•   
  •   
  •   

Politics Frustration and Fury as Rand Paul Holds Up Anti-Lynching Bill in Senate

05:20  06 june  2020
05:20  06 june  2020 Source:   nytimes.com

Hong Kong: demonstration against a new anti-democracy bill

 Hong Kong: demonstration against a new anti-democracy bill © Supplied by Euronews Protests continue in Hong Kong. On Wednesday, dozens of protesters gathered at the Hysan Place shopping center to protest a bill that aims to punish the violation of the Chinese national anthem. Those convicted face up to three years in prison and a maximum fine of HDK 50,000 (approximately € 5,868).

Senator Rand Paul , Republican of Kentucky, in the Capitol on Tuesday.Credit Al Drago for The New York Times.

Latest Videos (16 Videos). Paul holds up anti - lynching bill . Rand Paul (R-KY) explains why he is holding up popular bipartisan legislation to make lynching a federal crime.

As Congress prepares to wade into a contentious debate over legislation to address police brutality and systemic racial bias, a long-simmering dispute in the Senate over a far less controversial bill that would for the first time explicitly make lynching a federal crime has burst into public view.

Rand Paul wearing a suit and tie: Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, in the Capitol on Tuesday. © Al Drago for The New York Times Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, in the Capitol on Tuesday.

The bill, called the Emmett Till Antilynching Act after the 14-year-old black boy who was tortured and killed in 1955 in Mississippi, predates the recent high-profile deaths of three black men and women at the hands of white police and civilians that have inspired protests across the country. It passed the House this year by a vote of 410 to 4, and has the backing of 99 senators, who have urged support for belated federal recognition of a crime that once terrorized black Americans.

Rand Paul demands changes to House's anti-lynching bill

  Rand Paul demands changes to House's anti-lynching bill Paul said The House’s bill won’t move quickly without more changes. The fact that Congress is still struggling to respond to the past atrocities of lynching black people highlights how difficult it will be for Washington to deal with misuse of police force and outrage over police officers killing unarmed black Americans. Everyone seems to agree lynching is terrible and must be condemned and outlawed, but not specifically on how to do it.Paul said that he’s concerned that the way the House bill is written, it might “conflate lesser crimes with lynching.

Rand Paul that is holding up an anti - lynching bill . Paul claimed the bill was too broad. The effort came as a memorial service was being held for George Kamala Harris and Corey Booker spoke out in emotional terms against an amendment introduced by Sen. Rand Paul , a Republican, that held up

Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky is holding up an anti - lynching bill in the Senate , which was passed in the House. Kentucky State Representative and candidate for the Democratic nomination in the Senate race against Mitch Mconnell Charles Booker says it’s ‘grossly disrespectful, it’s ignorant of

But the private objections of one Republican, Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, have succeeded for months in preventing it from becoming law. At a time when lawmakers are looking at an array of other, potentially more divisive proposals to respond to a spate of recent killings of black Americans, the impasse illustrates the volatile mix of raw emotion and political division that has often frustrated attempts by Congress to enact meaningful changes in the law when it comes to matters of racial violence.

Sign Up For the Morning Briefing Newsletter

The issue erupted on the Senate floor on Thursday afternoon, when Mr. Paul sought to narrow the bill’s definition of lynching and push the revised measure through without a formal vote, drawing angry rebukes from two of the bill’s authors, Senators Cory Booker of New Jersey and Kamala Harris of California, both African-American Democrats.

Emotional debate erupts over anti-lynching legislation as Cory Booker objects to Rand Paul amendment

  Emotional debate erupts over anti-lynching legislation as Cory Booker objects to Rand Paul amendment In an emotional exchange on the Senate floor, Democratic Sens. Cory Booker of New Jersey and Kamala Harris of California spoke out Thursday against an amendment that GOP Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky was trying to add to anti-lynching legislation. © Provided by CNN From left to right, Sens. Kamala Harris of California, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Cory Booker of New Jersey.

Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky is holding up an anti - lynching bill in the Senate , which was passed in the House. Kentucky State Representative and candidate for the Democratic nomination in the Senate race against Mitch Mconnell Charles Booker says it’s ‘grossly disrespectful, it’s ignorant of

Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky is holding up an anti - lynching bill in the Senate , which was passed in the House. Kentucky State Representative and candidate for the Democratic nomination in the Senate race against Mitch Mconnell Charles Booker says it’s ‘grossly disrespectful, it’s ignorant of

Mr. Paul argued that the lynching bill was sloppily written and could lead to yet another injustice — excessive sentencing for minor infractions — unless it was revised.

“This bill would cheapen the meaning of lynching by defining it so broadly as to include a minor bruise of abrasion,” he said. “Our national history of racial terrorism demands more seriousness of us than that.”

Mr. Paul said that he took lynching seriously, but “this legislation does not.”

Ms. Harris rose to object, delivering a seething broadside against Mr. Paul as she noted that even as they debated, mourners were gathering to honor George Floyd, the African-American man who died last week after a Minneapolis police officer knelt on his neck for nearly nine minutes.

“The idea that we would not be taking the issue of lynching seriously is an insult — an insult to Senator Booker and Senator Tim Scott and myself,” she said from across the chamber floor, referring to the South Carolina Republican who helped write the bill and is the party’s lone black senator.

Fury vs. Wilder 3 could happen in Macau in November or December, says Bob Arum

  Fury vs. Wilder 3 could happen in Macau in November or December, says Bob Arum Macau, Australia and the new Raiders stadium in Las Vegas are all possibilities for a third fight between Tyson Fury and Deontay Wilder.

Rand Paul , R-Ky., is holding up passage of an anti - lynching bill with broad bipartisan support — the latest delay in an effort to pass a federal law against lynching that goes back Ordinarily the Senate handles these matters by unanimous consent, but Paul ’s objection means the act named for Till, a

An anti - lynching bill that Sen. Rand Paul has held up in the Senate for several months led to a heated and passionate battle on the Senate floor Thursday. Rand Paul holds up anti - lynching bill in Senate | whas11.com. The Kentucky senator is the only person holding up the passing of a bill

“To suggest that lynching would only be a lynching if someone’s heart was pulled out and displayed to someone else is ridiculous,” she added. “It should not require a maiming or torture for us to recognize a lynching when we see it and recognize it by federal law and call it what it is, which is that it is a crime that should be punishable with accountability and consequence.”

At issue is what, exactly, counts as lynching under federal law. The bill would add a new section called “lynching” to the civil rights statute to deal with group violence meant to intimidate people of color or other protected groups. The offense would be classified as a conspiracy by two or more people to cause bodily harm in connection with a hate crime, with penalties up to life in prison if convicted. Mr. Paul proposed to raise the bar beyond the standard in federal hate crimes statutes, to “serious bodily injury,” so that only crimes involving conspiracy to cause “substantial risk of death and extreme physical pain” could be charged as lynching, according to aides.

Such crimes can already be considered hate crimes under state and federal law. But the term lynching has deep historical significance, and the fact that it has never been formally outlawed has been an enduring symbol of Congress’s inability to fully reckon with the nation’s history of racial violence. The issue has taken on even greater significance in recent days.

'Not easy' to get a conviction in George Floyd killing, Harris says

  'Not easy' to get a conviction in George Floyd killing, Harris says Sen. Kamala Harris, a former Democratic presidential contender and potential VP pick, joined ABC's "The View" to discuss criminal justice, race, protests and politics.She joined ABC's "The View" as Derek Chauvin, the Minneapolis officer charged with second-degree murder in the case, makes a court appearance, and speaking as a former prosecutor, said "it will not be easy to get a conviction" because juries tend to believe police officers.

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul acknowledged Wednesday that he's the lone holdout on passing a bill that His objection holds up the bill even as Congress faces pressure for action during nationwide Congress has failed to pass anti - lynching legislation nearly 200 times over the past century, and the

Rand Paul — who is single-handedly holding up the bill despite letting it pass last year — sought changes to the legislation as a condition of allowing it to The legislative effort to make lynching a federal hate crime punishable by up to life in prison comes 65 years after 14-year-old Emmett Till was

Ms. Harris called the recent killing of Ahmaud Arbery, a 25-year-old black man jogging in Georgia who was chased down and shot by white men, “a modern lynching.” In court on Thursday, one of the men charged with murder in the case said he heard another use a racial slur as Mr. Arbery lay dying.

