump's charges of obstruction of Congress and abuse of power do not meet the constitutional criteria for impeachment.

Alan Dershowitz has been saying the same things for the last 50 years, but now that his message sometimes works inUS President Donald Trump ’ s favor, he’s lost some friends, Dershowitz told The Times of Israel in a phone interview. On December 4, the professor emeritus woke up to a tweeting

Dershowitz ’ s Defense of Trump Is Costing Him Friends. Alan Dershowitz , a professor emeritus at Harvard Law School, has frequented Mr. Dershowitz , a self-professed “liberal Democrat,” said that friends on the Vineyard had snubbed him for publicly arguing against impeaching President Trump on

“I’ve known him for a very long time," she said. “I’ve never seen anything like this."

Slideshow by photo services

Even before he made the case against impeachment in a book, Dershowitz has defended as lawful some of Trump's most scrutinized actions. In op-eds and TV appearances, he has accused special counsel Robert Mueller of partisan bias, ridiculed the idea Trump could have obstructed justice by firing his FBI chief and said presidents enjoy more power than kings.

“A civil libertarian should be concerned about deploying the levers of power for the wrong purposes," said Gertner, who is now a senior Harvard law lecturer. “These are not civil liberties positions. These are positions to garner attention to put him in the position that he now is in, which is to represent the president.”

Harvey Silverglate, a friend of Dershowitz's for more than 50 years, said his positions on Trump clearly make him unpopular “among the legal intelligentsia nationwide." But he said Dershowitz specializes in cases where the defense is difficult or unique, and the client unpopular.

Though Trump may not be an underdog in the conventional sense, Silverglate wrote in an email, “his impeachment does present just the kind of case, challenge and client for which Dershowitz is perfect — a high-profile assault on an individual who has powerful enemies and who is being ‘prosecuted.'"

Dershowitz says he's convinced that the same people criticizing him would be applauding him if he was prosecuting the House impeachment case. The attacks, he said, have been “ferocious." He calls it a “shoe on the other foot test."

“People say I’m not a constitutional lawyer because they don’t like the side I’m on," Dershowitz said. “They say I’m too old, I’m a has-been."

Trump has watched Dershowitz defend him on Fox News for years, sometimes tweeting links to the lawyer's statements that he finds especially helpful. Through the Mueller investigation and into impeachment he has been enamored with the possibility of assembling a legal dream team.

But White House aides cautioned Trump against bringing Dershowitz onto his team, concerned that Dershowitz was a self-promoter whose showboating style wouldn't put Trump's interests first.

They also feared Dershowitz's ties to Jeffrey Epstein and the surrounding legal drama would be a distraction for the defense. Trump overruled them.

According to one person familiar with the decision, Trump wanted the appearance of a bipartisan defense team. And he has always valued attorneys who can make the case to the public on Fox News, his preferred platform.

By the time of their Christmas Eve conversation, Dershowitz had already been approached about a role on the team. But his wife, who was with him that evening at Mar-a-Lago, was more apprehensive, concerned he'd lose his independence.

Trump sought to offer reassurance on that point, saying that while he appreciated that concern, it was nonetheless important to consider “how important this was for the future of the country and for precedent and all that," Dershowitz recalled.

Within days, his participation was settled.

“People have already said that my arguments will be bonkers or errant nonsense," Dershowitz said. “My only point is: Listen. I'm going to lay out a very serious constitutional argument. Maybe you'll agree with it or maybe you won't, but let's have a debate on the merits."

Dershowitz's central argument for Trump must be rejected .
I will not try to convince you how to vote in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump. My request is far more humble and possibly far more consequential: When you vote to acquit Trump of the charges leveled against him, please, please, forthrightly reject the central argument of Trump attorney Alan Dershowitz. During the Senate's Q&A session WednesdayDear Republican senators,

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 2
This is interesting!