Politics Trump-Backed Work-for-Medicaid Plan Is Rejected on Appeal

20:45  14 february  2020
20:45  14 february  2020 Source:   msn.com

Opinion: One thing Trump won’t brag about in his State of the Union: His plans to cut Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid

  Opinion: One thing Trump won’t brag about in his State of the Union: His plans to cut Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid We know the State of the Union speech will be filled with a number of exaggerations and outright falsehoods — especially when it comes to the economy. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); Since its passage two years ago, Trump has heralded the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act as this administration’s greatest accomplishment, declaring that it is “helping everybody so much.” But this couldn’t be further from the truth.

The Trump administration’s legal bid to restore a work requirement for Medicaid benefits in Arkansas was rejected on appeal, a blow to the government’s larger effort to reshape U.S. health-care policy.

a bedroom with a bed and a mirror: An examination room.© Bloomberg An examination room.

Friday’s ruling, by a federal appeals court in Washington, upholds a lower-court decision in March that voided the work rules and jeopardizes similar programs approved by the U.S. Health and Human Services Administration in seven other states, likely prompting the government to seek a Supreme Court review.

The initiative, which requires some Medicaid recipients to work, attend school or volunteer in order to maintain coverage, is part of a broader push to chip away at the Affordable Care Act, better known as Obamacare. The administration defeated a legal challenge to rules permitting expansion of short-term and limited-duration insurance policies in July. It lost an earlier ruling on a program allowing small businesses and individuals to create group plans that are cheaper than those offered under Obamacare but provide less coverage.

Draft U.N. resolution condemns Israeli annexation in Trump peace plan

  Draft U.N. resolution condemns Israeli annexation in Trump peace plan Draft U.N. resolution condemns Israeli annexation in Trump peace planThe draft text, circulated to council members by Tunisia and Indonesia, would seemingly face a U.S. veto, but nonetheless offered some members’ dim view of the peace plan that Trump rolled out last week with great fanfare.

The appeals court said the U.S. Health and Human Services Department’s stated objectives in approving Arkansas’s plan -- making people healthier and more independent -- were not consistent with the statutory goal of Medicaid.

“The text of the statute includes one primary purpose, which is providing health-care coverage without any restriction geared to healthy outcomes, financial independence or transition to commercial coverage,” Circuit Judge David Sentelle, a Reagan appointee, wrote for a unanimous panel that also included Circuit Judges Nina Pillard and Harry Edwards, both Democratic appointees. They heard arguments on Oct. 11.

HHS and the U.S. Justice Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

First Palestinian killed in protests against Trump peace plan

  First Palestinian killed in protests against Trump peace plan A Palestinian teenager was shot dead by Israeli troops on Wednesday in the West Bank city of Hebron, the first Palestinian killed in protests against US President Donald Trump's Middle East peace plan. The Israel army said troops responded to a "violent" rioter armed with a Molotov cocktail.

Jane Perkins, legal director of the National Health Law Program, said Thursday’s decision means thousands of low-income people in Arkansas will maintain health “coverage that enables them to live, work, and participate as fully as they can in their communities.” The group, alongside Legal Aid of Arkansas, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and the law firm Jenner & Block, represented the state residents who challenged the requirements.

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg in Washington had voided programs in Kentucky and Arkansas programs in simultaneous rulings on March 27, finding that HHS’s impact analysis, required in federal rulemaking, was inadequate. It failed, for example, to consider those who might lose coverage simply because they lacked internet access and couldn’t report their work activity online, Boasberg found.

Read More: Trump Can’t Make Arkansas, Kentucky Medicaid Recipients Work

Architect of US peace plan blames Palestinians for violence

  Architect of US peace plan blames Palestinians for violence Jared Kushner, the chief architect of the U.S. blueprint to resolve the decades-old conflict between Israelis and Palestinians, on Thursday blamed Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas for soaring tensions and violence in the occupied West Bank since the plan's release last week.Jared Kushner, the son-in-law and adviser to President Donald Trump who spent nearly three years working on the plan, said leaders who are ready for a state “don’t call for days of rage and encourage their people to pursue violence if they’re not getting what they want.

“The secretary’s failure to consider the effects of the project on coverage alone renders his decision arbitrary and capricious,” Boasberg wrote of the Arkansas program’s approval by HHS Secretary Alex Azar, because it didn’t address “whether and how the project would implicate the ‘core’ objective of Medicaid: the provision of medical coverage to the needy.”

Kentucky, under a new, Democratic governor, dropped its work requirement on Dec. 16 and asked the court to dismiss its appeal without affecting any others. Maine abandoned the work requirement for its low-income health insurance program in January.

The programs at issue require certain low-income adults to engage in their communities for 80 hours a month by working, looking for work, participating in job-skills training, getting an education or performing community service. They mostly cover people who got coverage after the Affordable Care Act expanded Medicaid, a joint federal-state program with more than 65 million people on its rolls as of July.

The federal government says the ACA authorized grants for states that give Medicaid recipients incentives for various “healthy behaviors” such as community engagement and financial independence.

Palestinians deny US charges of incitement, blame Trump plan

  Palestinians deny US charges of incitement, blame Trump plan The Palestinians on Friday rejected U.S. allegations of incitement after a day of clashes and attacks left three Palestinians dead and more than a dozen Israelis wounded. They instead linked the violence to President Donald Trump's Mideast initiative, which heavily favors Israel on all the most contentious issues of the conflict and would allow it to annex large parts of the occupied West Bank.

State residents fighting the work-for-Medicaid requirement -- joined in some cases by groups including the American Heart Association, the American Medical Association and The Southern Poverty Law Center -- argue that conditioning eligibility on employment will lead to mass disenrollment and dramatically worsen health outcomes.

Kentucky estimated that 95,000 adults would lose coverage under the new rules. More than 18,000 people lost coverage in Arkansas during its partial implementation.

Read More: Trump Win on Health Plans Advances Effort to Undo Obamacare

The appeals court ruling centered on Azar’s approval of the two programs, not on the lawfulness of the work requirements itself. Health policy scholars say that’s an important distinction to understand when looking at the impact of the court’s ruling.

“Regardless of your impressions of the Medicaid Act, the broad waiver authority that was granted to the secretary gives more than enough authority for this particular waiver,” said Wes Butler, outside counsel for the Kentucky Hospital Association, which advocated for the state programs to be upheld. “If the court of appeals has a different take on that, that’s only a question the Supreme Court can resolve.”

It isn’t clear whether the justices would take the case. The upholding of the lower court’s ruling doesn’t mean other states are blocked from issuing the requirements, said Leonardo Cuello, the National Health Law Program’s director of health policy.

Friday’s ruling may serve as a warning for future approvals.

“I think it sends a very clear signal to the Trump administration that this policy is unlawful and that they should stop approving these waivers,” said Joan Alker, a research professor at Georgetown University’s Health Policy Institute. “But they probably won’t.”

Health care reform takes a step in the right direction .
The Healthy Adult Opportunity program reflects the Trump administration’s agenda to diffuse federal control over health care programs.Between the Senate's impeachment hearings and the chaos surrounding the Democrats' results from the Iowa caucuses, there's been little room to hear about much else happening in Washington and across the states. Of course, this is to be expected during a presidential election year, but the drowning-out effect often leaves Americans sifting through a sea of rhetoric to determine what political agendas best align with their own.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!