Members of Congress have been fighting in one way or another to pass federal anti-lynching laws for more than a century, introducing nearly 200 such bills in the first half of the 20th century. When such a law would have had the most explicit effect, during the Jim Crow era when thousands of black people where lynched across the country, Southern senators succeeded repeatedly in blocking its passage.

The Senate formally apologized in 2005 for failing to outlaw the practice, and long ago adopted other measures to make racially motivated killings federal crimes.

Speaking after Ms. Harris on Thursday, Mr. Booker, describing himself as “raw” over the state of the country, pleaded with Mr. Paul to drop his objections, if only to offer a glimmer of hope to a nation in pain.

“Does America need a win today on racial justice? Does the anguished cries of people in the streets?” he asked. “It may not cure the ills so many are protesting about, but God, it could be a sign of hope.”

Mr. Paul has such influence because senators are trying to pass the bill by unanimous consent, rather than through a traditional recorded vote, meaning any one senator can grind consideration to a halt. The bill would easily have passed were it put up for a regular vote, but Republican leaders have so far been unwilling to go that route because it would eat up several days of the full Senate’s time and they believe Mr. Paul may yet be persuaded to drop his objections.

Eddie Hearn outlines progress being made for possible Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua fight

  Eddie Hearn outlines progress being made for possible Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua fight Hearn says the two have 'agreed in principle' but no contracts have been signed given all that needs to happenBritish promoter Eddie Hearn of Matchroom Sport, who represents unified champion Anthony Joshua (23-1, 21 KOs), told Sky Sports News on Tuesday that his fighter has agreed on the financials for two blockbuster bouts against WBC and lineal champion Tyson Fury (30-0-1, 21 KOs). The fights would be among the biggest that could be made in the sport and clearly the most important bout in the history of the boxing-crazed United Kingdom.

Mr. Booker and Mr. Paul have worked together on criminal justice legislation in the past, and are recognized as two of the Senate’s leading advocates for reducing prison sentences and lowering incarceration rates. But Mr. Booker chastised Mr. Paul for being the lone obstacle in Congress to the anti-lynching bill.

“Tell me another time when 500-plus Congress people — Democrats, Republicans, House members and senators — come together in a chorus of conviction and say, ‘Now is the time in America that we condemn the dark history of our past and actually pass anti-lynching legislation,’” Mr. Booker said.

Mr. Paul conceded that his position was unpopular, but insisted that changes were necessary so that the measure would be worthy of its name.

“You think I take joy in being here?” he said. “I will be excoriated by simple minded people on the internet who think somehow I don’t like Emmet Till or appreciate the history or memory of Emmett Till.”

Mr. Paul said he was concerned that the bill would allow excessive penalties against people who commit more minor, racially motivated acts of violence, like slapping or pushing. He did not account for why his position had changed from last year, when he supported the bill as written.

“Words have meaning,” he said. “It would be a disgrace for the Congress of the United States to declare that a bruise is lynching, that an abrasion is lynching, that any injury to the body, no matter how temporary, is on par with the atrocities done to people like Emmett Till.”

Mr. Booker said the notion that anyone would be charged with lynching for slapping someone was “absurd.”

Mr. Paul did not back down, and senators left Washington for the week without reaching a resolution, leaving Democrats calling the episode a missed opportunity.

“The frustrating thing for me is that at a time this country hungers for common-sense racial reconciliation, an acknowledgment of our past and a looking forward to a better future, this will be one of the sad days where that possibility was halted,” Mr. Booker said.

Federal Constitutional Court rejects urgent application for Corona demo .
The Federal Constitutional Court rejected an urgent application from an organizer who wanted to get 10,000 participants to demonstrate against the Corona measures in Munich. The city of Munich once again only allowed 1000 participants for the rally on the Theresienwiese planned for Saturday. © Photo: Sven Hoppe / dpa / archive picture A demonstrator against anti-corona measures stands on the edge of the Theresienwiese.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks
usr: 17
This is interesting!