•   
  •   
  •   

Politics Senate braces for fight over impeachment whistleblower testimony

02:05  17 february  2020
02:05  17 february  2020 Source:   thehill.com

Rep. Jim Jordan chosen as top Republican on House Judiciary Committee

  Rep. Jim Jordan chosen as top Republican on House Judiciary Committee Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio has been selected as the next ranking Republican on the House Judiciary Committee by the House Republican steering committee, a GOP source tells CNN. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); Jordan, a fierce defender of President Donald Trump, will replace Rep. Doug Collins, a Georgia Republican who is running for the Senate in a primary against Sen. Kelly Loeffler.

Senators are reviving the fight over the whistleblower complaint at the center of the months-long impeachment effort against President Trump.

The legal team for the whistleblower whose account kicked off the impeachment inquiry is preparing for the possibility that lawmakers will call their client to testify in the Senate , two people familiar told CNN.

Senators are reviving the fight over the whistleblower complaint at the center of the months-long impeachment effort against President Trump.

Richard Burr wearing a suit and tie: Senate braces for fight over impeachment whistleblower testimony© Bonnie Cash Senate braces for fight over impeachment whistleblower testimony

With Trump's trial in the rearview mirror, the Senate Intelligence Committee is quietly shifting its attention back to its investigation into the complaint process after hitting pause on the inquiry as the impeachment effort consumed Washington.

The probe will force senators to decide if, and how, they speak with the whistleblower - a controversial call that could test the bipartisan reputation the Intelligence panel has maintained even amid deeply partisan fights in Congress.

Pelosi has 'no plans right now' to seek John Bolton subpoena

  Pelosi has 'no plans right now' to seek John Bolton subpoena The former national security adviser could shed more light on Trump's dealings in Ukraine if compelled to testify.Pelosi pointed to a slew of ongoing legal battles against Trump — including to obtain his tax returns and a long-ignored subpoena related to Robert Mueller’s probe — that are still moving through the courts.

Senate Democrats are preparing for round two in the fight over impeachment trial witnesses. Now that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell Addison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnell Ginsburg says 'we still' need They also want the administration to turn over documents related to the delayed Ukraine aid.

Talks over whether the whistleblower who sparked an impeachment inquiry into U.S. President Donald Trump will testify to Congressional committees are hung up on the question of whether the person can submit written testimony , two sources familiar with the discussions said.

Asked by The Hill if he was willing to formally compel and subpoena the whistleblower to testify, Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) didn't rule out the possibility.

"I think you can rest assured that I'm prepared to do whatever we have to to interview the whistleblower," Burr said.

The renewed interest in speaking with the whistleblower comes after committee staff and lawyers for the individual hit a stalemate late last year over potential questioning.

Lawyers for the individual made offers at the time to both the House and Senate Intelligence committees that their client was willing to provide written answers under oath, but Burr rejected that offer.

The North Carolina senator indicated no progress had been made since then in trying to reach a deal on testimony, and that while he hadn't spoken recently with Mark Zaid, one of the whistleblower's lawyers, that his plan is "an interview with committee staff."

Trump’s quest for revenge could mean the end of whistleblowing

  Trump’s quest for revenge could mean the end of whistleblowing He and his allies are killing a crucial tool of democracyPresident Trump and some of his allies in the Senate are kicking off the post-impeachment era with vengeance on their minds. In a speech on Thursday, Trump condemned “leakers and liars” and declared that “this should never, ever happen to another president, ever.” On Capitol Hill, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said Republicans plan to launch an investigation of the whistleblower who disclosed President Trump’s effort to coerce Ukraine to investigate a political rival. Graham threatened that they are “going to get to the bottom of all of this to make sure this never happens again.

