•   
  •   
  •   

Politics Executive privilege standoff could roil Trump impeachment trial timeline

23:05  24 january  2020
23:05  24 january  2020 Source:   rollcall.com

Graham calls for swift end to impeachment trial, warns Dems against calling witnesses

  Graham calls for swift end to impeachment trial, warns Dems against calling witnesses Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., announced that his initial plan of a pre-trial dismissal of the impeachment case against President Trump is now unlikely to happen, but he is pushing for trial to now begin and end as quickly as possible. The Senate trial is set to begin Tuesday. Graham had previously floated the idea that the GOP majority could immediately vote to dismiss the case before hearing any arguments, but now he states that this does not appear to be a possibility given the lack of sufficient Republican support for such action.

As the Senate impeachment trial against Trump continues, the focus turns to McConnell’s resolution not During Clinton’s impeachment trial , senators ultimately heard video excerpts from three witnesses, including Monica The White House has cited executive privilege in its refusal to comply.

Trump Impeachment Trial Could Impact 2020 Election. Both parties seek advantage even though Senate expected to acquit. Senators to vote on McConnell resolution setting out timeline , but Democratic leader Schumer calls it 'a national disgrace' designed to hide evidence against Trump .

A legal fight over executive privilege in the middle of the Senate’s impeachment trial of President Donald Trump could put it into suspended animation.

Elizabeth Warren et al. standing in a room: Sen. Elizabeth Warren said the Senate should not ‘pack our bags and go home.’ (Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)© Provided by Roll Call Sen. Elizabeth Warren said the Senate should not ‘pack our bags and go home.’ (Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)

If senators ultimately decide to subpoena Trump administration documents or seek witness testimony, House Democratic managers might have to decide whether to now wage court battles that were avoided during the House phase of the impeachment process.

Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham has said in recent days that the Senate would either need to honor the claims that would likely be made by the White House regarding testimony from witnesses like acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney and former national security adviser John Bolton, or go to the federal courts.

Trump arrives in Davos hours before impeachment trial reopens

  Trump arrives in Davos hours before impeachment trial reopens US President Donald Trump arrived in Davos on Tuesday for the annual WEF forum, where he was to give a keynote speech just hours before his impeachment trial kicks into high gear in Washington. Meanwhile in Washington, Trump's impeachment enters a new phase in the Senate with legislators debating the format for the trial. Although Trump's Republican party holds a majority in the Senate and is almost sure to acquit him on charges of abusing his power and obstructing Congress, the impeachment adds volatility to an already tense 2020 presidential election.Trump returns to the White House on Wednesday.

Mr. Trump began his Twitter blitz around midnight Washington time while still in Davos, Switzerland, where he attended an economic forum. The White House passed up a chance to force a vote to dismiss the impeachment charges against Mr. Trump before arguments get underway.

If executive privilege applied in the impeachment context it could not block disclosure of information essential to the impeachment inquiry. The case for allowing the executive branch to withhold essential information is even weaker in the impeachment context than in the criminal trial context.

“If the president claims executive privilege, I’ll give him the same right as every other president to litigate it,” the South Carolina Republican told CQ Roll Call. “It means you’d have to stop the trial and it’d be a disaster for the country, and I don’t want any other House to ever do this again. So, if you really want a witness and they’re available to you, take the time to do it over there.”

Delaware Democratic Sen. Chris Coons said the question of seeking a legal remedy to get testimony from current and former White House officials would be “a judgment call for the House managers.”

“Executive privilege is not a ‘get out of testifying for free’ card. You can’t use executive privilege to shield evidence of misconduct, and frankly, if President Trump wants to have a real defense in front of the Senate, he should consent to Bolton testifying,” Coons said.

Protester interrupts Senate impeachment trial, yelling 'Schumer is the devil'

  Protester interrupts Senate impeachment trial, yelling 'Schumer is the devil' The man was arrested and charged with unlawful conduct.The protester was tackled and escorted out of the gallery within seconds. Jeffries, one of the seven House impeachment managers tasked with presenting the case against Trump, resumed his remarks, but the protester continued to scream loudly just outside the chamber, on the third floor near the press gallery.

Jerry Nadler speaks during the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump , Jan. “Let's say a witness like Mick Mulvaney or John Bolton come. invariably the White House would claim executive privilege . There'd be a lawsuit filed in District Court in the District of Columbia that would then go to

Using executive privilege has been “utilised by presidents since the founding” of the country, Mr Sekulow said, adding it exists to “protect the constitution and the separation of powers.” Trump 's lawyer Pat Cipollone tells Senate trial that president has done nothing wrong. But in no way did Mr Trump 's

Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer, asked Friday morning if Democrats would be willing to narrow some of their subpoenas to try to skirt any claims of executive privilege, said that’s “jumping the gun” when Republicans haven’t even said “yes” to the question of subpoenaing witnesses and documents.