As Senators gathered for the last day of questioning in President Trump’s impeachment trial, Kentucky Senator Rather, his decision was a personal one. Contrary to Schiff, the whistleblower does not enjoy a Senators will likely vote on Friday on whether to allow testimony from additional witnesses

Since Democrats announced the impeachment inquiry last week, the foreign affairs, intelligence and In issuing a separate subpoena last week as part of the impeachment inquiry, the chairmen of But the Republican senator Chuck Grassley told reporters the whistleblower “ought to be heard

The timeline for the panel's investigation is unclear. It is still wrapping up two final reports on the probe into Russian election interference in the 2016 election. Asked about a timeline for trying to speak with the whistleblower, Burr said, "sooner rather than later."

How the panel moves forward with trying to speak with the whistleblower could spark tensions among committee leadership - and even among Republicans as several senators have urged protection for the individual even as some of their colleagues have tried to out their alleged identity.

Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), vice chairman of the Intelligence Committee, noted that he and Burr have managed to keep the panel bipartisan despite the politically sensitive nature of their investigations, but sidestepped on if he was willing to compel the whistleblower.

Warner also declined to weigh in on the public offer from the whistleblower's attorney of providing answers to questions in writing and under oath.

Trump is exonerated, forever acquitted

  Trump is exonerated, forever acquitted Their legacy of impeachment is all they have to show for their House majority – and the American people will judge them harshly. In the midst of it all, President Trump stood up for America on the world stage and worked to unleash the best economy in the world. He never let the impeachment noise from the swamp stop him.It's time to move on now that the Democrats' efforts to dismiss 63 million Americans have been crushed. The impeachment chapter is closed, and the witch hunt is over.President Trump is vindicated and acquitted for life.It's time to get back to work.

"We'll get the unfiltered testimony of that whistleblower ," Schiff said. The whistleblower 's lawyer The whistleblower filed a complaint expressing concern that Trump was "using the power of his Trump, in a flurry of posts on Twitter over the weekend, slammed the impeachment inquiry as a

Such testimony could demonstrate the pattern of obstruction that Democrats seek to prove in the impeachment trial. A federal judge ruled in the House’s Despite Sekulow’s claim on the Senate floor, it said, the President’s legal team’s written brief on impeachment was in line with the DOJ’s position.

"Chairman Burr and I are working on how we're going to go through our proceedings. I'm really proud of the fact that we've managed for three and a half years to continue to put out broad, bipartisan reports," Warner said. "I'm not going to get into any details on what we're going to do. ...We've been pretty close to the vest."

A Democratic committee source said that protecting the whistleblower's safety and anonymity "is a top priority."

"We do not expect to be asked to cooperate with any effort that might endanger his or her safety," the source said.

The prospect of calling the whistleblower to speak with the committee has been talked up most recently not by a member of the panel but by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a close ally of the president's.

"The Senate Intel Committee under Richard Burr has told us that we will call the whistleblower," Graham said earlier this month during a Fox News interview.

He added in a subsequent interview with CBS's "Face the Nation" that the "whistleblower episode needs to be investigated by Richard Burr" and in an interview with Fox News Radio that "the Intel Committee should be looking at whether or not the whistleblower had a bias."

'Campaign of intimidation': Vindman's lawyer responds to new attacks by Trump

  'Campaign of intimidation': Vindman's lawyer responds to new attacks by Trump Trump tweeted that Vindman 'had problems with judgement, adhering to the chain of command and leaking information.' In a statement, attorney David Pressman said Trump’s claims “conflict with the clear personnel record and the entirety of the impeachment record of which the President is well aware.

Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), a member of the Intelligence Committee and GOP leadership, said that he would support subpoenaing the whistleblower if Burr takes that path.

"I'd be supportive of whatever it takes, including a subpoena," Blunt told The Hill, adding that he also thought the committee "would probably be willing to do this in any reasonable way that the whistleblower would be willing to come forward."

But Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), asked about Graham's comments by the Bangor Daily News, appeared wary unless there was a "compelling case."

"I am very uncomfortable when I hear about investigations of a whistleblower," Collins, a member of the Intelligence Committee, told the Maine publication. "We have a law that explicitly protects whistleblowers because they perform an invaluable role in exposing wrongdoing in government."