“We believe we need to get a full and fair trial at such a solemn and serious trial — at minimum the four witnesses we asked for and the four sets of documents we’ve asked for,” said Schumer, a New York Democrat.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal dismissed the idea that there could be an extended court process over Bolton’s potential testimony. He said the issues are being addressed in litigation over a subpoena the House Judiciary Committee issued for testimony from former White House Counsel Don McGahn about what he told investigators in former Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s probe into potential obstruction of justice by Trump.

CNN cancels Democratic presidential town halls because of impeachment trial

  CNN cancels Democratic presidential town halls because of impeachment trial CNN has canceled the Democratic presidential town halls scheduled to take place next week ahead of the Iowa caucuses because of the ongoing impeachment trial, a CNN spokesperson said Thursday. The network is working on rescheduling the town halls, the spokesperson said. CNN was scheduled to host the leading contenders for the Democratic nomination at live, back-to-back town halls on January 28 and 29 from the campus of Drake University. Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, businessman Andrew Yang and businessman Tom Steyer were scheduled to appear on Tuesday.

Trump was impeached in a party- line vote on two articles, or charges, in the House last month, for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress But the Senate trial may hold hidden pitfalls for Trump , including some that could be beyond the power of his sworn allies in the Senate leadership to prevent.

The trial could be over in two weeks, or it could stretch on much longer, depending on how much time is used Mr. Trump has said publicly that he wants to end the trial quickly, so his lawyers could move for The House leadership could decide, as the impeachment managers did during President Bill

“There should be no protracted legal battle. The issue of executive privilege has already been decided in the McGahn case. The president is not a king or a monarch. He can’t just assert broad executive privilege of blanket immunity,” the Democrat from Connecticut told reporters. “The president can do a lot more illegality, but I think the courts will reject that position very quickly.”

District Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson sided with the House, but it is now being reviewed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

House Counsel Douglas Letter wrote to the appeals court Thursday night, arguing that the statements by the president’s legal team in the impeachment trial undermined the Justice Department’s official position that the courts weren’t the appropriate venue for deciding such a dispute.

Gallery by photo services

“In light of President Trump’s argument, it is not clear whether DOJ still maintains its position that courts are barred from considering subpoena-enforcement suits brought by the House. At the very least, President Trump’s recognition that courts should resolve such suits undermines DOJ’s contrary threshold arguments in this case, which seek to prevent the House and its committees from seeking judicial resolution of subpoena-enforcement disputes. The Executive Branch cannot have it both ways.”

The Justice Department responded on Friday.

“The impeachment trial statements excerpted by the Committee were simply expounding on the President’s position that the House cannot have it both ways; they plainly were not reversing the position that the House may not properly seek judicial enforcement of subpoenas against the Executive,” wrote Deputy Assistant Attorney General Hashim Mooppan.

Lead House impeachment manager Adam B. Schiff, addressing GOP arguments about executive privilege, said, “Unlike in the House, where the president could play rope-a-dope in the courts for years, that is not an option for the president’s team here.”

The California Democrat told reporters that Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.,  who is presiding over the trial, could make decisions on privilege claims.

“We have a very capable justice, sitting in that Senate chamber, empowered by the Senate rules to decide issues of evidence and privilege,” Schiff said.

While the Senate can override any ruling from the justice, Trump and Republicans fear Roberts “will in fact apply executive privilege to that very narrow category where it may apply,” Schiff said.

“Executive privilege isn’t automatic. The president has to assert it,” Sen. Angus King, I-Maine, said Thursday night. “You can’t say a memo from OMB to the Department of Defense is executive privilege, and you also can’t assert executive privilege to cover up your own wrongdoing.”

Sen. John Hoeven of North Dakota is among the Republicans who doubt that legal arguments would be swift.

“They keep making the case that ... we subpoena more witnesses right away and do all that. Well, the question is why didn’t the House do that because we’re going to have to do that,” Hoeven said. “We could subpoena somebody, the White House would say, ‘OK, executive privilege,’ then you have to go to the court.”

Hoeven also said he has asked but not gotten clear answers about what happens in the event there is a need to go to court, noting that the regular order would restrict the Senate from doing other business without an agreement.

“Do we recess then, or what do we do?” Hoeven asked.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, one of the Democrats running for president, said in response to a question about the possibility of a court battle about executive privilege claims by Trump that the Senate should do what’s needed, even if it prolongs the trial.

“We have to have a fair trial. That’s what the Constitution requires,” Warren told CQ Roll Call. “And if the president of the United States can throw up roadblocks, including roadblocks that may have no basis in law, and as a result the Senate just backs off and says, ‘Well, I guess that’s hard, so we’re going to pack our bags and go home,’ then the whole notion of how impeachment works as a check on the president is completely lost.”

Lindsey McPherson contributed to this report.

Get breaking news alerts and more from Roll Call on your iPhone.

Justice Department lawyer says House can impeach over defied subpoenas .
A Justice Department lawyer said Thursday in federal court that the House can impeach a president over ignored subpoenas, a noted contrast to what lawyers for President Donald Trump are arguing at his Senate impeachment trial this week. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 0
This is interesting!