The Intelligence Committee investigation, senators stress, isn't about the identity of the whistleblower who helped spark the impeachment inquiry, but instead reviewing how the complaint was drafted, submitted and subsequently handled by the administration. The panel would also use the review to see if any legislation is needed to change or fill gaps in the process.

The panel met last year with Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) Michael Atkinson, acting Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Joseph Maguire and other DNI, Justice Department and CIA officials.

McConnell swipes at Dems after impeachment vote: 'We won and they lost'

  McConnell swipes at Dems after impeachment vote: 'We won and they lost' Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., had differing views on the impact of President Trump's impeachment acquittal on Tuesday, with each claiming victory for their own party. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); Democrats have suffered a series of damaging political losses over the past several weeks, McConnell said while speaking with reporters on Capitol Hill.

"I think we should and will revisit the whistleblower issue, the ICIG and the role they played and even the Justice Department and the role they played," Blunt told reporters earlier this month. "We may very well want to visit more with the DNI and his staff."

The whistleblower complaint focuses on Trump's July 25 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, alleging that Trump sought Ukraine's help in the 2020 election by announcing an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden.

The whistleblower, in the complaint, said that "multiple White House officials with direct knowledge" described the call, including that "the President used the remainder of the call to advance his personal interests. Namely, he sought to pressure the Ukrainian leader to take actions to help the President's 2020 reelection bid."

The whistleblower has emerged as a perennial target for Trump and his top allies since news of the complaint emerged last year, raising concerns among advocates and Democrats about the safety and legal protections of whistleblowers.

Tensions over the individual have also flared during - and after - the impeachment trial.

Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Chairman Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) told The Hill last month that he stuck printed out copies of an article about the alleged whistleblower into the cloakroom cubbies of his GOP colleagues.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) also grabbed headlines when Chief Justice John Roberts refused to read aloud a question he submitted during the trial that included the name of the alleged whistleblower. Paul subsequently gave a floor speech where he said the name of the individual alleged to be the whistleblower.

Top intel office lawyer who handled Ukraine whistleblower complaint resigning

  Top intel office lawyer who handled Ukraine whistleblower complaint resigning Jason Klitenic, the general counsel for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, will depart early next month.Jason Klitenic, the general counsel for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, will depart early next month, according to an agency spokeswoman. His exit comes as the acting DNI, Joseph Maguire, nears a March 11 deadline to depart as well. Federal law prevents Maguire from serving in an acting capacity beyond that date, meaning a new director must be nominated and confirmed by then, or Trump must pick a new acting official.

Asked about a potential subpoena, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), an adviser to Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and a member of the Intelligence Committee, argued that there were "unresolved questions."

"I think there's some unresolved questions about the whistleblower not their identity so much as their contact with HPSCI, HPSCI staff and ... if that was a result of a collaborative process between Mr. Schiff's staff and the whistleblower, I think that's something important to know and something we may need to legislate on," Cornyn said, using the acronym for the House Intelligence Committee.

House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and his staff have said repeatedly that he did not have direct contact with the whistleblower and doesn't know the individual's name or the details of the complaint, which the whistleblower's lawyers have said Schiff had no role in drafting.

Democrats have also noted that whistleblowers routinely reach out to Intelligence committees, before being directed to an investigator general or attorney.

"I don't know who the whistleblower is. I haven't met them or communicated with them in any way. The committee staff did not write the complaint or coach the whistleblower what to put in the complaint. The committee staff did not see the complaint before it was submitted to the inspector general," Schiff told senators during the impeachment trial.

"In short, the conspiracy theory," he added, "that the whistleblower colluded with the Intel Committee staff to hatch an impeachment inquiry is a complete and total fiction."

'All traitors must die': Feds charge man for threatening whistleblower attorney .
The man allegedly emailed the attorney in November, calling him a “traitor” who “must die a miserable death.” The attorney, Mark Zaid, confirmed to POLITICO that he received the email the day after Trump held up Zaid’s photo and read some of Zaid’s tweets during a rally. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); “All traitors must die miserable deaths,” reads the email to Zaid that was sent on November 7. “Those that represent traitors shall meet the same fate.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!